Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients treated with abaloparatide compared with those treated with placebo or teriparatide: Results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Abaloparatide is a 34-amino acid peptide that selectively binds to the RG conformation of the parathyroid hormone receptor type 1. It was developed for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. In ACTIVE, an 18-month phase 3 study (NCT01343004), abaloparatide increased bone mineral density (BMD), decreased the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo, and decreased the risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared with placebo and teriparatide. Here, we report a prospective, exploratory BMD responder analysis from ACTIVE. METHODS: Proportions of patients experiencing BMD gains from baseline of >0%, >3%, and >6% at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment were compared among the placebo, abaloparatide, and teriparatide groups in ACTIVE. Responders were defined prospectively as patients experiencing BMD gains at all 3 anatomic sites. RESULTS: At months 6, 12, and 18, there were significantly more >3% BMD responders in the abaloparatide group compared with placebo and teriparatide: month 6, 19.1% vs 0.9% for placebo and 6.5% for teriparatide; month 12, 33.2% vs 1.5% and 19.8%; month 18, 44.5% vs 1.9% and 32.0% (P < 0.001 for all comparisons of abaloparatide to placebo and to teriparatide). Findings were similar for the >0% and >6% responder thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with abaloparatide experienced increases in BMD than did those treated with placebo or teriparatide.

Treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with oral salmon calcitonin: results from two phase 3 trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the structure-modifying and symptom efficacy, as well as safety and tolerability of oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) formulated with a 5-CNAC carrier (a molecule based on Eligen(®) technology), in osteoarthritis (OA) patients with moderate to severe knee pain and joint structural damage classified as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL)2-3. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is the combined reporting of two randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled trials (CSMC021C2301 and CSMC021C2302), evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral sCT in patients with painful knee OA with structural manifestations, enrolling 1176 and 1030 patients, respectively. Study subjects were randomized (1:1) to oral sCT 0.8 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO) for 24 months. The primary efficacy objectives were to examine the treatment effect compared to placebo on change over 24 months in joint space width (JSW) in the signal knee measured by X-ray, and to examine the change in pain and function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire. Other study parameters included patient and physician global assessment, and biochemical markers of bone (CTX-I) and cartilage degradation (CTX-II). RESULTS: At the 24 month endpoint there was no statistically significant treatment effect on joint space narrowing (JSN) in any of the two studies. In CSMC021C2301 there was a treatment effect on WOMAC (sum of pain, function, stiffness, and total scores) as well as on the biomarkers of bone and joint metabolism, but due to the hierarchical testing procedure the treatment effect was not claimed statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The present formulation of oral sCT did not provide reproducible clinical benefits in patients with symptomatic knee OA (NCT00486434, NCT00704847).

OA phenotypes, rather than disease stage, drive structural progression--identification of structural progressors from 2 phase III randomized clinical studies with symptomatic knee OA.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify key characteristics of disease progression through investigation of the association of radiographic progression over two years with baseline Joint Space Width (JSW), Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, Joint Space Narrowing (JSN), and BMI. METHODS: Data from 2206 subjects (4390 knees) were combined for this post-hoc analysis of two randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled phase III trials (NCT00486434 and NCT00704847) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of 2-years treatment with oral salmon calcitonin of subjects with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA). RESULTS: There was a clear positive and significant correlation between KL grade and WOMAC pain and total WOMAC, albeit the variance in pain measures was from min-to-max for all KL categories, emphasizing the heterogeneity of this patient population and pain perception. 32% of target knees did not progress, and only 51% had changes over minimum significant change (MSC). BMI, KL-Score and WOMAC pain was diagnostic, but only KL-score and pain had prognostic value, albeit pain in a non-linear manner. CONCLUSION: These data clearly describe significant associations between KL grade, JSW, pain and BMI in patients with symptomatic knee OA. KL grade, BMI and WOMAC pain were diagnostically associated with OA based on JSW but only KL-score and pain in a non-linier fashion was prognostic. 50% of patients did not progress more than MSC, highlighting the importance for identification of structural progressors and the phenotypes associated with these. These results suggest that disease phenotypes, rather than disease status, are responsible for disease progression.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of oral recombinant human parathyroid hormone [rhPTH(1-31)NH(2)] in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

CONTEXT: Treatment of osteoporosis with subcutaneous (SC) injections of rhPTH(1-34) or rhPTH(1-84) is associated with significant improvements in BMD and reductions in osteoporotic fractures. However, subcutaneous injections can be associated with discomfort and thus deteriorating compliance. OBJECTIVE: The UGL-OR1001 trial aimed to establish the efficacy and safety parameters of a novel oral tablet formulation of rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) and matching placebo tablets and open-label teriparatide positive control in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DESIGN: 24 weeks of randomized, double-blind treatment with once daily doses of 5mg oral treatment or corresponding placebo, or open-label subcutaneous teriparatide. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Women diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis as detected by lumbar spine DXA, with an exclusion of those with prior treatment with bone active agents. INTERVENTION(S): Orally formulated recombinant human PTH(1-31)NH(2) and placebo, or open-label subcutaneous teriparatide as a positive control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was to characterize the percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at L1-L4 axial lumbar spine after 24 weeks in the rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) arm. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included safety and tolerability of the oral formulation, measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover, and evaluation of the PK profile at first and last dose. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT01321723. RESULTS: The oral tablet formulation of rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) resulted in similar PK profiles at both timepoints with mean C(max) values similar to subcutaneous administration. In the rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) arm, a 2.2% increase in lumbar spine BMD was observed compared to baseline (p<0.001), while no change was observed in the placebo arm. Open-label teriparatide resulted in a 5.1% increase in LS BMD (p<0.001). In the oral PTH study arm, the bone formation marker osteocalcin was increased by 32%, 21% and 23% at Weeks 4, 12 and 24, respectively. There was no significant increase in the level of the bone resorption marker CTx-1. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, these data demonstrate that enteric-coated oral tablet formulation technology consistently generated robust levels of exposure of rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) leading to induction of bone formation without inducing bone resorption resulting in significantly increased levels of LS BMD. Few adverse events were observed, recommending this orally delivered drug candidate for further development.

Efficacy of monthly oral ibandronate is sustained over 5 years: the MOBILE long-term extension study.

UNLABELLED: The long-term efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate were studied in this extension to the 2-year Monthly Oral Ibandronate in Ladies (MOBILE) trial. Over 5 years, lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) increased from baseline with monthly ibandronate 150 mg (8.4%). Long-term monthly ibandronate is effective and well tolerated for up to 5 years in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: Once-monthly therapy with ibandronate has been studied for up to 5 years in a long-term extension (LTE) to the 2 year MOBILE trial. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind extension study of monthly ibandronate involved postmenopausal women who had completed 2 years of the MOBILE core study, with ≥75% adherence. Patients were reallocated, or were randomized from daily therapy, to ibandronate 100 mg monthly or 150 mg monthly for a further 3 years. RESULTS: A pooled intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of 344 patients receiving monthly ibandronate from the core MOBILE baseline showed increases over 5 years in lumbar spine BMD (8.2% with 100 mg and 8.4% with 150 mg). Three-year data relative to MOBILE LTE baseline in the full ITT population of all 698 patients randomized or reallocated from MOBILE (including those previously on daily treatment) showed, on average, maintenance of proximal femur BMD gains achieved in the core 2-year study, with further small gains in lumbar spine BMD. In general, maintenance of efficacy was also indicated by markers of bone metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: There were no tolerability concerns or new safety signals. Monthly treatment with ibandronate 100 and 150 mg is effective and well tolerated for up to 5 years in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Lessons learned from the development of oral calcitonin: the first tablet formulation of a protein in phase III clinical trials.

Oral delivery of proteins has been hampered by an array of difficulties. However, promising novel oral delivery systems have been developed. 5-CNAC, formulated with the peptide salmon calcitonin, is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of osteoporosis or osteoarthritis and could become the first marketed oral peptide. This article reviews key findings and implications from studies undertaken to date with this oral formulation. Findings include these: (1) the optimal calcitonin tablet dose is 0.8 mg; (2) 0.8 mg of oral calcitonin is rapidly absorbed, reaching maximum concentration in 15 to 30 minutes, and is eliminated from plasma with a short half-life-9 to 15 minutes; (3) the 0.8-mg tablet is more highly absorbed than the marketed nasal formulation, with biomarker levels indicating significantly greater efficacy in suppression of bone resorption; (4) drug absorption is increased with dosing at least 10 minutes before a meal rather than postprandially and also with 50 mL of water; (5) the optimal timing of dosing for osteoporosis therapy is in the evening to mitigate the circadian peak in bone resorption; and (6) the oral formulations of synthetic and recombinant calcitonin have similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. These key findings may aid researchers in the development of other oral formulations.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent serum assays (ELISAs) for rat and human N-terminal pro-peptide of collagen type I (PINP)--assessment of corresponding epitopes.

OBJECTIVES: The present study describes two newly developed N-terminal pro-peptides of collagen type I (PINP) competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the assessment of corresponding PINP epitopes in the rat- and human species. METHODS: Monoclonal antibodies were raised against corresponding rat and human PINP sequences and competitive assays were developed for each species. They were evaluated in relevant pre-clinical or clinical studies. RESULTS: The antibody characterizations indicated that PINP indeed was recognized. Technical robust assays were obtained. Rat PINP and tALP showed similar patterns in the gold standard osteoporosis rat ovariectomized (OVX) model. No liver contribution was observed in the liver fibrosis rat bile duct ligation model (BDL). In an osteoporosis study, the human serum PINP levels were significantly decreased after ibandronate treatment compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The two corresponding PINP assays were specific and these bone turnover markers may improve translational science for the evaluation for bone-related diseases.

Biochemical markers identify influences on bone and cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis--the effect of sex, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score, body mass index (BMI), oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) treatment and diurnal variation.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) involves changes in both bone and cartilage. These processes might be associated under some circumstances. This study investigated correlations between bone and cartilage degradation in patients with OA as a function of sex, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score, Body Mass Index (BMI), oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) treatment and diurnal variation. METHODS: This study was a 2-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study including 37 postmenopausal women and 36 men, aged 57-75 years, with painful knee OA, and a KL-score of I - III. Subjects were allocated to one of three treatment arms: 0.6 mg or 0.8 mg oral sCT, or placebo given twice-daily for 14 days. Correlations between gender, KL score, or BMI and the bone resorption marker, serum C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX-I), or the cartilage degradation marker, urine C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II (CTX-II) were investigated. RESULTS: At baseline, biomarkers indicated women with OA experienced higher bone and cartilage degradation than men. CTX-I levels were significantly higher, and CTX-II levels only marginally higher, in women than in men (p = 0.04 and p = 0.06, respectively). Increasing KL score was not correlated with bone resorption, but was significantly associated with the cartilage degradation CTX-II marker in both men and women (p = 0.007). BMI was significantly and negatively correlated to the bone resorption marker CTX-I, r = -0.40 (p = 0.002), but showed only a borderline positive correlation to CTX-II, r = 0.25 (p = 0.12). Before morning treatments on days 1 and 14, no correlation was seen between CTX-I and CTX-II in either the sCT or placebo group. However, oral sCT and food intake induced a clear correlation between these bone and cartilage degradation markers. Four hours after the first sCT dose on treatment days 1 and 14, a significant correlation (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) between changes in both CTX-I and CTX-II was seen. In the placebo group a weakly significant correlation between changes in both markers was found on day 1 (r = 0.49, p = 0.02), but not on day 14. CONCLUSION: Bone resorption was higher in females than males, while cartilage degradation was correlated with increasing KL-score and only weakly associated with BMI. Bone and cartilage degradation were not correlated in untreated individuals, but dosing with oral sCT with or without food, and a mid-day meal, decreased bone and cartilage degradation and induced a correlation between both markers. Changes in bone and cartilage markers may aid in the identification of potential new treatment opportunities for OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number (EUDRACT2006-005532-24 & NCT00486369).

The effect of oral salmon calcitonin delivered with 5-CNAC on bone and cartilage degradation in osteoarthritic patients: a 14-day randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of oral salmon calcitonin (oSCT) administered over 14 days to men and women presenting with osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a phase-I, 2-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, gender-stratified study including 73 subjects aged 57-75 years. Patients had painful OA with a Kellgren and Lawrence index score of I-III. Treatment allocations were; 0.6 mg, 0.8 mg of oSCT, or placebo. Treatment was given twice daily for 14 days. The morning dose was administered between 07:00 and 08:00 at least 30 min before breakfast. The second dose was administered 30 min before evening dinner. On treatment day 1 and 14, the morning dose was followed by 5h of fasting, and blood samples and urine were collected immediately prior to dosing and according to the protocol. Study parameters were: plasma sCT levels, bone resorption by CTX-I (serum C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I), bone formation by osteocalcin (serum OC), and cartilage degradation by CTX-II (urine C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II) (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00486369). RESULTS: Doses of 0.8 mg compared with 0.6 mg produced significantly higher C(max) and AUC(0-4 hrs), of calcitonin, P=0.03. This resulted in significant reductions in CTX-I and CTX-II, [P<0.0001; P=0.007]. No differences were observed between baseline and follow-up at day 14 in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Gender had no observable influence on results. CONCLUSIONS: oSCT given twice daily with a pre-dinner and morning fasting dosing resulted in reductions in markers of bone resorption and cartilage degradation.

Investigation of the diurnal variation in bone resorption for optimal drug delivery and efficacy in osteoporosis with oral calcitonin.

BACKGROUND: Bone resorption displays marked diurnal variation. Reversible inhibition of bone resorption may result in best possible efficacy when bone resorption peaks. The aim of the study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of 0.8 mg of oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) and the effect of timing of drug intake. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase I study to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of 0.8 mg of oral sCT in healthy postmenopausal women. Totally 81 subjects were included, aimed at investigation of a morning dose given at 8:00 (n = 42), a pre-dinner dose given at 17:00 (n = 20), and an evening dose given at 22:00 (n = 19). Plasma sCT concentrations and bone resorption (C-terminal-telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX-I)) was assessed. RESULTS: Morning and pre-dinner dosing led to comparable concentration of sCT of 45 pg/ml, whereas there was a tendency towards lower Cmax for the evening dosing having a mean of 24 pg/ml. The maximum difference from placebo was observed 1 to 3 hours post-dose with a 40 to 50% suppression consequent to morning dose, and about 75% suppression after pre-dinner and evening dose, due to the increase bone resorption as a result of circadian variation. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that orally administered 0.8 mg of salmon calcitonin was effective in suppression of serum CTX irrespective of time of dosing. The pre-dinner dosing resulted in optimum efficacy response corresponding to an overall suppression of bone resorption by 25%.

Calcitonin is involved in cartilage homeostasis: is calcitonin a treatment for OA?

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of degenerative joint diseases and a major cause of disability and impaired quality of life in the elderly. Recent observations suggest that calcitonin may act on both osteoclasts and chondrocytes. The present review was sought to summarize emerging observations from the molecular level to the preliminary clinical findings of possible chondroprotective effects of calcitonin. METHOD: This review summarizes peer-reviewed articles found using pre-defined search criteria and published in the PubMed database before January 2006. In addition, abstracts from the OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) conferences in the time period 2000-2005 have been included in the search. RESULTS: Ample evidence for the effect of calcitonin on bone resorption was found. Support for direct effects of calcitonin on chondrocytes on matrix synthesis and inhibition of cartilage degradation have been published. In addition, clinical evidence for the effect of calcitonin on cartilage degradation is emerging. CONCLUSION: Several independent lines of evidence suggest a direct chondroprotective effect of calcitonin in addition to the well-established effect on bone resorption. Given the currently limited availability of chondroprotective agents, much expectation regards the ongoing clinical assessment of calcitonin therapy for the prevention and treatment of OA.

Adverse effects of a SERM (Levormeloxifene). Safety parameters and bone mineral density 12 months after treatment withdrawal.

OBJECTIVE: Levormeloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). The development of the drug was discontinued due to intolerable adverse effects. This paper follow-up on the adverse events in a group of 234 women that was followed for 12 months without treatment after 12 months of treatment with levormeloxifene. METHODS: Adverse events were recorded at all clinical visits. The double-layer thickness of the uterine endometrium was determined by transvaginal ultrasonography. Endometrial biopsies were obtained by pipelle. The biopsies taken at the entrance to the follow-up phase were taken under hysteroscopy-guidance. Bone mineral density of the total body, lumbar spine (L1-L4), hip and forearm was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The most prominent adverse event was increased endometrial thickness over the pre-defined threshold of 8 mm. No cases of proliferative endometrium were reported. Following withdrawal of treatment the mean endometrial thickness approached baseline levels in a dose dependent manner. Hysteroscopic examinations showed that levormeloxifene was related to increased incidence of edema, vascularization and cysticity. In the levormeloxifene groups, a total of eight women had utero-vaginal prolapse and five women reported urinary incontinence (including worsening of a previously existing condition). Bone density in the spine and hip approached baseline levels during the 12 months of follow-up without treatment. CONCLUSION: Endometrial thickening, seen in association with the use of some SERM's, may lead to harmful adverse effects more than 12 months after treatment is initiated. Levormeloxifene prevents the postmenopausal bone loss, but the lowest effective dose is unknown.

Ibandronate: a comparison of oral daily dosing versus intermittent dosing in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of continuous versus intermittent oral dosing of ibandronate. Two hundred forty women aged 55-75 years with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to active treatment or placebo. Similar total doses of ibandronate were provided by treatment regimens with either continuous 2.5 mg of ibandronate daily (n = 81) or intermittent 20 mg of ibandronate every other day for the first 24 days, followed by 9 weeks without active drug (n = 78). The placebo group (total, n = 81) was crossed over after 12 months to receive either continuous (n = 37) or intermittent ibandronate (n = 35). By 24 months, bone mineral density (BMD) had increased significantly relative to baseline in both active treatment groups. The continuous and intermittent groups showed statistically equivalent increases in lumbar spine BMD of +5.64% (+/-0.53) and +5.54% (+/-0.53) and in total hip of +3.35% (+/-0.40) and +3.41% (+/-0.40), respectively (per protocol population). Biochemical markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in both treatment groups. The level of marker suppression was similar, although the intermittent group displayed, as expected, more fluctuation over the treatment period. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the treatment groups. In conclusion, the intermittent and continuous regimens showed equivalent changes in BMD and bone turnover. These results confirm previous preclinical findings indicating that the efficacy of ibandronate depends on the total oral dose given rather than on the dosing schedule. This supports development of new flexible dosing regimens targeted to minimize the frequency of dosing, which are expected to improve convenience and lead to enhanced long-term patient compliance.

The effect of fluvastatin on parameters of bone remodeling.

Statins decrease the hepatic biosynthesis of cholesterol, and reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction in women who have already experienced a myocardial infarction. Statins also reduce the risk of atherosclerosis in diabetic patients, but it is unknown whether they influence the glucose tolerance. It has further been suggested that they may influence bone metabolism. Vitamin C is an antioxidant and it decreases serum cholesterol moderately. Antioxidants may also have other metabolic effects, but these are insufficiently studied. The aim of the present study was to investigate the metabolic effects of the cholesterol-lowering agent fluvastatin and the antioxidant vitamin C. Sixty-eight elderly, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild hypercholesterolemia were randomly assigned to 12 weeks open treatment with either fluvastatin (40 mg daily) + 500 mg vitamin C (n = 45) or vitamin C only (n = 23). We measured biochemical markers of bone formation (serum osteocalcin and total alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (serum and urinary CTX), parameters related to diabetes and serum lipids and lipoproteins. Fluvastatin in combination with vitamin C had no effect on bone formation markers. We found a weak decrease in parameters of bone resorption, which was significant from baseline, but not different between the two groups. There were no significant effects on any of the other markers of either fluvastatin or vitamin C. The lipid-lowering effect of fluvastatin was confirmed with a decrease of 20% and 30% in serum total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, respectively. We conclude that fluvastatin given in clinically relevant doses has no influence on parameters of bone remodeling. Other statins remain to be investigated.

Efficacy of levormeloxifene in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss and on the lipid profile compared to low dose hormone replacement therapy.

Three hundred and one healthy women between 45 and 65 yr of age and at least 1 yr postmenopausal were randomly assigned to 12-month double-blind therapy with levormeloxifene [1.25 (n = 51), 5, 10, or 20 mg/day], low dose continuous combined hormone replacement therapy [HRT; 1 mg 17 beta-estradiol and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate/day], or placebo (all n = 50). All of the women were also given a daily supplement of calcium (500 mg). Serum CrossLaps decreased by about 50% in the levormeloxifene groups, with no dose-response effect. The group receiving HRT decreased more (>60%), and the placebo group (500 mg calcium alone) decreased by about 10%. The pattern was similar for bone alkaline phosphatase, except that the decreases were smaller, about 30% for the levormeloxifene groups and 50% for the HRT group. Serum osteocalcin also showed highly significant decreases, of the same magnitude in the levormeloxifene and HRT groups. Spinal bone mineral density (BMD) decreased by less than 1% in the placebo group and increased by about 2% in the levormeloxifene groups and by almost 5% in the HRT group (P < 0.001 for the difference between levormeloxifene and HRT vs. placebo). BMD of the total hip and total body changed in the same direction, although differences between groups were not as pronounced as those for BMD spine. Total cholesterol decreased by about 13--20% during levormeloxifene therapy, whereas daily doses of 1 mg estradiol and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate produced a decrease of only about 8%. Levormeloxifene decreased low density lipoprotein cholesterol by about 22-30% compared with about 12% in the low dose HRT group. High density lipoprotein cholesterol was unchanged in all groups. Endometrial thickness increased both clinically and statistically significantly in the levormeloxifene groups independently of the dose; the difference from the placebo and HRT groups was significant (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the HRT and placebo groups. Other adverse events of interest include hot flushes, which did not occur more frequently in the levormeloxifene than the placebo groups, but occurred significantly less frequently in the HRT group (P < 0.05). Breast tenderness was much more common in the HRT group (<0.001) than in all other groups. In conclusion, the study shows that levormeloxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, has positive effects on BMD and bone turnover and apparently strong estrogenic effects on the serum concentrations of different cholesterol subfractions. Levormeloxifene at the doses tested had an estrogen-like effect on endometrium and no effect on hot flushes. The study was unable to differentiate between the effects of the different doses of levormeloxifene.

Monofluorophosphate combined with hormone replacement therapy induces a synergistic effect on bone mass by dissociating bone formation and resorption in postmenopausal women: a randomized study.

Sodium fluoride stimulates bone formation and has been used to treat osteoporosis for decades despite debate about the antifracture efficacy. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) results in only modest increases in bone mineral density (BMD). However, for women with low bone mass, the ideal therapy should not only inhibit bone resorption but simultaneously stimulate bone formation to increase bone mass above the fracture threshold. We thus performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention study to prospectively investigate the effect of a low dose of fluoride, in combination with HRT, on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover. One hundred healthy postmenopausal women (60-70 yr old) were thus randomly assigned to: 1) HRT [transdermal 17beta-estradiol, releasing 50 microg/day; plus oral norethisterone acetate (NETA), 1 mg/day]; or 2) oral monofluorophosphate (MFP; equivalent to fluoride, 20 mg/day); or 3) HRT+MFP; or 4) placebo, for 96 weeks. All participants received a calcium supplement of 1000 mg/day. Sixty-eight women completed the study. We found a pronounced, linear increase in spinal BMD during treatment with HRT+MFP [11.8% (1.7% SEM)], which was significantly greater than the increase in the HRT group [4.0% (0.5% per yr); P < 0.05]. MFP produced a smaller increase [2.4% (0.6% per yr)], whereas there was no change in the placebo group [0.0% (0.5% SEM)]. Similar changes were found at the other skeletal sites (distal forearm, hip, and total body). Markers of bone formation showed a fall in the HRT group, which was significantly more pronounced than in the combined HRT+MFP group. A nonsignificant increase was found in the MFP group, whereas the placebo group showed a decrease caused by calcium treatment. The marker of bone resorption decreased significantly more in the HRT and the HRT+MFP groups than in the placebo group but tended to increase in the MFP group. In conclusion, this study shows, by use of biochemical markers of bone turnover, that bone resorption and formation may be dissociated, as a result of actions of two compounds with diverging effects on bone turnover. Furthermore, the synergistic effects of relatively low doses of the compounds suggested statistically and clinically significant increases in trabecular and probably also cortical bone. Adverse effects were relatively rare and mild.

Design for an ipriflavone multicenter European fracture study.

In order to investigate the efficacy of ipriflavone (i.p.) on the prevention of vertebral fractures and the effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, a large multicentric European study was designed and is presently ongoing. Included in the study were 460 Caucasian, nonobese postmenopausal women aged > 45 and < 75 years, menopaused for at least 12 months. Inclusion was on the basis of a lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) lower than 2 SD compared with healthy women aged 50 years, corresponding to values below 0.860 g/cm2 (antero-posterior measurement) by Hologic QDR 1000. Women with prevalent vertebral fractures were excluded as well as those presenting secondary osteoporosis or having been treated with medications that could affect bone metabolism. This study was designed as a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study that randomized the women to the oral administration of either 3 x 200 mg/day of i.p. or placebo. All patients received a daily supplement of 500 mg calcium. The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of i.p. in preventing vertebral nontraumatic fractures. Fracture is defined here as a > or = 20% decrease in any anterior, central, or posterior T4-L4 vertebral height. Blinded vertebral X-ray readings and vertebral morphometry have been centralized in an independent Center, with standardized evaluation of two experts. Power calculations have been based on the hypothesis that 21% of placebo-treated patients would fracture within 3 years and that treatment with i.p. would lead to a 50% reduction in the incidence of fracture. Statistical tests have been designed to have a power of 80%, with a type I error equal to 5%. Secondary endpoints were changes in vertebral, radial, and femoral BMD. Centralized controls on 100% BMD scans would ensure the good quality of BMD readings. This study should verify the hypothesis that i.p. significantly decreases the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal, osteoporotic women.

The effect on bone mass and bone markers of different doses of ibandronate: a new bisphosphonate for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding study.

The present article describes the results from a phase II dose finding study of the effect of ibandronate, a new, third generation bisphosphonate, in postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred and eighty postmenopausal, white women, at least 10 years past a natural menopause, with osteopenia defined as a bone mineral density (BMD) in the distal forearm at least 1.5 SD below the premenopausal mean, entered and 141 (78%) completed a 12 months randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The women received 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg ibandronate daily or placebo. All women received a daily calcium supplementation of 1000 mg Ca2+. Bone mass and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured every 3 months throughout the study period. The average changes in bone mass showed positive outcome in all regions in the groups receiving ibandronate 2.5 and 5.0 mg. The responses in the two groups were not significantly different, although there was a tendency toward a higher response in bone mass in the group receiving ibandronate 2.5 mg, where the increase in BMD was 4.6 +/- 3.1% (SD) in the spine (p < 0.001), 1.3 +/- 3.0% (SD) to 3.5 +/- 5.3% (SD) in the different regions of the proximal femur (p < 0.03 to p < 0.002), and 2.0 +/- 1.9% (SD) in total body bone mineral content (BMC) (p < 0.001). There was no significant changes in bone mass in the group receiving calcium (placebo) and ibandronate 0.25 mg. Dose-related responses were found in all biochemical markers of bone turnover. In average, serum osteocalcin decreased 13 +/- 14% (SD) (placebo) and 35 +/- 14% (SD) (5.0 mg). Urinary excretions of breakdown products of type I collagen decreased 35 +/- 21% (SD) (placebo) and 78 +/- 28% (SD) (5.0 mg), p < 0.001 in all groups. In conclusion, the results suggest that ibandronate treatment increases bone mass in all skeletal regions in a dose dependent manner with 2.5 mg being the most effective dose. Ibandronate treatment reduces bone turnover to premenopausal levels and is well tolerated.