Evidence of prolactin immunoreactivity in the bone marrow of untreated multiple myeloma patients.

The role of prolactin (PRL) in the physiological regulation of the immune system and in hematopoiesis is well known. There is also evidence of the significance of PRL in several pathological conditions such as autoimmune diseases and some malignancies, e.g. colon and breast carcinomas and also B cell malignancies. Multiple myeloma is known as a B cell malignancy. It is the result of malignant transformation of a single clone of neoplastic plasma cells that synthesize abnormal amounts of monoclonal immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin fragments. In our present studies, the possible expression of PRL in bone marrow cells obtained from diagnosed multiple myeloma (17 cases) or nonmyeloma (5 cases) patients was examined by the method of immunocytochemistry. Samples obtained from those multiple myeloma patients (13 cases) who had not received chemotherapy for 6 months prior to these studies showed a positive immunocytochemical reaction for PRL. Bone marrow smears of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma who had received chemotherapy within 6 months of the study and also the smears of patients without diagnosed multiple myeloma failed to show a positive immune reaction for PRL. In the case of a patient who was examined prior to and also after a period of 3 months of chemotherapy, the PRL-immunopositive bone marrow cells had disappeared due to the treatment. According to the light microscopic analysis of the cell morphology, PRL-immunopositive cells in the bone marrow were mainly, but not exclusively, plasma cells. There was no correlation between the positive PRL staining of cells and the type of monoclonal immunoglobulin or the ratio of plasma cells detected in the bone marrow. Taken together, our results indicate a possible role of PRL in multiple myeloma. Further experiments are necessary to identify the prognostic value of PRL in multiple myeloma.

Elevated levels of serum prolactin in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of prolactin in immunoregulation and normal hemopoiesis is well known. However, prolactin also seems to be involved in the pathomechanism of malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Elevated serum prolactin levels were reported in patients with malignant lymphoma, colon and breast carcinoma, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Recently we demonstrated prolactin immunostaining in bone marrow cells of patients with multiple myeloma. DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum prolactin levels of 56 patients with multiple myeloma, as well as serum beta(2)-microglobulin, and interleukin-6 concentrations were determined in this study. RESULTS: Patients with advanced disease showed a significant increase in serum prolactin concentration, while patients with a clinical stage of I and II, and also control patients had normal values. The concentration of serum beta(2)-microglobulin and interleukin-6 changed in parallel with that of serum prolactin in patients with multiple myeloma. Determining serum prolactin levels several times during the disease process in a given patient clearly showed that the prolactin concentration was increasing during the disease progression. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a role of prolactin in disease progression in multiple myeloma.

The blood spot thyrotropin method is not adequate to screen for hypothyroidism in the elderly living in abundant-iodine intake areas: comparison to sensitive thyrotropin measurements.

We investigated whether the blood spot thyrotropin (TSH) method was adequate for screening elderly subjects with abundant iodine intake (median excretion 330 microg/g creatinine) for hypothyroidism. In 97 healthy adults (group A), 210 nursing home residents (group B) and 265 elderly subjects living at home (group C) serum (sensitivity < 0.02 mU/L, cost 1.2 U.S. dollars [USD]) and blood spot TSH (sensitivity < 1.0 mU/L, cost 0.4 USD) were measured, and the sensitivity and specificity of different blood spot TSH cutoff points to detect cases with elevated serum TSH were calculated. Elevated (> 3.5 mU/L) serum TSH levels (group A, 6.2%; group B, 16.2%; group C, 22.3%; B > A, p = 0.025; C > A, p < 0.001) were detected with the required sensitivity of greater than 0.9 only if the cutoff point of the blood spot TSH was set as low as 2.5 mU/L, but this led to a considerable loss of specificity. At cutoff point 2.5 mU/L, the rate of positivity was 39.3% and the cost of blood spot screening/person increased to 0.88 USD, considering that positive cases have to be rechecked by serum TSH to exclude false positivity. Cases with significantly elevated (> 10.0 mU/L) serum TSH (group A, 1.03%; group B, 2.85%; group C, 2.20%) were detected at blood spot cutoff points 10.0-4.0 mU/L with a sensitivity of 1.0 and without considerable loss of specificity. We conclude that while screening for hypothyroidism in the elderly population with abundant iodine intake is justified by the high prevalence of elevated ultrasensitive serum TSH values, the sensitivity of the blood spot method is insufficient to detect the subclinical hypothyroidism accurately and would, therefore, fail to detect most affected subjects.