Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Subst Abus ; 42(2): 205-212, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has exacerbated income inequality, structural racism, and social isolation-issues that drive addiction and have previously manifested in the epidemic of opioid-associated overdose. The co-existence of these epidemics has necessitated care practice changes, including the use of telehealth-based encounters for the diagnosis and management of opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS: We describe the development of the "Addiction Telehealth Program" (ATP), a telephone-based program to reduce treatment access barriers for people with substance use disorders staying at San Francisco's COVID-19 Isolation and Quarantine (I&Q) sites. Telehealth encounters were documented in the electronic medical record and an internal tracking system for the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) COVID-19 Containment Response. Descriptive statistics were collected on a case series of patients initiated on buprenorphine at I&Q sites and indicators of feasibility were measured. RESULTS: Between April 10 and May 25, 2020, ATP consulted on the management of opioid, alcohol, GHB, marijuana, and stimulant use for 59 I&Q site guests. Twelve patients were identified with untreated OUD and newly prescribed buprenorphine. Of these, all were marginally housed, 67% were Black, and 58% had never previously been prescribed medications for OUD. Four self-directed early discharge from I&Q-1 prior to and 3 after initiating buprenorphine. Of the remaining 8 patients, 7 reported continuing to take buprenorphine at the time of I&Q discharge and 1 discontinued. No patients started on buprenorphine sustained significant adverse effects, required emergency care, or experienced overdose. CONCLUSIONS: ATP demonstrates the feasibility of telephone-based management of OUD among a highly marginalized patient population in San Francisco and supports the implementation of similar programs in areas of the U.S. where access to addiction treatment is limited. Legal changes permitting the prescribing of buprenorphine via telehealth without the requirement of an in-person visit should persist beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo/terapia , COVID-19 , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Abuso de Maconha/terapia , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Quarentena , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Atenção à Saúde , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , São Francisco , Oxibato de Sódio , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Telefone
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 57(5): 1373-83, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22466077

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have found that a major proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) do not receive antiviral therapy. The objective of this study was to characterize treatment eligibility on the basis of current guidelines, determine whether eligible patients actually receive treatment, and examine associated predictors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who were evaluated for CHB at two community gastroenterology clinics between April 2007 and February 2009. Using criteria published by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) in 2007-2009 and by a panel of US hepatologists (US Panel) in 2006-2008, treatment eligibility was determined for the patients. RESULTS: Of 612 consecutive CHB patients included, mean age was 44 ± 13 years, 54 % were male, and 99 % were Asian. Half (51 %) were eligible for treatment on the basis of the US Panel algorithm and 47 % of these patients also met AASLD treatment criteria. Overall, antiviral therapy was initiated for 50 % of eligible patients: 72 % of AASLD-eligible patients and 29 % of patients who were US Panel-eligible only. Independent predictors for actual treatment initiation were higher ALT for AASLD-eligible patients and higher ALT and older age for patients who were US Panel-eligible only. The leading reasons for nontreatment were further observation recommended by the physician, followed by loss of follow-up and patient refusal. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the CHB patients evaluated at community referral clinics met treatment criteria of at least one guideline; however, only about half received antiviral therapy within 12 months of presentation. Further studies are needed to optimize treatment of eligible CHB patients.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Definição da Elegibilidade , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hepatite B Crônica , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Alanina Transaminase/metabolismo , Asiático , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , DNA Viral/sangue , Coleta de Dados , Definição da Elegibilidade/métodos , Definição da Elegibilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Vírus da Hepatite B/efeitos dos fármacos , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite B Crônica/etnologia , Hepatite B Crônica/metabolismo , Hepatite B Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/etnologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA