[Update of the recommendations of the Federal Falls Prevention Initiative-Identification and prevention of the risk of falling in older people living at home]. / Update der Empfehlungen der Bundesinitiative Sturzprävention ­ Identifizierung und Prävention des Sturzrisikos bei älteren zu Hause lebenden Menschen.

BACKGROUND: To reduce falls and their consequences, evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations are needed for risk stratification, screening, assessment, and fall prevention as well as treatment. In 2020, the Federal Falls Prevention Initiative (BIS) published recommendations for physical training for falls prevention as a group or individual intervention for older people living at home. In 2022, the world guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults (WFG) were published. OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations of the BIS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The recommendations of the BIS were compared with those of the WFG and, if necessary, extended by methodological and subject-specific aspects. The following areas were considered: 1) screening and risk stratification, 2) interventions, 3) multifactorial assessment and interventions, and 4) specific target groups. RESULTS: The BIS recommendations are largely consistent with those of the WFG. The main reason for differences is the previous focus of the BIS recommendations on physical training. The multifactorial approach, which is described in detail by the WFG, has so far been mentioned in the recommendation paper on physical training in individual settings but not elaborated in detail. The BIS recommendations are supplemented or clarified in this respect. CONCLUSION: By updating the BIS recommendations, the establishment and promotion of fall prevention services for older people in Germany can be further advanced. The implementation can thus be carried out as consistently and scientifically proven as possible.

"Can Do" vs. "Do Do" in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sensor-Derived Physical Activity Patterns.

(1) Background: Identifying groups with a misaligned physical capacity (PC) and physical activity (PA) is potentially relevant for health promotion. Although an important health determinant, deeper knowledge of underlying walking behavior patterns in older adults is currently missing. We aim to identify specific PA signatures of misaligned groups and determine PA variables discriminating between groups. (2) Methods: In total, 294 community-dwelling older adults (≥70 years) were divided into four quadrants based on thresholds for PA (≥ or <5000 steps/day) and PC (≤ or >12 s, Timed Up and Go test). Kruskal-Wallis and effect sizes were calculated to compare quadrants' PA variables and to determine the discriminative power of PA parameters on walking duration, frequency, and intensity. (3) Results: We identified quadrant-specific PA signatures. Compared with "can do-do do", the "cannot do-do do" group performs shorter continuous and lower-intensity walks; the "can do-do not do" group takes fewer steps and walks with less intensity. The "cannot do-do not do" group presents lower values in all PA variables. "Walking duration greater or equal 3 METs" was the strongest discriminative PA variable. (4) Conclusion: We provide distinct PA signatures for four clinically different groups of older adults. Walking intensity is most useful to distinguish community-dwelling older adults, which is relevant for developing improved customized health promotion interventions.

Gymnastic skills on a balance beam with simulated height.

Virtual reality (VR) is a valuable tool for simulating dangerous situations and training under these conditions with a reduced possibility of injury. This could be beneficial within different sports scenarios. In gymnastics, the height of the balance beam can be dangerous and frightening, especially for beginners. Here, a simulated height can reduce the participant's risk of injury and facilitate entry to balance beam gymnastics. However, the investigation of sports performance in a virtual environment is rare. Therefore, the current study aims to compare beginners' performance in balance beam tasks between the real world (RW) and VR. 34 sports students executed gymnastic balancing forward, backward and the extension of one leg to the front, the side and the back on a regular balance beam in the RW and on a balance beam with simulated height in VR (using a head-mounted display). We analyzed beginners' performance in both conditions (RW and VR) regarding different criteria for each balance beam task. Statistical analyses show significant differences in performance with better results in RW (p < .05). Especially the body tension and the upper body posture were superior in RW. One explanation can be the more difficult regulation of the balance in VR. For the tasks where the motion took part in a fixed position on the beam, the further performance aspects were similar for RW and VR. When the participants moved along the beam, further performance aspects, like the leg extension, were better in RW. In total, the participants executed the VR balance beam tasks with decreased danger of injury due to the simulated height of the balance beam, but their performance was slightly limited. We conclude that for the first contact with the height of a balance beam, VR is a suitable tool to reduce the danger of injury occurring from falling off the beam and facilitate entry to balance beam gymnastics.