HeartMate 3 implantation with an emphasis on the biventricular configuration.

OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular failure following implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a major driver of mortality. Reported survival following biventricular (BiVAD) or total artificial heart (TAH) implantation remains substantially inferior to LVAD alone. We report our outcomes with LVAD and BiVAD HeartMate 3 (HM3). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing implantation of an HM3 LVAD between November 2014 and December 2021, at The Alfred, Australia were included in the study. Comparison was made between the BiVAD and LVAD alone groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients, 65 patients with LVAD alone and 21 in a BiVAD configuration underwent implantation. The median age of the LVAD and BiVAD groups was 56 years (Interquartile range 46-62) and 49 years (Interquartile range 37-55), respectively. By 4 years after implantation, 54% of LVAD patients and 43% of BiVAD patients had undergone cardiac transplantation. The incidence of stroke in the entire experience was 3.5% and pump thrombosis 5% (all in the RVAD). There were 14 deaths in the LVAD group and 1 in the BiVAD group. The actuarial survival for LVAD patients at 1 year was 85% and BiVAD patients at 1 year was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The application of HM 3 BiVAD support in selected patients appears to offer a satisfactory solution to patients requiring biventricular support.

The results of a single-center experience with HeartMate 3 in a biventricular configuration.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) failure after left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is a difficult problem. One solution is the implantation of continuous-flow VADs in a biventricular configuration. Disappointing survival and a concerning incidence of right-sided pump thrombosis have been previously reported. METHODS: From May 2017 to April 2020, a total of 12 patients underwent implantation of HeartMate 3 (HM3) biventricular VADs (BiVADs) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. The right-sided pump was implanted in the right atrium in all cases. Adverse events and patient outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Patients were male, and the mean age was 44 years. The etiology was dilated cardiomyopathy (6 patients), sarcoid heart disease (2 patients), ischemic cardiomyopathy (1 patient), anthracycline cardiomyopathy (1 patient), non-compaction cardiomyopathy (1 patient), and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy with biventricular involvement (1 patient). There was 1 death from multisystem failure. There were 3 episodes of right VAD thrombus (thrombosis or clot ingestion); 1 managed medically, 1 recognized intraoperatively treated with clot retrieval, and 1 requiring pump exchange. There were 3 driveline infections. At 18 months after the procedure, 5 patients (41.7%) had undergone cardiac transplantation, 5 patients (41.7%) were alive and on biventricular support, 1 patient had died (8.3%), and 1 patient had VAD explantation for myocardial recovery (8.3%). Actuarial survival at 18 months was 91.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, HM3 BiVAD in these critically ill patients was used with low mortality. This suggests that the timely deployment of biventricular support with HM3 can be associated with favorable outcomes.