Olea europaea L-derived secoiridoids: Beneficial health effects and potential therapeutic approaches.

Over the years, health challenges have become increasingly complex and global and, at the beginning of the 21st century, chronic diseases, including cardiovascular, neurological, and chronic respiratory diseases, as well as cancer and diabetes, have been identified by World Health Organization as one of the biggest threats to human health. Recently, antimicrobial resistance has also emerged as a growing problem of public health for the management of infectious diseases. In this scenario, the exploration of natural products as supplementation or alternative therapeutic options is acquiring great importance, and, among them, the olive tree, Olea europaea L, specifically leaves, fruits, and oil, has been increasingly investigated for its health promoting properties. Traditionally, these properties have been largely attributed to the high concentration of monounsaturated fatty acids, although, in recent years, beneficial effects have also been associated to other components, particularly polyphenols. Among them, the most interesting group is represented by Olea europaea L secoiridoids, comprising oleuropein, oleocanthal, oleacein, and ligstroside, which display anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, cardioprotective, neuroprotective and anticancer activities. This review provides an overview of the multiple health beneficial effects, the molecular mechanisms, and the potential applications of secoiridoids from Olea europaea L.

Risk reduction of cardiac events by screening of unknown asymptomatic coronary artery disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk: an open-label randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Evaluated the efficacy of reducing the risk of cardiac events by a preclinical diagnosis of CAD in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with 2 or more cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: One hundred forty-one subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus without known cardiac disease and asymptomatic, aged >45 to <76 years, were randomized into the screening arm for CAD (71 patients) or to the control arm (70 patients). The screening consisted in performing an exercise electrocardiogram test and dipyridamole stress echocardiography; if 1 test was abnormal, coronary angiography is done. Screening was positive in 15 subjects (21.4%). At coronary angiography, which was performed in 14 of 15 patients, stenoses > or =50% of vessel diameter were present in 9 patients, of these 4 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 4 underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Stenoses <50% of vessel diameter were present in 5 patients. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 53.5 months (range, 42-54 months). During this period, 1 major (myocardial infarction) and 3 minor events (angina) occurred in the screening arm. Eleven major and 4 minor events occurred in the control arm. In the screened arm, the proportion of all events was significantly less (P = .018) (RR .226, 95% CI 0.707-0.719, P = .012); the proportion of major to minor events was significantly less (P = .006) (RR .07, 95% CI 0.0087-0.565, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The preclinical diagnosis of CAD is effective in reducing the risk of cardiac events, especially major events, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk.