Maintenance of Surgical Optimization in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: There are increased efforts to maximize medical optimization to improve the outcomes of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a paucity of literature demonstrating that optimized parameters are maintained throughout the perioperative period. METHODS: A retrospective review of 877 elective TJA patients from 2015 to 2019 was conducted. Patients who underwent medical optimization for body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), hemoglobin, albumin, and smoking status were reviewed at the initial visit, preoperatively, time of surgery, and one year postoperatively. For each of these variables at each time point, patients were stratified into 3 optimization groups. Analyses were performed to identify mean time to optimization, loss of optimization, and maintenance of optimization. RESULTS: Patients considered not optimized due to specific parameters at the initial visit were as follows: BMI (19%), HbA1c (13.5%), hemoglobin (16%), albumin (19%), and smoking status (9.5%). The mean time to optimization was 187.7 days [longest being BMI (220.1 days), and the shortest being HbA1c (60.9 days) (P = .0003)]. Patients who had intermediate optimization of BMI at the preoperative visit were at higher risk [odds ratio: 2.1 (0.97 to 4.6)] of worsening BMI by time of surgery (P < .0001). Between the preoperative and surgery time points, over 93.5% of patients maintained or improved optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon led medical optimization efforts alongside a TJA program provide maintenance of, or improvement in optimization in more than half of TJA patients up to one year postoperatively. Patients who had a BMI between 40 and 45 at the preoperative visit are at significant risk of increasing their BMI by the day of surgery.

How Many Patients Qualify for Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Infection Following Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasties?

Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) has been suggested to reduce rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) postoperatively after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this multicenter study is to define how many TJA patients are considered high risk for developing PJI based on published EOAP criteria and determine whether this status is associated with socioeconomic or demographic factors. All primary and aseptic revision TJAs performed in 2019 at three academic medical centers were reviewed. High-risk status was defined based on prior published EOAP criteria. Area deprivation index (ADI) was calculated as a measure of socioeconomic status. Data were reported as means with standard deviation. Both overall and institutional differences were compared. Of the 2,511 patients (2,042 primary and 469 revision) in this cohort, 73.3% met criteria for high risk (primary: 72.9% [1,490] and revision: 74.6% [350]). Patient's race or age did not have a significant impact on risk designation; however, a larger proportion of high-risk patients were women (p = 0.002) and had higher Elixhauser scores (p < 0.001). The mean ADI for high-risk patients was higher (more disadvantaged) than for standard-risk patients (64.0 [20.8] vs. 59.4 [59.4]) (p < 0.001). Over 72% of primary and revision TJA patients at three medical centers met published criteria for EOAP. These patients were more often women, had more comorbidities, and lived in more disadvantaged areas. Our findings suggest that most patients qualify for EOAP, which may call for more stringent criteria on who would benefit extended antibiotic prophylaxis.