Impact of healthcare-associated infections within 7-days of acute stroke on health outcomes and risk of care-dependency: a multi-centre registry-based cohort study.

Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) in patients admitted with acute conditions remain a major challenge to healthcare services. Here, we assessed the impact of HCAIs acquired within 7-days of acute stroke on indicators of care-quality outcomes and dependency. Data were prospectively collected (2014-2016) from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme for 3309 patients (mean age = 76.2 yr, SD = 13.5) admitted to four UK hyperacute stroke units (HASU). Associations between variables were assessed by multivariable logistic regression (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals), adjusted for age, sex, co-morbidities, pre-stroke disability, swallow screening, stroke type and severity. Within 7-days of admission, urinary tract infection (UTI) and pneumonia occurred in 7.6% and 11.3% of patients. Female (UTI only), older age, underlying hypertension, atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, pre-stroke disability, intracranial haemorrhage, severe stroke, and delay in swallow screening (pneumonia only) were independent risk factors of UTI and pneumonia. Compared to patients without UTI or pneumonia, those with either or both of these HCAIs were more likely to have prolonged stay (> 14-days) on HASU: 5.1 (3.8-6.8); high risk of malnutrition: 3.6 (2.9-4.5); palliative care: 4.5 (3.4-6.1); in-hospital mortality: 4.8 (3.8-6.2); disability at discharge: 7.5 (5.9-9.7); activity of daily living support: 1.6 (1.2-2.2); and discharge to care-home: 2.3 (1.6-3.3). In conclusion, HCAIs acquired within 7-days of an acute stroke led to prolonged hospitalisation, adverse health consequences and risk of care-dependency. These findings provide valuable information for timely intervention to reduce HCAIs, and minimising subsequent adverse outcomes.

An orthogeriatric service can reduce prolonged hospital length of stay in hospital for older adults admitted with hip fractures: a monocentric study.

BACKGROUND: The Blue Book (2005), recommended guidelines for patients care with fragility fractures. Together with introduction of a National Hip Fracture Database Audit and Best Practice Tariff model to financially incentivise hospitals by payment of a supplement for patients whose care satisfied six clinical standards), have improved hip fracture after-care. However, there is a lack of data-driven evidence to support its effectiveness. We aimed to verify the impact of an orthogeriatric service on hospital length of stay (LOS)-duration from admission to discharge. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study over a 10 year period of older individuals aged ≥ 60 years admitted with hip fractures to a hospital. RESULTS: Altogether 2798 patients, 741 men and 2057 women (respective mean ages; 80.5 ± 10.6 and 83.2 ± 8.9 years) were admitted from their own homes with a hip fracture and survived to discharge. Compared to 2009-2014, LOS during 2015-2019, when the orthogeriatric service was fully implemented, was shorter for all discharge destinations: 10.4 vs 17.5 days (P < 0.001). Each discharge destination showed reductions: back to own homes, 9.7 vs 17.7 days (P < 0.001); to rehabilitation units: 10.8 vs 13.1 days (P < 0.001); to residential care: 15.4 vs 26.2 days (P = 0.001); or nursing care, 24.4 vs 53.1 days (P < 0.001). During 2009-2014, the risk of staying > 3 weeks in hospital was greater by six-fold and pressure ulcers by three-fold. The number of bed days for every thousand patients per year was also shortened during 2015-2019 by: 1665 days for discharge back to own homes; 469 days with transfer to rehabilitation units; 1258 days for discharge to residential care, and 5465 days to nursing care. Estimated annual savings (2017 costs) per thousand patients after complete establishment of the service was about £2.7 m. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an orthogeriatric service generated significant reductions in hospital LOS for all patients, with associated cost-savings, especially for those discharged to nursing care.

Determination of independent risk factors for early healthcare-associated infections acquired after acute stroke admission: A multi-centre registry-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) in patients admitted with acute conditions pose a serious risk to patients and a major challenge to healthcare services. However, there is a lack of consistency in reporting aetiological risk factors, particularly in acute stroke patients. Here, we determined independent risk factors of two common HCAIs (urinary tract infection and pneumonia) acquired within 7-days of admission after an acute stroke. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected (2014-2016) from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme for 3,309 patients (mean age=76.2yr, SD=13.5) admitted to four UK hyperacute stroke units. Associations between variables were assessed by forward stepwise multivariable logistic regression (odds ratios, 95 % confidence intervals). RESULTS: The rate of urinary tract infection and/or pneumonia occurring within 7-days of admission was 15.0 %. The risk of urinary tract infection and/or pneumonia was increased amongst women: OR = 1.35 (1.08-1.68); patients from ethnic minority backgrounds: OR = 1.77 (1.01-3.10); patients aged 70-79 years: OR = 2.08 (1.42-3.06), and ≥80 years: OR = 3.20 (2.26-4.55); history of hypertension: OR = 1.59 (1.27-1.98); history of atrial fibrillation: OR = 1.67 (1.32-2.12); pre-stroke disability: OR = 2.08 (1.44-3.00); intracranial haemorrhage: OR = 1.41 (1.07-1.86); severe stroke: OR = 3.21 (2.32-4.45); swallow screening within 4-72 h: OR = 1.42 (1.08-1.86); swallow screening beyond 72 h: OR = 1.70 (1.08-2.70). History of congestive heart failure, diabetes and previous stroke did not significantly associate with HCAIs. CONCLUSIONS: A profile of independent risk factors for two common HCAIs in acute stroke was identified. These findings provide valuable information for timely intervention to reduce HCAIs, and the ability to minimise subsequent adverse outcomes.

Influences of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions and clinical outcomes in mental health disorders and self-poisoning: Age- and sex-specific analysis.

We measured rates of hospital admissions for mental health disorders and self-poisoning during the pandemic in patients without COVID-19, compared to those admitted before the pandemic. Data were collected from 01/04/2019 to 31/03/2021, including the pandemic period from 01/03/2020. There were 10 173 (47.7% men) from the pre-pandemic and 11 019 (47.5% men) from the pandemic periods; mean age = 68.3 year. During the pandemic, admission rates for mental health disorders and self-poisoning were higher for any given age and sex. Self-poisoning was increased with toxic substances, sedatives and psychotropic drugs, but reduced with nonopioid analgesics. Patients admitted with mental health disorders had lower readmission rates within 28 days during the pandemic, but did not differ in other outcomes. Outcomes from self-poisoning did not change between the two study periods.

Sex differences in clinical outcomes amongst 1105 patients admitted with hip fractures.

Amongst hip fracture admissions, mortality is higher in men than in women. However, sex differences in other care-quality measures have not been well-documented. We aimed to examine sex differences in mortality as well as a wide range of underlying health indicators and clinical outcomes in adults ≥ 60 year of age admitted with hip fractures from their own homes to a single NHS hospital between April-2009 and June-2019. Sex differences in delirium, length of stay (LOS) and mortality in hospital, readmission, and discharge destination, were examined by logistic regression. There were 787 women and 318 men of similar mean age (± SD): 83.1 year (± 8.6) and 82.5 year (± 9.0), respectively (P = 0.269). There were no sex differences in history of dementia or diabetes, anticholinergic burden, pre-fracture physical function, American Society of Anesthesiologists grades, or surgical and medical management. Stroke and ischaemic heart disease, polypharmacy, and alcohol consumption were more common in men. After adjustment for these differences and age, men had greater risk of delirium (with or without cognitive impairment) within one day of surgery: OR = 1.75 (95%CI 1.14-2.68), LOS ≥ 3 weeks in hospital: OR = 1.52 (1.07-2.16), mortality in hospital: OR = 2.04 (1.14-3.64), and readmission once or more after 30 days of a discharge: OR = 1.53 (1.03-2.31). Men had a lower risk of a new discharge to residential/nursing care: OR = 0.46 (0.23-0.93). The present study revealed that, in addition to a greater risk of mortality than women, men also had many other adverse health outcomes. These findings, which have not been well-documented, serve to stimulate future targeted preventive strategies and research.

Association of Polypharmacy and Anticholinergic Burden with Length of Stay in Hospital Amongst Older Adults Admitted with Hip Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Age-associated multimorbidity and polypharmacy, predispose individuals to falls and consequent hip fractures. We examined the impact of polypharmacy (≥ 4 drugs daily), including anticholinergic agents, on hospital length of stay (LOS), mobility within 1-day of hip surgery and pressure ulcers in adults ≥ 60 years admitted with hip fractures. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, information on medications at admission was obtained to calculate the total number of drugs taken, including those imposing an anticholinergic burden (ACB). Associations between variables were examined by logistic regression; adjusted for age, sex, co-morbidities, pre-fracture functional limitations and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: There were 787 women and 318 men of similar mean age (± SD): 83.1 years (± 8.6) and 82.5 years (± 9.0), respectively. Compared to patients with an ACB score = 0 and taking < 4 drugs daily, those with an ACB score ≥ 1 and taking ≥ 4 drugs daily had greater risk of prolonged LOS (≥ 2 weeks), OR 1.8 (1.2-2.7); failure to mobilise within 1-day of surgery, OR 1.9 (1.1-3.3); and pressure ulcers, OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.2-7.9). LOS was further prolonged by failure to mobilise within 1-day of surgery and/or pressure ulcers. Those with either an ACB score ≥ 1 or the use of ≥ 4 drugs daily had intermediate risks. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic agents and polypharmacy in patients with hip fractures are associated with longer LOS in hospital, further accentuated by failure to mobilise within 1-day after surgery and pressure ulcers. This study provides further evidence of the impact of polypharmacy, including those with an ACB, on adverse health outcomes and lends support to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Adverse stroke outcomes amongst UK ethnic minorities: a multi-centre registry-based cohort study of acute stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Socioeconomic and health inequalities persist in multicultural western countries. Here, we compared outcomes following an acute stroke amongst ethnic minorities with Caucasian patients. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected (2014-2016) from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme for 3309 patients who were admitted with an acute stroke in four UK hyperacute stroke units. Associations between variables were examined by chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, prestroke functional limitations and co-morbidities, presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: There were 3046 Caucasian patients, 95 from ethnic minorities (mostly South Asians, Blacks, mixed race and a few in other ethnic groups) and 168 not stated. Compared with Caucasian patients, those from ethnic minorities had a proportionately higher history of diabetes (33.7% vs 15.4%, P < 0.001), but did not differ in other chronic conditions, functional limitations or sex distribution. Their age of stroke onset was younger both in women (76.8 year vs 83.2 year, P < 0.001) and in men (69.5 year vs 75.9 year, P = 0.002). They had greater risk for having a stroke before the median age of 79.5 year: OR = 2.15 (1.36-3.40) or in the first age quartile (< 69 year): OR = 2.91 (1.86-4.54), requiring palliative care within the first 72 h: OR = 3.88 (1.92-7.83), nosocomial pneumonia or urinary tract infection within the first 7 days of admission: OR = 1.86 (1.06-3.28), and in-hospital mortality: OR = 2.50 (1.41-4.44). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Caucasian patients, those from ethnic minorities had earlier onset of an acute stroke by about 5 years and a 2- to fourfold increase in many stroke-related adverse outcomes and death.

Evaluation of independent risk factors associated with surgical site infections from caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: The present study assessed factors associated with the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after a caesarean section (C-section). METHODS: Data were collected in 1682 women undergoing elective (53.9%) and emergency (46.1%) C-sections between 1st August 2020, and 30th December 2021, at a National Health Service hospital (Surrey, UK). RESULTS: At the time of C-section, the mean age was 33.1 yr (SD ± 5.2). Compared to women with BMI < 30 kg/m2, those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 had a greater risk of SSI, OR 4.07 (95%CI 2.48-6.69). Women with a history of smoking had a greater risk of SSI than those who had never smoked, OR 1.69 (95%CI 1.05-2.27). Women with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and had a smoking history or emergency C-section had 3- to tenfold increases for these adverse outcomes. Ethnic minority, diabetes or previous C-section did not associate with any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: High BMI, smoking, and emergency C-section are independent risk factors for SSI from C-section. Women planning conception should avoid excess body weight and smoking. Women with diabetes and from ethnic minority backgrounds did not have increased risks of SSI, indicating a consistent standard of care for all patients.

Identification of preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in relation to delays in surgery for hip fractures.

We evaluated factors and outcomes associated with elapsed time to surgery (ETTS) in 1,081 men and 2,891 women (mean age 83.5 years ±9.1) undergoing hip fracture surgery (from 2009-2019). Mortality rates were 4.8%, 6.3%, 6.2% and 10.3% (chi-squared 19.0; p<0.001), and hospital length of stay (LOS) >19 days were 31.9%, 32.8%, 33.8% and 43.2% (chi-squared 18.5; p<0.001) for ETTS <24 hours, 24-35 hours, 36-47 hours and ≥48 hours, respectively. There were no differences between ETTS categories for failure to mobilise within 1 day of surgery, pressure ulcers or discharge to nursing care. After adjustment for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score and years of data collection, compared with Sunday, the risk of ETTS ≥36 hours was highest on Friday (odds ratio (OR) 3.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.43-5.03) and Saturday (OR 4.70; 95% CI 3.26-6.76). Compared with ETTS <24 hours, there were increases in the risk of death when ETTS ≥48 hours (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.47-3.65) and LOS >19 days (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.02-1.75). The median (interquartile range (IQR)) LOS for ETTS <24 hours was 12.7 days (IQR 8.0-23.0), 24-35 hours was 13.5 days (IQR 8.4-22.9), 36-47 hours was 14.1 days (IQR 8.9-23.3) and ≥48 hours was 16.9 (IQR 10.8-27.0; p<0.001). The 10-year period of collection did not change the conclusion. Admissions towards the end of the week are associated with delayed ETTS for hip fractures, while delay in surgery, particularly beyond 48 hours, is associated with increased risk of mortality and prolonged LOS.

High LACE index scores are associated with disproportionate excess deaths in hospital amongst patients with COVID-19.

Risk factors for COVID-19-related outcomes have been variably reported. We used the standardised LACE index to examine admissions and in-hospital mortality associated with COVID-19. Data were collected in the pre-pandemic period (01-04-2019 to 29-02-2020) from 10,173 patients (47.7% men: mean age ± standard deviation = 68.3 years ± 20.0) and in the pandemic period (01-03-2019 to 31-03-2021) from 12,434 patients. With the latter, 10,982 were without COVID-19 (47.4% men: mean age = 68.3 years ± 19.6) and 1452 with COVID-19 (58.5% men: mean age = 67.0 years ± 18.4). Admissions and mortality were compared between pre-pandemic and pandemic patients, according to LACE index. Admission rates rose disproportionately with higher LACE indices amongst the COVID-19 group. Mortality rates amongst the pre-pandemic, pandemic non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups with LACE index scores < 4 were 0.7%, 0.5%, 0%; for scores 4-9 were 5.0%, 3.7%, 8.9%; and for scores ≥ 10 were: 24.2%, 20.4%, 43.4%, respectively. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristic for predicting mortality by LACE index was 76% for COVID-19 and 77% for all non-COVID-19 patients. The risk of age and sex-adjusted mortality did not differ from the pre-pandemic group for COVID-19 patients with LACE index scores < 4. However, risk increased drastically for scores from 4 to 9: odds ratio = 3.74 (95% confidence interval = 2.63-5.32), and for scores ≥ 10: odds ratio = 4.02 (95% confidence interval = 3.38-4.77). In conclusion, patients with LACE index scores ≥ 4 have disproportionally greater risk of COVID-19 hospital admissions and deaths, in support of previous studies in patients without COVID-19. However, of importance, our data also emphasise their increased risk in patients with COVID-19. Because the LACE index has a good predictive power of mortality, it should be considered for routine use to identify high-risk COVID-19 patients.

Comparison of characteristics, management and outcomes in hospital-onset and community-onset stroke: a multi-centre registry-based cohort study of acute stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital-onset stroke (HOS) is associated with poorer outcomes than community-onset stroke (COS). Previous studies have variably documented patient characteristics and outcome measures; here, we compare in detail characteristics, management and outcomes of HOS and COS. METHODS: A total of 1656 men (mean age ± SD = 73.1 years ± 13.2) and 1653 women (79.3 years ± 13.0), with data prospectively collected (2014-2016) from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, were admitted with acute stroke in four UK hyperacute stroke units (HASU). Associations between variables were examined by chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression (COS as reference). RESULTS: There were 272 HOS and 3037 COS patients with mean ages of 80.2 years ± 12.5 and 76.4 years ± SD13.5 and equal sex distribution. Compared to COS, HOS had higher proportions ≥ 80 years (64.0% vs 46.4%), congestive heart failure (16.9% vs 4.9%), atrial fibrillation (25.0% vs 19.7%) and pre-stroke disability (9.6% vs 5.1%), and similar history of stroke, hypertension, diabetes, stroke type and severity of stroke. After age, sex and co-morbidities adjustments, HOS had greater risk of pneumonia: OR (95%CI) = 1.9 (1.3-2.6); malnutrition: OR = 2.2 (1.7-2.9); immediate thrombolysis complications: OR = 5.3 (1.5-18.2); length of stay on HASU > 3 weeks: OR = 2.5 (1.8-3.4); post-stroke disability: OR = 1.8 (1.4-2.4); and in-hospital mortality: OR = 1.8 (1.2-2.4), as well as greater support at discharge including palliative care: OR = 1.9 (1.3-2.8); nursing care: OR = 2.0 (1.3-4.0), help for daily living activities: OR = 1.6 (1.1-2.2); and joint-care planning: OR = 1.5 (1.1-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: This detailed analysis of underlying differences in subject characteristics between patients with HOS or COS and adverse consequences provides further insights into understanding poorer outcomes associated with HOS.

Does the length of stay in hospital affect healthcare outcomes of patients without COVID-19 who were admitted during the pandemic? A retrospective monocentric study.

Uncertainties remain if changes to hospital care during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic had an adverse impact on the care-quality of non-COVID-19 patients. We examined the association of hospital length of stay (LOS) with healthcare quality indicators in patients admitted with general medical conditions (non-COVID-19). In this retrospective monocentric study at a National Health Service hospital (Surrey), data were collected from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2021, including the pandemic from 1st March 2020. Primary admissions, in-hospital mortality, post-discharge readmission and mortality were compared between the pre-pandemic (reference group) and pandemic period, according to LOS categories. There were 10,173 (47.7% men) from the pre-pandemic and 11,019 (47.5% men) from the pandemic period; mean (SD) age 68.3 year (20.0) and 68.3 year (19.6), respectively. During the pandemic, primary admission rates for acute cardiac conditions, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident and malignancy were higher, whilst admission rates for respiratory diseases and common age-related infections, and in-hospital mortality rates were lower. Amongst 19,721 survivors, sex distribution and underlying health status did not significantly differ between admissions before the pandemic and during wave-1 and wave-2 of the pandemic. Readmission rates did not differ between pre-pandemic and pandemic groups within the LOS categories of < 7 and 7-14 days, but were lower for the pandemic group who stayed > 14 days. For patients who died within seven days of admission, in-hospital mortality rates were lower in patients admitted during the pandemic. Mortality rates within 30 days of discharge did not differ between pre-pandemic and pandemic groups, irrespective of the initial hospital LOS. Despite higher rates of admission for serious conditions during the pandemic, in-hospital mortality was lower. Discharge time was similar to that for patients admitted before the pandemic, except it was earlier during the pandemic for those who stayed > 14 days, There were no group differences in quality-care outcomes.

Adverse consequences of immediate thrombolysis-related complications: a multi-centre registry-based cohort study of acute stroke.

Complications following thrombolysis for stroke are well documented, and mostly concentrated on haemorrhage. However, the consequences of patients who experience any immediate thrombolysis-related complications (TRC) compared to patients without immediate TRC have not been examined. Prospectively collected data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme were analysed. Thrombolysis was performed in 451 patients (52.1% men; 75.3 years ± 13.2) admitted with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in four UK centres between 2014 and 2016. Adverse consequences following immediate TRC were assessed using logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex and co-morbidities. Twenty-nine patients (6.4%) acquired immediate TRC. Compared to patients without, individuals with immediate TRC had greater adjusted risks of: moderately-severe or severe stroke (National Institutes of Health for Stroke Scale score ≥ 16) at 24-h (5.7% vs 24.7%, OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-11.1); worst level of consciousness (LOC) in the first 7 days (score ≥ 1; 25.0 vs 60.7, OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.1-10.2); urinary tract infection or pneumonia within 7-days of admission (13.5% vs 39.3%, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.7); length of stay (LOS) on hyperacute stroke unit (HASU) ≥ 2 weeks (34.7% vs 66.7%, OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.5-18.4); mortality (13.0% vs 41.4%, OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.6-8.4); moderately-severe or severe disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 4) at discharge (26.8% vs 65.5%, OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1-10.9); palliative care by discharge date (5.1% vs 24.1%, OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.7-15.7). The median LOS on the HASU was longer (7 days vs 30 days, Kruskal-Wallis test: χ2 = 8.9, p = 0.003) while stroke severity did not improve (NIHSS score at 24-h post-thrombolysis minus NIHSS score at arrival = - 4 vs 0, χ2 = 24.3, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the risk of nosocomial infections, worsening of stroke severity, longer HASU stay, disability and death is increased following immediate TRC. The management of patients following immediate TRC is more complex than previously thought and such complexity needs to be considered when planning an increased thrombolysis service.

Predicting Stroke Complications in Hospital and Functional Status at Discharge by Clustering of Cardiovascular Diseases a Multi-Centre Registry-Based Study of Acute Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Indicators for outcomes following acute stroke are lacking. We have developed novel evidence-based criteria for identifying outcomes of acute stroke using the presence of clusters of coexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of prospectively collected data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP). A total of 1656 men (mean age ±SD=73.1yrs±13.2) and 1653 women (79.3yrs±13.0) were admitted with acute stroke (83.3% ischaemic, 15.7% intracranial haemorrhagic), 1.0% unspecified) in four major UK hyperacute stroke units (HASU) between 2014 and 2016. Four categories from cardiovascular disease Congestive heart failure, Atrial fibrillation, pre-existing Stroke and Hypertension (CASH).were constructed: CASH-0 (no coexisting CVD); CASH-1 (any one coexisting CVD); CASH-2 (any two coexisting CVD); CASH-3 (any three or all four coexisting CVD). These were tested against outcomes, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Compared to CASH-0, individuals with CASH-3 had greatest risks of in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 24.5%, OR=1.8, 95%CI=1.3-2.7) and disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥4) at discharge (24.2% vs 46.2%, OR=1.9, 95%CI=1.4-2.7), urinary tract infection (3.8% vs 14.6%, OR= 3.3, 95%CI= 1.9-5.5), and pneumonia (7.1% vs 20.6%, OR= 2.6, 95%CI= 1.7-4.0); length of stay on HASU >14 days (29.8% vs 39.3%, OR=1.8, 95%CI=1.3-2.6); and joint-care planning (20.9% vs 29.8%, OR=1.4, 95%CI=1.0-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: We present a simple tool for estimating the risk of adverse outcomes of acute stroke including death, disability at discharge, nosocomial infections, prolonged length of stay, as well as any joint care planning. CASH-0 indicates a low level and CASH-3 indicates a high level of risk of such complications after stroke.

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 during wave 1 and wave 2 of the current pandemic.

In this study of patients admitted with COVID-19, we examined differences between the two waves in patient characteristics and outcomes. Data were collected from the first COVID-19 admission to the end of study (01/03/2020-31/03/2021). Data were adjusted for age and sex and presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among 12,471 admissions, 1452 (11.6%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. On admission, the mean (± SD) age of patients with other causes was 68.3 years (± 19.8) and those with COVID-19 in wave 1 was 69.4 years (± 18.0) and wave 2 was 66.2 years (± 18.4). Corresponding ages at discharge were 67.5 years (± 19.7), 63.9 years (± 18.0) and 62.4 years (± 18.0). The highest proportion of total admissions was among the oldest group (≥ 80 years) in wave 1 (35.0%). When compared with patients admitted with other causes, those admitted with COVID-19 in wave 1 and in wave 2 were more frequent in the 40-59 year band: 20.8, 24.6 and 30.0%; consisted of more male patients: 47.5, 57.6 and 58.8%; and a high LACE (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidity and Emergency department visits) index (score ≥ 10): 39.4, 61.3 and 50.3%. Compared to wave-2 patients, those admitted in wave 1 had greater risk of death in hospital: OR = 1.58 (1.18-2.12) and within 30 days of discharge: OR = 2.91 (1.40-6.04). Survivors of COVID-19 in wave 1 stayed longer in hospital (median = 6.5 days; interquartile range = 2.9-12.0) as compared to survivors from wave 2 (4.5 days; interquartile range = 1.9-8.7). Patient characteristics differed significantly between the two waves of COVID-19 pandemic. There was an improvement in outcomes in wave 2, including shorter length of stay in hospital and reduction of mortality.

Association of risk of malnutrition with adverse outcomes and early support on discharge in acute stroke patients without prestroke disability: A multicenter, registry-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in hospitals remains highly prevalent. As part of quality improvement initiatives, the Royal College of Physicians recommends nutrition screening for all patients admitted with acute stroke. We aimed to examine the associations of patients at risk of malnutrition with poststroke outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from four hyperacute stroke units (HASUs) (2014-2016). Nutrition status was screened in 2962 acute stroke patients without prestroke disability (1515 men, [mean ± SD] 73.5 years ± 13.1; 1447 women, 79.2 ± 13.0 years). The risk of malnutrition was tested against stroke outcomes and adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Risk of malnutrition was identified in 25.8% of patients). Compared with well-nourished patients, those at risk of malnutrition had, within 7 days of admission, increased risk of stay on the HASU of >14 days (odds ratio [OR]: 9.9 [7.3-11.5]), disability on discharge (OR: 8.1 [6.6-10.0]), worst level of consciousness in the first 7 days (score ≥ 1) (OR: 7.5 [6.1-9.3]), mortality (OR: 5.2 [4.0-6.6], pneumonia (OR: 5.1 [3.9-6.7]), and urinary tract infection (OR: 1.5 [1.1-2.0]). They also required palliative care (OR: 12.3 [8.5-17.8]), discharge to new care home (OR: 3.07 [2.18-4.3]), activities of daily living support (OR: 1.8 [1.5-2.3]), planned joint care (OR: 1.5 [1.2-1.8]), and weekly visits (OR: 1.4 [1.1-1.8]). CONCLUSION: Patients at risk of malnutrition more commonly have multiple adverse outcomes after acute stroke and greater need for early support on discharge.

Changes in Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fractures Following the Initiation of Orthogeriatric Service: Temporal Trend Analysis.

The Blue Book published by the British Orthopaedic Association and British Geriatrics Society, together with the introduction of National Hip Fracture Database Audit and Best Practice Tariff, have been influential in improving hip fracture care. We examined ten-year (2009-2019) changes in hip fracture outcomes after establishing an orthogeriatric service based on these initiatives, in 1081 men and 2891 women (mean age = 83.5 ± 9.1 years). Temporal trends in the annual percentage change (APC) of outcomes were identified using the Joinpoint Regression Program v4.7.0.0. The proportions of patients operated beyond 36 h of admission fell sharply during the first two years: APC = - 53.7% (95% CI - 68.3, - 5.2, P = 0.003), followed by a small rise thereafter: APC = 5.8% (95% CI 0.5, 11.3, P = 0.036). Hip surgery increased progressively in patients > 90 years old: APC = 3.3 (95% CI 1.0, 5.8, P = 0.011) and those with American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade ≥ 3: APC = 12.4 (95% CI 8.8, 16.1, P < 0.001). There was a significant decline in pressure ulcers amongst patients < 90 years old: APC = - 17.9 (95% CI - 32.7, 0.0, P = 0.050) and also a significant decline in mortality amongst those > 90 years old: APC = - 7.1 (95% CI - 12.6, - 1.3, P = 0.024). Prolonged length of stay (> 23 days) declined from 2013: APC = - 24.6% (95% CI - 31.2, - 17.4, P < 0.001). New discharge to nursing care declined moderately over 2009-2016 (APC = - 10.6, 95% CI - 17.2, - 2.7, P = 0.017) and sharply thereafter (APC = - 47.5%, 95%CI - 71.7, - 2.7, P = 0.043). The rate of patients returning home was decreasing (APC = - 2.9, 95% CI - 5.1, - 0.7, P = 0.016), whilst new discharge to rehabilitation was increasing (APC = 8.4, 95% CI 4.0, 13.0; P = 0.002). In conclusion, the establishment of an orthogeriatric service was associated with a reduction of elapsed time to hip surgery, a progressive increase in surgery carried out on high-risk adults and a decline in adverse outcomes.

Evaluation of the association of length of stay in hospital and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There exist wide variations in healthcare quality within the National Health Service (NHS). A shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) has been implicated as premature discharge, that may in turn lead to adverse consequences. We tested the hypothesis that a short LOS might be associated with increased risk of readmissions within 28 days of hospital discharge and also post-discharge mortality. METHODS: We conducted a single-centred study of 32 270 (46.1% men) consecutive alive-discharge episodes (mean age = 64.0 years, standard deviation = 20.5, range = 18-107 years), collected between 01/04/2017 and 31/03/2019. Associations of LOS tertiles (middle tertile as a reference) with readmissions and mortality were assessed using observed/expected ratios, and logistic and Cox regressions to estimate odds (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) (adjusted for age, sex, patients' severity of underlying health status and index admissions), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The observed numbers of readmissions within 28 days of hospital discharge or post-discharge mortality were lower than expected (observed: expected ratio < 1) in patients in the bottom tertile (<1.2 days) and middle tertile (1.2-4.3 days) of LOS, whilst higher than expected (observed: expected ratio > 1) in patients in the top tertile (>4.3 days), amongst all ages. Patients in the top tertile of LOS had increased risks for one readmission: OR = 2.32 (95% CI = 1.86-2.88) or ≥2 readmissions: OR = 6.17 (95% CI = 5.11-7.45), death within 30 days: OR = 2.87 (95% CI = 2.34-3.51), and within six months of discharge: OR = 2.52 (95% CI = 2.23-2.85), and death over a two-year period: HR = 2.25 (95% CI = 2.05-2.47). The LOS explained 7.4% and 15.9% of the total variance (r2) in one readmission and ≥2 readmissions, and 9.1% and 10.0% of the total variance in mortality with 30 days and within six months of hospital discharge, respectively. Within the bottom, middle and top tertiles of the initial LOS, the median duration from hospital discharge to death progressively shortened from 136, 126 to 80 days, whilst LOS during readmission lengthened from 0.4, 0.9 to 2.8 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Short LOS in hospital was associated with favourable post-discharge outcomes such as early readmission and mortality, and with a delay in time interval from discharge to death and shorter LOS in hospital during readmission. These findings indicate that timely discharge from our hospital meets the aims of the NHS-generated national improvement programme, Getting It Right First Time.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in NHS healthcare workers in a large double-sited UK hospital.

We determined the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in NHS healthcare workers (HCWs) in a cross-sectional study from a large general hospital located in a double-sited rural and semi-rural area. The sample size of 3,119 HCWs (mean age 43±13) consisted of 75.2% women, 61.1% White individuals and predominantly (62.4%) asymptomatic individuals. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 19.7%. Determinants of seropositivity were preceding symptomatic infection and non-White ethnicity. Regardless of staff role or sex, multivariate regression analysis revealed that non-White HCWs were three times (odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-3.86, P<0.001) more likely to have antibodies than White staff, and seven times (OR 7.10, 95% CI 5.72-8.87, P<0.001) more likely if there was a history of preceding symptoms. We report relatively high rates of seropositivity in all NHS healthcare workers. Non-White symptomatic HCWs were significantly more likely to be seropositive than their colleagues, independent of age, sex or staff role.

LACE index predicts age-specific unplanned readmissions and mortality after hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND: The LACE index scoring tool (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Co-morbidities and Emergency department visits) has been designed to predict hospital readmissions. We evaluated the ability of the LACE index to predict age-specific frequent admissions and mortality. METHODS: Analysis of prospectively collected data of alive-discharge episodes between 01/04/2017 and 31/03/2019 in an NHS hospital. Data on 14,878 men and 17,392 women of mean age 64.0 years, SD = 20.5, range 18.0-106.7 years were analysed. The association of the LACE index with frequency of all-cause readmissions within 28 days of discharge and over a 2-year period, and with all-cause mortality within 30 days or within 6 months after discharge from hospital were evaluated. RESULTS: Within LACE index scores of 0-4, 5-9 or ≥ 10, the proportions of readmission ≥ 2 times within 28 days of discharge were 0.1, 1.3 and 9.2% (χ2 = 3070, p < 0.001) and over a 2-year period were 1.7, 4.8 and 19.1% (χ2 = 3364, p < 0.001). Compared with a LACE index score of 0-4, a score ≥ 10 increased the risk (adjusted for age, sex and frequency of admissions) of death within 6 months of discharge by 6.8-fold (5.1-9.0, p < 0.001) among all ages, and most strongly in youngest individuals (18.0-49.9 years): adjusted odds ratio = 16.1 (5.7-45.8, p < 0.001). For those aged 50-59.9, 60-69.9, 70-79.9 and ≥ 80 years, odds ratios reduced progressively to 9.6, 7.7, 5.1 and 2.3, respectively. Similar patterns were observed for the association of LACE index with mortality within 30 days of hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The LACE index predicts short-term and long-term frequent admissions and short-term and medium-term mortality, most pronounced among younger individuals, after hospital discharge.