Examining the impact of COVID-19 on Maori:non-Maori health inequities in Aotearoa, New Zealand: an observational study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had both direct and indirect impacts on the health of populations worldwide. While racial/ethnic health inequities in COVID-19 infection are now well known (and ongoing), knowledge about the impact of COVID-19 pandemic management on non-COVID-19-related outcomes for Indigenous peoples is less well understood. This article presents the study protocol for the Health Research Council of New Zealand funded project 'Ma te Mohio ka Marama: Impact of COVID-19 on Maori:non-Maori inequities'. The study aims to explore changes in access to healthcare, quality of healthcare and health outcomes for Maori, the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) and non-Maori during the COVID-19 outbreak period across NZ. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This observational study is framed within a Kaupapa Maori research positioning that includes Kaupapa Maori epidemiology. National datasets will be used to report on access to healthcare, quality of healthcare and health outcomes between Maori and non-Maori during the COVID-19 pandemic in NZ. Study periods are defined as (a) prepandemic period (2015-2019), (b) first pandemic year without COVID-19 vaccines (2020) and (c) pandemic period with COVID-19 vaccines (2021 onwards). Regional and national differences between Maori and non-Maori will be explored in two phases focused on identified health priority areas for NZ including (1) mortality, cancer, long-term conditions, first 1000 days, mental health and (2) rheumatic fever. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC AH26253). An advisory group will work with the project team to disseminate the findings of this project via project-specific meetings, peer-reviewed publications and a project-specific website. The overall intention of the project is to highlight areas requiring health policy and practice interventions to address Indigenous inequities in health resulting from COVID-19 pandemic management (both historical and in the future).

Support for and potential impacts of key Smokefree 2025 strategies among Maori who smoke.

AIM: The recently passed Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act has the potential to profoundly reduce smoking prevalence and related health inequities experienced among Maori. This study examined support for, and potential impacts of, key measures included within the legislation. METHOD: Data came from Wave 1 (2017-2019) of the Te Ara Auahi Kore longitudinal study, which was conducted in partnership with five primary health organisations serving Maori communities. Participants were 701 Maori who smoked. Analysis included both descriptive analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: More Maori participants supported than did not support the Smokefree 2025 (SF2025) goal of reducing smoking prevalence to below 5%, and the key associated measures. Support was greatest for mandating very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs). Participants also believed VLNCs would prompt high rates of quitting. Participants who had made more quit attempts or reported less control over their life were more likely to support VLNCs. CONCLUSION: There was support for the SF2025 goal and for key measures that could achieve it. In particular, VLNCs may have significant potential to reduce smoking prevalence among Maori. As part of developing and implementing these measures it will be important to engage with Maori who smoke and their communities.

Equity of Cancer and Diabetes Co-Occurrence: A National Study With 44 Million Person-Years of Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: The co-occurrence of diabetes and cancer is becoming increasingly common, and this is likely to compound existing inequities in outcomes from both conditions within populations. METHODS: In this study, we investigate the co-occurrence of cancer and diabetes by ethnic groups in New Zealand. National-level diabetes and cancer data on nearly five million individuals over 44 million person-years were used to describe the rate of cancer in a national prevalent cohort of peoples with diabetes versus those without diabetes, by ethnic group (Maori, Pacific, South Asian, Other Asian, and European peoples). RESULTS: The rate of cancer was greater for those with diabetes regardless of ethnic group (age-adjusted rate ratios, Maori, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.42; Pacific, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.43; South Asian, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.36; Other Asian, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.43; European, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.31). Maori had the highest rate of diabetes and cancer co-occurrence. Rates of GI, endocrine, and obesity-related cancers comprised a bulk of the excess cancers occurring among Maori and Pacific peoples with diabetes. CONCLUSION: Our observations reinforce the need for the primordial prevention of risk factors that are shared between diabetes and cancer. Also, the commonality of diabetes and cancer co-occurrence, particularly for Maori, reinforces the need for a multidisciplinary, joined-up approach to the detection and care of both conditions. Given the disproportionate burden of diabetes and those cancers that share risk factors with diabetes, action in these areas is likely to reduce ethnic inequities in outcomes from both conditions.

We still don't count: the under-counting and under-representation of Maori in health and disability sector data.

AIM: To examine ethnicity data quality; in particular, the representation and potential under-counting of Maori in health and disability sector data, as well as implications for inequities. METHODS: Maori and non-Maori ethnicity data are analysed at: 1) a population aggregate level across multiple 2018 datasets (Estimated Resident Population, Census Usually Resident Population, Health Service User (HSU) population and Primary Health Organisation (PHO) enrolments); and 2) an individual level for those linked in PHO and 2018 Census datasets. Ethnicity is drawn from the National Health Index (NHI) in health datasets and variations by age and gender are explored. RESULTS: Aggregate analyses show that Maori are considerably under-represented in HSU and PHO data. In linked analysis Maori were under-counted on the NHI by 16%. Under-representation in data and under-counting occur across both genders but are more pronounced for Maori men with variations by age. CONCLUSION: High quality ethnicity data are fundamental for understanding and monitoring Maori health and health inequities as well as in the provision of targeted services and interventions that are responsive to Maori aspirations and needs. The continued under-counting of Maori in health and disability sector data is a breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and must be addressed with urgency.

Mortality after release from incarceration in New Zealand by gender: A national record linkage study.

Background: People who enter and leave places of incarceration experience considerable health inequities and are at increased risk of premature death compared to the general population. Causes of premature death in this population vary markedly between countries and so country-specific information is needed. Additionally, there is a lack of large population-based studies which can disaggregate mortality risk based on person and incarceration factors. This study is the first examination of mortality in the period following release from incarceration in New Zealand. Methods: We linked deidentified administrative data on incarceration and release between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2016 with national mortality data for the same period to examine mortality after release in those who had been incarcerated for at least 1 day. Age standardised mortality rates and mortality ratios compared to the general New Zealand population were calculated separately for men and women, for releases from remand compared with prison, and by cause of death and time since release. Results: 90,195 individuals (13% women, 49% Maori) were followed up for 9.4 years after release from incarceration, with 4,764 deaths over the follow-up period. The overall standardised mortality ratio was 3.3 (95% CI 3.2, 3.4) compared to the general population, and higher for women (3.8) than men (2.7). The most common causes of death were cardiovascular disease, cancer and suicide. Rates of death were similar following release from remand versus prison, however suicide rates were highest following release from remand. Regardless of the type of incarceration, mortality was highest in the first month after release. Conclusion: Experience of incarceration in New Zealand is associated with high rates of mortality from both chronic conditions and external causes. There are urgent policy imperatives to recognise and actively address the increased health and mortality risks faced by people released from New Zealand prisons.

Analysis of deprivation distribution in New Zealand by ethnicity, 1991-2013.

AIMS: To compare the distribution of Maori and New Zealand (NZ) European populations in Aotearoa New Zealand by neighbourhood deprivation, for the five censuses between 1991 and 2013, and to identify changes in the distribution pattern over time. METHODS: Geographical meshblock data from the 1991-2013 New Zealand censuses, by NZDep Index deprivation score, and by prioritised ethnic group population, were combined to analyse ethnic population counts by deprivation decile and deprivation score. Trends over time were analysed. RESULTS: Maori were over-represented in the more deprived NZDep deciles and under-represented in the least deprived deciles for all census periods. The NZ European population were over-represented in the least deprived deciles, and under-represented in the more deprived deciles. In each census, over 40% of the Maori population have been living in the two most deprived deciles, compared to less than 15% for NZ European. CONCLUSION: The patterns of inequity in socio-economic deprivation between Maori and NZ Europeans have remained virtually unchanged since 1991, despite various Government commitments to reduce inequity. Socio-economic deprivation for Maori is a key determinant of health inequity, and bolder Government measures prioritised for Maori are needed to change this socio-economic gradient if health equity goals are to be met.

A kia ora, a wave and a smile: an urban marae-led response to COVID-19, a case study in manaakitanga.

BACKGROUND: When COVID-19 emerged, there were well-founded fears that Maori (indigenous peoples of Aotearoa (New Zealand)) would be disproportionately affected, both in terms of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 itself and through the impact of lock-down measures. A key way in which Kokiri (a Maori health provider) responded was through the establishment of a pataka kai (foodbank) that also provided a gateway to assess need and deliver other support services to whanau (in this case, client). Maori values were integral to this approach, with manaakitanga (kindness or providing care for others) at the heart of Kokiri's actions. We sought to identify how Kokiri operated under the mantle of manaakitanga, during Aotearoa's 2020 nationwide COVID-19 lockdown and to assess the impact of their contributions on Maori whanau. METHODS: We used qualitative methods underpinned by Maori research methodology. Twenty-six whanau interviews and two focus groups were held, one with eight kaimahi (workers) and the other with seven rangatahi (youth) kaimahi. Data was gathered between June and October 2020 (soon after the 2020 lockdown restrictions were lifted), thematically analysed and interpreted using a Maori worldview. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified that aligned to the values framework that forms the practice model that Kokiri kaimahi work within. Kaitiakitanga, whanau and manaakitanga are also long-standing Maori world values. We identified that kaitiakitanga (protecting) and manaakitanga (with kindness) - with whanau at the centre of all decisions and service delivery - worked as a protective mechanism to provide much needed support within the community Kokiri serves. CONCLUSIONS: Maori health providers are well placed to respond effectively in a public-health crisis when resourced appropriately and trusted to deliver. We propose a number of recommendations based on the insights generated from the researchers, kaimahi, and whanau. These are that: Maori be included in pandemic planning and decision-making, Maori-led initiatives and organisations be valued and adequately resourced, and strong communities with strong networks be built during non-crisis times.

Regional variation in post-operative mortality in New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of evidence that access to best practice perioperative care varies within our population. In this study, we use national-level data to begin to address gaps in our understanding of regional variation in post-operative outcomes within New Zealand. METHODS: Using National Collections data, we examined all inpatient procedures in New Zealand public hospitals between 2005 and 2017 (859 171 acute, 2 276 986 elective/waiting list), and identified deaths within 30 days. We calculated crude and adjusted rates per 100 procedures for the 20 district health boards (DHBs), both for the total population and stratified by ethnicity (Maori/European). Odds ratios comparing the risk of post-operative mortality between Maori and European patients were calculated using crude and adjusted Poisson regression models. RESULTS: We observed regional variations in post-operative mortality outcomes. Maori, compared to European, patients experienced higher post-operative mortality rates in several DHBs, with a trend to higher mortality in almost all DHBs. Regional variation in patterns of age, procedure, deprivation and comorbidity (in particular) largely drives regional variation in post-operative mortality, although variation persists in some regions even after adjusting for these factors. Inequitable outcomes for Maori also persist in several regions despite adjustment for multiple factors, particularly in the elective setting. CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of variation and ethnic disparities in spite of adjustment for confounding and mediating factors suggests that multiple regions require additional resource and support to improve outcomes. Efforts to reduce variation and improve outcomes for patients will require both central planning and monitoring, as well as region-specific intervention.

How is family health history discussed in routine primary healthcare? A qualitative study of archived family doctor consultations.

OBJECTIVES: Family health history underpins genetic medicine. Our study aimed to explore language and patterns of communication relating to family health history observed in interactions between general practitioners (GPs) and their patients within routine primary care consultations. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of patient and GP routine consultation data (n=252). PARTICIPANTS: Consultations that included 'family health history' were eligible for inclusion (n=58). PRIMARY OUTCOMES: A qualitative inductive analysis of the interactions from consultation transcripts. RESULTS: 46/58 conversations about family health history were initiated by the GP. Most discussions around family history lasted for between approximately 1 to 2 min. Patients were invited to share family health history through one of two ways: non-specific enquiry (eg, by asking the patient about 'anything that runs in the family'); or specific enquiry where they were asked if they had a 'strong family history' in relation to a particular condition, for example, breast cancer. Patients often responded to either approach with a simple no, but fuller negative responses also occurred regularly and typically included an account of some kind (eg, explaining family relationships/dynamics which impeded or prevented the accessibility of information). CONCLUSIONS: Family health history is regarded as a genetic test and is embedded in the sociocultural norms of the patient from whom information is being sought. Our findings highlight that it is more complex than asking simply if 'anything' runs in the family. As the collection of family health history is expected to be more routine, it will be important to also consider it from sociocultural perspectives in order to help mitigate any inequities in how family history is collected, and therefore used (or not) in a person's healthcare. Orientating an enquiry away from 'anything' and asking more specific details about particular conditions may help facilitate the dialogue.

Disparities in post-operative mortality between Maori and non-Indigenous ethnic groups in New Zealand.

AIM: To describe disparities in post-operative mortality experienced by Indigenous Maori compared to non-Indigenous New Zealanders. METHODS: We completed a national study of all those undergoing a surgical procedure between 2005 and 2017 in New Zealand. We examined 30-day and 90-day post-operative mortality for all surgical specialties and by common procedures. We compared age-standardised rates between ethnic groups (Maori, Pacific, Asian, European, MELAA/Other) and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression modelling adjusted for age, sex, deprivation, rurality, comorbidity, ASA score, anaesthetic type, procedure risk and procedure specialty. RESULTS: From nearly 3.9 million surgical procedures (876,976 acute, 2,990,726 elective/waiting list), we observed ethnic disparities in post-operative mortality across procedures, with the largest disparities occurring between Maori and Europeans. Maori had higher rates of 30- and 90-day post-operative mortality across most broad procedure categories, with the disparity between Maori and Europeans strongest for elective/waiting list procedures (eg, elective/waiting list musculoskeletal procedures, 30-day mortality: adj. HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.56-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: The disparities we observed are likely driven by a combination of healthcare system, process and clinical team factors, and we have presented the key mechanisms within these factors.

He Tamariki Kokoti Tau: Tackling preterm incidence and outcomes of preterm births by ethnicity in Aotearoa New Zealand 2010-2014.

OBJECTIVE: To explore preterm birth among Maori indigenous peoples through Kaupapa Maori research of preterm birth in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: Linked maternity, mortality, and hospital data were analyzed for women and their infants born between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014. Relative risks (RR) were calculated for each ethnic group for preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), and mortality. RESULTS: Adjusted rates showed that compared with Maori women, European women were at significantly less risk of having extremely and very preterm infants (RR 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.95). Preterm infants of European women had a significantly lower adjusted RR of early neonatal death (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93) or post-neonatal death (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.64). In addition to ethnicity, preterm rates were influenced by maternal age, body mass index, smoking status, and SGA status. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the Aotearoa New Zealand maternity system privileges whiteness, suggesting that clinical pathways for evidence-based medical care are not delivered systemically and equitably for all. Health pathways that focus on equity as a fundamental right will enhance health outcomes for Maori women and their infants.

When personal experience overlaps with study.

BACKGROUND: Health professional education programmes increasingly seek to train a generation of clinicians who reflect the population they serve. However, teaching approaches in health professional education have not always kept pace with this drive, and some educators tend to assume a lack of overlap between students' life experience and aspects of the curriculum. METHOD: In-depth interviews were conducted with 22 health professional students and graduates, who self-identified as having experienced a significant overlap between their personal life and their course of study. These interviews were analysed thematically to explore the role of teaching practices that created either alienating or inclusive learning environments. RESULTS: Participants identified areas where clinical teachers could modify their teaching approach and assumptions about the student cohort to be more inclusive of students whose life experience overlapped with the curriculum. They wanted educators to treat any teaching topic as if it could be personal for some students, which may include teaching inequities carefully, acknowledging family members' perspectives, moderating discussions, and avoiding stereotyping patients. Participants also wanted educators to practice shared decision-making about alternative arrangements or time off. DISCUSSION: Clinical educators have a key role in shaping an inclusive health sciences programme. Their assumptions, attitudes and teaching strategies can either strengthen or undermine the development of a diverse health workforce.

Bowel cancer screening age range for Maori: what is all the fuss about?

The current New Zealand Bowel Screening Programme (BSP) is inequitable. At present, just over half of bowel cancers in Maori present before the age of 60 years (58% in females and 52% in males), whereas just under a third of bowel cancers in non-Maori are diagnosed before the same age (27% in females and 29% in males). The argument for extending the bowel screening age range down to 50 years for Maori is extremely simple-in comparison to non-Maori, a greater percentage of bowel cancers in Maori occur before the age of 60 years (when screening starts). Commencing the BSP at 50 years of age for Maori with high coverage will help fix this inequity. In this paper we review the current epidemiology of colorectal cancer with respect to the age range extension for Maori.

The most commonly diagnosed and most common causes of cancer death for Maori New Zealanders.

Cancer is an important cause of morbidity and avoidable mortality for Maori-and substantial disparities exist in cancer incidence, mortality and survival for Maori compared to non-Maori New Zealanders. In this viewpoint, we draw together cancer incidence, mortality and survival data from the previous decade, in order to provide clarity regarding the most important causes of cancer burden for Maori. Covering the decade 2007-2016, our manuscript directly leads on from the landmark Unequal Impact II report (which covered 1996-2006), and provides the most up-to-date record of this burden as is currently possible. While focusing on the absolute burden of cancer for Maori, we also compare this burden to that experienced by non-Maori, and consider how this relative disparity may (or may not) have changed over time. Finally, we discuss how to reduce the occurrence and the overall cancer mortality burden for Maori, with a focus on those cancers that confer the greatest burden.