Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 91
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 12, 2024 01 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178170

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The impact of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on short-term mortality in adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction remains uncertain. The objective of the study is to assess the effect of adjunct TPE in this setting through a comprehensive literature review. METHODS: The National Library of Medicine's Medline, Ovid (Embase), the Cochrane Library database and clinicaltrial.gov from January 01, 1966, until October 01, 2022, were searched for terms: therapeutic plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, sepsis, and septic shock. We reviewed, selected and extracted data from relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and matched cohort studies (MCSs) comparing short-term mortality in critically ill adult septic patients treated with standard therapy versus those receiving adjunct TPE. Risk of bias was assessed in the RCTs using Cochrane Collaboration tool and in MCSs using ROBINS-I tool. Summary statistics, risk ratios (RRs), and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects model. RESULTS: This systematic review included 937 adult critically ill septic patients from five RCTs (n = 367) and fifteen MCSs (n = 570). Of these total, 543 received treatment with TPE in addition to standard care. The meta-analysis includes all five RCTs and only six MCSs (n = 627). The adjunct TPE treatment (n = 300) showed a significant reduction in short-term mortality (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.74, I2 3%) compared to standard therapy alone (n = 327). The systematic review of all 20 trials revealed that adding TPE to the standard therapy of critically ill septic patients resulted in faster clinical and/or laboratory recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive and up-to-date review demonstrates that adjunct TPE may provide potential survival benefits when compared to standard care for critically ill adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. While results of this meta-analysis are encouraging, large well-designed randomized trials are required to identify the optimal patient population and TPE procedure characteristics prior to widespread adoption into practice.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Humanos , Troca Plasmática/métodos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/terapia , Sepse/terapia , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 62(4): 103762, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487940
3.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 62(4): 103751, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330367
4.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 62(2): 103665, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872121
8.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(4): 103174, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088601

RESUMO

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is associated with high titers of immunoglobulin G class antibodies directed against the cationic platelet chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4). These antibodies activate platelets via FcγIIa receptors. VITT closely resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Inflammation and tissue trauma substantially increase the risk for forming pathogenic PF4 antibodies. We therefore propose the use of therapeutic plasma exchange as rescue therapy in VITT to deplete antibodies plus factors promoting inflammation such as excess cytokines in the circulation as well as extracellular vesicles derived from activated platelets.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Troca Plasmática , Fator Plaquetário 4/imunologia , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/terapia , Terapia de Salvação , Albuminas , Especificidade de Anticorpos , Anticoagulantes , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/farmacologia , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Citratos , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Citocinas/sangue , Vesículas Extracelulares , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Inflamação , Troca Plasmática/efeitos adversos , Troca Plasmática/métodos , Ativação Plaquetária , Transfusão de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/etiologia , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/imunologia , Sistema de Registros , Trombocitopenia/etiologia , Trombose/etiologia
10.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(10): 2496-2502, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment options for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), there are still limited high quality data to inform clinicians regarding its appropriate treatment. METHODS: In June 2018, the ISTH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel to issue recommendations about treatment of TTP. The panel discussed 12 treatment questions related to immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) and hereditary or congenital TTP (cTTP). The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 11 recommendations based on evidence ranging from very low to moderate certainty. For first acute episode and relapses of iTTP, the panel made a strong recommendation for adding corticosteroids to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and a conditional recommendation for adding rituximab and caplacizumab. For asymptomatic iTTP with low plasma ADAMTS13 activity, the panel made a conditional recommendation for the use of rituximab outside of pregnancy, but prophylactic TPE during pregnancy. For asymptomatic cTTP, the panel made a strong recommendation for prophylactic plasma infusion during pregnancy, and a conditional recommendation for plasma infusion or a wait and watch approach outside of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The panel's recommendations are based on all the available evidence for the effects of an individual component of various treatment approaches, including suppressing inflammation, blocking platelet clumping, replacing the missing and/or inhibited ADAMTS13, and suppressing the formation of ADAMTS13 autoantibody. There was insufficient evidence for further comparing different treatment approaches (eg, TPE, corticosteroids, rituximab, and caplacizumab, etc.), for which high quality studies are needed.


Assuntos
Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica , Anticorpos de Domínio Único , Proteína ADAMTS13 , Autoanticorpos , Humanos , Troca Plasmática , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/diagnóstico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/terapia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico
11.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(10): 2503-2512, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914535

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment options for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), there are still limited high quality data to inform clinicians regarding its management. METHODS: In June 2018, the ISTH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel to issue recommendations about treatment of TTP. The panel discussed 12 treatment questions related to both immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) and hereditary/congenital TTP (cTTP). The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on eleven recommendations based on evidence ranging from very low to moderate certainty. For first episode and relapses of acute iTTP, the panel made a strong recommendation for the addition of corticosteroids to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), and a conditional recommendation for addition of rituximab and caplacizumab. For asymptomatic iTTP with low ADAMTS13, the panel made a conditional recommendation for rituximab outside of pregnancy, and for prophylactic TPE during pregnancy. For asymptomatic cTTP, the panel made a strong recommendation for prophylactic plasma infusion during pregnancy, but a conditional recommendation for plasma infusion or a wait and watch approach outside of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The panel's recommendations are based on all the available evidence for the treatment effects of various approaches including suppressing inflammation, blocking platelet clumping, replacing the missing and/or inhibited ADAMTS13, and suppressing ADAMTS13 antibody production. There was insufficient evidence for further comparison of different treatment approaches, for which future high-quality studies in iTTP (e.g., rituximab, corticosteroids, recombinant ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab) and in cTTP (eg, recombinant ADAMTS13) are needed.


Assuntos
Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica , Anticorpos de Domínio Único , Proteína ADAMTS13 , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Troca Plasmática , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/diagnóstico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/terapia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico
12.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(10): 2486-2495, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in our understandings of pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), the approaches for initial diagnosis and management of TTP vary significantly. OBJECTIVE: The evidence-based guidelines of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the initial diagnosis and management of acute TTP. METHODS: In June 2018, ISTH formed a multidisciplinary panel that included hematologists, an intensive care physician, nephrologist, clinical pathologist, biostatistician, and patient representatives, as well as a methodology team from McMaster University. The panel composition was designed to minimize the potential conflicts of interests. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome framework to develop and grade their recommendations. Public comments were sought and incorporated in the final document. RESULTS: The panel agreed on three recommendations covering the initial diagnosis with emphasis on the importance of ADAMTS13 testing (eg, activity, anti-ADAMTS13 IgG or inhibitor) and assessment of the pretest probability of TTP by clinical assessment and/or the risk assessment models like the PLASMIC or French score. The panel noted how availability and turnaround time of ADAMTS13 test results might affect early diagnosis and management, in particular the use of caplacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support strong recommendations for the initial diagnosis and management of a suspected TTP. The panel emphasized the importance of obtaining ADAMTS13 testing in a proper clinical context. Future research should focus on how to monitor and act on ADAMTS13 levels during remission.


Assuntos
Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica , Trombose , Proteína ADAMTS13 , Diagnóstico Precoce , Hemostasia , Humanos , Troca Plasmática , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/diagnóstico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/terapia
16.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 58(6): 102670, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31744769
19.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 58(3): 230-236, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053333
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA