Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cornea ; 43(9): 1165-1170, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573840

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report our first clinical experience using topical losartan for the treatment of severe corneal haze after epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (CXL). METHODS: A 20-year-old man presented with clinically significant corneal haze in the right eye 1 month following Ultraviolet-A/Riboflavin Epithelium-off Collagen CXL. Haze progressed to a deep stromal scar, and vision was 20/150 with no improvement on refraction, 60 days after CXL. After unsuccessful treatment with topical corticosteroids, the patient elected to start off-label treatment with topical losartan 0.8 mg/mL, administered 6 times per day. RESULTS: After 3 months of initiating topical losartan, the right eye vision improved to preoperative vision of 20/40-1. Corneal haze was significantly reduced as observed on slitlamp examination and on Scheimpflug corneal tomography (Pentacam; OCULUS, Inc. Arlington, WA). CONCLUSIONS: Topical losartan, a transforming growth factor-ß inhibitor, is a potential treatment in clinically significant corneal haze following epithelium-off corneal CXL. This clinical experience highlights the potential efficacy of topical losartan as a novel therapeutic option in such cases, but further clinical studies are needed.


Assuntos
Colágeno , Opacidade da Córnea , Reagentes de Ligações Cruzadas , Losartan , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes , Riboflavina , Raios Ultravioleta , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Losartan/administração & dosagem , Losartan/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Riboflavina/uso terapêutico , Colágeno/metabolismo , Adulto Jovem , Opacidade da Córnea/tratamento farmacológico , Opacidade da Córnea/etiologia , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/uso terapêutico , Ceratocone/tratamento farmacológico , Substância Própria/metabolismo , Substância Própria/efeitos dos fármacos , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/administração & dosagem , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Soluções Oftálmicas , Administração Tópica
2.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 13(1): 97-112, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37875699

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: With the continuous rise of social media usage, more patients are looking online for health-related information. TikTok is one of the fastest-growing video-based social media platforms, but the quality of its ophthalmologic content, at a comprehensive level, has not been previously analyzed. We aim to explore and characterize popular ophthalmology content on TikTok, including the presence of misinformation. METHODS: Between April 16 and May 22, 2023, 37 different ophthalmology-relevant hashtags were queried on TikTok, and the top 20 most-liked videos per hashtag were analyzed. The quality of educational videos was graded on understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). Trends in creator identity, content type, engagement metrics, misinformation presence, and TikTok verification status were also assessed. RESULTS: The 37 ophthalmology-related hashtags yielded 723 videos comprising 3.806 billion views. A minority of videos were created by ophthalmologists (16.9%) and eyecare providers (35.1%), while the majority were created by non-healthcare providers (55.0%). The most common types of videos identified were primarily related to personal experiences (35.8%) and education (38.0%). Amongst educational videos, mean PEMAT-A/V understandability and actionability scores were 88.1% and 50.6%, respectively. Misinformation was found in 5.4% of all videos, comprising 4.8% of all likes, 4.7% of all comments, and 11.7% of all bookmarks. Its presence was significantly correlated with content created by non-healthcare providers (p < 0.001) and received a disproportionately higher percentage of bookmarks. CONCLUSIONS: This was the largest, most comprehensive evaluation of ophthalmologic content on TikTok. A significant portion of popular ophthalmologic content on TikTok is created by non-eyecare providers and contains misinformation. Our findings confirm the need for ophthalmologists to create more engaging, actionable, and factual educational content to combat misinformation adoption.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA