Predictive value of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio for no-reflow in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Introduction: The focus of this research was to explore the link between CRP (C-reactive protein) /albumin ratio (CAR), a novel inflammatory response marker, and no-reflow (NR) phenomena in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) patients during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: The current study recruited 209 non-STEMI participants who underwent PCI. The patients were divided into two groups based on their post-intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade; those with and without NR. Results: In all, 30 non-STEMI patients (6.9%) had NR after PCI. CAR values were substantially greater in the NR group. The CAR was identified to be a determinant of the NR (OR: 1.250, 95% CI: 1.033-1.513, P=0.02), although CRP and albumin were not independently related with NR in the multivariate analysis. In our investigation, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and high thrombus burden were also predictors of the occurrence of NR. According to receiver operating characteristic curve evaluation, the optimal value of CAR was>1.4 with 60% sensitivity and 47% specificity in detecting NR in non-STEMI patients following PCI. Conclusion: To the best of knowledge, this is the first investigation to demonstrate that the CAR, a new and useful inflammatory marker, can be utilized as a predictor of NR in patients with non-STEMI prior to PCI.

Comparison of periprocedural and long term outcomes of proximal versus distal cerebral protection method during carotid artery stenting.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the periprocedural and one-year outcomes of two different cerebral protection systems used during carotid artery stenting (CAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 90 consecutive patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS with a proximal flow blockage protection system (mean age 69.7 ± 8) or distal protection with a filter (mean age 70.8 ± 7). RESULTS: CAS was performed successively on 89 patients (99 %). Adverse events were defined as major stroke, minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, and death. Two strokes, one TIA, one death, and one myocardial infarction were observed in-hospital. There were no significant differences in safety or benefits between the proximal flow blockage embolic protection system (n = 45) and the distal filter protection system (n = 45) in terms of clinically apparent cerebral embolism, TIA, death, or myocardial infarction during the periprocedural stage or during the one-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Although it has been shown that the proximal flow blockage cerebral protection system decreases the risk of silent cerebral embolism, it has no advantage over the distal filter protection system in terms of adverse cerebrovascular or cardiac events during the periprocedural stage or during the long-term follow-up period.

Assessment of the Relationship Between Serum Vascular Adhesion Protein-1 (VAP-1) and Severity of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1), a dual-function glycoprotein, is secreted by endothelial cells, adipocytes, and kidney and vascular smooth muscle cells. It has been reported to participate in the development of atherosclerosis as an adhesion molecule and a pro-inflammatory enzyme. Increased VAP-1 levels are related to type 2 diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, stroke and chronic renal failure. The study aim was to investigate serum VAP-1 levels in patients with calcific aortic stenosis (AS) and the possible relationship between VAP-1 and severity of calcific AS. METHODS: A total of 168 patients was categorized as having mild (n = 54), moderate (n = 58), or severe (n = 56) AS. Serum VAP-1 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The mean serum VAP-1 level was significantly higher in patients with AS compared to healthy controls (244.3 ± 50.1 ng/ml versus 149.8 ± 27.5 ng/ml, p <0.001), and in the severe AS group compared to the moderate and mild AS groups (288.3 ± 30.1 ng/ml, 243.1 ± 31.8 ng/ml, and 200.8 ± 43.2 ng/ml, respectively, p <0.001). The VAP-1 level was positively related to the maximum aortic gradient, mean aortic gradient, and maximum aortic jet velocity (r = 0.649, p <0.001; r = 0.660, p <0.001; r = 0.655, p <0.001, respectively) and negatively related to the aortic valve area (r = -0.683, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study was the first to demonstrate a significant relationship between increased serum VAP-1 levels and the severity of calcific AS. VAP-1 might be a useful biomarker for the evaluation of AS and the follow up of its severity.