Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: Rationale and Tools.

Cognitive impairment is common and often under diagnosed in the early stages. Patients and family caregivers benefit from early diagnosis of reversible causes and longer lead time for care planning in primary dementia diagnoses. Primary care physicians are the first and best providers for diagnosing common, serious, and progressive cognitive disorders.

Changing Hospital Care For Older Adults: The Case for Geriatric Hospitals in the United States.

Hospital care of frail older adults is far from optimal. Although some geriatric models of care have been shown to improve outcomes, the effect size is small and models are difficult to fully implement, sustain and replicate. The two root causes for these shortcomings are competing interests (high revenue generating diseases, procedures and surgeries) and current hospital cultures (for example a culture of safety that emphasizes bed alarms and immobility rather than frequent ambulation). Geriatric hospitals would be hospitals completely dedicated to the care of frail older patients, a group which is most vulnerable to the negative consequences of a hospitalization. They would differ from a typical adult hospital because they could implement evidence based principles of successful geriatric models of care on a hospital wide basis, which would make them sustainable and allow for scaling up of proven outcomes. Innovative structural designs, unachievable in a typical adult hospital, would enhance mobility while maintaining safety. Financial viability and stability would be a challenge but should be feasible, likely through affiliation with larger health care systems with other hospitals because of cost savings associated with geriatric models of care (decreased length of stay, increased likelihood of discharge home, without increasing costs).

Applying Geriatric Principles to Hazardous Drinking in Older Adults.

Older adults continue to drink as they age. Aging changes alcohol kinetics just as with any other drug. Older adults have increased sensitivity to acute alcohol intake that accounts for the increased risk of falls, traffic accidents, and other injury. The Annual Medicare Wellness Exam is an excellent opportunity to introduce screening for unsafe drinking along with accumulated risks and deficits of aging. Older adults have responded well to brief interventions for unhealthy drinking. In the presence of alcohol use disorder or serious comorbidity including psychiatric illness, referral to specialized multidisciplinary care can be lifesaving.

Adherence to Measuring What Matters: Description of an Inpatient Palliative Care Service of an Urban Teaching Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Benefits of palliative care have been extensively described; however, reports on adherence to national quality indicators are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study focuses on describing the characteristics of patients who were seen at an urban academic hospital and their care team's adherence to 5 out of 10 Measuring What Matters (MWM) quality indicators. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review Setting/Subjects: Patients seen by inpatient palliative care service from January 2014 to December 2015 in an urban academic hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Patient age, gender, ethnicity, disease category, discharge end point, life-sustaining preferences, surrogate decision-maker documentation, and initial palliative assessment were analyzed using descriptive, parametric, and nonparametric statistics. RESULTS: During two years, 1272 patients were seen by the inpatient palliative care service. Fifty-one percent of patients were male, with an average age of 68 years. The majority were Caucasian (57%) and African American (41%). Life-limiting illnesses included were cancer, complex chronic illnesses, and gastrointestinal illness. Adherence to comprehensive palliative care assessment was measured at 64%; initial visit assessment for physical symptoms was 38%; code status preference was 99%; care consistent with preference in vulnerable elders was 99%; and surrogate documentation was noted at 33%. Compared to hospital patients discharged without hospice, patients discharged with hospice care had consults with higher adherence to comprehensive assessment and surrogate documentation quality standards (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to MWM measures was variable. Subjects discharged with hospice services were more likely to receive comprehensive assessment within 5 days of admission and surrogate documentation compared to those subjects without hospice care.

Impact of an Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients.

Limited data are available to guide the timing of palliative care involvement in the treatment of cancer. We describe the referral patterns of inpatient palliative care consultations(IPCC) in advanced cancer patients in a tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of IPCC for cancer patients from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014. Descriptive statistics are reported. RESULTS: IPCCs were requested for 245 cancer inpatients, of which 130 were male (53.1%) and 115 (46.9%) were female; 128 (52.2%) were Caucasian, 114 (46.5%) were African American, and 3 (1.2%) were another race. Of the 245 patients, 79 (32.2%) were newly diagnosed during the current admission, and the remaining 146 (67.8%) had been diagnosed previously. Fifty-seven (23.3%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization. Of the 39 patients (15.9%) who died during their hospital stay, 34 (87.0%) had an ICU stay during the hospitalization or died in the ICU. The most common malignancies were lung (71; 29.0%), pancreatic-biliary (33; 13.4%), lymphoma and leukemia (22; 8.9%), hepatocellular (18; 7.3%), head and neck (16; 6.5%), and upper gastrointestinal tract(GI) (16; 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that 15.9% of terminally ill cancer patients with IPCC died in the hospital, the majority of whom died in the ICU. This was likely due to delays in the initiation of outpatient palliative care consultation, leading to an increased strain on tertiary referral centers. Our study highlights a racial disparity in the rate of IPCC in African Americans, compared to historical data.

The Evolution of an Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation Service in an Urban Teaching Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Research on inpatient palliative medicine reports quality-of-life outcomes and selected "hard" outcomes including pain scores, survival, and readmissions. OBJECTIVE: This case study reports the evolution of an inpatient palliative consultation (IPC) team to show how IPC induces culture change in a hospital that previously had no palliative care. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A Catholic university-affiliated, inner-city hospital. POPULATION: A total of 1700 consecutive adult inpatients from May 2009 to October 2013. MEASURES: Consultation records enumerated demographics, code status, powers of attorney, referring physician, reason for consultation, and discharge destination. Deidentified data were uploaded to a spreadsheet. Simple descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Requests originated from internal medicine (24%), geriatrics (21%), neurology (including stroke and neurosurgery, 14.3%), medical intensive care unit (MICU, 12.2%), and hematology-oncology (10.3%). The MICU consults increased 17.6% over time. The numbers of consults nearly doubled after trainees began rounding with the service. Hospice discharges increased by 9.2%. Palliative management of in-hospital expirations increased 2- to 3-fold. The most common consultation requests were for pain and nonpain symptoms, establishing goals of care for patients experiencing clinical decline and convening family meetings in cases of divided judgment. CONCLUSION: We describe the evolution of palliative care in a safety-net hospital. Medicine services which are largely resident run adopted early. Specialty services that are attending driven adopted later. We believe house staff and nurses were the initial change agents. The number of consultations increased when house staff and students began rotating on the service suggesting unmet demand due to the limited supply of providers.

Should you screen nursing home residents for cancer?

When considering screening for early cancer detection physicians should anticipate how they plan to follow up a screen detected cancer. Geriatric oncology research has developed validated functional assessments to estimate the balance of risk and benefit for treating cancers in the elderly. Robust elderly can benefit from treatment and therefore might benefit from screening. However the majority of elderly in long term residential care (LTC, or "the nursing home") would not benefit from cancer screening. The 1.4 million elderly people who reside in U.S. nursing homes represent the oldest and frailest segment of the aged population. On average, LTC residents have less than 5years estimated remaining life expectancy (RLE.) E.U. figures are similar. The majority have multiple functional deficits that would result in geriatric oncology screening scores in the frail range, at very high risk for severe toxicity from standard chemotherapy or extensive surgery. Therefore screening for asymptomatic cancer is not likely to benefit and has the potential to harm elderly nursing home residents.

Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for mortality in older men with a PCa diagnosis as compared to controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men aged ≥65years from an urban geriatrics clinic completed the VES-13 between 2003 and 2008. Each patient with a PCa diagnosis was matched by age to five controls, resulting in 59 patients with a PCa diagnosis and 318 controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association of a PCa diagnosis and vulnerability on the VES-13 with mortality. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The mean age for men with a PCa diagnosis and controls was 77.9years and 76.1years, respectively. Of those with a PCa diagnosis, 74.6% had no active disease or a rising PSA only. Regardless of PCa diagnosis, vulnerable individuals on the VES-13 were more likely to die during the study period (VES-13≥3: HR=4.46, p<0.01; VES13≥6: HR=3.77, p<0.01). Men with a PCa diagnosis were not more likely to die compared to age-matched controls (VES-13≥3: HR=1.14, p=0.59; VES13≥6: HR=1.06, p=0.83). Vulnerability for men with a PCa diagnosis was more predictive of mortality. Therefore, the assessment of vulnerability is important for establishing goals of care.

Treating older adults with cancer: geriatric perspectives.

The proportion of older adults (age 65 and older) in oncology practices continues to increase. Older adults present with unique issues that complicate management decisions and evidence from randomized clinical trials to inform management of these patients is lacking. Despite this, principles of geriatric medicine need to be incorporated into oncology practice to provide optimal individualized care to patients. There is increasing evidence from observational studies that geriatric assessment (GA) strategies can be applied in oncology, can help predict treatment outcomes, and can inform supportive care management for older adults. In this review, we discuss the principles of GA and their use in older adults with cancer. In addition, considerations on when to refer to a geriatrician and issues related to management of vulnerable older adults will be addressed.

Postradiation osteosarcoma in an older prostate cancer survivor: case study and literature review with emphasis on geriatric principles.

The aging population and the increasing number of cancer survivors will likely be associated with more second primary malignancies due to prior cancer treatment. Since the incidence of most cancers increases with age, these treatment-associated second malignancies will likely disproportionately impact older adults. Here, we present the case of a 78-year-old man with a history of localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy 11 years prior, who developed osteosarcoma of the ilium. Geriatric screening showed a fit older male with few comorbidities, functional independence and no other geriatric syndromes. Given the patient's preference for a limb-sparing operation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was undertaken. With the paucity of clinical trial data on osteosarcoma in older adults, the patient was given a regimen of carboplatin (substituted for cisplatin), doxorubicin and methotrexate. Unfortunately, he developed methotrexate-induced acute kidney injury. Chemotherapy was discontinued, and he proceeded to hemipelvectomy. His postoperative course was marked by numerous complications, including delirium, depression and recurrent hospitalizations. He ultimately developed a local recurrence and elected for hospice care. This case highlights the challenges of managing older adults with treatment-associated malignancies. Clinicians face a lack of clinical trial data from which to extrapolate limitations of therapeutic options because of prior therapy and a limited ability to precisely predict which elders will experience adverse outcomes. Better approaches are needed to help older patients make decisions which fulfill their goals of care and to improve the care of older adults with treatment-associated malignancies.

Cancer in long-term care.

This article describes the range of cancer patients in longterm care and provides a framework for clinical decision making. The benefits and burdens of providing standard therapy to a vulnerable population are discussed. To give more specific guidelines for advocates of treatment, skeptics, and others, the authors present best estimates of the current burden of cancer in the long-term care population and current screening guidelines that apply to the elderly under long-term care. Experience-based suggestions are offered for oncologists and clinicians involved in long-term care to help them respond to patient and family concerns about limitations of cancer care.

Cognitive effects of androgen deprivation therapy in an older cohort of men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the baseline prevalence of cognitive impairment in older men treated with ADT and to assess changes in cognitive performance over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (median age of 71 years, range 51-87) were administrated an extensive neuropsychological testing battery prior to ADT initiation, with 21 (65%) completing post-treatment evaluations 6 months later. At baseline, 45% scored >1.5 standard deviations below the mean on > or = 2 neuropsychological measures. Using standardized inferential statistics, no change in cognition was documented following treatment. The Reliable Change Index revealed that, on a case-by-case basis, 38% demonstrated a decline in measures of executive functioning and 48% showed improvement on measures of visuospatial abilities. Within exploratory analyses, patients who scored below expectation at baseline displayed no change in cognition, while patients with average or better scores at baseline displayed improvements in visuospatial planning and timed tests of phonemic fluency. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of lower than expected cognitive performance among a sample of patients just starting ADT for prostate cancer. Assessment of baseline cognitive function should be taken into account for future research and to inform clinical management.

WITHDRAWN: Cognitive effects of androgen deprivation therapy in an older cohort of men with prostrate cancer.

This article has been withdrawn from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. With the permission of the authors, it has been published in Volume1, issue 1 of the Journal of Geriatric Oncology (www.geriatriconcology.net). The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

Association of a cancer diagnosis with vulnerability and frailty in older Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the independent effect of a cancer diagnosis on vulnerability and frailty, which have been associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults. METHODS: We used data in the 2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from a nationally representative sample of 12,480 community-dwelling elders. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate whether cancer was independently associated with vulnerability and frailty. Measures of vulnerability and frailty included disability, geriatric syndromes, self-rated health, and scores on two assessment tools for elderly cancer patients-the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) and the Balducci frailty criteria. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Diagnosis of a non-skin cancer was reported by 18.8% of the respondents. Compared with respondents without a cancer history, respondents with a personal history of cancer had a statistically significantly higher prevalence of limitations in activities of daily living (31.9% vs 26.9%), limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (49.5% vs 42.3%), geriatric syndromes (60.8% vs 53.9%), low self-rated health (27.4% vs 20.9%), score of 3 or higher on the VES-13 (45.8% vs 39.5%), and satisfying criteria for frailty as defined by Balducci (79.6% vs 73.4%) (P < .001 for all characteristics). After adjustment for confounders, a cancer diagnosis was found to be associated with low self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 1.64; relative risk [RR] = 1.33), limitations in activities of daily living (adjusted OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33; RR = 1.13), limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.38; RR = 1.13), a geriatric syndrome (adjusted OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.41; RR = 1.11), VES-13 score of 3 or higher (adjusted OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.41; RR = 1.14), and frailty (adjusted OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.65; RR = 1.09) as defined by Balducci criteria. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of a non-skin cancer was associated with increased levels of having disability, having geriatric syndromes, and meeting criteria for vulnerability and frailty.

Assessing decisional capacity in the elderly.

Elderly cancer patients may differ from younger patients in their preferences for treatment, in decisional style, and in the kinds of information. In addition, both the prevalence of cognitive disorders and risk for delirium in severe illness increase among the elderly. This discussion presents research findings on decisional style in the elderly and on determination of decisional capacity. The legal standard of capacity requires demonstrating understanding, appreciation, reasoning and stating a choice. We present formal screening tools and informal interview techniques for assessment, as well as guidelines for when formal assessment may be helpful.

Falls and physical performance deficits in older patients with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Men experience a decrease in lean muscle mass and strength during the first year of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The prevalence of falls and physical and functional impairment in this population have not been well described. METHODS: A total of 50 men aged 70 years and older (median 78) receiving ADT for systemic prostate cancer (80% biochemical recurrence) underwent functional and physical assessments. The functional assessments included Katz's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Lawton's Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Patients completed the Vulnerable Elder's Survey-13, a short screening tool of self-perceived functional and physical performance ability. Physical performance was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery. The history of falls was recorded. Of the 50 patients, 40 underwent follow-up assessment with the same instruments 3 months after the initial assessment. RESULTS: Of the 50 men, 24% had impairment in the ADLs, 42% had impairment in the IADLs, 56% had abnormal Short Physical Performance Battery findings, and 22% reported falls within the previous 3 months. Within the Short Physical Performance Battery, deficits occurred within all subcomponents (balance, walking, and chair stands). On univariate analysis, age, deficits in ADLs and IADLs, and abnormal cognitive and functional screen findings were associated with an increased risk of abnormal physical performance. ADL deficits, the use of an assistive device, and abnormal functional screen findings were associated with an increased risk of falling. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that older men with prostate cancer receiving long-term ADT exhibit significant functional and physical impairment and are at risk of falls that is greater than that for similar-aged cohorts. Careful assessment of the functional and physical deficits in older patients receiving ADT is warranted.

Cancer patients admitted to nursing homes: what do we know?

Tens of thousands of cancer patients, representing 10% to 15% of nursing home residents, are admitted to nursing facilities every year. Patients with a cancer diagnosis have a greater than 50% probability of death during the first year. Due to this statistic, or expectation, most studies that identify cancer patients in nursing homes have focused on end-of-life care, the evaluation of the quality of pain management, and predictors of nursing home death. Studies of cancer databases have examined place of death as one component of the cost of cancer care and quality of end-of-life care. This literature provides little descriptive or evaluative data about the over 40% of cancer patients admitted to nursing facilities who do not die there. Clinical experience is that this is a prognostically diverse group. This review will summarize what is known about cancer patients in nursing homes and anticipate important clinical issues in addition to end-of-life care for physicians, medical directors and nurses in long-term care. These include estimating cancer survival, anticipating chemotherapy-related drug toxicity and managing transitions of care.