Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Primary Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Study of Weight Loss Trajectories and Perioperative Outcomes.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns led to substantial changes in health-related behaviors and deferred elective surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on weight loss trajectories (WLT) and perioperative outcomes in primary bariatric surgery at a single tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery immediately prior to the enforced lockdown (During-Lockdown Group, DLG) were compared with historical controls who underwent surgery before the lockdown (Before-Lockdown Group, BLG). WLT were estimated using a random intercept mixed-effects model with repeated measures. Cross-sectional group differences at 3- and 6-months post-surgery were examined. Perioperative outcomes were also analyzed. Results: A total of 273 patients were included (133 BLG, 140 DLG). The adjusted average weight decreased in both groups over time at different levels. The expected difference in weight between BLG and DLG at 3-months was 1.06 kg (P = .013) and at 6-months was .04 kg (P = .920), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, emergency department visits, re-admission rates, re-operation rates, or mortality. Conclusions: This study suggests that bariatric procedures performed before the COVID-19 lockdown were effective and safe. Despite a statistically significant difference in weight between groups at 3- and 6-months post-surgery, the difference was small and unlikely to be clinically significant. Short-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Further investigation is warranted to assess the impact of lifestyle changes during the lockdown on long-term bariatric surgery outcomes.

Emerging Endoscopic Interventions in Bariatric Surgery.

Various endoscopic tools and techniques have been developed to treat obesity and its associated weight-related medical conditions. However, many of these endoscopic treatments may be little known or utilized. This article examines the many endoscopic options that have been developed to treat obesity including gastric aspiration devices, incisionless magnetic anastomotic systems, endoluminal bypass barrier sleeves, primary obesity surgery endoluminal, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. We review their development, application, efficacy, and the reported literature on their use and results.

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Flow-Mediated Vasodilation as a Measure of Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives. Flow mediated vasodilation (FMD) is a marker of endothelial function and its decline is related to increased cardiovascular risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of bariatric surgery on FMD. Materials and methods. A systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was performed to 1 May 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) V2 software. All types of bariatric surgery were considered, with the inclusion that FMD had to have been tested before and after the surgical procedure. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model and the generic inverse variance approach. The leave-one-out approach was used for sensitivity analysis. To assess metabolic parameter confounders, a weighted random-effects meta-regression was used. Results. A meta-analysis and a systematic review of 23 studies (n = 891 individuals) demonstrated improvement in FMD following bariatric surgery (weighted mean difference (WMD): 5.867, 95% CI: 4.481, 7.252, p < 0.001; I2: 96.70). Iteratively removing each item in the meta-analysis did not result in a significant alteration in the pooled estimate of effect size. There was an improvement in FMD for up to 6 months following bariatric surgery in a meta-analysis from 7 trials that included 356 subjects (WMD: 5.248, 95% CI: 2.361, 8.135, p < 0.001; I2: 98.18). The meta-analysis from 9 trials (n = 414 subjects) showed an improvement in FMD 6 to 12 months after bariatric surgery (WMD: 5.451, 95% CI: 3.316, 7.587, p < 0.001; I2: 94.18). The meta-analysis from 10 trials (n = 414 subjects) demonstrated an improvement in FMD 12 months after bariatric surgery (WMD: 2.401, 95% CI: 0.944, 3.859, p = 0.001; I2: 88.35). Random-effects meta-regression did not show any association between the alteration in FMD and percent body mass index (BMI) change (slope: 0.0258; 95% CI: −0.323, 0.375; p = 0.884), or changes in blood pressure; however, there was an association between the changes in FMD and the duration of follow-up (slope: −0.106; 95% CI: −0.205, −0.008; p = 0.033) with greater changes in FMD after 12 months. Conclusions. Bariatric surgery significantly improved FMD that increased with time, and the resultant improvement in endothelial function was independent of weight loss or a reduction in blood pressure.

Emerging Endoscopic Interventions in Bariatric Surgery.

Although obesity rates are growing across the world, endoscopic modalities to treat obesity and its metabolic consequences are advancing rapidly. Multiple devices and techniques dedicated to weight management are being developed and have either been approved for use or are undergoing clinical trial. This article reviews many of these endoscopic interventions in bariatric surgery, including gastric aspiration devices, incisionless magnetic anastomotic systems, endoluminal bypass barrier sleeves, primary surgery obesity endoluminal, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. These effective techniques may serve either as a primary therapy or as a bridge to bariatric surgery.

Peroral Pyloromyotomy.

Peroral pyloromyotomy, an innovative intramural endoscopic surgery procedure, is a successful management option for appropriately selected patients who suffer from medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroparesis is a debilitating disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, which significantly decreases quality of life and overall survival. This article describes the history and background, the indications for, the diagnosis of, and the preparation, technique, and short-term outcomes of peroral pyloromyotomy.

Minimally invasive Roux-en-Y reconstruction as a salvage operation after failed nissen fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Conversion of Nissen fundoplication to Roux-en-Y (RnY) anatomy may be indicated in patients with post-surgical complications or who fail to achieve durable control of their disease. Herein we describe the largest series of patients at a single institution who underwent minimally invasive conversion of Nissen fundoplication to RnY reconstruction. METHODS: All patients with prior Nissen fundoplication which were converted to RnY anatomy at our institution from March 2009 through November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were identified based on CPT codes and the description of the operation performed. All cases with attempted minimally invasive approach were included for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent conversion from prior Nissen fundoplication to RnY anatomy during the study period. The cohort was 84.0% female with a mean age of 53.5 years and a median body mass index of 36.7 kg/m2. Thirteen patients (26.0%) had multiple prior foregut operations. Complications from fundoplication that warranted revision included recurrent hiatal hernia (n = 16), post-surgical gastroparesis (n = 10), and mechanical complications from the wrap (n = 8). An additional fourteen patients underwent conversion to RnY for metabolic disease. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 266 min and 132 mL, respectively, with all but one (98.0%) completed with a minimally invasive approach. The median length of stay was 5 days. Complications included marginal ulcer (n = 2), superficial surgical site infection (n = 2), anastomotic leak (n = 2), and one case each of pulmonary embolism, small bowel obstruction, and gastrointestinal bleeding. There were no mortalities at a median follow-up of 12.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of prior Nissen fundoplication to RnY anatomy is technically challenging, although it is safe and feasible even in the setting of multiple prior foregut operations. A minimally invasive approach should be offered to patients by surgeons with experience in revisional foregut and bariatric surgery.

Gastrectomy versus stomach left in situ with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach marked by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Patients with severe, refractory symptoms may ultimately be managed with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; however, it is unclear whether the stomach should be left in situ, similar to a conventional gastric bypass, or resected as in gastrectomy. METHODS: All patients undergoing Roux-en-Y for the treatment of gastroparesis (GP) at our institution from September 2010 through March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior gastric resection or whose primary operative indication was not gastroparesis were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent Roux-en-Y with stomach left in situ (RY-SIS) and twenty-seven patients underwent gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction during the study period. The mean age was 49.7 years in the RY-SIS cohort and 48.5 years in the gastrectomy cohort. Etiology of GP was similar between the two cohorts. Patients undergoing gastrectomy were more likely to have previous interventions for GP (63.0% vs. 26.9%). RY-SIS was associated with a shorter operative time (155 vs. 223 min), less blood loss (24 vs. 130 mL), and shorter length of stay (4.0 vs. 7.2 days). Twelve patients (44.4%) had complications within 30 days following gastrectomy compared to two patients (7.7%) following RY-SIS (p = 0.001). Patients in the RY-SIS cohort were more likely to require further subsequent surgical intervention for GP (23.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.04). At last follow-up, there were no differences in reported GP symptoms or symptom scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrectomy was associated with greater perioperative morbidity compared to leaving the stomach in situ. Symptomatic improvement at intermediate follow-up was equivalent following either procedure. However, patients undergoing RY-SIS were more likely to require subsequent surgical intervention, suggesting that gastrectomy may be a more definitive operation for the management of medically refractory gastroparesis.

Enhanced recovery outcomes following per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP): a comparison of safety and cost with same-day discharge versus inpatient recovery.

BACKGROUND: While per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) has shown promise as a novel endoscopic procedure to treat medically refractory gastroparesis, standardized care pathways are not well-defined. We aimed to compare the safety and cost of same-day discharge (SDD) after POP with inpatient stay overnight or longer. METHODS: All patients with SDD after POP between January 2016 and May 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Propensity scores considering gender, age, gastroparesis etiology, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class were used to match a comparison group which stayed overnight or longer. Statistical tests included two-sample t tests for continuous variables, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and paired sample t tests for within-group comparisons with repeated measures. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients who underwent POP with SDD during the study period were propensity-matched with 54 patients with inpatient recovery. The SDD cohort was 85.2% female with a mean age of 44.8 years and median ASA class 3. The etiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic in 53.7% (n = 29), diabetic in 29.6% (n = 16), and post-surgical in 11.1% (n = 6). Operative time was shorter in the SDD cohort (25.4 vs. 31.3 min, p = 0.02). The mean post-procedure recovery time was 4 h in patients with SDD and 29.3 h in the inpatient cohort (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards less readmissions with SDD (7.4% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.08). There was no increased risk of complications with SDD (1.9% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.57). Compared to inpatient recovery, the average total cost for the procedure, recovery, and all subsequent care within 30 days was 26.0% less with SDD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following POP, patients can be safely discharged the same day with low risk of both complications and readmission. Total costs in the complete perioperative period are significantly less with SDD compared to inpatient recovery.

Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Post-surgical gastroparesis (psGP) is putatively related to vagal denervation from either therapeutic transection or inadvertent injury. Here, we present a series of patients undergoing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) as a treatment for medically refractory psGP. METHODS: Patients identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing POP procedures at our institution from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. Surgical history, symptom scores, and gastric emptying studies before and 3 months after POP were additionally recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 177 POP procedures were performed, of which 38 (21.5%) were for psGP. The study cohort was 84.2% female with a mean body mass index of 27.6 kg/m2 and mean age of 55.2 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (34.2%), depression (31.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (28.9%). Hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repair (39.5%) or fundoplication (36.8%) preceded psGP diagnosis most often. The mean operative time was 30 ± 20 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean postoperative length of stay was 1.2 days. There were two readmissions within 30 days, one for melena and one for dehydration. The mean improvement in total Gastroparesis Symptom Index Score was 1.29 (p = 0.0002). The mean 4-h gastric retention improved from a pre-POP mean of 46.4 to 17.9% post-POP. Normal gastric emptying was noted in 50% of subjects with available follow-up imaging. CONCLUSION: POP is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for patients with psGP. POP should be considered a reasonable first-line option for patients with medically refractory psGP and may allow stomach preservation.

Laparoscopic pyloroplasty versus endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy for the treatment of gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying absent an obstructive etiology. Surgical or endoscopic disruption of the pylorus has been utilized to treat this disease, but there is little evidence comparing laparoscopic pyloroplasty (LP) with endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP). Herein we describe our experience at our institution using a propensity-matched cohort study to compare outcomes between these procedures. METHODS: All patients who underwent LP for the treatment of gastroparesis from October 2014 through September 2017 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity scoring was used to match these patients 1:1 to patients undergoing POP during this time period based on gender, age, and etiology of gastroparesis. Symptom scores using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES), and perioperative outcomes were compared between matched cohorts. Thirty patients underwent LP for gastroparesis during the study period which were matched 1:1 with patients undergoing POP. The etiology of gastroparesis was 63.3% idiopathic (n = 19), 20.0% post-surgical (n = 6), and 16.7% diabetic (n = 5) in both cohorts. RESULTS: Patients who underwent LP had a longer average length of stay (4.6 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.003), operative time (99.3 vs. 33.9 min, p < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (12.9 vs. 0.4 mL, p < 0.001). There were more complications in the LP cohort (16.7 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.086), which included surgical site infection (6.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.153), pneumonia (6.7 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.153), and unplanned ICU admission (10.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.078). LP and POP both resulted in similar, significant improvements in both in GCSI scores and objective gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) is safe and effective for the treatment of medical refractory gastroparesis. POP has less perioperative morbidity compared to LP with comparative functional outcomes.

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: A subset of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) require eventual conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to complications from SG or to enhance weight loss. The aim of this study is to characterize the indications for conversion and perioperative outcomes in a large cohort of these patients at a single institution. METHODS: Patients who underwent revisional surgery to convert SG to RYGB at our institution from January 2008 through January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with previous SG underwent conversion to RYGB as part of a planned two-stage approach to gastric bypass (n = 36), for weight recidivism (n = 11), or for complications related to SG (n = 42). Complications from SG that warranted conversion included refractory GERD (40.5%), sleeve stenosis (31.0%), gastrocutaneous (16.7%), or gastropleural (7.1%) fistula, and gastric torsion (4.1%). The mean (SD) age was 47.2 years (11.4 years) and median BMI at the time of revision was 43.2 kg/m2. A laparoscopic approach was successfully completed in 76 patients (85.4%), with an additional of four completed robotically (4.5%). The median length of stay was 3 days. Twenty-eight patients (31.5%) had complications which included surgical site infection (20.2%), re-operation (6.7%), anastomotic stricture (3.4%), and one pulmonary embolism. There were no mortalities with a median follow-up of 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of SG to RYGB is safe and technically feasible when performed for complications of SG or to enhance weight loss. This operation can be successfully performed laparoscopically with a low rate of conversion and reasonable complication profile.

Completion Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy for Management of Complications of Benign Foregut Surgery.

BACKGROUND: With the worldwide epidemic of obesity, an increasing number of bariatric operations and antireflux fundoplications are being performed. Despite low morbidity of the primary foregut surgery, completion gastrectomy may be necessary as a definitive procedure for complications of prior foregut surgery; however, the literature evaluating outcomes after completion gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy (EJ) for benign diseases is limited. We present our experience of completion gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y EJ in the setting of benign disease at a single tertiary center. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: All patients who underwent total, proximal, or completion gastrectomy with EJ for complications of benign foregut surgery from January 2006 to December 2015 were retrospectively identified. All cancer operations were excluded. RESULTS: There were 23 patients who underwent gastrectomy with EJ (13 laparoscopic EJ [LEJ] and 10 open EJ). The index operations included 12 antireflux, 9 bariatric, and 2 peptic ulcer disease surgeries. Seventy-eight percent of patients had surgical or endoscopic interventions before EJ, with a median of one prior intervention and a median interval from the index operation to EJ of 25 months (interquartile range 9-87). The 30-day perioperative complication rate was 30% with 17% classified being major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) and no 30-day perioperative mortality. Comparing laparoscopic and open approaches showed similar operative times, estimated blood loss, and overall complication rate. LEJ was associated with a shorter length of stay (LOS) (P < .001), fewer postoperative ICU days (P = .002), fewer 6-month complication rates (P < .007), and decreased readmission rate (P = .024). CONCLUSION: Our series demonstrates that EJ is a reasonable option for reoperative foregut surgery. The laparoscopic approach appears to be associated with decreased LOS and readmissions.

Comparative Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Impaired Mobility and Ambulatory Population.

PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize complications, metabolic improvement, and change in ambulation status for patients with impaired mobility undergoing bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Individuals undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from February 2008 to December 2015 were included. Impaired mobility (WC) was defined as using a wheelchair or motorized scooter for at least part of a typical day. The WC group was propensity score matched to ambulatory patients (1:5 ratio). Comparisons were made for 30-day morbidity and mortality and 1-year improvement in weight-related comorbidities. RESULTS: There were 93 patients in the WC group matched to 465 ambulatory controls. The median operative time (180 vs 159 min, p = 0.003) and postoperative length of stay (4 vs 3 days, p ≤ 0.001) was higher in the WC group. There were no differences in readmission or all-cause morbidity within 30 days. The median percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year was similar (WC group, 65% available, 53% EWL vs AMB group, 73% available, 54% EWL); however, patients with impaired mobility were less likely to experience improvement in diabetes (76 vs 90%, p = 0.046), hypertension (63 vs 82%, p < 0.005), and obstructive sleep apnea (53 vs 71%, p < 0.001). Within the WC group, 62% had improvement in their mobility status, eliminating dependence on wheelchair or scooter assistance. CONCLUSION: Patients with both obesity and impaired mobility experience similar rates of perioperative morbidity and weight loss at 1 year compared to ambulatory controls. However, improvement in weight-related comorbidities may be less likely with impaired mobility.

Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Enteral access through the jejunum is indicated when patients cannot tolerate oral intake or gastric feeding. While multiple approaches for feeding jejunal access exist, few studies have compared the efficacy of these techniques. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term durability, re-intervention rates, and nutritional outcomes following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes with jejunal extension tubes (PEG-JET) versus laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes (j-tubes). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent PEG-JET or laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement from January 2005 through December 2015 at our institution. Thirty-day and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent PEG-JET and 307 patients underwent laparoscopic j-tube placement during the defined study period. In terms of 30-day outcomes, patients who underwent PEG-JET placement were significantly more likely to experience a tube dislodgement event (p = 0.005) and undergo a re-intervention (p < 0.001). Patients who had a laparoscopic j-tube placed were significantly more likely to meet their enteral feeding goals (p = 0.002) and less likely to require nutritional supplementation with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (p < 0.001). With regard to long-term outcomes, patients who underwent PEG-JET placement were significantly more likely to experience tube occlusion (p < 0.001) and require an endoscopic or surgical tube re-intervention (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent laparoscopic j-tube placement were significantly more likely to experience a tube site leak (p = 0.015) but were less likely to require nutritional supplementation with TPN (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes provide more durable long-term enteral access compared to PEG-JET. Consideration should be given to laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement in eligible patients who cannot tolerate oral intake or gastric enteral feeding.

An Odyssey of complications from band, to sleeve, to bypass; definitive laparoscopic completion gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy and esophagojejunostomy for persistent leak.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leaks are uncommon yet potentially devastating complications after bariatric surgery. While the initial management includes resuscitation and sepsis control, the definitive management often requires endoscopic or surgical interventions. Surgical revision of the initial surgery may be necessary for chronic non-healing fistula. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patient is a 45-year-old female with history of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding who underwent band removal and conversion to a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) due to her failed weight loss, which resulted in a leak at gastroesophageal junction. She underwent multiple attempted endoluminal treatments without success and then SG was converted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, this failed and the persistent leak led to a gastro-pleural fistula requiring left chest decortication. After addressing nutritional deficiencies, she underwent laparoscopic completion gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy reconstruction. RESULTS: Five ports and a liver retractor were placed. Dissection was carried down posteriorly to free up the Roux limb and then to the right crus. There was an abscess cavity around the left crus. The esophagus was circumferentially mobilized and the abscess cavity was debrided. The proximal Roux limb was disconnected with a linear stapler. Upper endoscopy was used to identify the leak. The healthy tissue was confirmed above the leak and the distal esophagus was transected. Esophageal stump was mobilized up into the middle mediastinum. Esophagojejunostomy was completed with 25 mm circular stapler. A linear stapler was used to close the candy cane. The procedure took 2 h and 40 min. Estimated blood loss was 100 ml. Her postoperative course was uncomplicated. CONCLUSION: We present a video of the complex surgical revision of a leak after through the gamut of bariatric surgery: band to sleeve, failed endoluminal therapy and conversion of SG to RYGB. Durable success was achieved by a completion gastrectomy, distal esophagectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy.

Magnetic surgery: first U.S. experience with a novel device.

INTRODUCTION: Magnet-assisted surgery is a new platform within minimally invasive surgery. The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System, the first magnetic surgical system to receive Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, includes a deployable, magnetic grasper and an external magnet that is used to manipulate the grasper within the peritoneal cavity. This system is currently approved for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a body mass index (BMI) between 21 and 34 kg/m2. Herein, we detail the first United States experience with the Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System was used on consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution from June 2016 through November 2016. Only patients undergoing elective surgery and those with a body mass index (BMI) between 21 and 34 kg/m2 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, operative time, and perioperative details were collected. RESULTS: A total of ten patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System during the defined study period. The mean age at the time of surgery was 49.0 years and the average BMI of the cohort was 27.6 kg/m2. The average operative time was 64.4 min. There were no perioperative complications. Seven (70.0%) patients were discharged to home on the day of surgery, while the remaining three (30.0%) patients were discharged to home on postoperative day number one. Surgeons reported that the magnetic grasper was easy to use and provided adequate tissue retraction and exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System is safe and feasible to use in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine use of this system may facilitate a reduction in the total number of laparoscopic trocars used, leading to less tissue trauma and improved cosmesis. Additional studies are needed to determine the applicability and utility of this system for other general surgery cases.