Empagliflozin improves quality of life in nondiabetic HFrEF patients. Sub-analysis of the EMPATROPISM trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Initially considered as just anti-diabetic agents, SGLT2-i show remarkable cardiac and renal benefits independently of its hypoglycemic activity. METHODS: We used the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), which has recently been qualified as a Clinical Outcome Assessment, in the EMPATROPISM trial. RESULTS: A significant mean improvement of 22 points with KCCQ was seen with Empagliflozin versus only 2 points in the Placebo. The proportion of patients experiencing clinically important changes in the Empagliflozin group was higher. Patients with the lowest starting KCCQ score saw significantly greater improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin benefits quality of life in the non-diabetic, ethnic minority represented, EMPATROPISM trial population.

Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors: a New Opportunity in Renal and Myocardial Protection.

Hypoxia, via the activity of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), plays a crucial role in fibrosis, inflammation, and oxidative injury, processes which are associated with progression of cardiovascular and kidney diseases. HIFs are key transcription heterodimers consisting of regulatory α-subunits (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, HIF-3α) and a constitutive ß-subunit (HIF-ß). The stability of HIFs is regulated by the prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs). Specific PHD inhibitors (PHD-i) are being investigated as a therapeutic approach to modulate the cellular signaling pathways and harness the native protective adaptive responses to hypoxia. Selective inhibition of PHD leads to the stabilization of the HIFs, which is the transcriptional gatekeeper of a multitude of genes involved in angiogenesis, energy metabolism, apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. PHD-i downregulate hepcidin, improve iron absorption, and increase the endogenous production of erythropoietin. Furthermore, this pharmacological group has also been proven to ameliorate ischemic injuries in several organs, opening a new and promising field in cardiovascular research.. In this review, we present the basic and clinical potential of PHD-i treatment in different scenarios, such as ischemic heart disease, cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure, and their interplay with other pharmacological agents with proven cardiovascular benefits, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

Not only how much, but also how to, when measuring epicardial adipose tissue.

Epicardial Adipose Tissue (EAT) is drawing increasing attention. As a quantifiable, modifiable, and potentially new cardiovascular therapeutic target, its accurate measurement is particularly relevant. In Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) different methods can be used to assess EAT burden. We take advantage of CMR-studies of EMPATROPISM trial to assess EAT through three different methods, evaluate the effect of Empagliflozin and look for significant difference in the ability to detect changes in serial measurements. In some settings such as treatment-induced changes or patient follow-up, multi-slice method of EAT evaluation provides higher accuracy to detect significant differences, otherwise unnoticed by single-slice approaches.

Mechanistic Insights of Empagliflozin in Nondiabetic Patients With HFrEF: From the EMPA-TROPISM Study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin, in addition to optimal medical treatment, on epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and aortic stiffness in nondiabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have established the benefits of the inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 receptor (SGLT2-i) in HFrEF, independent of their hypoglycemic effects. The mechanisms of the benefits of SGLT2-i in HFrEF have not been well defined. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of patients enrolled in the EMPA-TROPISM [ATRU-4] (Are the cardiac benefits of Empagliflozin independent of its hypoglycemic activity?) clinical trial. It was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of empagliflozin in nondiabetic patients with HFrEF. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline and after 6 months. Interstitial myocardial fibrosis was calculated by using T1 mapping (extracellular volume). Aortic stiffness was calculated by using pulsed wave velocity, and EAT was measured from the cine sequences. RESULTS: Empagliflozin is associated with significant reductions in EAT volume (-5.14 mL; 95% CI: -8.36 to -1.92) compared with placebo (-0.75 mL; 95% CI: -3.57 to 2.06; P < 0.05); this finding was paralleled by reductions in subcutaneous adipose tissue area (-5.33 cm2 [95% CI: -12.61 to 1.95] vs 9.13 cm2 [95% CI: -2.72 to 20.99]; P < 0.05). Empagliflozin-treated patients reported a reduction in extracellular volume (-1.25% [±0.56 95% CI] vs 0.24% [±0.57 95% CI]; (P < 0.01)]; specifically, empagliflozin reduced both matrix volume (-7.24 mL [95% CI: -11.59 to -2.91] vs 0.70 mL [95% CI: -0.89 to 2.29]; P < 0.001) and cardiomyocyte volume (-11.08 mL [95% CI: -19.62 to -2.55] vs 0.80 mL [95% CI: -1.96 to 3.55]; P < 0.05). Pulsed wave velocity was also significantly reduced in the empagliflozin group (-0.58 cm/s [95% CI: -0.92 to -0.25] vs 0.60 cm/s [95% CI: 0.14 to 1.06]; P < 0.01). Using proteomics, empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction in inflammatory biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin significantly improved adiposity, interstitial myocardial fibrosis, aortic stiffness, and inflammatory markers in nondiabetic patients with HFrEF. These results shed new light on the mechanisms of action of the benefits of SGLT2-i. (Are the "Cardiac Benefits" of Empagliflozin Independent of Its Hypoglycemic Activity [ATRU-4] [EMPA-TROPISM]; NCT03485222).

Randomized Trial of Empagliflozin in Nondiabetic Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Large clinical trials established the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes and with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The early and significant improvement in clinical outcomes is likely explained by effects beyond a reduction in hyperglycemia. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) function and volumes, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in nondiabetic HFrEF patients. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, nondiabetic HFrEF patients (n = 84) were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in LV end-diastolic and -systolic volume assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Secondary endpoints included changes in LV mass, LV ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption in the cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6-min walk test, and quality of life. RESULTS: Empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction of LV end-diastolic volume (-25.1 ± 26.0 ml vs. -1.5 ± 25.4 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume (-26.6 ± 20.5 ml vs. -0.5 ± 21.9 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo; p < 0.001). Empagliflozin was associated with reductions in LV mass (-17.8 ± 31.9 g vs. 4.1 ± 13.4 g, for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p < 0.001) and LV sphericity, and improvements in LV ejection fraction (6.0 ± 4.2 vs. -0.1 ± 3.9; p < 0.001). Patients who received empagliflozin had significant improvements in peak O2 consumption (1.1 ± 2.6 ml/min/kg vs. -0.5 ± 1.9 ml/min/kg for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.017), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (111 ± 267 vs. -145 ± 318; p < 0.001), as well as in 6-min walk test (81 ± 64 m vs. -35 ± 68 m; p < 0.001) and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12: 21 ± 18 vs. 2 ± 15; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin administration to nondiabetic HFrEF patients significantly improves LV volumes, LV mass, LV systolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life when compared with placebo. Our observations strongly support a role for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of HFrEF patients independently of their glycemic status. (Are the "Cardiac Benefits" of Empagliflozin Independent of Its Hypoglycemic Activity? [ATRU-4] [EMPA-TROPISM]; NCT03485222).