Failure after operative repair is higher for ballistic femoral neck fractures than for closed, blunt-injury fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes after operative repair of ballistic femoral neck fractures. To better highlight the devastating nature of these injuries, we compared a cohort of ballistic femoral neck fractures to a cohort of young, closed, blunt-injury femoral neck fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods: Retrospective chart review identified all patients presenting with ballistic femoral neck fractures treated at three academic trauma centers between January 2016 and December 2021, as well as patients aged ≤50 with closed, blunt-injury femoral neck fractures who received ORIF. The primary outcome was failure of ORIF, which includes the diagnosis of non-union, avascular necrosis, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and conversion to Girdlestone procedure. Additional outcomes included deep infection, postoperative osteoarthritis, and ambulatory status at last follow-up. Results: Fourteen ballistic femoral neck fractures and 29 closed blunt injury fractures were identified. Of the ballistic fractures, 7 (50%) patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up or met the failure criteria. Of the closed fractures, 16 (55%) patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up or met the failure criteria. Median follow-up was 21 months. 58% of patients with ballistic fractures were active tobacco users. Five of 7 (71%) ballistic fractures failed, all of which involved non-union, whereas 8 of 16 (50%) closed fractures failed (p=0.340). No outcomes were significantly different between cohorts. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that ballistic femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of non-union. Large-scale multicenter studies are necessary to better determine optimal treatment techniques for these fractures. Level of evidence: Level III. Retrospective cohort study.

Life Expectancy After Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease: An International Trend Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The decision to treat metastatic bone disease (MBD) surgically depends in part on patient life expectancy. We are unaware of an international analysis of how life expectancy among these patients has changed over time. Therefore, we asked (1) how has the life expectancy for patients treated for MBD changed over time, and (2) which, if any, of the common primary cancer types are associated with longer survival after treatment of MBD? METHODS: We reviewed data collected from 2000 to 2022 in an international MBD database, as well as data used for survival model validation. We included 3,353 adults who underwent surgery and/or radiation. No patients were excluded. Patients were grouped by treatment date into period 1 (2000 to 2009), period 2 (2010 to 2019), and period 3 (2020 to 2022). Cumulative survival was portrayed using Kaplan-Meier curves; log-rank tests were used to determine significance at P < 0.05. Subgroup analyses by primary cancer diagnosis were performed. RESULTS: Median survival in period 2 was longer than in period 1 ( P < 0.001). Median survival (at which point 50% of patients survived) had not been reached for period 3. Median survival was longer in period 2 for all cancer types ( P < 0.001) except thyroid. Only lung cancer reached median survival in period 3, which was longer compared with periods 1 and 2 ( P < 0.001). Slow-growth, moderate-growth, and rapid-growth tumors all demonstrated longer median survival from period 1 to period 2; only rapid-growth tumors reached median survival for period 3, which was longer compared with periods 1 and 2 ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Median duration of survival after treatment of MBD has increased, which was a consistent finding in nearly all cancer types. Longer survival is likely attributable to improvements in both medical and surgical treatments. As life expectancy for patients with MBD increases, surgical methods should be selected with this in mind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VI.

How Mental Health Affects Injury Risk and Outcomes in Athletes.

CONTEXT: The importance of mental health among athletes is becoming more recognized and valued. Athletes experience symptoms of depression, anxiety, and related mental health disorders at rates similar to those of the general population, but because athletes face unique cultural and environmental pressures, such disorders are exacerbated in the context of an injury. Furthermore, we review the less well-known evidence that mental health disorders in athletes are associated with an increased risk of injury. We discuss the increasing awareness of the deficiencies in mental health support for athletes, which has been especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in prominent professional and Olympic athletes, and describe both internal and external barriers to appropriate care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched PubMed for pertinent peer-reviewed studies. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. RESULTS: There is a known psychological response to injury that can prolong recovery from musculoskeletal injury; conversely, mental health disorders in athletes are not only associated with an increased injury risk but also portend poorer outcomes subsequently, including prolonged recovery times, increased rates of injury recurrence, decreased rates of return to sport, and reduced performance upon return. Because of inherent barriers to appropriate care of athletes, including identification, stigma, and resource availability, there are currently various ongoing efforts nationally to create and implement initiatives regarding athlete mental health screening, support systems, and directed interventions to address the inextricably linked physical and mental health of athletes. CONCLUSION: Athletic injury negatively impacts the mental health of athletes. Likewise, mental health can and does influence athletic performance and is also intimately tied to the risk of athletic injury, thus creating a complex cycle with inability to separate physical and mental health.

Gluteal compartment syndrome: who is most at risk?

PURPOSE: Gluteal compartment syndrome (GCS) is a rare but devastating condition with a paucity of literature to help guide diagnosis and management. This study aims to identify and describe the risk factors and patient characteristics associated with GCS to facilitate early diagnosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing gluteal compartment release between 2015 and 2022 at an academic Level I trauma center. Chart reviews were performed to extract data on patient demographics, presenting symptoms, risk factors, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: 14 cases of GCS were identified. 12 (85.7%) were male, with a mean age of 39.4 ± 13 years and a mean BMI of 25.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2. 12 (85.7%) patients did not present as traumas and only 3 had ≥ 1 fracture. 9 patients reported drug use. Hemoglobin (Hgb) (11.7 ± 4 g/dL) was generally low (5 had Hgb < 10 g/dL). Creatine kinase (49,617 ± 60,068 units/L) was consistently elevated in all cases, and lactate (2.8 ± 1.6 mmol/L) was elevated in 9. 13 had non-viable muscle requiring debridement. Postoperatively, the mean ICU length of stay was 12 ± 23 days. 2 patients died during admission and all remaining patients required discharge to rehabilitation facilities. CONCLUSION: GCS is more likely to present in a young to middle-aged, otherwise healthy, male using drugs who is either found down or experienced an iatrogenic injury. Recognizing that GCS is different from that of the leg, in terms of etiology, may help avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.

What Factors Are Associated With Delayed Wound Closure in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Adult Both-bone Forearm Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Delayed wound closure is often used after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of both-bone forearm fractures to reduce the risk of skin necrosis and subsequent infection caused by excessive swelling. However, no studies we are aware of have evaluated factors associated with the use of delayed wound closure after ORIF. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of patients undergo delayed wound closure after ORIF of adult both-bone forearm fractures? (2) What factors are associated with delayed wound closure? METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent ORIF with plate fixation for both-bone fractures by the adult orthopaedic trauma service at our institution were considered potentially eligible for analysis. Between January 2010 and April 2022, we treated 74 patients with ORIF for both-bone forearm fractures. Patients were excluded if they had fractures that were fixed more than 2 weeks from injury (six patients), if their fracture was treated with an intramedullary nail (one patient), or if the patient experienced compartment syndrome preoperatively (one patient). No patients with Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB and C open fractures were included. Based on these criteria, 89% (66 of 74) of the patients were eligible. No further patients were excluded for loss of follow-up because the primary endpoint was the use of delayed wound closure, which was performed at the time of ORIF. However, one further patient was excluded for having bilateral forearm fractures to ensure that each patient had a single fracture for statistical analysis. Thus, 88% (65 of 74) of patients were included in the analysis. These patients were captured by an electronic medical record search of CPT code 25575. The mean ± SD age was 34 ± 15 years and mean BMI was 28 ± 7 kg/m 2 . The mean follow-up duration was 4 ± 5 months. The primary endpoint was the use of delayed wound closure, which was determined at the time of definitive fixation if tension-free closure could not be achieved. All surgeons used a volar Henry or modified Henry approach and a dorsal subcutaneous approach to the ulna for ORIF. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify which factors might be associated with delayed wound closure. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed for male gender, open fractures, age, and BMI. RESULTS: Twenty percent (13 of 65) of patients underwent delayed wound closure, 18% (12 of 65) of which occurred in patients who had high-energy injuries and 14% (nine of 65) in patients who had open fractures. Being a man (adjusted odds ratio 9.9 [95% confidence interval 1 to 87]; p = 0.04) was independently associated with delayed wound closure, after adjusting for open fractures, age, and BMI. CONCLUSION: One of five patients had delayed wound closure after ORIF of both-bone forearm fractures. Being a man was independently associated with greater odds of delayed wound closure. Surgeons should counsel all patients with these fractures about the possibility of delayed wound closure, with particular attention to men with high-energy and open fractures. Future larger-scale studies are necessary to confirm which factors are associated with the use of delayed wound closure in ORIF of both-bone fractures and its effects on fracture healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Evaluating Patellofemoral Patients: Physical Examination, Radiographic Imaging, and Measurements.

Patellofemoral pain is one of the most common symptoms of patients presenting to sports medicine clinics. Obtaining a pertinent history and performing a thorough examination is crucial to identifying the subset of patients with instability who are most likely to benefit from surgical stabilization. A comprehensive radiographic work-up that includes standard radiographs and advanced imaging helps elucidate the diagnosis and provides crucial information for preoperative planning. This article reviews the evaluation, physical examination, and interpretation of radiographic imaging of patients with patellofemoral pain as an introduction to subsequent articles in this issue discussing surgical interventions.

Association of Body Mass Index With Severity and Lesion Location in Adolescents With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee.

BACKGROUND: The association between body mass index (BMI) and severity of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee at presentation is poorly understood. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that adolescents in higher BMI percentiles for age and sex would have OCD lesions that were more severe at their initial presentation and located more posteriorly on the condyle as compared with adolescents in lower BMI percentiles. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study included patients aged 10 to 18 years who were treated for knee OCD at a tertiary care hospital from 2006 to 2017. Patients with noncondylar OCD or missing BMI data within 3 months of presentation were excluded. Patients were stratified per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines as underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese, and the groups were compared according to age, side of lesion, 4 markers of lesion severity (cystic changes, loose fragments, subchondral fluid, and subchondral edema), and surgical treatment. Lesion angle was measured in reference to a line parallel to the femoral axis drawn through the center of a best-fit circle covering the distal condyle. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, relative risk, Student t tests, analysis of variance, and linear regression of cumulative running percentages. Bonferroni correction was performed when applicable. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients met our inclusion criteria (mean age, 14.2 years; range, 10.1-18.8): 2 were underweight, 50 had normal BMI, 13 were overweight, and 12 were obese. We found correlations between BMI percentile and surgical treatment (R 2 = .732), subchondral fluid (R 2 = .716), subchondral edema (R 2 = .63), loose fragments (R 2 = .835), and the presence of at least 1 marker of lesion severity (R 2 = .857) (P < .0001 for all). No correlation was observed for cystic changes (R 2 = .026). There were significant associations between BMI ≥80th percentile and subchondral edema (risk ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.8), medial condylar lesions (risk ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.7), and lesions more anterior on the condyle (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Higher BMI in adolescents was strongly correlated with multiple markers of severity of knee OCD at initial presentation as well as with more anterior lesions.