Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(27): 608-614, 2019 Jul 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31295232

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a serious paralytic illness, was first recognized as a distinct condition in 2014, when cases were reported concurrent with a large U.S. outbreak of severe respiratory illness caused by enterovirus D-68 (EV-D68). Since 2014, nationwide outbreaks of AFM have occurred every 2 years in the United States; the cause for the recent change in the epidemiology of AFM in the United States, including the occurrence of outbreaks and a biennial periodicity since 2014, is under investigation. This report updates clinical, laboratory, and outcome data for cases reported to CDC during 2018. METHODS: Clinical data and specimens from persons in the United States who met the clinical criterion for AFM (acute onset of flaccid limb weakness) with onset in 2018 were submitted to CDC for classification of the illnesses as confirmed, probable, or non-AFM cases. Enterovirus/rhinovirus (EV/RV) testing was performed on available specimens from persons meeting the clinical criterion. Descriptive analyses, laboratory results, and indicators of early recognition and reporting are summarized. RESULTS: From January through December 2018, among 374 reported cases of AFM, 233 (62%) (from 41 states) were classified as confirmed, 26 (7%) as probable, and 115 (31%) as non-AFM cases. Median ages of patients with confirmed, probable, and non-AFM cases were 5.3, 2.9, and 8.8 years, respectively. Laboratory testing identified multiple EV/RV types, primarily in respiratory and stool specimens, in 44% of confirmed cases. Among confirmed cases, the interval from onset of limb weakness until specimen collection ranged from 2 to 7 days, depending on specimen type. Interval from onset of limb weakness until reporting to CDC during 2018 ranged from 18 to 36 days, with confirmed and probable cases reported earlier than non-AFM cases. CONCLUSION: Identification of risk factors leading to outbreaks of AFM remains a public health priority. Prompt recognition of signs and symptoms, early specimen collection, and complete and rapid reporting will expedite public health investigations and research studies to elucidate the recent epidemiology of AFM and subsequently inform treatment and prevention recommendations.


Assuntos
Viroses do Sistema Nervoso Central/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Mielite/epidemiologia , Doenças Neuromusculares/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Genome Announc ; 4(6)2016 Dec 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932649

RESUMO

The genomic sequences of three 2016 enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) strains were obtained from respiratory samples of patients from Florida, Texas, and New York. These EV-D68 sequences share highest nucleotide identities with strains that circulated in North America, Europe, and Asia in 2014-2015.

3.
Lancet Respir Med ; 3(11): 879-87, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26482320

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) has been infrequently reported historically, and is typically associated with isolated cases or small clusters of respiratory illness. Beginning in August, 2014, increases in severe respiratory illness associated with EV-D68 were reported across the USA. We aimed to describe the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory features of this outbreak, and to better understand the role of EV-D68 in severe respiratory illness. METHODS: We collected regional syndromic surveillance data for epidemiological weeks 23 to 44, 2014, (June 1 to Nov 1, 2014) and hospital admissions data for epidemiological weeks 27 to 44, 2014, (June 29 to Nov 1, 2014) from three states: Missouri, Illinois and Colorado. Data were also collected for the same time period of 2013 and 2012. Respiratory specimens from severely ill patients nationwide, who were rhinovirus-positive or enterovirus-positive in hospital testing, were submitted between Aug 1, and Oct 31, 2014, and typed by molecular sequencing. We collected basic clinical and epidemiological characteristics of EV-D68 cases with a standard data collection form submitted with each specimen. We compared patients requiring intensive care with those who did not, and patients requiring ventilator support with those who did not. Mantel-Haenszel χ(2) tests were used to test for statistical significance. FINDINGS: Regional and hospital-level data from Missouri, Illinois, and Colorado showed increases in respiratory illness between August and September, 2014, compared with in 2013 and 2012. Nationwide, 699 (46%) of 1529 patients tested were confirmed as EV-D68. Among the 614 EV-D68-positive patients admitted to hospital, age ranged from 3 days to 92 years (median 5 years). Common symptoms included dyspnoea (n=513 [84%]), cough (n=500 [81%]), and wheezing (n=427 [70%]); 294 (48%) patients had fever. 338 [59%] of 574 were admitted to intensive care units, and 145 (28%) of 511 received ventilator support; 322 (52%) of 614 had a history of asthma or reactive airway disease; 200 (66%) of 304 patients with a history of asthma or reactive airway disease required intensive care compared with 138 (51%) of 270 with no history of asthma or reactive airway disease (p=0·0004). Similarly, 89 (32%) of 276 patients with a history of asthma or reactive airway disease required ventilator support compared with 56 (24%) of 235 patients with no history of asthma or reactive airway disease (p=0·039). INTERPRETATION: In 2014, EV-D68 caused widespread severe respiratory illness across the USA, disproportionately affecting those with asthma. This unexpected event underscores the need for robust surveillance of enterovirus types, enabling improved understanding of virus circulation and disease burden. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Enterovirus Humano D , Infecções por Enterovirus/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Asma/complicações , Asma/virologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colorado/epidemiologia , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/virologia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/virologia , Infecções por Enterovirus/complicações , Infecções por Enterovirus/virologia , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/virologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Sons Respiratórios , Infecções Respiratórias/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Clin Virol ; 70: 77-82, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26305825

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enterovirus 68 (EV-D68) causes acute respiratory tract illness in epidemic cycles, most recently in Fall 2014, but clinical characteristics of severe disease are not well reported. OBJECTIVES: Children with EV-D68 severe respiratory disease requiring pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) management were compared with children with severe respiratory disease from other enteroviruses/rhinoviruses. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was performed of all children admitted to Children's Mercy Hospital PICU from August 1-September 15, 2014 with positive PCR testing for enterovirus/rhinovirus. Specimens were subsequently tested for the presence of EV-D68. We evaluated baseline characteristics, symptomatology, lab values, therapeutics, and outcomes of children with EV-D68 viral infection compared with enterovirus/rhinovirus-positive, EV-D68-negative children. RESULTS: A total of 86 children with positive enterovirus/rhinovirus testing associated with respiratory symptoms were admitted to the PICU. Children with EV-D68 were older than their EV-D68-negative counterparts (7.1 vs. 3.5 years, P=0.01). They were more likely to have a history of asthma or recurrent wheeze (68% vs. 42%, P=0.03) and to present with cough (90% vs. 63%, P=0.009). EV-D68 children were significantly more likely to receive albuterol (95% vs. 79%, P=0.04), magnesium (75% vs. 42%, P=0.004), and aminophylline (25% vs. 4%, P=0.03). Other adjunctive medications used in EV-D68 children included corticosteroids, epinephrine, and heliox; 44% of EV-D68-positive children required non-invasive ventilatory support. CONCLUSIONS: EV-D68 causes severe disease in the pediatric population, particularly in children with asthma and recurrent wheeze; children may require multiple adjunctive respiratory therapies.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Enterovirus Humano D/classificação , Enterovirus Humano D/genética , Infecções por Enterovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterovirus/virologia , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Fatores Etários , Biomarcadores , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Gerenciamento Clínico , Infecções por Enterovirus/terapia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções Respiratórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Neurol Sci ; 305(1-2): 149-51, 2011 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21444094

RESUMO

We describe a fatal case of proven enterovirus 71 meningoencephalitis complicating monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. B-cell depletion, an effective treatment strategy in an expanding spectrum of hematological and inflammatory disorders, impairs neutralising antibody-mediated clearance of enterovirus. The global threat of emerging neurotropic viruses such as enterovirus 71 is heightened by an increasing pool of susceptible individuals in non-endemic regions.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/efeitos adversos , Enterovirus Humano A/imunologia , Infecções por Enterovirus/imunologia , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Meningoencefalite/virologia , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Enterovirus/complicações , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Meningoencefalite/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rituximab
7.
J Clin Virol ; 49(1): 73-4, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20667767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostic tests to detect enterovirus in clinical specimens usually target highly conserved sites in the 5'-non-translated region, allowing detection of all members of the genus. The sequences in the 5'-NTR do not correlate with serotype, but PCR and sequencing of the VP1 region can be used for typing; this system has largely replaced traditional antigenic typing. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative performance of two common enterovirus assays. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the relative sensitivities of Taqman real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) and a VP1 semi-nested PCR (RT-snPCR) assay in which sequencing the VP1 amplicon also provides typing information. RESULTS: There was 89% concordance between the two methods among the 371 clinical specimens tested (74 positive in both assays and 257 negative in both assays). Twenty-seven rRT-PCR-negative/VP1-positive specimens were confirmed positive by sequencing; 13 specimens were rRT-PCR-positive/VP1-negative. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that either assay can produce satisfactory results, but that using both assays in parallel should provide the highest sensitivity for clinical diagnostic testing.


Assuntos
Proteínas do Capsídeo/genética , Infecções por Enterovirus/sangue , Infecções por Enterovirus/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/virologia , Enterovirus/classificação , Enterovirus/genética , Infecções por Enterovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterovirus/virologia , Fezes/virologia , Humanos , Nasofaringe/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , RNA Viral/análise , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA