Determination of finerenone - a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist - in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in venous and capillary human plasma.

A straightforward and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay allowing the sensitive and selective quantitation of finerenone (BAY 94-8862) in lithium heparin human plasma is described. Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of chronic kidney disease. Finerenone quantitation is performed after addition of its stable isotope-labelled internal standard (ISTD) by protein precipitation with acidified acetonitrile followed by HPLC-MS/MS separation and detection. The determination of finerenone concentrations was validated for a plasma volume of 0.100 mL and subsequently also for a lower plasma volume of 0.010 mL, collected e.g. in paediatric studies. The analytical range was from 0.100 µg/L (lower limit of quantification) to 200 µg/L (upper limit of quantification). Inter-day accuracy was 99.7-105.0% for the plasma volume of 0.100 mL and 101.1-104.5% for the plasma volume of 0.010 mL. Inter-day precision was ≤ 7.0%, independent of the extracted plasma volume. A moderate, concentration-independent matrix effect on ionisation was observed for both finerenone and its ISTD of 0.535-0.617, which is fully compensated by the ISTD (ISTD-normalised matrix factors were 0.98-1.03). The assay was successfully applied with both validated plasma volumes to a clinical phase I study in which the pharmacokinetics of 20 mg finerenone were compared in capillary plasma (0.010 mL) and venous plasma (0.100 mL) in a concentration range from the lower limit of quantification to 310 µg/L (capillary plasma) and 252 µg/L (venous plasma). The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve was similar in both matrices, while maximum concentrations were 37% higher in capillary plasma. In conclusion, capillary sampling should not bias pharmacokinetic exposure estimates compared with venous plasma values, if limited to sampling times in the distribution and elimination phases of finerenone.

Biotransformation of Finerenone, a Novel Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, in Dogs, Rats, and Humans, In Vivo and In Vitro.

Mass balance and biotransformation of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, were investigated in four healthy male volunteers following a single oral administration of 10 mg (78 µCi) of [14C]finerenone and compared with data from studies in dogs and rats. The total recovery of the administered radioactivity was 101% in humans, 94.7% in dogs, and 95.2% in rats. In humans, radioactivity was mainly excreted renally (80%); in rats, it was primarily the biliary/fecal route (76%); and in dogs, excretion was more balanced. Finerenone was extensively metabolized in all species by oxidative biotransformation, with minor amounts of unchanged drug in excreta (humans: 1%; dogs, rats: <9%). In vitro studies suggested cytochrome P450 3A4 was the predominant enzyme involved in finerenone metabolism in humans. Primary metabolic transformation involved aromatization of the dihydronaphthyridine moiety of metabolite M1 as a major clearance pathway with a second oxidative pathway leading to M4. These were both prone to further oxidative biotransformation reactions. Naphthyridine metabolites (M1-M3) were the dominant metabolites identified in human plasma, with no on-target pharmacological activity. In dog plasma, finerenone and metabolite M2 constituted the major components; finerenone accounted almost exclusively for drug-related material in rat plasma. For metabolites M1-M3, axial chirality was observed, represented by two atropisomers (e.g., M1a and M1b). Analysis of plasma and excreta showed one atropisomer (a-series, >79%) of each metabolite predominated in all three species. In summary, the present study demonstrates that finerenone is cleared by oxidative biotransformation, mainly via naphthyridine derivatives.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor [14C]copanlisib (BAY 80-6946) in a mass balance study in healthy male volunteers.

PURPOSE: To determine the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled copanlisib (BAY 80-6946) in healthy male volunteers and to investigate the disposition and biotransformation of copanlisib. METHODS: A single dose of 12 mg copanlisib containing 2.76 MBq [14C]copanlisib was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion to 6 volunteers with subsequent sampling up to 34 days. Blood, plasma, urine and feces were collected to monitor total radioactivity, parent compound and metabolites. RESULTS: Copanlisib treatment was well tolerated. Copanlisib was rapidly distributed throughout the body with a volume distribution of 1870 L and an elimination half-life of 52.1-h (range 40.4-67.5-h). Copanlisib was the predominant component in human plasma (84% of total radioactivity AUC) and the morpholinone metabolite M1 was the only circulating metabolite (about 5%). Excretion of drug-derived radioactivity based on all 6 subjects was 86% of the dose within a collection interval of 20-34 days with 64% excreted into feces as major route of elimination and 22% into urine. Unchanged copanlisib was the main component excreted into urine (15% of dose) and feces (30% of dose). Excreted metabolites (41% of dose) of copanlisib resulted from oxidative biotransformation. CONCLUSIONS: Copanlisib was eliminated predominantly in the feces compared to urine as well as by hepatic biotransformation, suggesting that the clearance of copanlisib would more likely be affected by hepatic impairment than by renal dysfunction. The dual mode of elimination via unchanged excretion of copanlisib and oxidative metabolism decreases the risk of clinically relevant PK-related drug-drug interactions.

Laboratory assessment of rivaroxaban: a review.

Research into new anticoagulants for preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders has focused on targeting single enzymes in the coagulation cascade, particularly Factor Xa and thrombin, inhibition of which greatly decreases thrombin generation. Based on the results of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, a direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved in many countries for the management of several thromboembolic disorders. Owing to its predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, fixed-dose regimens are used without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. In situations where assessment of rivaroxaban exposure may be helpful, anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays (in tandem with standard calibration curves generated with the use of rivaroxaban calibrators and controls) could be used. It is important to note that test results will be affected by the timing of blood sampling after rivaroxaban intake. In addition, the anti-Factor Xa method measures the drug concentration and not the intensity of the drug's anticoagulant activity, and a higher than expected rivaroxaban plasma level does not necessarily indicate an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, clinicians need to consider test results in relation to the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and other patient risk factors associated with bleeding.

Accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels requires different calibrator sets but not addition of antithrombin.

Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor, which can be monitored by anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays. This ex vivo study evaluated different assays for accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels. Eighty plasma samples from patients receiving rivaroxaban (Xarelto) 10 mg once daily and 20 plasma samples from healthy volunteers were investigated using one anti-factor Xa assay with the addition of exogenous antithrombin and two assays without the addition of antithrombin. Two different lyophilised rivaroxaban calibration sets were used for each assay (low concentration set: 0, 14.5, 59.6 and 97.1 ng/ml; high concentration set: 0, 48.3, 101.3, 194.2 and 433.3 ng/ml). Using a blinded study design, the rivaroxaban concentrations determined by the assays were compared with concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS. All assays showed a linear relationship between the rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS and the optical density of the anti-FXa assays. However, the assay with the addition of exogenous antithrombin detected falsely high concentrations of rivaroxaban even in plasma samples from controls who had not taken rivaroxaban (intercept values using the high calibrator set and the low calibrator set: +26.49 ng/ml and +13.71 ng/ml, respectively). Plasma samples, initially determined by the high calibrator setting and containing rivaroxaban concentrations <25 ng/ml, had to be re-run using the low calibrator setting for precise measurement. In conclusion, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays that use rivaroxaban calibrators at different concentration levels can be used to measure accurately a wide range of rivaroxaban concentrations ex vivo. Assays including exogenous antithrombin are unsuitable for measurement of rivaroxaban.

Evaluation of the anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay for the measurement of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations using calibrators and controls.

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Routine coagulation monitoring is not required, but a quantitative determination of rivaroxaban concentrations might be useful in some clinical circumstances. This multicentre study assessed the suitability of the anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay for the measurement of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations (ng/ml) using rivaroxaban calibrators and controls, and the inter-laboratory precision of the measurement. Twenty-four centres in Europe and North America were provided with sets of rivaroxaban calibrators (0, 41, 209 and 422 ng/ml) and a set of rivaroxaban pooled human plasma controls (20, 199 and 662 ng/ml; the concentrations were unknown to the participating laboratories). The evaluation was carried out over 10 days by each laboratory using local anti-factor Xa reagents as well as the centrally provided reagent, a modified STA® Rotachrom® assay. A calibration curve was produced each day, and the day-to-day precision was evaluated by testing three human plasma controls. When using the local anti-factor Xa reagents, the mean rivaroxaban concentrations (measured/actual values) were: 17/20, 205/199 and 668/662 ng/ml, and the coefficient of variance (CV) was 37.0%, 13.7% and 14.1%, respectively. When the modified STA Rotachrom method was used, the measured/actual values were: 18/20, 199/199 and 656/662 ng/ml, and the CV was 19.1%, 10.9% and 10.0%, respectively. The results suggest that, by using rivaroxaban calibrators and controls, the anti-factor Xa chromogenic method is suitable for measuring a wide range of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations (20-660 ng/ml), which covers the expected rivaroxaban plasma levels after therapeutic doses.

Workshop/conference report on EMA draft guideline on validation of bioanalytical methods.

This is a summary report of the workshop on the EMA Draft Guideline on Validation of Bioanalytical Methods held April 15-16th 2010 in Brussels (Belgium) and jointly organised by the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) and the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS). Aim of the workshop was to discuss the current scientific knowledge in the area of bioanalysis, the regulatory requirements with special focus on the new Draft Guideline and their subsequent implementation to the work in bioanalytical laboratories. Comments on the Draft Guideline were presented and discussed with representatives from regulatory authorities in Europe. The workshop started with discussions on the scope of the Guideline and the need for implementation of GLP. A special focus was set on method validation of chromatographic procedures and subsequent study sample analysis. In addition, requirements for ligand-binding assays were briefly addressed. Intention of this Conference Report is to summarise important aspects of the discussions in order to draw certain conclusions, and to identify points which remain open and may require clarification at a later stage.