Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 42(9): 653-661, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789838

RESUMO

Goltz-Gorlin syndrome (GGS) (focal dermal hypoplasia) is a very rare developmental disorder affecting ectodermal and mesodermal structures. The syndrome is inherited in an X-linked manner, with the majority of affected individuals being female. We report the case of a 51-year-old man presenting with congenital skin lesions, syndactyly, facial and thoracic asymmetry, inguinal and laryngeal papillomas, cryptorchidism, polythelia, and dental anomalies. Molecular genetic analysis confirmed the clinically suspected diagnosis of GGS by detecting a known pathogenic mutation in the PORCN gene, c.502G>A [p.(Gly168Arg)] in the mosaic state. Histopathological examinations of skin biopsies of affected individuals typically show focal dermal hypoplasia and fat herniation; despite numerous skin biopsies, these characteristics were not found in the patient involved. Instead, we observed a notable reduction and fragmentation of the elastic fibers in the upper dermis. A systematic literature review regarding the histopathological presence or absence of dermal hypoplasia and/or information on elastic fibers revealed 240 histopathological descriptions of 173 individuals. Absence of dermal hypoplasia was found in 21 biopsies (8.8%). Information on elastic fibers was given in 47 cases (19.6%), showing decrease/absence in 31 cases and fragmentation of elastic fibers in 11 cases. Therefore, the histopathological absence of dermal hypoplasia does not exclude the diagnosis of the GGS. Decrease and fragmentation of elastic fibers may represent new histopathological clues to the diagnosis of this rare syndrome. At the same time, GGS should be included in the histopathological differential diagnoses of elastolytic disorders.


Assuntos
Derme/patologia , Tecido Elástico/patologia , Hipoplasia Dérmica Focal/patologia , Aciltransferases , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Hipoplasia Dérmica Focal/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Proteínas de Membrana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Fenótipo , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
4.
Immunotherapy ; 9(15): 1225-1238, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29130797

RESUMO

AIM: To determine the optimal effective and safe dose of sublingual immunotherapy tablets containing carbamylated monomeric allergoids in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, Phase II study, four different daily doses were applied preseasonally for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 158 randomized adults, 155 subjects (safety population) received 300 units of allergy (UA)/day (n = 36), 600 UA/day (n = 43), 1000 UA/day (n = 39), or 2000 UA/day (n = 37). After treatment, 54.3, 47.6, 59.0 and 51.4% of patients, respectively, ceased to react to the highest allergen concentration in a conjunctival provocation test. Furthermore, the response threshold improved in 70.4, 62.9, 76.7 and 66.7% of patients, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: This study found 1000 UA/day to be the optimal effective and safe dose.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/uso terapêutico , Antígenos de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Conjuntivite Alérgica/terapia , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alérgenos/química , Alérgenos/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Conjuntivite Alérgica/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poaceae/imunologia , Pólen/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Comprimidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA