Influence of a Short Course of Ritonavir Used as Booster in Antiviral Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2 on the Exposure of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin.

PURPOSE: Early antiviral treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is recommended for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk for severe courses. Such patients are usually chronically ill and susceptible to adverse drug interactions caused by ritonavir. We investigated the interactions of short-term low-dose ritonavir therapy with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, two statins commonly used in this population. METHOD: We assessed exposure changes (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax)) of a single dose of 10 mg atorvastatin and 10 mg rosuvastatin before and on the fifth day of ritonavir treatment (2 × 100 mg/day) in healthy volunteers and developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to estimate dose adjustment of atorvastatin during ritonavir treatment. RESULTS: By the fifth day of ritonavir treatment, the AUC∞ of atorvastatin increased 4.76-fold and Cmax 3.78-fold, and concurrently, the concentration of atorvastatin metabolites decreased to values below the lower limit of quantification. Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated that a stepwise reduction in atorvastatin dose during ritonavir treatment with a stepwise increase up to 4 days after ritonavir discontinuation can keep atorvastatin exposure within safe and effective margins. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics were only mildly modified; ritonavir significantly increased the Cmax 1.94-fold, while AUC∞ was unchanged. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin doses should likely be adjusted during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. For patients on a 20-mg dose, we recommend half of the original dose. In patients taking 40 mg or more, a quarter of the dose should be taken until 2 days after discontinuation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Patients receiving rosuvastatin do not need to change their treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2021-006634-39. DRKS00027838.

Perpetrator Characteristics of Azole Antifungal Drugs on Three Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors Administered as a Microdosed Cocktail.

BACKGROUND: Factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) are increasingly used without having sufficient drug-drug interaction data. Using a microdosed cocktail methodology could support filling the knowledge gap quickly. METHODS: In a randomised crossover trial, we investigated the drug-drug interactions between six oral azole antifungals and a microdosed FXaI cocktail containing 25 µg rivaroxaban, 25 µg apixaban, and 50 µg edoxaban. Additionally, different enzyme activities were also monitored using a microdosed cocktail approach. The six different azole antifungals were administered in therapeutic doses over a 24 h period, while the microdosed cocktails were administered 1 h after administration of the azole antifungals. RESULTS: Ketoconazole and posaconazole were the strongest perpetrators, showing similar increases as apixaban (area under the concentration-time curve ratio [AUCR] 1.64 and 1.62, respectively) and edoxaban (AUCR 2.08 and 2.1, respectively), whereas ketoconazole increased rivaroxaban 2.32-fold but only increased posaconazole 1.37-fold. All other azole antifungals showed less perpetrator effects on the FXaIs. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibition was confirmed using microdosed midazolam, with ketoconazole also the most potent perpetrator (8.42-fold). CONCLUSION: Drug-drug interactions for three victim drugs of the same drug class (FXaIs) with different clearance mechanisms can be studied using a microdosed cocktail approach. Using members of the azole antifungal drug class as perpetrators, multiple interactions can be studied in one trial, and a more detailed insight into the underlying interaction mechanisms is possible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-004453-16.

Proposal of a Safe and Effective Study Design for CYP3A-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

Numerous drug-drug interaction (DDI) trials have to be conducted in healthy volunteers based on current regulatory guidelines. Because the worst-case scenario of strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors has to be tested, the results and their validity have to be balanced with the risk to volunteer safety. The use of ketoconazole in clinical DDI studies has been discouraged by regulatory agencies due to an alleged risk of liver injury. In order to reduce the risk to healthy volunteers, we carried out a study with single-day exposure to each of 6 perpetrator azole fungistatic drugs. They were evaluated regarding their CYP3A inhibition using microdosed midazolam and a limited sampling strategy. Ratios of areas under the concentration-time curves ranged from 1.93 with isavuconazole to 8.42 with ketoconazole. The highest number of adverse events occurred with voriconazole, followed by ketoconazole; 2 dropouts occurred due to adverse events following itraconazole administration. Literature data on adverse events of azole fungistatic drugs in DDI trials are rare and inconclusive. Only in recent years with the newer drugs are they more precise and reliable. It can be concluded that the duration of preexposure of perpetrator drugs can be reduced to 1 hour before administration of the victim drug. This still can be sufficient to achieve the scientific objectives of the trial with the lowest possible risk.