Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Coortes , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Background: Nano-Pulse Stimulation™ (NPS™) therapy is a new, non-thermal bioelectric modality that applies ultrashort pulses of electric energy to trigger regulated cell death (RCD) in treated tissues. Instead of initiating necrosis by heating or freezing, NPS therapy permeabilizes intracellular organelles to activate the cell's own self-destruct pathway of programmed or regulated cell death. Unlike cryotherapeutic procedures that can both damage structural tissues and diffuse into the periphery beyond the margins of the lesion, NPS therapy only affects cells within the treated zone leaving surrounding tissue and acellular components unaffected. Methods: In this study we treated 37 basal cell carcinoma lesions on 30 subjects (NCT04918381). The treated lesions were photographed on 3-, 7-, 14-, 30- and 60-days after treatment. All subjects then underwent surgical excision for histological examination of the treated tissue. Results: 92% of the BCC lesions (34 of 37) showed complete histological clearance of BCC. Histologic analysis of the 3 cases where residual BCC was noted indicated that full energy coverage was not achieved, which could be remedied with an improved treatment guide to standardize and optimize the CellFX® procedure based on NPS technology. Conclusion: The CellFX procedure was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of low-risk nodular and superficial BCC lesions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nanosecond pulsed electric field technology (also known as Nano-Pulse Stimulation or NPS) is a nonthermal, drug-free, energy-based technology that has demonstrated effects on cellular structures of the dermis and epidermis in previous clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single NPS treatment for clearing seborrheic keratoses (SKs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multisite, nonsignificant risk trial in which each subject served as their own control. Fifty-eight subjects had 3 of 4 confirmed SK lesions treated, resulting in 174 total treated lesions. Subjects returned for 5 to 6 follow-up evaluations and photographs. RESULTS: At 106 days after NPS treatment, 82% of treated seborrheic keratoses were rated clear or mostly clear by the assessing physician. Seventy-one percent of lesions were rated clear or mostly clear by the 3 independent reviewers based on the 106-day photographs. All treated subjects returned for all study visits, and 78% of the subjects were satisfied or mostly satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The NPS procedure was well tolerated and effective in the removal of SKs.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Ceratose Seborreica/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Ceratose Seborreica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas/efeitos adversos , Satisfação do Paciente , Fotografação , Estudos Prospectivos , Pele/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) technology involves delivery of ultrashort pulses of electrical energy and is a nonthermal, drug-free technology that has demonstrated favorable effects on cellular structures of the dermis and epidermis. OBJECTIVE: Determine the tolerability and effectiveness of nsPEF treatment of sebaceous gland hyperplasia (SGH). METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multisite, nonsignificant risk trial in which each subject served as their own control. After injection of local anesthetic, high-intensity, ultrashort pulses of electrical energy were used to treat 72 subjects resulting in a total of 222 treated lesions. Subjects returned for 3 to 4 follow-up evaluations with photographs. RESULTS: At the final study visit, 99.6% of treated SGH lesions were rated clear or mostly clear and 79.3% of the subjects were satisfied or mostly satisfied with the outcome. At 60 days after nsPEF treatment, 55% of the lesions were judged to have no hyperpigmentation and 31% exhibited mild post-treatment hyperpigmentation. At the last observation for all lesions, 32% of the 222 lesions were noted as having slight volume loss. CONCLUSION: Nanosecond pulsed electric field procedure is well tolerated and is very effective in the removal of SGHs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03612570.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Glândulas Sebáceas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hiperplasia/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fotografação , Estudos Prospectivos , Glândulas Sebáceas/diagnóstico por imagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of skin cancers has evolved with the development of Mohs micrographic surgery and a greater emphasis on surgical training within dermatology. It is unclear whether these changes have translated into innovations and contributions to the reconstructive literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess contributions from each medical specialty to the cutaneous head and neck oncologic reconstructive literature. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the head and neck reconstructive literature from 2000 through 2015 based on a priori search terms relating to suture technique, linear closure, advancement, rotation, transposition and interpolation flaps, and identified the specialty of the senior authors. RESULTS: The authors identified 74,871 articles, of which 1,319 were relevant. Under suture technique articles, the senior authors were primarily dermatologists (58.2%) and plastic surgeons (20.3%). Under linear closure, the authors were dermatologists (48.1%), plastic surgeons (22.2%), and otolaryngologists (20.4%). Under advancement and rotation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (40.5%, 38.9%), dermatologists (38.1%, 34.2%), and otolaryngologists (14.4%, 21.6%). Under transposition and interpolation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (47.3%, 39.4%), dermatologists (32.3%, 27.0%), and otolaryngologists (15.3%, 23.4%). CONCLUSION: The primary specialties contributing to the cutaneous head and neck reconstructive literature are plastic surgery, dermatology, and otolaryngology.
Assuntos
Cirurgia de Mohs/normas , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/normas , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/normas , Competência Clínica , Dermatologia/normas , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cirurgia de Mohs/métodos , Cirurgia de Mohs/estatística & dados numéricos , Otolaringologia/normas , Otolaringologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Plástica/normas , Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Sutura/normas , Técnicas de Sutura/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/normas , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, the isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) package insert contains language advising the discontinuation of isotretinoin for 6 months before performing cosmetic procedures, including waxing, dermabrasion, chemical peels, laser procedures, or incisional and excisional cold-steel surgery. It is common practice to follow this standard because of concerns regarding reports of sporadic adverse events and increased risk of scarring. OBJECTIVE: To develop expert consensus regarding the safety of skin procedures, including resurfacing, energy device treatments, and incisional and excisional procedures, in the setting of concurrent or recent isotretinoin use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American Society for Dermatologic Surgery authorized a task force of content experts to review the evidence and provide guidance. First, data were extracted from the literature. This was followed by a clinical question review, a consensus Delphi process, and validation of the results by peer review. RESULTS: The task force concluded that there is insufficient evidence to justify delaying treatment with superficial chemical peels and nonablative lasers, including hair removal lasers and lights, vascular lasers, and nonablative fractional devices for patients currently or recently exposed to isotretinoin. Superficial and focal dermabrasion may also be safe when performed by a well-trained clinician.
Assuntos
Abrasão Química , Dermabrasão , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Isotretinoína/uso terapêutico , Terapia a Laser , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Abrasão Química/efeitos adversos , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/prevenção & controle , Dermabrasão/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Dermatopatias/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Council of Graduate Medical Education, which oversees much of postgraduate medical education in the United States, has championed the concept of "milestones," standard levels of achievement keyed to particular time points, to assess trainee performance during residency. OBJECTIVE: To develop a milestones document for the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgery (CDS) fellowship program. METHODS: An ad hoc milestone drafting committee was convened that included members of the ASDS Accreditation Work Group and program directors of ASDS-approved Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgery (CDC) fellowship training programs. Draft milestones were circulated through email in multiple rounds until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: Thirteen milestones were developed in the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency areas, with 8 of these being patient-care milestones. Additional instructions for milestone administration more specific to the CDS fellowship than general ACGME instructions were also approved. Implementation of semiannual milestones was scheduled for the fellowship class entering in July 2018. CONCLUSION: Milestones are now available for CDS fellowship directors to implement in combination with other tools for fellow evaluation.
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Objetivos Organizacionais , Acreditação , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Common noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures are widely believed to be safe given the low incidence of reported adverse events, but reliable incidence data regarding adverse event rates are unavailable to date. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of adverse events associated with noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures, including those involving laser and energy devices, as well as injectable neurotoxins and fillers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter prospective cohort study (March 28, 2011, to December 30, 2011) of procedures performed using laser and energy devices, as well as injectable neurotoxins and soft-tissue augmentation materials, among 8 geographically dispersed US private and institutional dermatology outpatient clinical practices focused on cosmetic dermatology, with a total of 23 dermatologists. Participants represented a consecutive sample of 20 399 cosmetic procedures. Data acquisition was for 3 months (13 weeks) per center, with staggered start dates to account for seasonal variation. EXPOSURES: Web-based data collection daily at each center to record relevant procedures, by category type and subtype. Adverse events were detected by (1) initial observation by participating physicians or staff; (2) active ascertainment from patients, who were encouraged to self-report after their procedure; and (3) follow-up postprocedural phone calls to patients by staff, if appropriate. When adverse events were not observed by physicians but were suspected, follow-up visits were scheduled within 24 hours to characterize these events. Detailed information regarding each adverse event was entered into an online form. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the total incidence of procedure-related adverse events (total adverse events divided by total procedures performed), as verified by clinical examination. RESULTS: Forty-eight adverse events were reported, for a rate of 0.24% (95% CI, 0.18%-0.31%). Overall, 36 procedures resulted in at least 1 adverse event, for a rate of 0.18% (95% CI, 0.13%-0.25%). No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events were infrequently associated with known risk factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures, including energy, neurotoxin, and filler procedures, are safe when performed by experienced board-certified dermatologists. Adverse events occur in less than 1% of patients, and most of these are minor and transient.
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Neurotoxinas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Dermatologia/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Injeções , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurotoxinas/administração & dosagem , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Excisional skin cancer surgery is a common procedure, with no formal consensus for mitigating the risk of wrong-site cutaneous surgery. OBJECTIVE: To systematically consider the usefulness and feasibility of proposed methods for correct biopsy site identification in dermatology. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Survey study with a formal consensus process. Item development was via a literature review and expert interviews, followed by 2 stages of a Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations. FINDINGS: In total, 2323 articles were reviewed in the literature search, with data extraction from 14. Twenty-five experts underwent 30-minute structured interviews, which were transcribed and coded. The resulting survey was composed of 42 proposed interventions by multiple stakeholders (biopsying physicians, operating physicians, nurses, ancillary staff, patients, caregivers, and family members) at 3 time points (day of biopsy, delay and consultation period, and day of definitive surgery). Two rounds of a Delphi process with 59 experts (25 academic and 34 private practice) scored the survey. Strong consensus was obtained on 14 behaviors, and moderate consensus was obtained on 21 other behaviors. In addition, a 2-state simultaneous algorithm was developed to model surgeon behavior on the day of definitive surgery based on surgeon and patient perceptions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When definitive surgery is performed after the initial biopsy and by a different surgeon, procedures can be implemented at several time points to increase the likelihood of correct site identification. The specific circumstances of a case suggest which methods may be most appropriate and feasible, and some may be implemented. The risk of wrong-site cutaneous surgery can be reduced but not eliminated.
Assuntos
Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/tendências , Dermatologia/normas , Dermatologia/tendências , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Participação do Paciente , Papel do Médico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Detailed information regarding perioperative risk and adverse events associated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) can guide clinical management. Much of the data regarding complications of MMS are anecdotal or report findings from single centers or single events. OBJECTIVES: To quantify adverse events associated with MMS and detect differences relevant to safety. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter prospective inception cohort study of 21 private and 2 institutional US ambulatory referral centers for MMS. Participants were a consecutive sample of patients presenting with MMS for 35 weeks at each center, with staggered start times. EXPOSURE: Mohs micrographic surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Intraoperative and postoperative minor and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Among 20 821 MMS procedures, 149 adverse events (0.72%), including 4 serious events (0.02%), and no deaths were reported. Common adverse events reported were infections (61.1%), dehiscence and partial or full necrosis (20.1%), and bleeding and hematoma (15.4%). Most bleeding and wound-healing complications occurred in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy. Use of some antiseptics and antibiotics and sterile gloves during MMS were associated with modest reduction of risk for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Mohs micrographic surgery is safe, with a very low rate of adverse events, an exceedingly low rate of serious adverse events, and an undetectable mortality rate. Common complications include infections, followed by impaired wound healing and bleeding. Bleeding and wound-healing issues are often associated with preexisting anticoagulation therapy, which is nonetheless managed safely during MMS. We are not certain whether the small effects seen with the use of sterile gloves and antiseptics and antibiotics are clinically significant and whether wide-scale practice changes would be cost-effective given the small risk reductions.
Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia de Mohs/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Luvas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Masculino , Cirurgia de Mohs/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , Cicatrização/fisiologiaRESUMO
An article titled "Current issues in dermatologic office-based surgery" was published in the JAAD in October 1999 (volume 41, issue 4, pp. 624-634). The article was developed by the Joint American Academy of Dermatology/American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Liaison Committee. A number of subjects were addressed in the article including surgical training program requirements for dermatology residents and selected advances in dermatologic surgery that had been pioneered by dermatologists. The article concluded with sections on credentialing, privileging, and accreditation of office-based surgical facilities. Much has changed since 1999, including more stringent requirements for surgical training during dermatology residency, and the establishment of 57 accredited Procedural Dermatology Fellowship Training Programs. All of these changes have been overseen and approved by the Residency Review Committee for Dermatology and the Accreditation Committee for Graduate Medical Education. The fertile academic environment of academic training programs with interaction between established dermatologic surgeons and fellows, as well as the inquisitive nature of many of our colleagues, has led to the numerous major advances in dermatologic surgery, which are described herein.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Técnicas de Ablação , Acne Vulgar/complicações , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Certificação , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Dermabrasão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo , Cabelo/transplante , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Cirurgia de Mohs , Segurança do Paciente , Transtornos da Pigmentação/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Escleroterapia , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Dermatopatias/cirurgia , Tatuagem , Varizes/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fractionated technology has revolutionized laser therapy. With the success of initial devices, several fractionated lasers have appeared on the market. Claims of superiority have made device choice difficult for physicians and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects were treated with fractionated ablative lasers (10,600-nm carbon dioxide and 2790-nm yttrium scandium gallium garnet) in this institutional review board-approved trial. Each face was divided into four quadrants, and each quadrant was randomly treated using one of four lasers. Clinical experience was used to optimize settings. Two patients submitted biopsies from each quadrant immediately after treatment. Patients and blinded investigators assessed pain during treatment and post-treatment improvement in photoaging (measured by rhytides, lentigines, texture, and pore size) using a five-point scale. RESULTS: All devices resulted in statistical improvement in photoaging in all patients, but no device was statistically significantly superior. No statistically significant difference was found in pain scores. All patients reported satisfaction 1 month after treatment. Three patients experienced adverse reactions. Histologically, there were no statistically significant differences between devices. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated ablative lasers reliably result in improvement in photoaging. Despite marketing claims, no statistically significant differences were found in outcomes, pain during treatment, or histologic findings. Even with experienced users, significant adverse reactions are possible.
Assuntos
Face/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser/instrumentação , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Envelhecimento da Pele/patologia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Gás/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Fotografação , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an imaging technology with the potential to provide high-resolution images of the skin non-invasively. With this device, it is possible to identify a host of skin structures including tumors. In this case report, we demonstrate the use of an OCT device in delineating a lateral tumor margin of an ill-defined basal cell carcinoma prior to Mohs micrographic surgery. Following surgery, the OCT images are compared to histologic sections to confirm their accuracy. OCT technology has the potential to be a vital tool for dermatologists and particularly Mohs surgeons in identifying tumor margins and potentially reducing the number of invasive procedures needed.