Patterns of Perception of Cardiac Symptoms by Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and their Knowledge of Coronay Artery Disease Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Proper knowledge regarding Coronary Artery Disease and their risk factors is essential for the early recognition of the disease and its presentation. This study was conducted to identify pattern of clinical symptoms and knowledge regarding Coronary Artery Disease risk factors among ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted among 340 ST-Elevation myocardial infarction patients in the inpatient Cardiology Department of Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre Nepal, from November 2020 to February 2021. Baseline clinical characteristics, knowledge regarding Coronary Artery Disease risk factors, patterns of symptoms, and prehospital delay were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: In our study, 299 (87.9%) had typical ischemic chest pain during the symptom onset, however, only 81 (23.8%) perceived chest pain as cardiac disease, and 311 (91.5%) of the patients presented to the nearby health care center within the recommended time of less than 12 hours for the reperfusion therapy of ST-Elevation myocardial infarction. Perception of symptoms as a cardiac origin and typical chest pain were not significantly associated with earlier presentation. Also, the typical chest pain was not significantly associated with the perception of the symptom as a cardiac origin. The history of Coronary Artery Disease was considered as a Coronary Artery Disease risk factor by 184(54.1%) of the study population and 137(40.3%), 132(38.8%), 110(32.4%), 105(30.9%) and 71(20.9%) considered hypertension, smoking, age, obesity, and diabetes mellitus as a Coronary Artery Disease risk factor respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Though most patients presented with typical chest pain, identification of the chest pain as a cardiac origin and the awareness of the Coronary Artery Disease risk factors was low.

Feasibility and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on feasibility and safety of coronary interventions performed using radial artery at anatomical snuffbox as vascular access point in South Asian region. Our study attempts to evaluate the feasibility and safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention using transradial access at anatomical snuffbox. METHODS: Transradial access at anatomical snuffbox was attempted in 128 consecutive patients, who were planned for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Success in vascular access, completion of planned procedure and complications encountered, including patency of radial artery after the procedure, were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients (76 males [59.4%]; 52 females [40.6%]) between 44-78 years of age (mean age, 59.0 +/- 10.2 years) were included in the study. Distal radial artery puncture and sheath placement was successful in all patients however planned procedure was completed in 126 (98.4%) patients. Total 90 coronary angiographies and 36 percutaneous coronary interventions were performed of which five were primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We encountered brachial artery spasm among two patient (1.5%) and significant pain and swelling among three patients (2.3%). No bleeding complication, numbness or parasthesia were observed on follow-up. Patients had average pain rating of 2.4+/- 1.1 in visual analogue pain rating scale. There were no instances of radial artery occlusion after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Distal radial artery, at anatomical snuffbox, is a safe and feasible alternative vascular access site for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Anomalous origin of left main coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva presenting as non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A case report.

Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries are a cause of sudden cardiac death. Of the known anatomic variants, anomalous origination of a coronary artery from an opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) remains a major clinical issue and a challenging condition to treat. Congenital coronary anomalies are likely to be under-recognized, as completing an anatomic assessment in a very large portion of the population would seem unfeasible. However, we present a case report with image of a 49 year old male presented with acute non-ST elevation ACS for which he underwent diagnostic angiography of the coronary system which revealed a common origin of both right and left main coronary artery from right sinus of Valsalva with significant obstructive lesion in the mid segment of right coronary artery. However, due to financial constraints CT angiography could not be done in this patient to identify the detail anatomy and the course of the anomalous left coronary artery origin (L-ACAOS). He was managed medically with dual antiplatelets, beta blockers, nitrates and ACE inhibitors.