Teleneurocritical care is associated with equivalent billable charges to in-person neurocritical care for patients with acute stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Teleneurocritical care (TNCC) provides virtual care for hospitals who do not have continuous neurointensivist coverage. It is not known if TNCC is cost effective nor which variables impact the total billed charges per patient encounter. We characterize cost, defined by charge characteristics of TNCC compared to in-person neurocritical care (NCC), for patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke requiring ICU care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review from 2018 to 2021 of prospectively collected multinstitutional databases from a large, integrated, not-for-profit health system with an in-person NCC and spoke TNCC sites. The primary outcome was the total billable charge per TNCC patient with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke compared to in-person NCC. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome, transfer rate, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 1779 patients met inclusion criteria, 1062 at the hub in-person NCC hospital and 717 at spoke TNCC hospitals. Total billed patient charges of TNCC were similar to in-person NCC (median 104% of the cost per in-person NCC patient, 95% CI: 99%-108%). From 2018 to 2021, the charge difference between TNCC and NCC was not different (r2 = 0.71, p = 0.16). Both age and length stay were independently predictive of charges: for every year older the charge increased by US $6.3, and every day greater LOS the charge increased by $2084.3 (p < 0.001, both). TNCC transfer rates were low, and TNCC had shorter LOS and greater favorable functional outcome. DISCUSSION: TNCC was associated with similar patient financial charges as compared to in-person NCC. Standardization of care and the integrated hub-spoke value-focused operational procedures of TNCC may be applicable to other healthcare systems, however, further prospective study is needed.

Teleneurocritical Care for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusive Ischemic Stroke Treated by Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Teleneurocritical care (TNCC) provides 24/7 virtual treatment of patients with neurological disease in the emergency department or intensive care unit. However, it is not known if TNCC is safe, effective, or associated with similar outcomes compared with in-person neurocritical care. We aim to determine the effect of daily inpatient consults from TNCC on the outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusive acute ischemic stroke treated by thrombectomy. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old with acute ischemic stroke from a large vessel occlusion treated by thrombectomy were identified from 2018 to 2021 within a telehealth network of an integrated not-for-profit health care system in the United States. The primary end point was good functional outcome, i.e., modified Rankin Scale 0-3, at the time of hospital discharge in patients receiving in-person neurocritical care versus TNCC. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients met inclusion criteria, 226 at the in-person hospital (median age 67, 53% women) and 211 at the two TNCC hospitals (median age 74, 49% women). The rate of successful endovascular therapy (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3) was not different among hospitals. Good functional outcome at discharge was similar between in-person neurocritical care and TNCC (in-person 31.4% vs. TNCC 33.5%, odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.6-1.3; p = 0.64). Only National Institutes of Health stroke scale and age were multivariable predictors of outcome. There were no differences in mortality (9.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.19), intensive care unit length of stay (2.1 vs. 1.9 days, p = 0.39), or rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (6.8% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.47) between in-person neurocritical care and TNCC. CONCLUSIONS: Teleneurocritical care allows for equivalent favorable functional outcomes compared with in-person neurocritical care for patients with acute large vessel ischemic stroke receiving thrombectomy. The standardized protocols used by TNCC in this study, specifically the comprehensive 24/7 treatment of patients in the intensive care unit for the length of their stay, may be relevant for other health systems with limited in-person resources; however, additional study is required.

Clinical impact of early hyperglycemia during acute phase of traumatic brain injury.

INTRODUCTION: While tight glucose control has been widely adopted in the critical care setting, the optimal target glucose level following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains debatable. This observational study was conducted to delineate the relationship between glucose levels and clinical outcomes during acute phase (first 5 days) of TBI. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 429 TBI patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2005 to December 2006. Of those, 380 patients were retained for final analysis. Collected data included demographics, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and APACHE II, glucose on admission and during the first 5 days of admission, and insulin use. Clinical outcomes included mortality, ICU, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The overall hospital mortality was 13.2% (n = 50). Demographics were similar between survivor and nonsurvivor groups; however, nonsurvivors were older and had worse disease severity on admission. Nonsurvivors also had significantly higher glucose levels at admission and during the first 24 h of admission (P < 0.001). Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, admission and day-1 peak glucose were better predictors for mortality compared to hospital days 2-5 glucose levels, with day-1 peak glucose being the best predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.820). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed that patients with glucose <160 mg/dl during the first day of ICU admission had a significantly better survival rate compared to those with glucose > or =160 mg/dl (P < 0.001). Two glucose bands, <60 and > or =160 mg/dl, were identified to be associated with increased mortality irrespective of injury severity (OR = 1.130; 95% CI 1.034-1.235; P = 0.007; OR = 1.034; 95% CI 1.021-1.047, P < 0.001; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our study suggest a glucose level > or =160 mg/dl within the first 24 h of admission following TBI is associated with poor outcomes irrespective of severity of injury, and this presents a timeframe for which active therapeutic interventions may improve clinical outcomes. Prospective efficacy trials are needed to corroborate these findings.