Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Transplantation: Foe or Common Innocent Bystander?

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HT) is regarded as the treatment of choice for end-stage heart failure (ESHF) patients. Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) after HT is a frequent clinical problem with devastating consequences for HT recipients. METHODS: Data from 112 ESHF patients undergoing HT in 2010-2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary end point was the development of AKI stage III, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. RESULTS: In total, 81 patients (72.3%) developed AKI, of which 33 (29.4%) developed AKI stage I, 18 (16%) stage II, and 30 (26.7%) stage III; within this group, 27 recipients (24%) required renal replacement therapy (RRT). Overall hospital mortality was 14%. However, when stratifying by AKI stage, hospital mortality increased from 0% to 46% comparing recipients without AKI and those with AKI stage III, respectively (P = .001). In the same way, 1-year mortality increased from 6% to 53% for recipients without AKI compared with those who developed AKI stage III (log-rank test for trend: P = .001). Recipients that required RRT had a 1-year mortality of 59.2% compared with 5.8% in those without RRT requirement. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that AKI stage III is common after HT and adversely affects early and late mortality. Clinical variables together with perioperative hemodynamic assessment could add more powerful prognostic information to predict severe AKI before HT and therefore evaluate potential heart-kidney recipients.

[Clinical and angiographic expression of myocardial ischemia in stable angina as a function of its coronary reserve]. / Expresión clínica y angiográfica de la isquemia miocárdica en la angina estable en función de su reserva coronaria.

We have studied the distribution of the coronary reserve, evaluated by serial effort tests, in patients with proved coronaropathy, determining the correlation between clinic (effort and mixed angina) and coronary reserve (fixed and variable), assessing angiographic findings in function to that reserve. We took 120 patients with stable angina to whom 2 effort tests were performed, basal and after vasodilator drugs. It was considered variable reserve if in the second test the S-T descend improved greater than or equal to 1 mm for a similar of greater double product and fixed when it didn't improve. In all patients coronarography was performed. Seventy two patients (60%) showed fixed reserve, 58 with effort angina (80%) and 14 (20%) with mixed. Forty eight showed variable reserve, 40 (80%) with mixed angina and 8 (17%) with effort. The group with fixed reserve had a greater S-T max. descent (2.9 +/- 0.9 vs 2.2 +/- 0.4) (p less than 0.001), a lower double product max. (221 +/- 44 vs 284 +/- 37) (p less than 0.001) and a lower maximal oxygen consumption (MVO2 7 +/- 2 vs 11 +/- 2) (p less than 0.001) than the variable reserve group. Considering the angiography, the fixed reserve group had more number of vessels affected (1.9 +/- 0.7 vs 1.4 +/- 0.5) (p less than 0.01), a higher angiographic score (4.88 +/- 2.4 vs 2.2 +/- 1.2) (p less than 0.001), a lower ejection fraction (59 +/- 8.5 vs 65 +/- 7.5) (p less than 0.001), more multivessel and descending anterior artery lesion than the variable reserve group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)