Orofacial Pain.

OBJECTIVE: This article explores the multiple etiologies, diagnosis, and management of orofacial pain. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Published in 2019, the International Classification of Orofacial Pain has become the internationally accepted classification system for primary and secondary facial pain. New discoveries in temporomandibular disorders have demonstrated that they are far more complex than the traditional dental mechanistic point of view. A 2020 consensus report released by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine entitled "Temporomandibular Disorders: Priorities for Research and Care" highlighted this paradigm shift and its importance for patient care, education, and research. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Orofacial pain comprises many disorders with different etiologies and pathophysiologies. The subjectivity of the pain experience and the interrelated anatomy and physiology of the craniofacial area add to the complexity of diagnosis when the source and etiology of pain are not clear. As orofacial pain straddles the expertise of multiple disciplines, a multidisciplinary approach combining medication, physical therapy, and procedural and psychological strategies is essential in treating patients with orofacial pain.

Trigeminal neuralgia.

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a facial pain disorder characterized by intense and paroxysmal pain that profoundly affects quality of life and presents complex challenges in diagnosis and treatment. TN can be categorized as classical, secondary and idiopathic. Epidemiological studies show variable incidence rates and an increased prevalence in women and in the elderly, with familial cases suggesting genetic factors. The pathophysiology of TN is multifactorial and involves genetic predisposition, anatomical changes, and neurophysiological factors, leading to hyperexcitable neuronal states, central sensitization and widespread neural plasticity changes. Neurovascular compression of the trigeminal root, which undergoes major morphological changes, and focal demyelination of primary trigeminal afferents are key aetiological factors in TN. Structural and functional brain imaging studies in patients with TN demonstrated abnormalities in brain regions responsible for pain modulation and emotional processing of pain. Treatment of TN involves a multifaceted approach that considers patient-specific factors, including the type of TN, with initial pharmacotherapy followed by surgical options if necessary. First-line pharmacological treatments include carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Surgical interventions, including microvascular decompression and percutaneous neuroablative procedures, can be considered at an early stage if pharmacotherapy is not sufficient for pain control or has intolerable adverse effects or contraindications.

Temporomandibular Disorders, Bruxism and Headaches.

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and headache disorders are highly prevalent in the population. TMDs can present headache symptoms as a secondary headache and, in addition, be comorbid with primary headache disorders. This overlap has significant clinical implications for which it is essential for the physician to be aware, and they should screen for the potential presence of TMDs in a headache patient. Bruxism is a parafunctional behavior also prevalent in the population which has a role in TMDs and may influence headache symptomatology, but it is still necessary to clarify this relationship.

PACAP-38 related modulation of the cranial parasympathetic projection: A novel mechanism and therapeutic target in severe primary headache.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known of how cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS) in cluster headache and migraine may contribute to their severe headache phenotype. This strong association suggests the involvement of the cranial parasympathetic efferent pathway. To investigate its contribution, we studied the role of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38), a potent sensory and parasympathetic neuropeptide, in modulating pre- and post-ganglionic cranial parasympathetic projection neurons, and their influence on headache-related trigeminal-autonomic responses. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using PACAP-38 and PACAP-38 responsive receptor antagonists, electrophysiological, behavioural and facial neurovascular-blood flow was measured in rats to probe trigeminal- and parasympathetic-neuronal, periorbital thresholds and cranial-autonomic outcomes, as they relate to primary headaches. KEY RESULTS: Sumatriptan attenuated the development of PACAP-38 mediated activation and sensitization of trigeminocervical neurons and related periorbital allodynia. PACAP-38 also caused activation and enhanced responses of dural-responsive pre-ganglionic pontine-superior salivatory parasympathetic neurons. Further, the PACAP-38 responsive receptor antagonists dissected a role of VPAC1 and PAC1 receptors in attenuating cranial-autonomic and trigeminal-neuronal responses to activation of the cranial parasympathetic projection, which requires post-ganglionic parasympathetic neurotransmission. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Given the prevailing view that sumatriptan acts to some degree via a peripheral mechanism, our data support that PACAP-38 mediated receptor activation modulates headache-related cranial-autonomic and trigeminovascular responses via peripheral and central components of the cranial parasympathetic projection. This provides a mechanistic rationale for the association of CAS with more severe headache phenotypes in cluster headache and migraine, and supports the cranial parasympathetic projection as a potential novel locus for treatment by selectively targeting PACAP-38 or PACAP-38 responsive VPAC1 /PAC1 receptors.

An Update on Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) and Headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview and highlight recent updates in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and their comorbidity with headache disorders regarding pathophysiology and management. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last decade, there have been great advancements in the understanding of TMDs and their relationship with neurovascular pains such as headaches. Understanding of TMDs is necessary for the context of its comorbidity with primary headache disorders. The literature regarding management of these comorbidities is scarce but points to combination therapy including pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to optimize management. The use of CGRP receptor-targeted monoclonal antibodies or CGRP receptor antagonists should be explored for the management of chronic TMDs. It could also be used as a novel monotherapy or in combination with non-pharmacological approaches for TMDs' comorbidity with headache, particularly migraine. Research is needed to support evidence-based management protocols. A team involving neurology (headache medicine) and dentistry (orofacial pain) is critical for optimal management.

Pharmacological Management of Orofacial Pain.

Orofacial pain is a category of complex disorders, including musculoskeletal, neuropathic and neurovascular disorders, that greatly affect the quality of life of the patient. These disorders are within the fields of dentistry and medicine and management can be challenging, requiring a referral to an orofacial pain specialist, essential for adequate evaluation, diagnosis, and care. Management is specific to the diagnosis and a treatment plan is developed with diverse pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities. The pharmacological management of orofacial pain encompasses a vast array of medication classes and approaches. This includes anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and anesthetics. In addition, as adjunct therapy, different injections can be integrated into the management plan depending on the diagnosis and needs. These include trigger point injections, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injections, and neurotoxin injections with botulinum toxin and nerve blocks. Multidisciplinary management is key for optimal care. New and safer therapeutic targets exclusively for the management of orofacial pain disorders are needed to offer better care for this patient population.

Interplay of Oral, Mandibular, and Facial Disorders and Migraine.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Migraine and other primary headache disorders can be localized in the face resembling facial or dental pain, indicating the influence of the trigeminovascular system in the structures innervated by the maxillary (V2) and mandibulary (V3) branches of the trigeminal nerve. Disorders of oral and craniofacial structures may influence primary headache disorders. In the current article, we review the potential links of this interplay. RECENT FINDINGS: This interplay may be related to anatomy, with the trigeminal pathway and the involvement of both peripheral and central mechanisms, and the presence of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a key mediator in migraine pathophysiology. CGRP is also involved in the pathophysiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and their comorbidity with migraine and is also implicated in dental and periodontal pathology. Inflammatory and pathological processes of these structures and their trigeminal nociceptive pathways may influence the trigeminovascular system and consequently may exacerbate or even potentially trigger migraine.

Nitroglycerin as a model of migraine: Clinical and preclinical review.

Migraine stands as one of the most disabling neurological conditions worldwide. It is a disorder of great challenge to study given its heterogeneous representation, cyclic nature, and complexity of neural networks involved. Despite this, clinical and preclinical research has greatly benefitted from the use of the nitric oxide donor, nitroglycerin (NTG), to model this disorder, dissect underlying mechanisms, and to facilitate the development and screening of effective therapeutics. NTG is capable of triggering a migraine attack, only in migraineurs or patients with a history of migraine and inducing migraine-like phenotypes in rodent models. It is however unclear to what extent NTG and NO, as its breakdown product, is a determinant factor in the underlying pathophysiology of migraine, and importantly, whether it really does facilitate the translation from the bench to the bedside, and vice-versa. This review provides an insight into the evidence supporting the strengths of this model, as well as its limitations, and shines a light into the possible role of NO-related mechanisms in altered molecular signalling pathways.

Targeting reactive nitroxidative species in preclinical models of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Reactive nitroxidative species, such as nitric oxide but particularly peroxynitrite, have been strongly implicated in pain mechanisms. Targeting peroxynitrite is anti-nociceptive in pain models, but little is known about its role in migraine mechanisms. Given the need to validate novel targets for migraine headache, our objective was to study the potential of reactive nitroxidative species, particularly peroxynitrite, as novel targets for drug discovery and their role in migraine mechanisms. METHODS: We recorded neuronal activity in rats with extracellular electrodes and examined the effects of targeting nitric oxide or peroxynitrite on ongoing and cranial-evoked firing rates of central trigeminocervical neurons. We injected calcitonin gene-related peptide (which produces migraine-like headache in migraineurs) and characterized neuronal responses to cranial stimulation and on behavioral responses to nociceptive periorbital stimulation and determined the effects of targeting reactive nitroxidative species on the mediated changes. RESULTS: L-NAME (nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) and Fe(III)5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrinato chloride (FeTPPS; peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst) inhibited ongoing and dural-evoked responses of trigeminocervical neurons, without affecting normal facial-cutaneous responses. Calcitonin gene-related peptide caused activation and sensitization of dural-responsive trigeminovascular neurons with hypersensitivity to intracranial and extracranial stimulation, and reduction of periorbital withdrawal thresholds. Only the peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst prevented these neuronal and behavioral nociceptive responses. DISCUSSION: The data support that calcitonin gene-related peptide mediates the underlying neurobiological mechanisms related to the development of migraine-like headache. They also confirm the role of nitric oxide and implicate peroxynitrite production along the trigeminovascular migraine pathway in these mechanisms. The data also support peroxynitrite as a novel and potentially effective target for migraine treatment. The current drug development focus on peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts for chronic pain disorders should therefore extend to migraine.

Glia and Orofacial Pain: Progress and Future Directions.

Orofacial pain is a universal predicament, afflicting millions of individuals worldwide. Research on the molecular mechanisms of orofacial pain has predominately focused on the role of neurons underlying nociception. However, aside from neural mechanisms, non-neuronal cells, such as Schwann cells and satellite ganglion cells in the peripheral nervous system, and microglia and astrocytes in the central nervous system, are important players in both peripheral and central processing of pain in the orofacial region. This review highlights recent molecular and cellular findings of the glia involvement and glia-neuron interactions in four common orofacial pain conditions such as headache, dental pulp injury, temporomandibular joint dysfunction/inflammation, and head and neck cancer. We will discuss the remaining questions and future directions on glial involvement in these four orofacial pain conditions.

Phenotypic and Functional Alterations of Immune Effectors in Periodontitis; A Multifactorial and Complex Oral Disease.

Survival and function of immune subsets in the oral blood, peripheral blood and gingival tissues of patients with periodontal disease and healthy controls were assessed. NK and CD8 + T cells within the oral blood mononuclear cells (OBMCs) expressed significantly higher levels of CD69 in patients with periodontal disease compared to those from healthy controls. Similarly, TNF-α release was higher from oral blood of patients with periodontal disease when compared to healthy controls. Increased activation induced cell death of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) but not OBMCs from patients with periodontal disease was observed when compared to those from healthy individuals. Unlike those from healthy individuals, OBMC-derived supernatants from periodontitis patients exhibited decreased ability to induce secretion of IFN-γ by allogeneic healthy PBMCs treated with IL-2, while they triggered significant levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6 by untreated PBMCs. Interaction of PBMCs, or NK cells with intact or NFκB knock down oral epithelial cells in the presence of a periodontal pathogen, F. nucleatum, significantly induced a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IFN-γ. These studies indicated that the relative numbers of immune subsets obtained from peripheral blood may not represent the composition of the immune cells in the oral environment, and that orally-derived immune effectors may differ in survival and function from those of peripheral blood.

Therapeutic targeting of nitroglycerin-mediated trigeminovascular neuronal hypersensitivity predicts clinical outcomes of migraine abortives.

ABSTRACT: Cranial hypersensitivity is a prominent symptom of migraine, exhibited as migraine headache exacerbated with physical activity, and cutaneous facial allodynia and hyperalgesia. The underlying mechanism is believed to be, in part, activation and sensitization of dural-responsive trigeminocervical neurons. Validated preclinical models that exhibit this phenotype have great utility for understanding putative mechanisms and as a tool to screen therapeutics. We have previously shown that nitroglycerin triggers cranial allodynia in association with migraine-like headache, and this translates to neuronal cranial hypersensitivity in rats. Furthermore, responses in both humans and rats are aborted by triptan administration, similar to responses in spontaneous migraine. Here, our objective was to study the nitroglycerin model examining the effects on therapeutic targets with newly approved treatments, specifically gepants and ditans, for the acute treatment of migraine. Using electrophysiological methods, we determined changes to ongoing firing and somatosensory-evoked cranial sensitivity, in response to nitroglycerin, followed by treatment with a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, gepant (olcegepant), a 5-HT1F receptor agonist, ditan (LY344864), and an NK1 receptor antagonist (GR205171). Nitroglycerin induced activation of migraine-like central trigeminocervical neurons, and intracranial and extracranial neuronal hypersensitivity. These responses were aborted by olcegepant and LY344864. However, GR205171, which failed in clinical trial for both abortive and preventive treatment of migraine, had no effect. These data support the nitroglycerin model as a valid approach to study cranial hypersensitivity and putative mechanisms involved in migraine and as a screen to dissect potentially efficacious migraine therapeutic targets.

Preclinical studies investigating the neural mechanisms involved in the co-morbidity of migraine and temporomandibular disorders: the role of CGRP.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and migraine can be co-morbid. This can be a significant factor in exacerbating and increasing the prevalence of migraine-like symptoms. However, the underlying mechanisms involved are unknown. Our objective was to investigate these neural mechanisms and the role of CGRP as a key modulator in this co-morbidity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We combined experimental approaches using CGRP, which triggers a migraine-like response in patients, with that of masseteric muscle injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), to model myofascial TMD-like inflammation. Using validated electrophysiological methods to assess each of the above approaches independently or in combination, we examined their effects on the response properties of migraine-like dural-trigeminocervical neurons. KEY RESULTS: Independently, in ~2/3 of animals (rats) each approach caused delayed migraine-like activation and sensitisation of dural-trigeminocervical neurons. The response to masseteric-CFA was attenuated by a selective CGRP receptor antagonist. The combination approach caused a migraine-like neuronal response in all animals tested, with somatosensory-evoked cranial hypersensitivity significantly exacerbated. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The data demonstrate a neuronal phenotype that translates to the exacerbated clinical co-morbid phenotype, supporting this combination approach as a relevant model to study the mechanisms involved. It provides a pathophysiological rationale for this exacerbated phenotype, strongly implicating the involvement of CGRP. The results provide support for targeting the CGRP pathway as a novel monotherapy approach for treating this co-morbid condition. This has key implications into our understanding of this co-morbid condition, as well as potentially addressing the major unmet need for novel and effective therapeutic approaches.

Nitroglycerine triggers triptan-responsive cranial allodynia and trigeminal neuronal hypersensitivity.

Cranial allodynia associated with spontaneous migraine is reported as either responsive to triptan treatment or to be predictive of lack of triptan efficacy. These conflicting results suggest that a single mechanism mediating the underlying neurophysiology of migraine symptoms is unlikely. The lack of a translational approach to study cranial allodynia reported in migraine patients is a limitation in dissecting potential mechanisms. Our objective was to study triptan-responsive cranial allodynia in migraine patients, and to develop an approach to studying its neural basis in the laboratory. Using nitroglycerine to trigger migraine attacks, we investigated whether cranial allodynia could be triggered experimentally, observing its response to treatment. Preclinically, we examined the cephalic response properties of central trigeminocervical neurons using extracellular recording techniques, determining changes to ongoing firing and somatosensory cranial-evoked sensitivity, in response to nitroglycerine followed by triptan treatment. Cranial allodynia was triggered alongside migraine-like headache in nearly half of subjects. Those who reported cranial allodynia accompanying their spontaneous migraine attacks were significantly more likely to have symptoms triggered than those that did not. Patients responded to treatment with aspirin or sumatriptan. Preclinically, nitroglycerine caused an increase in ongoing firing and hypersensitivity to intracranial-dural and extracranial-cutaneous (noxious and innocuous) somatosensory stimulation, reflecting signatures of central sensitization potentially mediating throbbing headache and cranial allodynia. These responses were aborted by a triptan. These data suggest that nitroglycerine can be used as an effective and reliable method to trigger cranial allodynia in subjects during evoked migraine, and the symptom is responsive to abortive triptan treatments. Preclinically, nitroglycerine activates the underlying neural mechanism of cephalic migraine symptoms, central sensitization, also predicting the clinical outcome to triptans. This supports a biological rationale that several mechanisms can mediate the underlying neurophysiology of migraine symptoms, with nitrergic-induced changes reflecting one that is relevant to spontaneous migraine in many migraineurs, whose symptoms of cranial allodynia are responsive to triptan treatment. This approach translates directly to responses in animals and is therefore a relevant platform to study migraine pathophysiology, and for use in migraine drug discovery.

Targeting the central projection of the dural trigeminovascular system for migraine prophylaxis.

Migraine abortives likely target both peripheral-dural and central trigeminovascular mechanisms in mediating their therapeutic effects. However, in preclinical assays, many migraine preventives have little success at inhibiting similar trigeminovascular-mediated peripheral changes within the dural microenvironment. In addition, their effects on central trigeminovascular neuronal responses are largely unknown. Using a validated preclinical model of acute dural-intracranial (migraine-like) head pain, using Sprague Dawley rats, we tested whether migraine preventives suppress ongoing firing of central trigeminocervical neurons, and evoked responses to cranial neurovascular activation. Flunarizine, sodium valproate, propranolol, and amitriptyline, all dose-dependently inhibited ongoing spontaneous firing of dural trigeminovascular neurons, and differentially affected neuronal responses to intracranial-dural and extracranial-cutaneous somatosensory stimulation. Lamotrigine, only effective in the treatment of migraine aura, did not affect responses. These data provide a mechanistic rationale for the clinical effects of migraine preventives in the treatment of migraine, via the modulation of dural-responsive central trigeminovascular neurons. Also, given their limited effect on peripheral dural vasdilatory responses, these data also suggest that migraine preventives specifically target central, rather than peripheral, components of trigeminal neurovascular mechanisms involved in migraine pathophysiology, to mediate their preventive action. Finally, these data further validate this preclinical model of central trigeminovascular activation to screen migraine preventives.

Brain structure and function related to headache: Brainstem structure and function in headache.

OBJECTIVE: To review and discuss the literature relevant to the role of brainstem structure and function in headache. BACKGROUND: Primary headache disorders, such as migraine and cluster headache, are considered disorders of the brain. As well as head-related pain, these headache disorders are also associated with other neurological symptoms, such as those related to sensory, homeostatic, autonomic, cognitive and affective processing that can all occur before, during or even after headache has ceased. Many imaging studies demonstrate activation in brainstem areas that appear specifically associated with headache disorders, especially migraine, which may be related to the mechanisms of many of these symptoms. This is further supported by preclinical studies, which demonstrate that modulation of specific brainstem nuclei alters sensory processing relevant to these symptoms, including headache, cranial autonomic responses and homeostatic mechanisms. REVIEW FOCUS: This review will specifically focus on the role of brainstem structures relevant to primary headaches, including medullary, pontine, and midbrain, and describe their functional role and how they relate to mechanisms of primary headaches, especially migraine.

Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses acute noxious activation of trigeminocervical neurons in animal models of primary headache.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been reported to be effective in the abortive treatment of both migraine and cluster headache. Using validated animal models of acute dural-intracranial (migraine-like) and trigeminal-autonomic (cluster-like) head pain we tested whether VNS suppresses ongoing and nociceptive-evoked firing of trigeminocervical neurons to explain its abortive effects in migraine and cluster headache. Unilateral VNS was applied invasively via hook electrodes placed on the vagus nerve. A single dose of ipsilateral or contralateral VNS, to trigeminal recording and dural-stimulating side, suppressed ongoing spontaneous and noxious dural-evoked trigeminocervical neuronal firing. This effect was dose-dependent, with two doses of ipsilateral VNS prolonging suppression of ongoing spontaneous firing (maximally by ~60%) for up to three hours, and dural-evoked (Aδ-fiber; by ~22%, C-fiber: by ~55%) responses for at least two hours. Statistically, there was no difference between ipsilateral and contralateral groups. Two doses of VNS also suppressed superior salivatory nucleus-evoked trigeminocervical neuronal responses (maximally by ~22%) for 2.5h, to model nociceptive activation of the trigeminal-autonomic pathway. VNS had no effect on normal somatosensory cutaneous facial responses throughout. These studies provide a mechanistic rationale for the observed benefits of VNS in the abortive treatment of migraine and cluster headache. In addition, they further validate these preclinical models as suitable approaches to optimize therapeutic efficacy, and provide an opportunity to hypothesize and dissect the neurobiological mechanisms of VNS in the treatment of primary headaches.

Hypericum perforatum (St. John's Wort) as a possible therapeutic alternative for the management of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) - A case report.

Hypericum perforatum (St. John's Wort) is an alternative remedy used primarily for depression but also is used for rheumatism, gastroenteritis, headache and neuralgias. The mechanism of action of Hypericum perforatum comprehends a neurotransmitter inhibitory profile, and potential anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects suggesting a role for pain management. In this case report, we describe a 53-year-old Hispanic female patient who came to our orofacial pain clinical service presenting with a history of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The patient was not able to get an appointment soon enough and decided to take an over the counter homeopathic preparation of Hypericum perforatum since she found on the internet that it was effective for nerve pain. The patient responded dramatically to the Hypericum perforatum preparation. The use of this homeopathic preparation relieved completely the TN pain. The management of TN is often a challenge. Hypericum perforatum may be a promising therapeutic option for TN that deserves to be explored further to solidly support its use in the clinical setting.

Current and novel insights into the neurophysiology of migraine and its implications for therapeutics.

Migraine headache and its associated symptoms have plagued humans for two millennia. It is manifest throughout the world, and affects more than 1/6 of the global population. It is the most common brain disorder, and is characterized by moderate to severe unilateral headache that is accompanied by vomiting, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and other hypersensitive symptoms of the senses. While there is still a clear lack of understanding of its neurophysiology, it is beginning to be understood, and it seems to suggest migraine is a disorder of brain sensory processing, characterized by a generalized neuronal hyperexcitability. The complex symptomatology of migraine indicates that multiple neuronal systems are involved, including brainstem and diencephalic systems, which function abnormally, resulting in premonitory symptoms, ultimately evolving to affect the dural trigeminovascular system, and the pain phase of migraine. The migraineur also seems to be particularly sensitive to fluctuations in homeostasis, such as sleep, feeding and stress, reflecting the abnormality of functioning in these brainstem and diencephalic systems. Implications for therapeutic development have grown out of our understanding of migraine neurophysiology, leading to major drug classes, such as triptans, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, and 5-HT1F receptor agonists, as well as neuromodulatory approaches, with the promise of more to come. The present review will discuss the current understanding of the neurophysiology of migraine, particularly migraine headache, and novel insights into the complex neural networks responsible for associated neurological symptoms, and how interaction of these networks with migraine pain pathways has implications for the development of novel therapeutics.

Cancer and Referred Facial Pain.

Orofacial pain may be a symptom of diverse types of cancers as a result of local or distant tumor effects. The pain can be presented with the same characteristics as any other orofacial pain disorder, and this should be recognized by the clinician. Orofacial pain also can arise as a consequence of cancer therapy. In the present article, we review the mechanisms of cancer-associated facial pain, its clinical presentation, and cancer therapy associated with orofacial pain.