Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Glob Infect Dis ; 14(2): 69-74, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910820

RESUMO

Introduction: Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine (HQ), and darunavir/ritonavir are widely prescribed as an oral treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection despite their uncertainty of clinical benefit. The objective is to determine the safety and the efficacies of two treatment regimens against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We conducted an open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy between a 3-day course of once-daily high-dose oral ivermectin plus zinc sulfate (Group A) and a combination of HQ, darunavir/ritonavir, and zinc sulfate (HQ + antiretroviral, Group B) for 5 days in asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study period was between December 2020 and April 2021. Results: Overall, 113 patients were randomized and analyzed (57 patients in Group A and 56 patients in Group B). The median duration to achieve the virological outcome of either undetected or cycle threshold (Ct) for N gene of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction was 6 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-6.7) versus 7 days (95% CI: 5.4-8.6) in Group A and Group B, respectively (P = 0.419) in the modified intention-to-treat population. All patients were discharged from hospital quarantine as planned. Two patients in Group A and one patient in Group B were considered clinically worsening and received 10 days of favipiravir treatment. There was no serious adverse event found in both groups. Conclusion: We demonstrated that both treatment regimens were safe, but both treatment regimens had no virological or clinical benefit. Based on this result and current data, there is no supporting evidence for the clinical benefit of ivermectin for coronavirus-19.

2.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 247(15): 1350-1363, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35611811

RESUMO

Anemia is a major complication in over 50% of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. One of the main causes of anemia in CKD is the reduction of erythropoietin (EPO) synthesis from renal tubular cells. Therefore, first-line treatment of CKD is EPO administration; however, EPO unresponsiveness in several patients is frequently found. More undefined causes of anemia in CKD are under interest, especially uremic toxins, which are a group of solutes accumulated in CKD patients. The highly detectable protein-bound uremic toxin, indoxyl sulfate (IS) was investigated for its effects on in vitro erythropoiesis in this study. CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells were isolated from human umbilical cord blood and differentiated toward erythrocyte lineage for 14 days in various concentrations of IS (12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL). The effects of IS on cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and senescence were determined. Cell proliferation was investigated by manual cell counting. Cell surface marker expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Wright's staining was performed to evaluate cell differentiation capacity. Apoptosis and senescence marker expression was measured using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). TUNEL assay was performed to detect apoptotic DNA fragmentation. Our results demonstrated that IS reduced cell proliferation and impaired erythrocyte differentiation capacity. In addition, this study confirmed the effects of IS on cell apoptosis and senescence during erythropoietic differentiation. Therefore, the promotion of apoptosis and senescence might be one of the possible mechanisms caused by uremic toxin accumulation leading to anemia in CKD patients.


Assuntos
Anemia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Apoptose , Eritropoese , Humanos , Indicã/metabolismo , Indicã/farmacologia , Toxinas Urêmicas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA