Screening strategies for glucose tolerance abnormalities and diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis.

The increase in life expectancy of patients with cystic fibrosis has come with new comorbidities, particularly diabetes. The gradual development of glucose tolerance abnormalities means that 30 to 40% of adults will be diabetic. Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes is a major challenge in the care of these patients because it is a morbidity and mortality factor at all stages of the disease. Early glucose tolerance abnormalities observed from childhood, before the stage of diabetes, are also associated with a poor pulmonary and nutritional outcome. The long asymptomatic period justifies systematic screening with an annual oral glucose tolerance test from the age of 10 years. However, this strategy does not take into account the new clinical profiles of patients with cystic fibrosis, recent pathophysiological knowledge of glucose tolerance abnormalities, and the emergence of new diagnostic tools in diabetology. In this paper, we summarise the challenges of screening in the current context of new patient profiles - patients who are pregnant, have transplants, or are being treated with fibrosis conductance transmembrane regulator modulators - and put forward an inventory of the various screening methods for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes, including their applications, limitations and practical implications.

Clinical practice versus guidelines for the screening of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: A French survey from the 47 centers.

This study aimed to analyze clinical practices concerning cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) screening in France. A web-based questionnaire was distributed between December 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021 among 47 cystic fibrosis centers including pediatric, adult, and mixed units. In accordance with guidelines, 92.8% of CF centers performed annual oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Overall, 86.3% of CF centers performed 1- and 2-hour blood glucose determinations following OGTT. The OGTT was conducted before 10 years of age in 73% of pediatric centers. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and laboratory glycated hemoglobin were employed for CFRD screening in 86.5% and 50% of centers, respectively. CGM was carried out in 69% of centers after glucose tolerance abnormalities had been detected in OGTT. Most CF centers used OGTT and CGM for CFRD screening. Studies are required to assess CGM usefulness as a validated tool in CFRD screening.

Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in diabetic patients with an acute coronary syndrome. A pharmacodynamic randomised study.

Optimal P2Y12 receptor blockade is critical to prevent ischaemic recurrence in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the level of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition achieved by prasugrel and ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in diabetic acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI. We performed a single-center prospective open-label randomised trial. Patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing PCI for an ACS were randomised to receive prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg. The primary endpoint of the study was the level of platelet reactivity (PR) assessed between 6 and 18 hours post-LD using the VASP index. We randomised 100 diabetic patients undergoing PCI for an ACS. No difference was observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. In particular, the rate of patient receiving insulin therapy was identical (25 vs 28.6%; p =0.7). Ticagrelor achieved a significantly lower PR compared to prasugrel loading dose (17.3 ± 14.2 vs 27.7 ± 23.3%; p=0.009). In addition the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, defined by a VASP ≥50%, tend to be lower in the ticagrelor group although the difference did not reach statistical significance (6 vs 16%; p=0.2). The rate of low on treatment PR was identical (60 vs 54%; p=0.8). The present study demonstrates that ticagrelor LD is superior to prasugrel LD to reduce PR in ACS patients with diabetes mellitus. Whether the higher potency of ticagrelor could translate into a clinical benefit should be investigated.

Assessing post-treatment platelet reactivity: a focus on patient selection and setting.

Dual antiplatelet therapy is critical to inhibit platelet reactivity in order to prevent ischemic recurrences in stented patients. However, studies have observed a variable blockade of the P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor between patients following clopidogrel intake. This interindividual variability in the biological response is not uncommon with clopidogrel (about 50%) and even prasugrel (20%). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is correlated with thrombotic events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Several studies suggested that tailoring of antiplatelet therapy based on platelet reactivity (PR) monitoring could safely reduce the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in HTPR patients. In addition, low on-treatment PR was recently associated with bleeding events both in patients treated with prasugrel and clopidogrel. Of importance, bleedings are associated with a poor prognosis in stented patients. Overall, the potential of PR monitoring to individualize antiplatelet therapy might benefit stented patients by reducing both ischemic and bleeding risks. However, such strategies remain to be evaluated in adequately designed large-scale randomized clinical trials.