Prognostic value of Geriatric-8 for adverse outcomes within 30 days of surgery in older adults with colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether the Geriatric-8 (G8) has the accuracy to preselect patients for complete geriatric assessment, and has the ability to predict adverse outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We therefore aimed to determine whether the G8, or other variables present in the medical record, are applicable in predicting 30-day adverse outcomes in older patients undergoing surgery for CRC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients ≥70 years who had surgery for CRC between 2018 and 2020 in a general hospital in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was adverse outcome(s), which is a composite of surgical and non-surgical complications, readmission and mortality, all within 30 days of surgery. The secondary endpoints were the individual components, such as delirium, infection and ileus. We explored potential prognostic factors using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Data were collected from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DRCA) and medical records. RESULTS: The study included 200 patients (mean age 78.9 years: 50% female), with 36.5% having adverse outcomes in the first 30 days of surgery. In neither univariate nor multivariable analysis were G8 scores associated with adverse outcomes. Factors with higher odds of adverse outcomes were male gender, and having cognitive decline or previous delirium. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that G8 scores have no prognostic value for adverse outcomes, complications and mortality within 30 days of surgery among older adults with CRC. Therefore, the G8 should not be the tool for short-term risk prediction of adverse outcomes in these patients.

The orientation and attitudes of intermediate vocational trained nursing students (MBO-V) towards their future profession: A pre-post survey.

Students' perceptions of nursing influence recruitment and retention in nursing education. Nursing education in the Netherlands differentiates two levels: Bachelor's (HBO-V) and intermediate vocational (MBO-V) level training, with MBO-V students accounting the majority. To avoid the expected nursing shortages, these students' perceptions of nursing need to be explored. We aimed to examine the orientation and attitudes of MBO-V students towards their future profession and their relation to demographic characteristics. A descriptive survey with a pretest-posttest design was conducted. Newly enrolled MBO-V students completed a questionnaire at the beginning and after five months of education, consisting of the Nursing Orientation Tool, the Nursing Attitude Questionnaire and demographic characteristics. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test and regression analysis were used for data analyses. At the first time point, students agreed most with statements related to caring, nursing expertise, advocacy, empathy, and knowledge. After five months, students were more life-oriented, while caring, nursing expertise, advocacy, and empathy decreased. Selecting nursing as a first-choice programme and aiming for a nursing career influenced students' orientation and attitudes towards nursing positively. Being aware of students' orientation and attitudes towards nursing can help nursing educators in recruitment and retention strategies.

[Good clinical practice and the maintenance of ethical standards in medical research: advice for junior researchers working in mental health care]. / Good clinical practice en medisch-ethische toetsing: handvatten voor (beginnend) onderzoekers in de ggz.

BACKGROUND: In mental health care, more and more research is being done, particularly in the field of educational programmes. Unfortunately, junior researchers are often not fully informed about the rules and regulations relating to research and about medical ethics. Therefore, they are not in a position to make considered judgements that conform to good clinical practice and acceptable medical ethics.
AIM: To give practical advice to trainees, stimulating them to think carefully about ethical standards in patient-related research in mental health care. METHODS The article provides a practice-based overview of practical advice and ethical considerations.
RESULTS: We stress that before beginning their research, researchers should think very carefully about the ethics of medical research. Instructions and guidelines relating to medical and ethical standards are to be found in: directive for good clinical practice compiled by the central committee for human research (CCMO) with the accompanying e-learning module and in the basic course 'rules and organisation for clinical researchers' (BROK). Practical tips, illustrated with examples, provide a framework for stimulating thoughts on medical ethics. Finally, it is important to improve the ways in which research is embedded in the organisational structure of teaching programmes.
CONCLUSION: Basic information about GCP and the upholding of medical and ethical standards in patient-related research can be obtained from various sources. The main challenge is to ensure that GCP is firmly embedded in patient-related research undertaken by junior researchers.