RESUMO
BACKGROUND: C. auris has become a growing concern worldwide due to increases in incidence of colonization and reports of invasive infections. There are limited data on clinical factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with C. auris bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: We assembled a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with C. auris BSI from two geographics areas in US healthcare settings. We collected data on demographic, clinical, and microbiologic characteristics to describe the cohort and constructed multivariate logistic regression models to understand risk factors for two clinical outcomes, all-cause mortality during facility admission, and blood culture clearance. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 187 patients with C. auris BSI (56.1% male, 55.6% age >65 years); 54.6% died by facility discharge and 66.9% (of 142 with available data) experienced blood culture clearance. Pitt bacteremia score at infection onset was associated with mortality (odds-ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.19 [1.01,1.40] per 1-point increase). Hemodialysis was associated with a reduced odds of microbiologic clearance (0.15 [0.05,0.43]) and with mortality (3.08 [1.27,7.50]). CONCLUSIONS: The Pitt bacteremia score at the onset of C. auris BSI may be a useful tool in identifying patients at risk for mortality. Targeted infection prevention practices in patients receiving hemodialysis may be useful to limit poor outcomes.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Candida auris is a highly transmissible yeast that is capable of causing invasive and fatal infections, particularly among persons with underlying medical conditions. Its incidence is rising, especially among patients cared for in post-acute care facilities. Individuals colonized with the yeast may be cared for in inpatient rehabilitation settings, without heightened risk for invasive infection and/or transmission to others, as long as appropriate infection control measures are followed. This article reviews key information for rehabilitation nurses caring for persons with C. auris , including risk factors for infection, the need for contact precautions, appropriate disinfection practices for therapy and diagnostic equipment, and critical components of safe transitions in the care of these patients.
Assuntos
Candidíase Invasiva , Candidíase , Controle de Infecções , Enfermagem em Reabilitação , Humanos , Candidíase/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Enfermagem em Reabilitação/métodos , Candida auris/fisiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Candida auris (CA) is an organism that has spread globally over the last decade. We conducted a quality improvement project with the aim of decreasing or eliminating skin colonization of patients with CA through a modified bathing protocol. METHODS: An isotonic hypochlorite solution was added to routine bathing protocols for hospitalized patients colonized with CA. Weekly skin swabs from axillary and inguinal areas were tested for the presence of CA using polymerase chain reaction and culture. Multidisciplinary efforts, such as environmental terminal cleaning, dedicated equipment, education, and signage were reinforced among staff to improve patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. After 4 weeks of a modified bathing protocol, 81.2% of the patients remained colonized with CA. Three patients were discharged safely to their homes and 3 were transferred to long-term care acute hospitals. Nine patients remained hospitalized after 60 days. Localized rash was reported in 3 patients, which resolved after discontinuation of the product. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of our bathing protocols by including an isotonic hypochlorite solution did not lead to skin decolonization of CA. Further studies are needed to identify effective measures to eradicate, eliminate or reduce colonization.
RESUMO
Background: The impact of strategies for rapid diagnostic screening of Candida auris on hospital operations has not been previously characterized. We describe the implementation of in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on admission for screening of colonization with C. auris, associated process improvements, and financial impact. Methods: This study was conducted across an integrated health system. Patients were tested based on risk factors for C. auris carriage. Pre-intervention, the PCR was sent out to a reference laboratory, and postintervention was performed in-house. Changes in the incidence rates (IRs) of C. auris present on admission (CA-POA) and C. auris hospital-onset fungemia (CA-HOF) were assessed using interrupted time series analysis. The economic impact on isolation and testing costs was calculated. Results: Postintervention, the IR of CA-POA doubled (IRR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.16-5.69; P = .02) compared with the pre-intervention period. The baseline rate of CA-HOF was increasing monthly by 14% (95% CI, 1.05-1.24; P = .002) pre-intervention, while during the postintervention period there was a change in slope with a monthly decrease in IR of 13% (95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .02). The median turnaround time (TAT) of the results (interquartile range) was reduced from 11 (8-14) days to 2 (1-3) days. Savings were estimated to be between $772 513.10 and $3 730 480.26. Conclusions: By performing in-house PCR for screening of C. auris colonization on admission, we found a doubling of CA-POA rates, a subsequent decrease in CA-HOF rates, reduced TAT for PCR results, and more efficient use of infection control measures. In-house testing was cost-effective in a setting of relatively high prevalence among individuals with known risk factors.
RESUMO
Recent evidence suggests an association between hypertension and periodontitis, although the pathways and implications underlying both chronic conditions are still poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hypertension and periodontitis through an observational clinical study using periodontal, physical, and biochemical analyses in hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals with periodontitis. A total of one hundred patients were divided into two groups. The first group was hypertensive patients with periodontitis. The second group was non-hypertensive patients with periodontitis. Periodontal parameters of probing depth, bleeding on probing, and clinical attachment level were evaluated. The systolic, diastolic, mean, and differential blood pressure were measured in the physical examination. In addition, body mass index and waist-hip ratio were verified. Biochemical tests for glycated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, estimated blood glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, creatinine, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and C-reactive protein were evaluated. The data were submitted for statistical analysis (α = 0.05%). The results of this study demonstrated that patients with cardiovascular disease did not present with worse periodontal clinical parameters in the conditions studied. However, it is important to bear in mind that this cross-sectional study has some inherent limitations to its design; therefore, to study the relationship between hypertension and periodontitis further, an interventional randomized clinical trial should be conducted.
RESUMO
We sought to evaluate the effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT) on periodontal clinical parameters, systemic blood pressure (BP), and plasma levels of systemic inflammation markers in patients with combined refractory arterial hypertension (RAH) and stage III grade B periodontitis. Twenty-seven participants with RAH and periodontitis received NSPT. The analyzed clinical parameters were probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI). An assessment was performed for systemic BP, complete blood count, coagulogram, creatinine measurement, C-reactive protein (CRP), glycated hemoglobin, cholesterol, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, glutamate pyruvic transaminase, waist-hip ratio, and body mass index. In the follow-up period, twenty-two patients were evaluated at baseline and after 90 and 180 days. The data were submitted for statistical analysis (α = 0.05%). As expected, the clinical results showed a significant improvement in the percentages of PI, BOP, PD, and CAL, which were statistically significant at 90 and 180 days (p < 0.0001). Importantly, NSPT significantly reduced the blood level of CRP (p < 0.02). However, no significant reduction in BP parameters was noted in the evaluated follow-up periods. NSPT, despite the benefits in periodontal clinical parameters, reduced the plasma level of CRP but not the BP in patients with combined RAH and periodontitis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) and persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) were disproportionately affected by global mpox outbreak in 2022. In this retrospective review, we describe epidemiology and clinical characteristics of mpox infection in South Florida with a focus on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of 198 adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of mpox between 01 January 2020, and 10 September 2022, in two large health systems in South Florida. A descriptive analysis was performed to summarize demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of the patients. RESULTS: Young male patients and PLWH were disproportionately represented among patients with mpox. HIV positive patients were less likely to have adenopathy and myalgia and were more likely to have oral or facial lesions. 22.7% of studied patients were diagnosed with one or more concurrent STI at the time of mpox diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest screening for sexually transmitted infections and HIV for patients diagnosed with mpox. We suggest prompt consultation or referral to infectious disease specialist if needed for the patients who are diagnosed with mpox especially in the severely immunocompromised host.
RESUMO
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a considerable cause of patient morbidity and mortality and are associated with increased hospital lengths of stay as well as increased health care costs to both patients and health care facilities. Substantial advances have been made in infection control practices throughout the perioperative setting to prevent SSIs and improve patient quality of care. Preventing and reducing SSIs requires a multifaceted approach encompassing the continuum of medical and surgical care. This article reviews four major infection prevention guidelines and provides an updated summary of effective strategies that perioperative team members can implement for the prevention of SSIs preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively.
Assuntos
Instalações de Saúde , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologiaRESUMO
We estimated the predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for blood, bone, and soft-tissue cultures. The specificities were 88.8%, 88.5%, and 92.7% for all cultures, blood cultures, and bone and soft-tissue cultures respectively, and the negative predictive values were 99.3%, 99.8%, and 92.7% respectively.
RESUMO
Cascade reporting is an antimicrobial stewardship strategy that has been successfully implemented in inpatient settings, but evidence of its impact on outpatient settings is scarce. We report on the impact on fluroquinolone prescribing at a network of urgent care clinics following the implementation of cascade reporting of Enterobacterales in urine cultures.
RESUMO
Changes in antimicrobial use during the pandemic in relation to long-term trends in utilization among different antimicrobial stewardship program models have not been fully characterized. We analyzed data from an integrated health system using joinpoint regression and found temporal fluctuations in prescribing as well as continuation of existing trends.
RESUMO
A clinical decision tree was developed using point-of-care characteristics to identify patients with culture-proven sepsis due to extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). We compared its performance with the clinical gestalt of emergency department (ED) clinicians and hospital-based clinicians. The developed tree outperformed ED-based clinicians but was comparable to inpatient-based clinicians.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To externally validate various prognostic models and scoring rules for predicting short term mortality in patients admitted to hospital for covid-19. DESIGN: Two stage individual participant data meta-analysis. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary care. PARTICIPANTS: 46 914 patients across 18 countries, admitted to a hospital with polymerase chain reaction confirmed covid-19 from November 2019 to April 2021. DATA SOURCES: Multiple (clustered) cohorts in Brazil, Belgium, China, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Iran, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States previously identified by a living systematic review of covid-19 prediction models published in The BMJ, and through PROSPERO, reference checking, and expert knowledge. MODEL SELECTION AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prognostic models identified by the living systematic review and through contacting experts. A priori models were excluded that had a high risk of bias in the participant domain of PROBAST (prediction model study risk of bias assessment tool) or for which the applicability was deemed poor. METHODS: Eight prognostic models with diverse predictors were identified and validated. A two stage individual participant data meta-analysis was performed of the estimated model concordance (C) statistic, calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large, and observed to expected ratio (O:E) across the included clusters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30 day mortality or in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Datasets included 27 clusters from 18 different countries and contained data on 46 914patients. The pooled estimates ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 (C statistic), 0.22 to 1.22 (calibration slope), and 0.18 to 2.59 (O:E ratio) and were prone to substantial between study heterogeneity. The 4C Mortality Score by Knight et al (pooled C statistic 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.84, 95% prediction interval 0.72 to 0.86) and clinical model by Wang et al (0.77, 0.73 to 0.80, 0.63 to 0.87) had the highest discriminative ability. On average, 29% fewer deaths were observed than predicted by the 4C Mortality Score (pooled O:E 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.11, 95% prediction interval 0.21 to 2.39), 35% fewer than predicted by the Wang clinical model (0.65, 0.52 to 0.82, 0.23 to 1.89), and 4% fewer than predicted by Xie et al's model (0.96, 0.59 to 1.55, 0.21 to 4.28). CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of the included models varied greatly between the data sources. Although the Knight 4C Mortality Score and Wang clinical model appeared most promising, recalibration (intercept and slope updates) is needed before implementation in routine care.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Modelos Estatísticos , Análise de Dados , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , PrognósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately afflicted vulnerable populations. Older adults, particularly residents of nursing facilities, represent a small percentage of the population but account for 40% of mortality from COVID-19 in the United States. Racial and ethnic minority individuals, particularly Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous Americans have experienced higher rates of infection and death than the White population. Although there has been an unprecedented explosion of clinical trials to examine potential therapies, participation by members of these vulnerable communities is crucial to obtaining data generalizable to those communities. METHODS: We undertook an open-label, factorial randomized clinical trial examining hydroxychloroquine and/or azithromycin for hospitalized patients. RESULTS: Of 53 screened patients, 11 (21%) were enrolled. Ten percent (3/31) of Black patients were enrolled, 33% (7/21) of White patients, and 50% (6/12) of Hispanic patients. Forty-seven percent (25/53) of patients declined participation despite eligibility; 58%(18/31) of Black patients declined participation. Forty percent (21/53) of screened patients were from a nursing facility and 10% (2/21) were enrolled. Enrolled patients had fewer comorbidities than nonenrolled patients: median modified Charlson comorbidity score 2.0 (interquartile range 0-2.5), versus 4.0 (interquartile range 2-6) for nonenrolled patients (P = 0.006). The limitations of the study were the low participation rate and the multiple treatment trials concurrently recruiting at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of nonparticipation in our trial of nursing facility residents and Black people emphasizes the concern that clinical trials for therapeutics may not target key populations with high mortality rates.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , População Negra , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Grupos Minoritários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Background: Patients at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) frequently receive care at non-specialized outpatient clinics staffed by physicians and advanced practice clinicians (APCs).Methods: Retrospective cohort study including adult patients diagnosed with chlamydia and/or gonorrhea at urgent care (UC), family medicine (FM), internal medicine (IM) or obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) clinics. The effect of type of clinician on guideline-adherent treatment was estimated using logistic regression adjusted for age, type of clinic, type of infection, and (in female patients) pregnancy status.Results: A total of 1021 patients were identified, 654 (64.1%) females and 367 (35.9%) males. Overall, 12.8% (84/654) of female patients and 19.1% (70/367) of male patients received inadequate antibiotic therapy. Among females, 63.5% (415/654) were treated by APCs and 36.5% (239/654) by physicians. Odds of inadequate therapy did not differ when comparing APCs to physicians (OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.52-1.32; p = .42]). Variables independently associated with inadequate therapy were pregnancy (OR 3.80 [95% CI 1.55-6.10; p < .001]), infection with gonorrhea (OR 2.91 [95% CI 1.65-5.10; p < .0001]) and co-infection (OR 2.63 [95% CI 1.24-5.58; p = .01]) compared to infection with chlamydia alone. Compared to UC clinics, female patients treated at Ob-Gyn clinics had lower odds of inadequate therapy (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.90; p = .02]). Among males, odds of inadequate therapy did not differ by clinician type.Conclusions: Inadequate antibiotic therapy for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea was not associated with type of clinician. These results can help guide educational strategies and resources towards the clinical settings with the greatest gaps in adequacy of management of chlamydia and gonorrhea.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Feminino , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Gravidez , Prescrições , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid initiation of optimal antimicrobial therapy is crucial for the management of Gram-negative (GN) bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the impact of Accelerate PhenoTM (AxDx) system on change in therapy and length of stay among patients with GN bacteremia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized who had at least 1 blood culture with presence of Enterobacterales. We compared clinical outcomes among patients who had their blood cultures processed through standard methods alone vs AxDx. RESULTS: We identified 255 bacteremia episodes among 243 unique patients. In the AxDx group, 31.1% of patients had deescalation of antibiotics within 48 h from blood culture collection compared to 20.0% of patients in the control group (P = 0.09). We found no impact of AxDx on the odds of deescalation at 48 h from blood culture collection [odds ratio (OR) 1.80 (95% CI 0.91-3.56), P = 0.09] or Gram stain report [OR 1.61 (95% CI 0.86-3.01), P = 0.14]. Escalation in therapy at 48 h from blood culture collection occurred in 16.8% and 16.9% of patients in the AxDx and control groups, respectively (P = 0.99). There was no impact on the odds of escalation at 48 h from blood culture collection [OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.47-2.11), P = 0.99] or Gram stain report [OR 1.26 (95% CI 0.57-2.80), P = 0.57]. No differences were seen in length of stay and mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of rapid identification and susceptibility technologies may differ according to the setting in which they are implemented.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemocultura , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severity of disease and outcomes in patient with COVID-19 has been associated with several risk factors tied to the metabolic syndrome. AIMS: We conducted a study with the objective of describing the association between the baseline Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the severity of COVID-19 among patients at risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with at least two risk factors for metabolic syndrome diagnosed with COVID-19. The main exposure of interest was FIB-4 index prior to infection, categorized into three previously validated age-specific levels. The main outcomes of interest were disease requiring hospitalization and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included 373 patients [median age, 62 years; 194 male (52%); median number of metabolic syndrome risk factors, 3]. The median FIB-4 index was 1.10 (interquartile range 0.78-1.61). In models adjusting for diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, patients with intermediate FIB-4 index had 67% higher odds of hospitalization compared to those in the low category {odds ratio (OR) 1.67 [(95% CI 1.06-2.64); p = 0.03]} and patients with high FIB-4 index had higher odds of mortality compared to intermediate and low category with an OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.20-4.12; p = 0.01). However, when we evaluated components of FIB-4 (age and AST/ALT ratio), we found that age alone was the best predictor of hospitalization and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at risk of NAFLD with COVID-19 infection, elevated pre-infection FIB-4 index was associated with worsened clinical outcomes, but age was the strongest predictor.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome Metabólica , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , COVID-19/complicações , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/complicações , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/diagnóstico , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Objective: The BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RFA) has been proposed as a tool that can aid in the timely diagnosis and treatment of respiratory tract infections but its effect on antibiotic prescribing among adult patients has varied. We evaluated the impact of RFA result on antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs) in 2 distinct cohorts: hospitalized patients and patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The study was conducted in 3 community hospitals in Des Moines, Iowa, from March 3 to March 16, 2019. Patients: Adults aged >18 years. Methods: Potential outcome means and average treatment effects for RFA results on antibiotic DOTs were estimated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with regression adjustment was used. Results: We identified 243 patients each in the hospitalized and ED-discharged cohorts. Among hospitalized patients, RFA results did not affect antibiotic DOTs. Among patients discharged from the ED, we found that if all patients had had influenza detected, the average DOTs would have been 2.3 DOTs (-3.2 to -1.4) less than the average observed if all the patients had had a negative RFA (P < .0001); no differences in DOTs were observed when comparing an RFA with a noninfluenza virus detected compared to an RFA with negative results. Conclusions: The impact of RFA results on antibiotic DOTs varies by clinical setting, and reductions were observed only among patients discharged from the ED who had influenza A or B detected.