Redesigning the MCAT exam: balancing multiple perspectives.

The authors of this commentary discuss the recently completed review of the current Medical College Admission Test (MCAT), which has been used since 1991, and describe the blueprint for the new test that will be introduced in 2015. The design of the MCAT exam reflects changes in medical education, medical science, health care delivery, and the needs of the populations served by graduates of U.S. and Canadian medical schools. The authors describe how balancing the ambitious goals for the new exam and the varying priorities of the testing program's many stakeholders made blueprint design complex. They discuss the tensions and trade-offs that characterized the design process as well as the deliberations and data that shaped the blueprint.The blueprint for the MCAT exam balances the assessment of a broad range of competencies in the natural, social, and behavioral sciences and critical analysis and reasoning skills that are essential to entering students' success in medical school. The exam will include four sections: Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems; Chemical and Physical Foundations of Biological Systems; Psychological, Social, and Biological Foundations of Behavior; and Critical Analysis and Reasoning Skills.The authors also offer recommendations for admission committees, advising them to review applicants' test scores, course work, and other academic, personal, and experiential credentials as part of a holistic admission process and in relation to their institutions' educational, scientific, clinical, and service-oriented goals.

Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish documentation standards for medical education activities, beyond educational research, for academic promotion consistent with principles of excellence and scholarship. METHODS: In 2006 a Consensus Conference on Educational Scholarship was convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Group on Education Affairs (GEA) to outline a set of documentation standards for use by educators and academic promotion committees. Conference participants' work was informed by more than 15 years of literature on scholarship, educator portfolios and academic promotion standards. RESULTS: The 110 conference participants, including medical school deans, academic promotion committee members, department chairs, faculty and AAMC leaders, re-affirmed the 5 education activity categories (teaching, curriculum, advising and/or mentoring, education leadership and/or administration, and learner assessment), the contents of each category, and cross-category documentation standards. Educational excellence requires documentation of the quantity and quality of education activities. Documenting a scholarly approach requires demonstrating evidence of drawing from and building on the work of others, and documenting scholarship requires contributing work through public display, peer review and dissemination; both involve engagement with the community of educators. Implementation of these standards - quantity, quality and engagement with the education community - should occur in parallel with the development of an infrastructure to support educators, including sustained faculty development for educators, access to educational resources and journals, peer review mechanisms and consultation and support specific to each activity category. CONCLUSIONS: Educators' contributions to their institutions must be visible to be valued. The establishment of documentation standards for education activities provides the foundation for academic recognition of educators.

A Problem-Based Learning Approach to Incorporating Nutrition into the Medical Curriculum.

Problem Based Learning (PBL) provides a unique opportunity for medical students to learn nutrition principles in the context of evidence-based clinical cases. At the University of Texas Medical School at Houston (UTMSH), PBL is a major component during the second year of the four year undergraduate medical curriculum. A recent review of forty-two clinical cases has shown that over half of the cases include nutrition-specific objectives related to diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, or disease prevention. Thus, these PBL cases provide students the opportunity to study a broad range of nutrition topics in a clinically relevant context. The students' nutrition knowledge is evaluated using clinically-oriented, multiple-choice questions. In order for students to develop fully their competency in clinical nutrition topics, they are also provided a foundation in basic nutrition principles. This report describes a comprehensive approach through a case-based curriculum to help prepare students in their pre-clinical years for the nutritional care of patients in their clerkships, residency, and as practicing physicians.

Low attendance by basic science educators at medical education meetings.

BACKGROUND: Recently, concern has been expressed about the perception that few basic science educators (BSE) attend national and regional medical education meetings. PURPOSE: This study was designed to analyze the issues affecting BSE decisions about whether to attend medical education meetings. METHOD: An online survey was created and submitted to basic science course directors at the 128 U.S. allopathic medical schools. RESULTS: Responses from 486 BSE suggest that because of the pressure to obtain research funding and achieve academic promotion, participation in medical education meetings is not a high priority with most BSE. CONCLUSIONS: BSE attendance at medical education meetings can be improved, but it will require joint efforts by the BSE home institution and medical education organizations.