Differential Impact of Virtual Family-Centered Rounds in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by Social Factors: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis.

Background: Barriers to attending family-centered rounds (FCR) exist for socially disadvantaged families. Using telehealth to conduct virtual FCR could potentially promote equitable parent/guardian FCR access. The objective of this work was to assess whether the effects of a virtual FCR intervention on parent FCR attendance varied by subgroups defined by social factors. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of virtual FCR in the neonatal intensive care unit. Parents of intervention arm infants were invited to participate in virtual FCR plus usual care; control arm infants received usual care. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned group and by race/ethnicity, insurance, mother's education, and neighborhood health conditions. We used Poisson regression to estimate and compare FCR parent attendance rates. Heterogeneity of intervention effects was assessed using interaction terms to evaluate the relative benefit of the intervention in increasing parent FCR attendance. Results: We included all enrolled trial subjects (74 intervention, 36 control). Intervention arm infants had 3.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.66-4.23) times the FCR parent attendance rate of subjects in the control arm. Compared with the corresponding reference subgroup, intervention benefits were 2.15 times (95% CI: 1.30-3.56) better for racial/ethnic minorities, 3.08 times (95% CI: 1.59-5.95) better for those with private insurance, 2.68 times (95% CI: 1.12-6.40) better for those whose mother reported no college education, and 4.14 times (95% CI: 2.07-8.25) better for those from a neighborhood with worse health conditions. Conclusions: Virtual FCR improved parent FCR attendance overall, with even greater benefits for certain subgroups. Further research is needed to mitigate the differential benefit demonstrated for privately insured subjects.

Using inpatient telehealth for family engagement: A mixed methods study of perceptions from patients, families, and care team providers.

Background: The Inpatient Telehealth Program permits family to remotely communicate with the patient and care team through secure, live video. We aimed to assess the implementation of this program for family engagement from the perspectives of patients, families, and providers. Methods: We used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of surveys assessing patient, family, and provider experience. The qualitative component used thematic analysis of patient, family, and provider interviews plus survey free text responses. We performed memo-writing and coding. We developed hypotheses about relationships among categories and identified analytic themes. We used data transformation and narrative discussion to report the integrated findings. Results: Surveys from 214 individuals (33 patients, 145 family, 36 providers) were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation) experience ratings (1-poor, 5-best) were 4.0 (1.5) for patients, 4.6 (0.8) for family, and 4.0 (1.4) for providers. We received 134 free text responses and conducted 21 interviews. Three themes emerged: (1) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient and family experience through strengthened relationships and increased support; (2) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient care through improved information sharing and engagement; (3) low awareness of the program limited adoption. Quantitative and qualitative data aligned in that participants perceived inpatient telehealth to be valuable; however, surveys revealed that patients and providers have relatively lower satisfaction with the program. Conclusion: Inpatient telehealth for family engagement was perceived to improve family-centeredness of care. Future work is needed to overcome implementation challenges and to increase awareness of this resource among patients and families.

A Qualitative Intervention Evaluation of Neonatal Virtual Family-Centered Rounds.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an implementation evaluation of the virtual family-centered rounds (FCR) intervention by exploring the perceptions and experiences of parents and care team providers. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using a thematic analysis of unobtrusive observations of rounding encounters and semi-structured interviews with the parents of discharged infants and members of the neonatal care team. Eligible participants had used virtual FCR at least once. Five research team members independently performed focused coding and memo writing of transcripts and observation fieldnotes. The team met weekly to compare and refine codes, update the interview guide, develop tentative categories, and discuss the theoretical direction. RESULTS: We conducted 406 minutes of unobtrusive observations and 21 interviews with parents, physicians, neonatal nurse practitioners, bedside nurses, dieticians, and pharmacists. Three themes and 13 subthemes emerged from the analysis: (1) virtual FCR improved perceived care delivery and clinical outcomes through increased opportunities for parent engagement, (2) the acceptance of virtual FCR by providers grew over time despite the persistent presence of technical challenges, and (3) the implementation of virtual FCR should be standardized and delivered by the care team to enhance usability, effectiveness, and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual FCR is perceived by NICU parents and care team providers to be a valuable intervention that can enhance family centered care. The identified virtual FCR implementation strategies should be tested in further studies.

Adapting telehealth to address health equity: Perspectives of primary care providers across the United States.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth has the potential to increase access to care for medically underserved patients. This qualitative study aimed to identify telecare practices used during the COVID-19 pandemic to meet the needs of patients experiencing homelessness, patients with disabilities, and patients with language preference other than English (LOE). METHODS: We conducted a secondary qualitative data analysis of 47 clinician interviews at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) around the country. Using thematic analysis, transcripts were coded by line-by-line by five qualitative researchers. A multidisciplinary team of telehealth experts, researchers and primary care clinicians reviewed memos and excerpts to generate major themes. RESULTS: We identified six main areas demonstrating how community providers developed strategies or practices to improve access to care for vulnerable patients: reaching patients experiencing homelessness, serving deaf and hard of hearing patients, improving access for patients with disabilities, serving patients with LOE, improving access for mental and behavioral health services, and educating patients about telehealth. During the pandemic, FQHCs developed innovative solutions to provide access to care for the unhoused, including using telehealth in shelters, vans, and distributing devices like mobile phones and tablets. Telehealth reduced transportation burdens for patients with disabilities and reduced no-show rates for mental health services by adapting group therapy via telehealth features (like break-out rooms) and increasing provider capacity. CONCLUSION: Our study identified strategies adopted by FQHCs to serve underserved populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the need for enduring strategies to improve health equity through telehealth..

Using human-centered design to develop a nurse-to-family telehealth intervention for pediatric transfers.

Objective: To develop a nurse-to-family telehealth intervention for pediatric inter-facility transfers using the human-centered design approach. Methods: We conducted the inspiration and ideation phases of a human-centered design process from July 2022 to December 2022. For the inspiration phase, we conducted a qualitative cross-sectional case study design over 3 months. We used thematic analysis with the framework approach of parent and provider interviews. Five team members individually coded transcripts and then met to discuss memos, update a construct summary sheet, and identify emerging themes. The team adapted themes into "How Might We" statements. For the ideation phase, multidisciplinary stakeholders brainstormed solutions to the "How Might We" statements in a design workshop. Workshop findings informed the design of a nurse-to-family telehealth intervention, which was iteratively revised over 2 months based on stakeholder feedback sessions. Results: We conducted interviews with nine parents, 11 nurses, and 13 physicians. Four themes emerged supporting the promise of a nurse-to-family telehealth intervention, the need to effectively communicate the intervention purpose, the value of a user-friendly workflow, and the essentiality of ensuring that diverse populations equitably benefit from the intervention. "How Might We" statements were discussed among 22 total workshop participants. Iterative adaptations were made to the intervention until feedback from workshop participants and 67 other stakeholders supported no further improvements were needed. Conclusion: Human-centered design phases facilitated stakeholder engagement in developing a nurse-to-family telehealth intervention. This intervention will be tested in an implementation phase as a feasibility and pilot trial.