Application of artificial intelligence in cataract management: current and future directions.

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought breakthroughs in many areas of medicine. In ophthalmology, AI has delivered robust results in the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and retinopathy of prematurity. Cataract management is another field that can benefit from greater AI application. Cataract  is the leading cause of reversible visual impairment with a rising global clinical burden. Improved diagnosis, monitoring, and surgical management are necessary to address this challenge. In addition, patients in large developing countries often suffer from limited access to tertiary care, a problem further exacerbated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. AI on the other hand, can help transform cataract management by improving automation, efficacy and overcoming geographical barriers. First, AI can be applied as a telediagnostic platform to screen and diagnose patients with cataract using slit-lamp and fundus photographs. This utilizes a deep-learning, convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect and classify referable cataracts appropriately. Second, some of the latest intraocular lens formulas have used AI to enhance prediction accuracy, achieving superior postoperative refractive results compared to traditional formulas. Third, AI can be used to augment cataract surgical skill training by identifying different phases of cataract surgery on video and to optimize operating theater workflows by accurately predicting the duration of surgical procedures. Fourth, some AI CNN models are able to effectively predict the progression of posterior capsule opacification and eventual need for YAG laser capsulotomy. These advances in AI could transform cataract management and enable delivery of efficient ophthalmic services. The key challenges include ethical management of data, ensuring data security and privacy, demonstrating clinically acceptable performance, improving the generalizability of AI models across heterogeneous populations, and improving the trust of end-users.

Myopia.

Myopia, also known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness, is a very common condition that typically starts in childhood. Severe forms of myopia (pathologic myopia) are associated with a risk of other associated ophthalmic problems. This disorder affects all populations and is reaching epidemic proportions in East Asia, although there are differences in prevalence between countries. Myopia is caused by both environmental and genetic risk factors. A range of myopia management and control strategies are available that can treat this condition, but it is clear that understanding the factors involved in delaying myopia onset and slowing its progression will be key to reducing the rapid rise in its global prevalence. To achieve this goal, improved data collection using wearable technology, in combination with collection and assessment of data on demographic, genetic and environmental risk factors and with artificial intelligence are needed. Improved public health strategies focusing on early detection or prevention combined with additional effective therapeutic interventions to limit myopia progression are also needed.

Three-Year Outcomes of Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking and Femto-LASIK for the Treatment of High Myopia in Asian Eyes.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term visual outcomes of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK) and accelerated cross-linking (CXL) [LASIK Xtra] for the treatment of high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 163 consecutive eyes of 85 patients who underwent LASIK Xtra for the treatment of high myopia and/or myopic astigmatism (spherical equivalent ≥ -6.00 D) in Singapore National Eye Centre from the years 2013 to 2017 were included in this retrospective case series. Post-operative follow-up was up to 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 163 eyes, 67 were followed up for 1 year (mean 12.9 months), 69 for 2 years (mean 24.0 months) and 43 for 3 years (mean 36.4 months). Overall mean follow-up was 22.8 months (9-46 months). The mean pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) was -8.60 ± 1.47 D [range: -11.75 to -4.75] (n = 163) and mean attempted correction SE was -8.84 ± 1.41 D [range: -11.88 to -5.25]. Most eyes (>95%) maintained an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 6/12 or better over 3 years. Visual outcomes were predictable with ≥95% of eyes achieving a SE correction within ± 1D of attempted correction over 3 years. There was a mild regression in SE refraction over 3 years with a mean of -0.10 ± 0.45 D three years post-operatively (p = 0.03). The safety index was >1.05 at 3 years follow-up. There were no significant post-operative complications though 24 eyes had mild haze and 2 eyes had grade 1 diffuse lamellar keratitis that resolved within 1 month. CONCLUSION: Our 3-year LASIK Xtra results show favorable safety, efficacy, predictability and stability outcomes in Asian patients with high myopia.

Corneal Inlay Damage After Cosmetic Laser Treatment of the Eyelid With Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser.

Importance: Protective eyewear or corneal shields are recommended during cosmetic facial laser treatment. Objective: To describe the occurrence of corneal inlay damage following treatment to the eyelids and face with an Nd:YAG laser. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational case report includes a single incident case cared for at a tertiary care center. A 58-year-old man who had undergone bilateral uncomplicated myopic laser in situ keratomileusis surgery in 2003 and corneal inlay implant in the nondominant left eye in 2013 experienced decreased visual acuity (VA) and pain in the left eye after the application of 2 passes of the Nd:YAG laser to his face and both eyelids for facial tightening. At presentation, the uncorrected VA was counting fingers OS and 20/20 OD. Slitlamp biomicroscopy showed a corneal epithelial defect overlying a deformed corneal inlay, peripheral scattered pigmentary deposits, corneal haze, and brown discoloration of the lamellar pocket of the inlay. He underwent explant of the inlay and debridement 48 hours later because of deteriorating VA and increasing corneal haze. Exposure: Application of long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm to the middle one-third of both upper eyelids and the periorbital region in a man with a corneal inlay implant. Corneal shields were not worn during the procedure. The peak penetration depth of this laser system is approximately 4 mm. The mean (SD) thickness of the upper eyelid in Asian eyes is 1.127 (0.238) mm. Main Outcomes and Measures: Improvement of corneal inlay damage. Results: In this 58-year-old man, 3 months after the inlay explant, the intrastromal discoloration had resolved. There was still residual corneal haze, but the patient was able to achieve a best-corrected VA of 20/25 OS for distance and J3 (Snellen equivalent, 20/30) OS for near. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the exact cause and effect cannot be determined from a single case, our findings suggest that a history of corneal inlay implant should be asked about prior to any long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatment to the periorbital skin and eyelids. Furthermore, these findings suggest that laser treatment to the eyelids should be avoided and that protective eyewear or corneal shields are recommended during cosmetic facial laser treatment in all patients.

Eighteen-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 53 731 eyes.

BACKGROUND: To assess the outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed for the treatment of myopia in terms of safety, efficacy and predictability in an 18-year clinical audit. METHOD: In this single-centre, prospective, non-randomised study, preoperative and postoperative refractions, uncorrected (UCVA), best-corrected Snellen visual acuity (BCVA) and complications of all eyes undergoing myopic LASIK were recorded. Safety, efficacy, refractive predictability, treatment trends, retreatment rates and complication rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2015, 53 731 eyes of 27312 patients underwent myopic LASIK. Patients' median age was 31.6 years (mean, 32.6±7.3 years); there were 9703 males (35.5%). Patients were predominantly ethnic Chinese (87.4%). Mean follow-up time was 78±75.6 days (median, 86 days). Overall efficacy index was 0.91 with >99% of eyes achieving UCVA of ≥20/40 and >70% achieving 20/20 since 2010. 95.43% of eyes had no loss of vision postoperatively and 4.2% and 0.37% lost 1 and ≥2 lines BCVA, respectively. From 2010 the safety index has been >1.05. More than 94.0% of eyes achieved within ±1.0 D of target refraction and at least 70% achieved within ±0.50 D of target from 2010 onwards. Retreatment rate was 2.55% and after retreatment 98.4% of eyes achieved ≥20/40 UCVA and 63.5% achieved ≥20/20 UCVA. The overall complication rate is 0.98%, and since 2010, the annual complication rate has been <0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Myopic LASIK performed in Asian eyes is safe and effective with high refractive predictability in a comprehensive LASIK programme with appropriate clinical audit.

Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking and Laser In situ Keratomileusis for the Treatment of High Myopia in Asian Eyes.

BACKGROUND: LASIK Xtra is a recently described technique which combines LASIK and accelerated corneal cross-linking(CXL) in the same setting. Its long-term outcome in Asians with high myopia is not well described. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, predictability and safety of LASIK Xtra with LASIK in patients with high myopia. METHOD: This is a retrospective study comparing 50 consecutive eyes undergoing LASIK Xtra for the correction of high myopia and/or myopic astigmatism (-6.63 to -15.50 D manifest spherical equivalent) with a matched control group of 50 eyes undergoing LASIK alone for correction of high myopia (-6.00 to -12.25 D manifest spherical equivalent). Mean follow-up was 5.7 months (range, 1.5-13.3 months) for LASIK Xtra and 3.6 months (range, 1.7-4.2 months) for LASIK only. Outcome measures included Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA), Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA), refraction and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At post-operative 3 months, all eyes achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better, and 80.0% of LASIK Xtra eyes achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better, compared to 66.0% of LASIK only eyes (p = 0.115). Efficacy indices were 0.99±0.17 for LASIK Xtra and 0.94±0.17 for LASIK only (p = 0.164). The proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of attempted correction was 84% in the LASIK only group and 72% in the LASIK Xtra group at post-operative 3 months (p = 0.148). Safety indices were 1.11±0.19 and 1.11±0.18 in the LASIK Xtra and LASIK only groups, respectively (p = 0.735). CONCLUSION: LASIK Xtra achieved comparable safety, predictability and efficacy as LASIK in patients with high myopia. Good refractive stability was attained at 6-12 months. Further long term studies are required to determine whether simultaneous CXL is able to reduce postoperative LASIK keratectasia in high-risk individuals.

Enhancement after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of enhancement after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-four eyes of 307 patients who underwent SMILE at Singapore National Eye Center between February 2012 and March 2016. METHODS: The data collected included patient age at primary SMILE, gender, race, preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity, the occurrence of suction loss during the procedure, and the need for enhancement. All enhancements were carried out by performing an alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) procedure with application of mitomycin C (MMC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, prevalence, preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for enhancement, and outcomes after enhancement. RESULTS: The prevalence of enhancement was 2.7%, and 71.4% eyes had enhancement within 1 year of primary SMILE. The incidence of enhancement was 2.1% and 2.9% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Age older than 35 years, preoperative MRSE more than -6.00 diopters (D), preoperative myopia more than 6.00 D, preoperative astigmatism more than 3.00 D, and intraoperative suction loss were significant risk factors for enhancement after SMILE after adjusting for all other covariates (odds ratios, 5.58, 4.80, 1.41, 3.06, and 2.14, respectively; P = 0.004, 0.021, 0.022, 0.002, and 0.020, respectively). In the patients who underwent bilateral SMILE, the first-operated eye had a marginal trend toward significance for enhancement (P = 0.054). There was no gender or racial difference. In the 14 eyes requiring enhancement, the uncorrected distance visual acuity before enhancement ranged from 20/80 to 20/25, and the mean attempted enhancement spherical equivalent was -0.50±0.86 D. The uncorrected distance visual acuity improved in most patients (92.9%) after enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year incidence of enhancement after SMILE was 2.9%. Risk factors associated with enhancement included older age at SMILE procedure, greater preoperative MRSE, greater preoperative myopia, greater preoperative astigmatism, and the occurrence of intraoperative suction loss. Clinical outcomes of using PRK with application of MMC for enhancement were good.

Ophthalmology simulation for undergraduate and postgraduate clinical education.

This is a review education paper on the current ophthalmology simulators utilized worldwide for undergraduate and postgraduate training. At present, various simulators such as the EYE Exam Simulator (Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), Eyesi direct ophthalmoscope simulator (VRmagic, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), Eyesi indirect ophthalmoscope simulator (VRmagic, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and Eyesi cataract simulators (VRmagic, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). These simulators are thought to be able to reduce the initial learning curve for the ophthalmology training but further research will need to be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the simulation-assisted Ophthalmology training. Future research will be of great value to assess the medical students and residents' responses and performance regarding the usefulness of the individual eye simulator.

Extracapsular cataract extraction training: junior ophthalmology residents' self-reported satisfaction level with their proficiency and initial learning barrier.

PURPOSE: To investigate residents' self-reported satisfaction level with their proficiency in extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) surgery and the initial barriers to learning the procedure. METHODS: This is a single-centre prospective descriptive case series involving eight first-year ophthalmology residents in Singapore National Eye Center. We recorded the demographics, frequency of review by the residents of their own surgical videos and their satisfaction level with their proficiency at each of the ECCE steps using a 5-point Likert scale. All ECCE surgical videos between October 2013 and May 2014 were collected and analysed for the overall time taken for the surgery and the time taken to perform the individual steps of the procedure. RESULTS: The mean age of the residents was 27.6 ± 1.5 years and 62.5% (5/8) were women. More than half (62.5%, 5/8) reviewed their own surgical videos while 37.5% (3/8) discussed the surgical videos with their peers or supervisors. Of the ECCE steps, the residents were most dissatisfied with their proficiency in performing irrigation and aspiration (87.5%, 7/8), followed by suturing (62.5%, 5/8), intraocular lens insertion (62.5%, 5/8) and tin can capsulotomy (62.5%, 5/8). The average time taken for each ECCE case was 55.0 ± 12.2 min and, of all the steps, most time was spent on suturing (20.5 ± 6.8 min), followed by irrigation and aspiration (5.5 ± 3.6 min) and tin can capsulotomy (3.3 ± 1.8 min). CONCLUSIONS: The first-year ophthalmology residents were most dissatisfied with their proficiency in irrigation/aspiration, suturing and tin can capsulotomy. More training needs to be directed to these areas during teaching sessions in the operating room, wet laboratory or cataract simulation training sessions.

Comparative analysis of two femtosecond LASIK platforms using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics.

PURPOSE: New femtosecond laser platforms may reduce ocular surface interference and LASIK-associated dry eye. This study investigated tear protein profiles in subjects who underwent LASIK using two femtosecond lasers to assess differences in protein expression. METHODS: This was a randomized interventional clinical trial involving 22 patients who underwent femtosecond laser refractive surgery with a contralateral paired eye design. Corneal flaps of 22 subjects were created by either Visumax or Intralase laser. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively using Schirmer's strips. Tear protein ratios were calculated relative to preoperative protein levels at baseline. The main outcome measures were the levels of a panel of dry eye protein markers analyzed using isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 824 unique proteins were quantifiable. Tear protein ratios were differentially regulated between the eyes treated with different lasers. The secretoglobulins Lipophilin A (1.80-fold) and Lipophilin C (1.77) were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05) at 1 week postoperatively in Visumax but not in Intralase-treated eyes. At 1 week, orosomucoid1 was upregulated (1.78) in Intralase but not Visumax-treated eyes. In the same eyes, lysozyme, cathepsin B, and lipo-oxygenase were downregulated at 0.44-, 0.64-, and 0.64-folds, respectively. Transglutaminase-2 was downregulated in both groups of eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Different laser platforms induce distinct biological responses in the cornea and ocular surface, which manifests as different levels of tear proteins. This study has implications for surgical technology and modulation of wound healing responses. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01252654.).

Patient and surgeon experience during laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser systems.

PURPOSE: To describe the subjective experience of patients and surgeons during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Intralase 60 kHz or the Visumax 500 kHz femtosecond laser. SETTING: Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical study. METHODS: In myopic patients, LASIK was performed with the corneal flap created using the 60 kHz laser in 1 eye and the 500 kHz laser in the contralateral eye. Postoperatively, patients completed a standardized validated questionnaire about their subjective intraoperative experiences (eg, light perception, pain, fear). Surgeons reported their intraoperative experiences and preferences. RESULTS: Loss of light perception occurred in 50.0% of 60 kHz laser cases and 0% of 500 kHz laser cases during docking and in 63.0% and 0% of cases, respectively, during laser flap creation (P < .0001). The mean pain score with the 60 kHz laser was significantly higher during docking (P < .0001) but not during laser flap cutting (P = .006). Subconjunctival hemorrhage occurred in 67.4% of eyes with the 60 kHz laser and in 2.2% of eyes with the 500 kHz laser (P < .0001). The 500 kHz laser was preferred by 78.3% of patients, while 21.7% preferred the 60 kHz laser (P < .0001). The surgeons preferred the 60 kHz laser in 50.0% of cases and the 500 kHz laser in 8.7% (P < .0001); 41.3% had no preference. CONCLUSIONS: Patients preferred surgery with the 500 kHz laser with no loss of light perception, less pain, less fear, and less subconjunctival hemorrhage. Surgeons preferred the 60 kHz laser.

Visual outcomes comparison of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, predictability, and safety outcomes of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: In this single-center multisurgeon study, patients had LASIK with flaps created using a Visumax 500 kHz or Intralase 60 kHz femtosecond laser system. Ablation was performed with the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser in all patients. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative manifest refraction, attempted treatment spherical equivalent (SE), visual acuity, and complications were compared. RESULTS: The 500 kHz femtosecond laser group comprised 381 patients (381 eyes) and the 60 kHz femtosecond laser group, 362 patients (362 eyes). Three months postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 99.1% of eyes in the 60 kHz laser group and 99.4% of eyes in the 500 kHz laser group (P=.678). Regarding predictability, 98.6% of eyes and 97.4% of eyes, respectively, were within ± 1.0 diopter of the attempted SE correction postoperatively (P=.228). The safety index was similar in the 60 kHz laser group and the 500 kHz laser group (mean 1.06 ± 0.16 [SD] versus 1.05 ± 0.14) (P=.321). CONCLUSION: The safety, predictability, and efficacy profiles of the 500 kHz femtosecond platform for LASIK were excellent and comparable to those of the 60 kHz platform.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser platforms in contralateral eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, predictability, and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using 2 femtosecond platforms for flap creation. SETTING: Multisurgeon single center. DESIGN: Clinical trial. METHODS: Bilateral femtosecond LASIK was performed using the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser system. The Visumax femtosecond platform (Group 1) was used to create the LASIK flap in 1 eye, while the Intralase femtosecond platform (Group 2) was used to create the LASIK flap in the contralateral eye. The preoperative, 1-month, and 3-month postoperative visual acuities, refraction, and contrast sensitivity in the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The study enrolled 45 patients. Three months after femtosecond LASIK, 79.5% of eyes in Group 1 and 82.1% in Group 2 achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 (P=.808). The mean efficacy index was 0.97 in Group 1 and 0.98 in Group 2 at 3 months (P=.735); 89.7% of eyes in Group 1 and 84.6% of eyes in Group 2 were within ± 0.50 diopter of emmetropia at 3 months (P=.498). No eye in either group lost more than 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The mean safety index at 3 months was 1.11 in Group 1 and 1.10 in Group 2 (P=.570). CONCLUSION: The results of LASIK with both femtosecond lasers were similar, and both platforms produced efficacious and predictable LASIK outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Comparison of corneal sensitivity, tear function and corneal staining following laser in situ keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms.

PURPOSE: To evaluate longitudinal changes in corneal sensitivity, tear function, and corneal staining in patients who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using two different femtosecond lasers. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, contralateral eyes of 45 patients underwent flap creation by either VisuMax or IntraLase™ femtosecond laser. Corneal sensitivity, tear break up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, and corneal fluorescein staining were assessed preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in any clinical outcome measure between the two femtosecond lasers (P > 0.05), although there was a trend towards slightly lower reductions for corneal sensitivity and TBUT in VisuMax-operated eyes. Overall, corneal sensitivity was significantly reduced at 1 week (P < 0.05), 1 month (P < 0 .001), and 3 months (P < 0.001) postoperatively. A significantly greater reduction of corneal sensitivity was noted in eyes with a myopic spherical equivalent of -6.00 diopters (D) to -11.25 D as compared with eyes that had a relatively lower level of myopia of less than -6.00 D (P < 0.001). TBUT and Schirmer's test values were significantly diminished at 1 week postoperatively (P < 0.04). Overall, corneal staining was significantly increased at 1 week postoperatively (P < 0.001). The level of myopia did not significantly affect postoperative changes in TBUT, Schirmer's test values, or corneal staining (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that changes in corneal sensitivity, tear function, and corneal staining were statistically similar in LASIK using VisuMax and IntraLase femtosecond lasers for flap creation. However, the trend towards faster recovery of corneal sensitivity and TBUT observed in VisuMax-operated eyes may be attributable to improved technical specifications.

Singapore Malay Eye Study: rationale and methodology of 6-year follow-up study (SiMES-2).

BACKGROUND: To describe the rationale and study design of a follow-up epidemiological eye study among Singaporean Malay adults. DESIGN: Follow-up prospective population-based study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants of the Singapore Malay Eye Study (SiMES-1), which was conducted from August 2004 to June 2006. METHODS: This is a follow-up study of the 3280 participants who participated in the SiMES-1 and are residing in Singapore. All participants of this follow-up study will undergo various standardized validated questionnaires on socio-demographics, quality of life and impact of visual impairment. Participants will undergo assessment of blood pressure, anthropometry, presenting and best corrected visual acuity, subjective refraction, ocular biometry, slit lamp and dilated eye examination, Goldmann tonometry, optic disc imaging, digital lens and retinal photography. Retinal tomography, retinal optical coherence topography and fundus autofluorescence will also be performed. Gonioscopy and visual fields examination will be performed on selected individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, risk factors and impact of visual impairment and major eye diseases. RESULTS: A total of 3280 people who participated in the SiMES-1 will be contacted and invited to participate in this follow-up study. It is estimated that 12.8% of the participants will be deceased and there will be an 80% participation rate for the survivors of SiMES-1 (approximately 2288 participants). CONCLUSION: SiMES-2 will be one of the few follow-up epidemiological eye studies among Asians and will determine the cumulative 6-year incidence, progression, risk factors and impact of major eye diseases in Singaporean Malay adults.

Prevalence and risk factors of meibomian gland dysfunction: the Singapore Malay eye study.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and associations of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in an urban Malay population in Singapore. METHODS: Population-based cross-sectional study of 3280 (78.7% response rate) Malay persons aged 40 to 80 years, living in Singapore. MGD was defined by a slit-lamp clinical examination as either lid margin telangiectasia or meibomian gland orifice plugging in at least one eye. Participants underwent a standardized questionnaire and clinical examination, including laboratory investigations. Data were analyzed for 3271 persons. RESULTS: The age-standardized prevalence of MGD was 56.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 53.3-59.4]. A higher MGD prevalence was found in male participants across all age groups [odds ratio (OR), 1.30; 95% CI, 1.35-1.79], postmenopausal women (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.19-2.33), and all participants with pinguecula (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.08-2.85), high diastolic blood pressure (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.62), and use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.74-9.27). CONCLUSIONS: MGD was highly prevalent in this Asian population and associated with various systemic and ocular conditions.

Refractive stability of LASIK with the Visx 20/20 excimer laser vs ZB5m phakic iol implantation in patients with high myopia (>-10.00 d): a 10-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term outcomes of LASIK and ZB5M phakic intraocular lens implantation (PIOL) (Domilens) for high myopia (>-10.00 diopters [D]). METHODS: This long-term (10 years) follow-up retrospective interventional case series study included 126 eyes that underwent LASIK and 52 eyes that underwent ZB5M angle-supported PIOL implantation. Both groups of eyes were similar in terms of preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SE), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and age. RESULTS: Mean preoperative SE was -14.33 D in the LASIK group and -14.84 D in the PIOL group. At 10-year follow-up, mean postoperative SE was -1.47±2.00 D in the LASIK group and -1.01±1.36 D in the PIOL group (P=.21). In the LASIK group, 67% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia at 2 years after surgery, compared to 42% at 10 years. In the PIOL group, 68% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia 2 years after implantation compared to 53% at 10 years. In the LASIK group, 43.5% of eyes achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better 10 years after surgery compared to 67.9% in the PIOL group (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The ZB5M angle-supported PIOL was shown to have better predictability and stability compared to LASIK over 10 years. However, reductions in endothelial cell count over time were observed in eyes with PIOLs.

Effect of corneal arcus on central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of corneal arcus with central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: This was a population-based cross-sectional study of Malay participants aged 40 to 80 years living in Singapore. Participants underwent a standardized interview and systemic and ocular examinations, including CCT, IOP, and corneal curvature radius measurements. Corneal arcus, assessed using a slitlamp, was defined as gray-white or yellow opacity located near the periphery of the cornea but separated from the limbus by a clear zone. RESULTS: Corneal arcus was found in right eyes among 1747 (57.9%) of 3015 participants. After adjusting for age, sex, and systemic factors, IOP was higher (15.87 vs 14.86 mm Hg, P < .001) and CCT was thinner (540.6 vs 543.4 µm, P = .03) in eyes with vs without corneal arcus. In multiple linear regression models, eyes with corneal arcus had on average 1.14 mm Hg higher IOP than eyes without corneal arcus. In the presence of corneal arcus, the linear correlations of CCT × IOP and of corneal curvature radius × IOP were altered. The prevalence of ocular hypertension, but not primary open-angle glaucoma, was significantly higher among participants with corneal arcus than among participants without corneal arcus (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal arcus was associated with higher IOP and lower CCT independent of age, sex, and systemic and ocular factors. Further research is required to investigate the clinical implications of these findings for IOP assessment in eyes with corneal arcus.