Once-Weekly Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Older Patients: A Potential Alternative Treatment Schedule to Daily 3-Week Hypofractionation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively report clinical outcomes on a consecutive series of older early breast cancer patients treated with once-weekly adjuvant whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 291 patients (298 breasts) were treated with WBRT between 2007 and 2013. Patients were given 6 to 6.5 Gy in 5 weekly fractions (total dose, 32.5-30 Gy) over 5 weeks. Clinical end points were local control (LC), disease-free (DFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS), and acute and late toxicity and cosmesis. Prognostic clinical variables were assessed with respect to DFS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 46.5 months (range, 12-84 months). The 3- and 5-year LC rates were 99.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.4-99.9) and 98% (95% CI, 91.1-99.6). The 3- and 5-year CSS and OS were 97.7% (95% CI, 94.5-99.1), 95.3% (95% CI, 90.5-97.7), 94.4% (95% CI, 90.4-96.7), and 83.6% (95% CI, 76.1-88.9), respectively. Maximum detected acute skin toxicity was Grade (G) 0 in 71.8% of patients, G1 in 22.6%, G2 in 4.8%, G3 in 1%, and G4 in 0.3%. Treatment interruption occurred in 2 patients because of severe skin reactions. Late skin toxicity consisted of G1 fibrosis in 31.5% of patients, G2 in 4.2%, and G3 in 3.5%. Grade 1 edema was observed in 7% of patients, G2 in 4.2%, and G3 in 1.4%. G1 telangiectasia occurred in 1.8% and G3 in 0.7%. G1 hyperpigmentation was found in 4.6% of patients, G2 in 2.4%, and G1 atrophy was detected in 2.1%. Pain was observed as G1 in 13%, G2 in 1.8%, and G3 in 0.4%. Cosmetic results were good to excellent in 86.4% and fair to poor in 13.6%. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly hypofractionated WBRT (30-32-5 Gy in 5 fractions), delivered with standard tangential fields with the patient in the supine position seems feasible and effective for a selected population of primarily old breast cancer patients with predominantly low-risk features. This schedule might allow fragile patients to receive adjuvant WBRT after BCS, increasing radiotherapy accessibility and utilization.

Variation in gynecological oncology follow-up practice: attributable to cancer centers or to patient characteristics? A Piedmont Regional Oncology Network Study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend minimalist follow-up, there is wide variability in gynecological oncology practice. The aims of this study were to describe between-center differences in the follow-up of endometrial, ovarian, and uterine cervical cancer; to identify the determinants of test prescription; to estimate the related costs; and to assess the weight of center habits and patient characteristics as sources of unexplained variability. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of patients treated between August 2004 and July 2005 for gynecological malignancies and followed up for the detection of recurrent disease were retrospectively collected from 29 centers of the Piedmont Oncology Network. Multivariate multilevel analyses were performed to study the determinants of test prescription and costs. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 351 patients (median follow-up: 578 days). The unexplained variability in computed tomography prescriptions (26%), ultrasound prescriptions (17%), and total cost of follow-up (15%) can be attributed to center habits, independenty of the clinical characteristics of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Much of the unexplained variability in the follow-up for gynecological malignancies is attributable to different habits of centers belonging to a cancer network. These results prompted us to design a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare minimalist versus intensive follow-up programs in endometrial cancer.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in neo-adjuvant and concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: To evaluate feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA-CT) followed by CT + radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced or unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: 22 HNSCC patients were enrolled (18 males, 4 females; median age, 59.5 years; median ECOG PS, 1). Sites of disease: oral cavity, 18.2%; oropharynx, 40.9%; hypopharynx, 18.2%; larynx, 4.6%, multiple sites, 18.2%. T (tumor) category: T2, 13.6%; T3, 31.8%; T4, 54.5%. N (nodes) category: NO, 9.1%; N1, 18.1%; N2, 40.9%; N3, 31.8%. Stage: III, 4.6%; IVA, 63.6%; IVB, 31.8%. Induction carboplatin (AUC = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) x 3 cycles (q21 days) were given. Responders received definitive radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin (35 mg/m2/day from days 1 to 5 in weeks 1, 3, 5 and 7) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 on days 10, 24 and 38). Patients with node involvement were suggested to undergo postradiotherapy neck dissection. RESULTS: NA-CT. 97% of planned chemotherapy cycles were administered. Prevalent toxicity was hematologic: 50% G4 neutropenia and 31.8% G3, one neutropenic fever. All patients had alopecia. Complete responses in T and N were 4 (18.2%) and 3 (15%), respectively. Partial responses were 13(59%) and 9 (45%). There was 1 progressive disease. CT + RT. 79.9% of planned cycles of CT were administered. In 19 patients (86.4%) more than 50% of planned cycles of CT were completed. Median dose of RT was 70.2 Gy on T/N+ and 54 Gy on NO. Limiting toxicity was mucositis in 77.3%, followed by neutropenia (59.1% G3-G4). Median weight loss was 4.9%.18.2% of patients required hospitalization. Complete responses in T and N were 15 (68.1%) and 8 (40%), respectively. Partial responses were 5 (22.7%) and 7 (35%). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results of this study are encouraging, despite the toxicity. Adequate follow-up is required to evaluate efficacy in terms of local-regional control and overall survival.