Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 10279, 2023 06 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37355726

RESUMO

The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16S sequencing. In that context, four commonly used DNA extraction methods were compared for the analysis of the gut microbiota. Commercial versions were evaluated against modified protocols using a stool preprocessing device (SPD, bioMérieux) upstream DNA extraction. Stool samples from nine healthy volunteers and nine patients with a Clostridium difficile infection were extracted with all protocols and 16S sequenced. Protocols were ranked using wet- and dry-lab criteria, including quality controls of the extracted genomic DNA, alpha-diversity, accuracy using a mock community of known composition and repeatability across technical replicates. SPD improved overall efficiency of three of the four tested protocols compared with their commercial version, in terms of DNA extraction yield, sample alpha-diversity, and recovery of Gram-positive bacteria. The best overall performance was obtained for the S-DQ protocol, SPD combined with the DNeasy PowerLyser PowerSoil protocol from QIAGEN. Based on this evaluation, we strongly believe that the use of such stool preprocessing device improves both the standardization and the quality of the DNA extraction in the human gut microbiome studies.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Genes de RNAr , DNA , Microbiota/genética
2.
Front Microbiol ; 9: 911, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29867822

RESUMO

Sepsis is the leading cause of death among patients in intensive care units (ICUs) requiring an early diagnosis to introduce efficient therapeutic intervention. Rapid identification (ID) of a causative pathogen is key to guide directed antimicrobial selection and was recently shown to reduce hospitalization length in ICUs. Direct processing of positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS technology is one of the several currently available tools used to generate rapid microbial ID. However, all recently published protocols are still manual and time consuming, requiring dedicated technician availability and specific strategies for batch processing. We present here a new prototype instrument for automated preparation of Vitek®MS slides directly from positive blood culture broth based on an "all-in-one" extraction strip. This bench top instrument was evaluated on 111 and 22 organisms processed using artificially inoculated blood culture bottles in the BacT/ALERT® 3D (SA/SN blood culture bottles) or the BacT/ALERT VirtuoTM system (FA/FN Plus bottles), respectively. Overall, this new preparation station provided reliable and accurate Vitek MS species-level identification of 87% (Gram-negative bacteria = 85%, Gram-positive bacteria = 88%, and yeast = 100%) when used with BacT/ALERT® 3D and of 84% (Gram-negative bacteria = 86%, Gram-positive bacteria = 86%, and yeast = 75%) with Virtuo® instruments, respectively. The prototype was then evaluated in a clinical microbiology laboratory on 102 clinical blood culture bottles and compared to routine laboratory ID procedures. Overall, the correlation of ID on monomicrobial bottles was 83% (Gram-negative bacteria = 89%, Gram-positive bacteria = 79%, and yeast = 78%), demonstrating roughly equivalent performance between manual and automatized extraction methods. This prototype instrument exhibited a high level of performance regardless of bottle type or BacT/ALERT system. Furthermore, blood culture workflow could potentially be improved by converting direct ID of positive blood cultures from a batch-based to real-time and "on-demand" process.

3.
Sci Rep ; 5: 13944, 2015 Sep 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350205

RESUMO

Mass spectrometry (MS) in Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) mode is proposed for in-depth characterisation of microorganisms in a multiplexed analysis. Within 60-80 minutes, the SRM method performs microbial identification (I), antibiotic-resistance detection (R), virulence assessment (V) and it provides epidemiological typing information (T). This SRM application is illustrated by the analysis of the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, demonstrating its promise for rapid characterisation of bacteria from positive blood cultures of sepsis patients.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Bactérias/patogenicidade , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana/métodos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Virulência/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA