Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Microbiol ; 158(1-2): 136-41, 2012 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22366049

RESUMO

There are many reports on the occurrence of Livestock Associated Methicilline resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA, CC398) in healthy pigs. There are however, very few reports of LA-MRSA being associated with pathological lesions in pigs. With this study we try to find the answers to the questions: (1) how often is S. aureus found in post-mortem material from pigs, (2) how many of these isolates are methicillin resistant, (3) are these equally distributed over the years? Here we report the isolation of MRSA and of methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) from samples derived from post-mortem examinations at the Animal Health Service in The Netherlands in the period from 2003 through October 2008. The MSSA and MRSA described here were isolated from 159 pathological lesions and from 7 submissions of aborted foetuses derived from a total of 116 animals, representing 103 submissions coming from 92 different herds. This is approximately 0.5% of all pigs submitted for post mortem examination in those years. The proportion of pigs from which S. aureus (both MSSA and MRSA) was isolated from, did not increase over the years. MSSA (N=97) and LA-MRSA CC398 (N=18) were present mainly in (peri)arthritis in over 30% of all cases, but were also isolated from internal organs such as lung, brain, spleen, kidneys, heart, indicating septicaemia. Remarkably, one non-CC398 MRSA (ST1) was isolated in a joint and a kidney of one pig. This isolate was resistant to 5 out of 6 antimicrobials tested. There was no significant difference in the type of lesions in which LA-MRSA was found compared to MSSA. The number of antimicrobials these isolates were resistant to, increased rapidly after 2004. LA-MRSA was isolated for the first time in 2005 and then again in 2007 and 2008, suggesting that this is an emerging pathogen. However, due to changes in the panel of antimicrobials used to test S. aureus for antimicrobial susceptibility in 2005 and 2007, the possibility exists that we may have missed some MRSA isolates. LA-MRSA isolates are resistant to at least three but sometimes five out of six antimicrobials tested. All isolates were susceptible to the combination of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethaxol.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/veterinária , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Sus scrofa/microbiologia , Doenças dos Suínos/microbiologia , Abscesso/microbiologia , Abscesso/veterinária , Animais , Autopsia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Países Baixos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/epidemiologia
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 93(12): 5707-15, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21094742

RESUMO

Fast and reliable identification of the microorganisms causing mastitis is important for management of the disease and for targeting antimicrobial treatment. Methods based on PCR are being used increasingly in mastitis diagnostics. Comprehensive field comparisons of PCR and traditional milk bacteriology have not been available. The results of a PCR kit capable of detecting 11 important etiological agents of mastitis directly from milk in 4h were compared with those of conventional bacterial culture (48h). In total, 1,000 quarter milk samples were taken from cows with clinical or subclinical mastitis, or from clinically healthy quarters with low somatic cell count (SCC). Bacterial culture identified udder pathogens in 600/780 (77%) of the clinical samples, whereas PCR identified bacteria in 691/780 (89%) of the clinical samples. The PCR analysis detected major pathogens in a large number of clinical samples that were negative for the species in culture. These included 53 samples positive for Staphylococcus aureus by PCR, but negative by culture. A total of 137 samples from clinical mastitis, 5 samples from subclinical mastitis, and 1 sample from a healthy quarter were positive for 3 or more bacterial species in PCR, whereas culture identified 3 or more species in 60 samples from clinical mastitis. Culture identified a species not targeted by the PCR test in 44 samples from clinical mastitis and in 9 samples from subclinical mastitis. Low SCC samples provided a small number of positive results both in culture (4/93; 4.3%) and by PCR (7/93; 7.5%). In conclusion, the PCR kit provided several benefits over conventional culture, including speed, automated interpretation of results, and increased sensitivity. This kit holds much promise as a tool to complement traditional methods in identification of pathogens. In conventional mastitis bacteriology, a sample with 3 or more species is considered contaminated, and resampling of the cow is recommended. Further study is required to investigate how high sensitivity of PCR and its quantitative features can be applied to improve separation of relevant udder pathogens from likely contaminants in samples where multiple species are detected. Furthermore, increasing the number of species targeted by the PCR test would be advantageous.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Mastite Bovina/microbiologia , Leite/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/veterinária , Animais , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/veterinária , Bovinos , Feminino , Mastite Bovina/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA