The role of automated external defibrillators in athletics.

CONTEXT: Sudden cardiac arrest is the leading cause of death in young athletes. The purpose of this review is to summarize the role of automated external defibrillators and emergency planning for sudden cardiac arrest in the athletic setting. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Relevant studies on automated external defibrillators, early defibrillation, and public-access defibrillation programs were reviewed. Recommendations from consensus guidelines and position statements applicable to automated external defibrillators in athletics were also considered. RESULTS: Early defibrillation programs involving access to automated external defibrillators by targeted local responders have demonstrated a survival benefit for sudden cardiac arrest in many public and athletic settings. CONCLUSION: Schools and organizations sponsoring athletic programs should implement automated external defibrillators as part of a comprehensive emergency action plan for sudden cardiac arrest. In a collapsed and unresponsive athlete, sudden cardiac arrest should be suspected and an automated external defibrillator applied as soon as possible, as decreasing the time interval to defibrillation is the most important priority to improve survival in sudden cardiac arrest.

Automated external defibrillators in Washington State high schools.

BACKGROUND: The placement of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in schools and public sporting venues is a growing national trend. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and use of AEDs in Washington State high schools and to examine the existing emergency preparedness for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: High schools in Washington State. PARTICIPANTS: The principal at each high school in the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (n = 407) was invited to complete a web-based questionnaire using the National Registry for AED Use in Sports (http://www.AEDSPORTS.com). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measures studied included AED prevalence and location, funding for AEDs, AED training of school personnel, coordination of AED placement with local emergency response agencies, and prior AED use. RESULTS: 118 schools completed the survey (29% response rate). 64 (54%) of the schools have at least one AED on school grounds (mean 1.6, range 1-4). The likelihood of AED placement increased with larger school size (p = 0.044). 60% of AEDs were funded by donations, 27% by the school district and 11% by the school or athletic department itself. Coaches (78%) were the most likely to receive AED training, followed by administrators (72%), school nurses (70%) and teachers (48%). Only 25% of schools coordinated the implementation of AEDs with an outside medical agency and only 6% of schools coordinated with the local emergency medical system. One school reported having used an AED previously to treat SCA in a basketball official who survived after a single shock. The estimated probability of AED use to treat SCA was 1 in 154 schools per year. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of Washington State high schools have an AED on school grounds. AED use occurred in <1% of schools annually and was effective in the treatment of SCA. Funding of AED programmes was mostly through private donations, with little coordination with local emergency response teams. Significant improvement is needed in structuring emergency response plans and training targeted rescuers for an SCA in the high-school setting.

Factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical research.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have looked at the motivation behind enrollment in clinical trials of adults and healthy subjects, little is known about the factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical studies where the subjects themselves do not provide consent. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to define a group of factors that impact parental consent in the pediatric clinical trial. This may allow investigators to identify a subset of specific appealing aspects of clinical trials that will promote participation while also bringing ethical issues to light that may require further consideration. METHODS: Forty-four parents or guardians of children currently participating in clinical asthma research completed questionnaires from July 1999 to September 1999 pertaining to motives for allowing their child to participate in clinical trials. The responses were then rated on a Likert numerical scale. RESULTS: The most important motive for parents is learning more about their child's illness. Next important was the motive of helping medical knowledge. Availability of free medication was negatively correlated with family income. CONCLUSIONS: Although altruistic motives are present in pediatric asthma research, most parents/guardians gave consent for their child to learn more about their child's asthma. Access to free medication was more important in families with lower incomes than in families with higher incomes.