Sulcus deepening trochleoplasty for patellofemoral instability: A series of 34 cases after 15 years postoperative follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Trochlear dysplasia is one of the main elements of patellofemoral instability. Although correction by trochleoplasty seems logical, the long-term outcome of this procedure is unknown and the progression to osteoarthritis has not been clarified. Thus, we performed a retrospective study of a series of sulcus deepening trochleoplasties with a 15-year follow-up whose goal was to (1) evaluate the long-term clinical outcome and radiological rate of osteoarthritis, and (2) define the results in relation to the type of instability and the grade of dysplasia. HYPOTHESIS: Sulcus deepening trochleoplasty is an effective procedure to stabilize the patellofemoral joint that does not increase the risk of osteoarthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 34 sulcus deepening trochleoplasties based on clinical scores (IKS, Lille, Kujala and Oxford scores) and radiological results (stage of osteoarthritis according to the Iwano score) after a mean follow-up of 15 years (12-19 years). An Insall procedure was systematically associated with an anterior tibial tubercle transfer in 17 cases (7 prior tibial transfers). RESULTS: No recurrent objective instability was observed. Seven knees had additional surgery after a mean follow-up of 7 years (2-16): 7 underwent conversion to total knee arthroplasty because of progression of osteoarthritis and one knee had tibial tubercle transfer for pain and episodes of the knee giving way. The mean Lille, Kujala and IKS scores increased from 53.3 (30-92), 55 (13-75) and 127 (54-184) to 61.5 (25-93), 76 (51-94) and 152.4 (66-200) respectively between preoperative and follow-up assessment (P<0.05) (revisions included). Functional outcome was significantly better for dysplasia with supratrochlear spurs (IKS score 168 [127-200] versus 153 [98-198] and Kujula score 81.5 [51-98] versus 76 [51-94] [P<0.05]). Patients were satisfied in 65% of the cases and the total mean Oxford score was 24.1/60 (12-45 points). Occasional pain was present in 53% of the cases. The trochlear prominence decreased from 4.9 mm (3-9 mm) to -1.2mm (-7-4mm). Ten cases of preoperative patellofemoral osteoarthritis were identified, but none with>Iwano 2, while osteoarthritis was present in 33/34 cases at the final follow-up with 20 cases>Iwano 2 (65%). DISCUSSION: Sulcus deepening trochleoplasty corrects patellofemoral stability even in patients with severe dysplasia and the long-term functional outcome is better in this group. It does not prevent patellofemoral osteoarthritis. It should be limited to severe dysplasia with supratrochlear spurs and associated with procedures to realign the extensor apparatus.

Do bone loss and reconstruction procedures differ at revision of cemented unicompartmental knee prostheses according to the use of metal-back or all-polyethylene tibial component?

INTRODUCTION: Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision are known but the severity of bone loss and the need for reconstruction are not detailed for different tibial implants. HYPOTHESIS: Metal-backing UKA revision exposes the patient to more severe tibial bone loss and requires more substantial reconstruction procedures than cemented polyethylene UKA revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective series of 23 revisions of UKA to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared 11 all-polyethylene UKAs with 12 metal-backing UKAs. Factors that contributed to failure were aseptic loosening (n=12) and osteoarthritis evolution (n=11). Both groups were similar regarding the demographic and clinical features. We reported bone loss and the reconstruction procedure to fill it according to the initially used tibial implant. The results were evaluated with the IKS score to a follow-up of 37 months (range, 24-67 months). RESULTS: There were more tibial segmental bone loss (10 versus 3) and more metal wedges (8/12 versus 2/11) in metal-backing UKA revision (P<0.05). Tibial stems were more often used in metal-backing UKA revision (12/12 versus 7/11) (P=0.04). The results of TKA at follow-up did not differ according to whether the revised tibial implant was all polyethylene (IKS=155 [range, 107-195]) or metal-back (IKS=155 [range, 127-172]). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that metal-backing UKA revision exposes the patient to more severe tibial bone loss requiring more substantial reconstruction. These results must be confirmed on a larger population, but surgeons should be alerted to this kind of revision surgery, which warrants having available a revision knee prothesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

[Double dislocation of the interphalangeal joints of the little finger, a report of two cases]. / Luxation bipolaire des articulations interphalangiennes du cinquième doigt, à propos de deux cas.

Two cases of simultaneous traumatic dorsal dislocation of the interphalangeal joints of the little finger are described. In both cases the patients were managed by closed reduction and neighbour strapping followed by immediate mobilisation. At review, no complications were noted. The range of movements of all the affected joints was normal.