Utility of HbA1c assessment in people with diabetes awaiting liver transplantation.

AIMS: To investigate the relationship between HbA1c and glucose in people with co-existing liver disease and diabetes awaiting transplant, and in those with diabetes but no liver disease. METHODS: HbA1c and random plasma glucose data were collected for 125 people with diabetes without liver disease and for 29 people awaiting liver transplant with diabetes and cirrhosis. Cirrhosis was caused by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatitis C, alcoholic liver disease, hereditary haemochromatosis, polycystic liver/kidneys, cryptogenic/non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and α-1-antitrypsin-related disease. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age of the diabetes with cirrhosis group was 55 (49-63) years compared to 60 (50-71) years (P=0.13) in the group without cirrhosis. In the diabetes with cirrhosis group there were 21 men (72%) compared with 86 men (69%) in the group with diabetes and no cirrhosis (P=0.82). Of the group with diabetes and cirrhosis, 27 people (93%) were of white European ethnicity, two (7%) were South Asian and none was of Afro-Caribbean/other ethnicity compared with 94 (75%), 16 (13%), 10 (8%)/5 (4%), respectively, in the group with diabetes and no cirrhosis (P=0.20). Median (interquartile range) HbA1c was 41 (32-56) mmol/mol [5.9 (5.1-7.3)%] vs 61 (52-70) mmol/mol [7.7 (6.9-8.6)%] (P<0.001), respectively, in the diabetes with cirrhosis group vs the diabetes without cirrhosis group. The glucose concentrations were 8.4 (7.0-11.2) mmol/l vs 7.3 (5.2-11.5) mmol/l (P=0.17). HbA1c was depressed by 20 mmol/mol (1.8%; P<0.001) in 28 participants with cirrhosis but elevated by 28 mmol/mol (2.6%) in the participant with α-1-antitrypsin disorder. Those with cirrhosis and depressed HbA1c had fewer larger erythrocytes, and higher red cell distribution width and reticulocyte count. This was reflected in the positive association of glucose with mean cell volume (r=0.39) and haemoglobin level (r=0.49) and the negative association for HbA1c (r=-0.28 and r=-0.26, respectively) in the diabetes group with cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: HbA1c is not an appropriate test for blood glucose in people with cirrhosis and diabetes awaiting transplant as it reflects altered erythrocyte presentation.

Validation of an algorithm combining haemoglobin A(1c) and fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in UK and Australian populations.

AIM: To determine whether glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) can be used in combination with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and in a broader spectrum of patients. METHODS: An algorithm was derived from oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) capillary samples in 500 consecutive UK patients with IFG by World Health Organization criteria. It was validated in a further 500 UK patients and, with venous specimens, in 1175 unselected Australian patients. RESULTS: The derivation cohort was aged 61 years (50-69 years) (median IQ range) with 52% male and 12% South Asian. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial-aligned HbA(1c) was 6.2% (5.8-6.6%) (reference interval < 6.0%) and FPG 6.7 mmol/l (6.3-7.2 mmol/l). FPG was in the diabetes range in 36% of patients, with an OGTT identifying a further 12% with diabetes. The derived algorithm, (HbA(1c) >or= 6.0% with FPG < 7.0 mmol/l) identified those patients requiring an OGTT to diagnose diabetes. When applied to the UK validation cohort, sensitivity was 97% and specificity 100%. The algorithm was equally effective in the unselected group, aged 59 years (49-68 years) and 54% male, with sensitivity 93% and specificity 100%. HbA(1c) was 6.0% (5.6-6.6%) and FPG 6.0 mmol/l (5.3-6.8 mmol/l), with 26% having IFG. Use of the algorithm would reduce the number of OGTTs performed in the UK validation cohort by 33% and by 66% in the Australian patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: Use of this algorithm would simplify procedures for diagnosis of diabetes and could also be used for monitoring pre-diabetes. Validation is now required in other populations and patient groups.

Calibration of HbA1c and its measurement in the presence of variant haemoglobins: report on questionnaire to manufacturers.

AIMS: To review 'Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)-aligned' HbA(1c) reporting in UK, use of individual/network equations relating IFCC calibration to 'DCCT alignment', and whether HbA(1c) in the presence of variant haemoglobins is, according to manufacturers, suitable for current, clinical guidelines. METHODS: Questionnaire sent to nine manufacturers and responses analysed. RESULTS: All methods were certified as 'DCCT-aligned' by National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP); UK EQA schemes reported 95% of results 'DCCT-aligned' in December 2004. The master equation relating networks was used by six manufacturers and specific equations for individual methods by three. HbA(1c) results from laboratory/point of care testing analysers can be affected by variant haemoglobins including elevated HbF; only IE HPLC (and LPLC) detect their presence. If chromatographic separation is ideal in heterozygous patients, laboratories either choose not to report HbA(1c) and propose another strategy for monitoring glycaemia, or report HbA(1c) and issue a caution that it may not be appropriate for guidelines. HbA(1c) reported from immunochemistry or affinity chromatography in presence of variant haemoglobins, may not be reliable for use with clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical care, HbA(1c) must reflect its relationship to glycaemia in clinical trials underpinning national guidelines. A flowchart to establish if HbA(1c) measurement is appropriate has been produced for use in a clinical setting.

Elevation of plasma fatty acids by ten-hour intralipid infusion has no effect on basal or glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in normal man.

There is controversy over the effect of free fatty acids (FFAs) on insulin secretion. Previous studies have shown opposite effects of short- and long-term exposure to elevated concentrations of FFAs. We studied 8 normal subjects (mean age, 30 years; mean body mass index, 23.4 kg/m2) on 2 occasions. Each had a 10-hour overnight infusion of Intralipid 20% (Pharmacia, Milton Keynes, UK) with simultaneous infusion of heparin (0.4 U/kg body weight/min) or a control infusion of saline (150 mmol/L). Insulin secretion was assessed immediately after completion of the 10-hour infusion by an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Results were analyzed using paired ttests. Intralipid infusion caused an increase in plasma FFAs of more than 9-fold (P < .01), with a simultaneous increase in glycerol (P < .01) and hydroxybutyrate (P < .01). There was no difference in blood glucose concentrations during the infusion or intravenous glucose tolerance test. Similarly, insulin secretion was not significantly different during Intralipid infusion or in the intravenous glucose tolerance test (peak insulin achieved in glucose tolerance test, P = .51; total insulin secretion during intravenous glucose tolerance test, P = .27). In conclusion, after increasing plasma FFA concentrations over 9-fold during a 10-hour infusion of Intralipid and heparin, we found no difference in basal or glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.