Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Periodontal Res ; 53(1): 12-21, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28872188

RESUMO

Adjunctive therapeutic agents may be used to improve the response to nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Local delivery of statins (simvastatin, artovastatin and rosuvastatin) is a promising adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP). Thus, the aim of this review is to evaluate if adjunctive local delivery of statins is more effective than SRP alone. Randomized clinical trials that presented a test group evaluating local delivery of statins as adjuncts in healthy, diabetic and smoking patients were included. Medline and the Cochrane library database were searched up to November 2016. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for pocket depth change and clinical attachment gain. One hundred and twenty-five studies potentially related to the aim of this review were screened, but only 10 were included. The majority of the trials reported additional clinical benefits in the groups that were treated with adjunctive local delivery of statins. Pooled calculations showed that local delivery of statins resulted in additional reduction of pocket depth and clinical attachment gain in healthy people, smokers and diabetic patients. Local statins may offer additional clinical benefits to SRP, even in smokers and diabetics.


Assuntos
Periodontite Crônica/terapia , Raspagem Dentária , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Aplainamento Radicular , Terapia Combinada , Humanos
2.
J Immunol Res ; 2017: 5193572, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28503577

RESUMO

Proteinase-activated receptors 1 (PAR1) and 2 (PAR2) are the most highly expressed members of the PAR family in the periodontium. These receptors regulate periodontal inflammatory and repair processes through their activation by endogenous and bacterial enzymes. PAR1 is expressed by the periodontal cells such as human gingival fibroblasts, gingival epithelial cells, periodontal ligament cells, osteoblasts, and monocytic cells and can be activated by thrombin, matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1), MMP-13, fibrin, and gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis. PAR2 is expressed by neutrophils, osteoblasts, oral epithelial cells, and human gingival fibroblasts, and its possible activators in the periodontium are gingipains, neutrophil proteinase 3, and mast cell tryptase. The mechanisms through which PARs can respond to periodontal enzymes and result in appropriate immune responses have until recently been poorly understood. This review discusses recent findings that are beginning to identify a cardinal role for PAR1 and PAR2 on periodontal tissue metabolism.


Assuntos
Periodontite/metabolismo , Periodontite/fisiopatologia , Periodonto/metabolismo , Receptor PAR-1/metabolismo , Receptores Ativados por Proteinase/metabolismo , Adesinas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Cisteína Endopeptidases/metabolismo , Células Epiteliais , Fibroblastos , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Cisteína Endopeptidases Gingipaínas , Gengiva/citologia , Gengiva/metabolismo , Humanos , Metaloproteinase 1 da Matriz/genética , Metaloproteinase 1 da Matriz/metabolismo , Camundongos , Periodontite/genética , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Receptor PAR-1/agonistas , Receptor PAR-1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor PAR-1/genética , Receptores Ativados por Proteinase/agonistas , Receptores Ativados por Proteinase/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores Ativados por Proteinase/genética
3.
J Oral Rehabil ; 44(3): 229-236, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917518

RESUMO

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate implant loss in younger and older patients. An electronic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library) was undertaken until May 2016 without time restriction and was supplemented by manual searching. Prospective cohorts were included if they met the following criteria: (i) presence of an exposed group (older subjects) with a minimum age of 60 years; (ii) presence of a control group (younger subjects) with a maximum age of 59 years; and (iii) outcome data considering implant survival or loss. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of ageing on implant failure. Of 4152 potentially eligible articles, four were included in the qualitative analysis and quantitative synthesis. The pooled estimates suggest that the risk of implant loss in older patients is not significantly higher (RR = 0·92; 95% CI 0·43-1·96, P = 0·83) when compared to younger subjects. This systematic review suggests that age is not a limiting factor for dental implant therapy.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantes Dentários , Falha de Restauração Dentária/estatística & dados numéricos , Arcada Parcialmente Edêntula/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA