Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.

The ASN Board of Directors appointed the Nutrition Research Task Force to develop a report on scientific methods used in nutrition science to advance discovery, interpretation, and application of knowledge in the field. The genesis of this report was growing concern about the tone of discourse among nutrition professionals and the implications of acrimony on the productive study and translation of nutrition science. Too often, honest differences of opinion are cast as conflicts instead of areas of needed collaboration. Recognition of the value (and limitations) of contributions from well-executed nutrition science derived from the various approaches used in the discipline, as well as appreciation of how their layering will yield the strongest evidence base, will provide a basis for greater productivity and impact. Greater collaborative efforts within the field of nutrition science will require an understanding that each method or approach has a place and function that should be valued and used together to create the nutrition evidence base. Precision nutrition was identified as an important emerging nutrition topic by the preponderance of task force members, and this theme was adopted for the report because it lent itself to integration of many approaches in nutrition science. Although the primary audience for this report is nutrition researchers and other nutrition professionals, a secondary aim is to develop a document useful for the various audiences that translate nutrition research, including journalists, clinicians, and policymakers. The intent is to promote accurate, transparent, verifiable evidence-based communication about nutrition science. This will facilitate reasoned interpretation and application of emerging findings and, thereby, improve understanding and trust in nutrition science and appropriate characterization, development, and adoption of recommendations.

Communicating science-based food and nutrition information.

Science evolves. Ongoing research, review and debate generate novel ideas and provide new insights to current scientific understanding. However, science is frequently reported to the public without context, which creates confusion. One study seemingly contradicts another, leaving consumers to doubt both scientific experts and science. This paper highlights quantitative and qualitative data to illustrate consumer confusion, frustration and apathy toward nutrition science and health information. Further, this paper shows how science communications and health advice can be tailored for specific audiences and, importantly, how scientists themselves can help the media understand and position research to minimize consumer confusion.