CD8 T-cell ability to exert immunodomination correlates with T-cell receptor: epitope association rate.

When presented alone, H7 a and HY antigens elicit CD8 T-cell responses of similar amplitude, but H7 a totally abrogates the response to HY when both antigens are presented on the same antigen-presenting cell. We found that H7a- and HY-specific T-cell precursors had similar frequencies in nonimmune mice and expressed similar levels of CD5. The H7a -specific CD8 T-cell repertoire harvested at the time of primary response showed highly restricted T-cell receptor (TCR) diversity. Furthermore, T cells specific for H7a and HY expressed equivalent levels of CD8 and TCR and displayed similar tetramer decay rates. The key difference was that anti-H7a T cells exhibited a much more rapid TCR:epitope on-rate than anti-HY T cells. Coupled with evidence that primed CD8 T cells limit the duration of antigen presentation by killing or inactivating antigen-presenting cells, our data support a novel and simple model for immunodomination: the main feature of T cells that exert immunodomination is that, compared with other T cells, they are functionally primed after a shorter duration of antigen presentation.

Do thymically and strictly extrathymically developing T cells generate similar immune responses?

If present in sufficient numbers, could extrathymic T cells substitute for thymus-derived T cells? To address this issue, we studied extrathymic T cells that develop in athymic mice under the influence of oncostatin M (OM). In this model, extensive T-cell development is probably due to amplification of a minor pathway of T-cell differentiation taking place only in the lymph nodes. Extrathymic CD4 T cells expanded poorly and were deficient in providing B-cell help after infection with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). Compared with classic T cells, stimulated extrathymic CD8 T cells produced copious amounts of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), and their expansion was precocious but of limited amplitude because of a high apoptosis rate. Consequently, although extrathymic cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) responded to LCMV infection, as evidenced by the expansion of GP33-41 tetramer-positive CD8 T cells, they were unable to eradicate the virus. Our data indicate that the site of development impinges on T-cell quality and function and that extrathymic T cells functionally cannot substitute for classical thymic T cells.

Tissue distribution of target antigen has a decisive influence on the outcome of adoptive cancer immunotherapy.

Adoptive transfer of allogeneic T cells has unmatched efficacy to eradicate leukemic cells. We therefore sought to evaluate in kinetic terms interactions between T cells and allogeneic leukemic cells. T cells primed against the model B6(dom1) minor histocompatibility antigen were adoptively transferred in irradiated B10 (B6(dom1)-positive) and congenic B10.H7(b) (B6(dom1)-negative) recipients, some of which were also injected with EL4 leukemia/lymphoma cells (B6(dom1)-positive). A key finding was that the tissue distribution of the target epitope dramatically influenced the outcome of adoptive cancer immunotherapy. Widespread expression of B6(dom1) in B10 recipients induced apoptosis and dysfunction of antigen-specific T cells. Furthermore, in leukemic B10 and B10.H7(b) hosts, a massive accumulation of effector/memory B6(dom1)-specific T cells was detected in the bone marrow, the main site of EL4 cell growth. The accumulation of effector/memory cells in recipient bone marrow was EL4 dependent, and its kinetics was different from that observed in recipient spleen. We conclude that strategies must be devised to prevent apoptosis of adoptively transferred T cells confronted with a high antigen load and that local monitoring of the immune response at the site of tumor growth may be mandatory for a meaningful assessment of the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy.