Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 34(6): 618-626, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37060266

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate of dental implants inserted in an alveolar cleft area where one or more bone graft procedures were performed and to identify possible factors that affect the survival rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The available data from 78 implants placed in 64 patients with grafted alveolar clefts were retrospectively analysed. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests and univariable Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The median follow-up period from insertion to the last follow-up appointment was 46 months (IQR: 29-79.3). In five patients, a single implant failed. This resulted in a cumulative survival rate of 95.0% at median follow-up. The factors investigated in this study did not have a significant effect on implant survival. CONCLUSIONS: Dental implants placed in patients with alveolar clefts are a reliable treatment option for dental rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Fissura Palatina , Implantes Dentários , Humanos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fissura Palatina/cirurgia , Fissura Palatina/reabilitação , Transplante Ósseo , Seguimentos , Falha de Restauração Dentária
2.
JIMD Rep ; 63(6): 621-629, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36341168

RESUMO

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) and mucolipidosis II and III (ML II and III) often manifest with orofacial (progressive) abnormalities, which may have a major impact on quality of life. However, because these patients have multiple somatic health issues, orofacial problems are easily overlooked in clinical practice and available literature on this topic solely consists of case reports, small case series, and small cohort studies. The aim of this systematic review was to gain more insight in the nature and extent of orofacial abnormalities in MPS, ML II, and III. A systematic review of all previously published articles addressing orofacial abnormalities in MPS, ML II, and III was performed. Both clinical studies and case reports were included. Outcome was the described orofacial abnormalities, subdivided into abnormalities of the face, maxilla, mandible, soft tissues, teeth, and occlusion. The search resulted in 57 articles, describing orofacial features in 340 patients. Orofacial abnormalities were present in all subtypes of MPS, ML II, and III, and consisted of thickened lips, a hypoplastic midface, a high-arched palate, hypoplastic condyles, coronoid hyperplasia, macroglossia, gingival hyperplasia, thick dental follicles, dentigerous cysts, misshapen teeth, enamel defects, and open bite. Orofacial abnormalities are present in all subtypes of MPS, ML II, and III. As orofacial abnormalities may cause complaints, evaluation of orofacial health should be part of routine clinical care.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA