Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; : 101398, 2024 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821159

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are frequently seen in critically ill sepsis patients and are associated with poor outcomes. There is a need for further research, however, studies are limited due to challenges in identifying patient cohorts. Administrative data using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) are routinely used for identifying disease cohorts in large datasets. However, the validity of ICD-10 for AF/AFL remains unexplored in these populations. METHODS: This validation study included 6,554 adults with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit. We sought to determine whether ICD-10 coding could accurately identify patients with and without AF/AFL compared to manual chart review. We also evaluated whether the date of ICD-10 code entry could distinguish prevalent from incident AF/AFL, presuming codes dated during the index admission to be incident AF/AFL. A manual chart review was performed on 400 randomly selected patients for confirmation of AF/AFL, and validity was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Among the 400 randomly selected patients, 293 lacked ICD-10 codes for AF/AFL. The manual chart review confirmed the absence of AF/AFL in 286 patients (NPV 97.3%, specificity 99.7%). Among the 107 patients with ICD-10 codes for AF/AFL, 106 were confirmed to have AF/AFL by manual chart review (PPV 99.1%, sensitivity 93.0%). Out of the 114 patients with confirmed AF/AFL, 44 had ICD-10 codes dated during the index admission. All 44 were confirmed to have AF/AFL, however, 18 patients had prior documentation of AF/AFL (incident AF/AFL: PPV 59.1%). Specificity for incident (95.1%) and prevalent (99.7%) AF/AFL were high; however, sensitivity was 76.5% and 77.5%, respectively. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: ICD-10 codes perform well in identifying clinical AF/AFL in critically ill sepsis. However, their temporal specificity in distinguishing incidents from prevalent AF/AFL is limited.

3.
Clin Transplant ; 37(9): e15079, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37477286

RESUMO

Lung transplant recipients are at an increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), and those who develop CDI post-transplant can have worsened outcomes including graft failure and death. We sought to describe the efficacy and safety of primary CDI prophylaxis with oral vancomycin among 86 adult lung transplant recipients. Overall, we observed a 9.3% (8/86) incidence of CDI among patients receiving prophylaxis, with the majority of infections occurring a median of 25 days after completion of prophylaxis. Furthermore, we observed a 4.7% incidence of VRE infection/colonization. Opportunities exist to optimize the duration of CDI prophylaxis to balance the benefits and risks in lung transplant recipients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Transplante de Pulmão , Prevenção Primária , Vancomicina , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Incidência
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 57(10): 1178-1184, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36803019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Essential to the coagulation pathway, vitamin K (phytonadione) is used to correct clotting factor deficiencies and for reversal of warfarin-induced bleeding. In practice, high-dose intravenous (IV) vitamin K is often used, despite limited evidence supporting repeated dosing. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to characterize differences in responders and nonresponders to high-dose vitamin K to guide dosing strategies. METHODS: This was a case-control study of hospitalized adults who received vitamin K 10 mg IV daily for 3 days. Cases were represented by patients who responded to the first dose of IV vitamin K and controls were nonresponders. The primary outcome was change in international normalized ratio (INR) over time with subsequent vitamin K doses. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with response to vitamin K and incidence of safety events. The Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this study. RESULTS: There were 497 patients included, and 182 were responders. Most patients had underlying cirrhosis (91.5%). In responders, the INR decreased from 1.89 at baseline (95% CI = [1.74-2.04]) to 1.40 on day 3 (95% CI = [1.30-1.50]). In nonresponders, the INR decreased from 1.97 (95% CI = [1.83-2.13]) to 1.85 ([1.72-1.99]). Factors associated with response included lower body weight, absence of cirrhosis, and lower bilirubin. There was a low incidence of safety events observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of mainly patients with cirrhosis, the overall adjusted decrease in INR over 3 days was 0.3, which may have minimal clinical impact. Additional studies are needed to identify populations who may benefit from repeated daily doses of high-dose IV vitamin K.


Assuntos
Vitamina K , Varfarina , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Vitamina K 1/uso terapêutico , Vitamina K 1/farmacologia , Coagulação Sanguínea , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos
6.
Crit Care Med ; 48(6): 899-911, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32317593

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the evidence and discuss the risks and clinical relevance of ketamine for the treatment of various disease states impacting the adult critically ill population. DATA SOURCES: A literature review was performed using PubMed evaluating primary literature published until August 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Case reports, observational studies (cohort, case-control), and randomized controlled trials involving patients 18 years and older in a nonperioperative setting using either IV or intramuscular ketamine were included for analysis. Uses of ketamine discussed focused on critically ill patients in the ICU and emergency department settings. DATA EXTRACTION: Included studies were evaluated for dosing, outcomes, and adverse effects of ketamine. For each study, the design, population, intervention, investigated outcomes, and results were assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The evidence was organized according to use of ketamine, which included pain, sedation, status asthmaticus, alcohol withdrawal syndrome, status epilepticus, and acute behavioral psychologic disturbances. Evaluation of the evidence was based on the included primary literature along with any related guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine has suggested potential benefit in several disease states impacting critically ill patients including pain, alcohol withdrawal syndrome, status epilepticus, and acute agitation. Further supporting evidence is needed to validate its use in the setting of critical illness.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/farmacologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA