RESUMO
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a degenerative disease accompanied by the loss of nucleus pulposus cells and the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM), which tends to be associated with lower back pain. The ECM and various types of cell death in IVDD are regulated by multiple factors, such as inflammatory responses and oxidative stress. The glutathione (GSH) redox system is the most important antioxidant defense system in cells. GSH is one of the most abundant thiol antioxidants in mammalian cells, which functions directly and indirectly by scavenging peroxides through the GSH redox system. In these reactions, GSH is oxidized by electrophilic substances, such as reactive oxygen species and free radicals, to form glutathione disulfide to exert antioxidative effects. It has been reported that GSH can protect cells against the damage of oxidative stress and various pathophysiological stimulus that can lead to different types of cell death. In addition, it was reported that the level of GSH widely participates in apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and oxidative stress in many diseases including osteoarthritis and IVDD. Therefore, we summarized the effects of GSH on ECM metabolism and cells' functions during IVDD. In addition, we summarized the regulatory effects of small molecule compounds on GSH to explore potential ways to regulate the level of GSH. Better understanding the underlying role of GSH in regulating IVDD will facilitate the goal of preventing and retarding the progress of IVDD in the future.
Assuntos
Morte Celular , Matriz Extracelular , Glutationa , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral , Estresse Oxidativo , Matriz Extracelular/metabolismo , Humanos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/metabolismo , Glutationa/metabolismo , Animais , Autofagia/fisiologia , Apoptose , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismoRESUMO
Osteoporosis development is linked to abnormal bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) differentiation. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a prevalent mRNA modification, is known to influence BMSCs' osteogenic capacity. Qianggu decoction (QGD), a traditional Chinese medicine for osteoporosis, has unknown effects on BMSCs differentiation. This study investigates QGD's impact on BMSCs and its potential to ameliorate osteoporosis through m6A regulation. Using Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis, it is evaluated QGD's antiosteoporotic effects through micro-CT, histology, Western blotting, and osteoblastogenesis markers. QGD is found to enhance bone tissue growth and upregulate osteogenic markers Runx2, OPN, and OCN. It also promoted BMSCs osteogenic differentiation, as shown by increased calcium nodules and ALP activity. QGD treatment significantly increased m6A RNA levels and Mettl3 expression in BMSCs. Silencing Mettl3 with siRNA negated QGD's osteogenic effects. Collectively, QGD may improve BMSCs differentiation and mitigate osteoporosis, potentially through Mettl3-mediated m6A modification.
RESUMO
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and vertebral reconstruction (PPSR) vs. that of open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 153 patients who underwent PPSR and 176 patients who received OPSF. Periprocedural characteristics, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation duration was 93.843 ± 20.611 in PPSR group and 109.432 ± 11.903 in OPSF group; blood loss was 131.118 ± 23.673 in PPSR group and 442.163 ± 149.701 in OPSF group, incision length was 7.280 ± 1.289 in PPSR group and 14.527 ± 2.893 in OPSF group, postoperative stay was 8.732 ± 1.864 in PPSR group and 15.102 ± 2.117 in OPSF group, and total hospitalization costs were 59027.196 ± 8687.447 in PPSR group and 73144.432 ± 11747.567 in OPSF group. These results indicated that these parameters were significantly lower in PPSR compared with those in OPSF group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of complications between the two groups. The radiographic parameters including height of the anterior vertebra, Cobb angle, and vertebral wedge angle were better in PPSR group than in OPSF group. Recovery rate of AVH was 0.449 ± 0.079 in PPSR group and 0.279 ± 0.088 in OPSF group. Analysis of clinical results revealed that during postoperative period, the VAS and ODI scores in PPSR group were lower than those in OPSF group. Conclusions: Collectively, these results indicated that PPSR more effectively restored the height of anterior vertebra and alleviated local kyphosis compared with OPSF. Moreover, the VAS and ODI scores in PPSR group were better than those of OPSF group.