Influence of supracrestal tissue height on peri-implant hard and soft tissues of single implants placed in the esthetic area using the one abutment-one time approach: a 1-year prospective interventional study.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot, prospective interventional study aimed to analyze the influence of supracrestal tissue height when using the one abutment-one time concept at the time of implant placement, on peri-implant hard and soft tissue remodeling in esthetic areas. The definitive crown was placed 7 days later. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Facial mucosal margin position, mesial and distal papilla levels, and mesial and distal marginal bone loss were assessed after 7 days (placement of the definitive crown), and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after implant placement. Patients were classified according to the supracrestal tissue height as thin (< 3 mm) and thick (≥ 3 mm). RESULTS: Fifteen patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Eight presented a thick supracrestal tissue height and seven a thin supracrestal tissue height. After 12 months, the implant success rate was 100%. The mean recession at the facial mucosal margin position was -0.47 ± 0.57 mm and -0.19 ± 0.41 mm in thin and thick groups, respectively (P = .29). The mean mesial papilla level recession was -0.19 ± 0.06 mm in the thin group and -0.01 ± 0.07 mm in the thick group (P < .01), and the mean distal papilla level recession was -0.15 ± 0.09 mm in the thin group and 0.00 ± 0.15 mm in the thick group (P < .05). The mean bone loss was -0.21 ± 0.18 mm and -0.04 ± 0.14 mm in the thin and thick groups, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Single maxillary anterior implants with thin supracrestal tissue height (< 3 mm) at the time of implant placement had greater bone loss and papillary recession than implants with a thick soft tissue height (≥ 3 mm), even when using the one abutment-one time concept.

Single-Tooth Replacement in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone with Immediate Implant Insertion and Definitive Abutment Placement and Provisionalization: 1-Year Results of a Prospective Case Series.

This prospective longitudinal study evaluated the peri-implant soft tissue remodeling, marginal bone levels, and implant success rate of immediately placed single implants-which received a definitive zirconia abutment and provisional restoration at implant placement-in the maxillary esthetic zone. The final crown was delivered 7 days later. Patients (n = 26) presenting a single extraction-indicated lateral or central incisor with adequate bone volume were eligible for this study. Mesial and distal papilla levels (MPL and DPL, respectively), facial gingival level (FGL), and mesial and distal marginal bone levels (MMBL and DMBL, respectively) were assessed after 7 days and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients were classified according to gingival phenotype: thin (≤ 2 mm) or thick (> 2 mm). After 1 year, the implant success rate was 100%. Mean soft tissue recession was -0.04 ± 0.15 mm (MPL), -0.09 ± 0.02 mm (DPL), and -0.13 ± 0.18 mm (FGL). Mean bone remodeling at 1 year was 0.12 ± 0.17 mm (MMBL) and 0.13 ± 0.18 mm (DMBL). The marginal interproximal bone was above the implant platform in 100% of sites. Patients with thick phenotype showed significantly less papillary recession than thin-phenotype patients. Minimal peri-implant hard and soft tissue changes were observed at the 1-year follow-up.

Evaluation of cervical peri-implant optical density in longitudinal control of immediate implants in the anterior maxilla region.

OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to longitudinally evaluate the optical density of peri-implant alveolar bone. The data acquired from study participants previously treated with 37 osseointegrated implants were analyzed utilizing the radiographic subtraction technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The radiographic follow-ups were performed five times: at the implantation of the prostheses and after 15, 90, 180 and 360 days. Intraoral radiographs were obtained by the paralleling technique using individualized Hanshin-type positioners to guarantee the standardization of the images. The obtained digital images were aligned and equalized before they were submitted to the radiographic subtraction procedure. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the distal region of Group I (patients treated with osseointegrated implants who required extraction of the dental element) and the 360 day follow-up and the distal region of Group II (patients with healed alveolar sockets) in all follow-up analyses (p < 0.05). We did not observe a significant difference between the groups analyzed and other follow-ups concerning the subcrestal and middle third regions for both the mesial and distal variables (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the distal sites [χ2 = 5,745,, p = 0.03], showing a significant association between time and the presence of bone resorption. This association was not shown on the mesial surface (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: We concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between groups I and II. Using this technique, we were able to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the changes in the proximal sites on the digital radiographic images for the analyzed data. Digital subtraction technology to measure peri-implant bone density is an accurate and reproducible technique for quantifying peri-implant bone reactions to different therapeutic modalities.