Characteristics of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children: A Croatian Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), encompassing ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic gastrointestinal disorders often diagnosed in youth, presenting unique features compared to adult-onset cases. We aimed to profile pediatric IBD patients in Croatia through a retrospective analysis of children up to 18 years old diagnosed with IBD at the University Hospital of Split from 1 January 2012, to 31 December 2021, utilizing data collected during hospitalization for diagnosis. Over a decade, 107 children were diagnosed, with 43.9% having UC, 55.1% CD, and 0.9% IBD-unclassified. Median age at diagnosis was 14.1 years, with UC patients being older (14.8 vs. 13.7 years, p = 0.044). Males constituted 60.7% of patients. Median symptom duration was 2.0 months, with CD patients experiencing a longer diagnostic delay (3.0 vs. 2.0 months, p = 0.003). The median incidence rate was 9.89 (95% CI 5.93-13.84) per 100,000 children/year, varying across age groups. Median (IQR) BMI z-score was -0.34 (-0.97-0.45). Common symptoms included diarrhea (60.7%) and abdominal pain (50.5%), with rectal bleeding more prevalent in UC (72.3% vs. 32.2%, p < 0.001). While our study offers valuable insights into pediatric IBD in Croatia, further prospective research is needed to clarify disease progression and development.

Most systematic reviews that used the term "update" in title/abstract were not an updated version.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether articles labelled as systematic reviews or meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) in the title and used terms "updated" or "update" in the title or abstract are indeed a report of an updated version of a previously existing SR/MA. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched PubMed for SRs/MAs, using descriptors updated/update in the title/abstract published in 2018-2019. We analyzed how the articles used the term "update"/"updated" and whether the previous version of SR was referenced. We surveyed authors who indicated that the SR was an updated version, but there was no reference to the original SR. RESULTS: Among 1,118 included articles, most (N = 716; 64%) used the term "update" only to denote that an SR includes recent data. Among 47 authors eligible for survey, 15 replied (32%). Six authors (40%) stated that their article was an updated version and gave reference to the previous version, while 9 authors (60%) stated that their SR was not an updated version of a previous SR. CONCLUSION: Most SRs that used the term "update" in title/abstract were not an updated version of an SR. Authors should use the descriptor "update"/"updated" in their title/abstract only to refer to a new version of an SR to avoid ambiguity.

Clinical and Cytogenetic Characteristics of Children With Leukemia 20-Year Retrospective Study.

Acute leukemias are the most common malignant diseases in childhood. The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to investigate the frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities in acute pediatric leukemia; the correlation between cytogenetic abnormalities and 5-year survival; and the correlation between cytogenetic abnormalities and clinical and laboratory features. We included 105 patients; acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) had 80.9% patients, B-cell lineage ALL (B-ALL) 84.7% of them, and T-cell lineage (T-ALL) 15.3%. The overall 5-year survival for B-ALL was 85.9% and for T-ALL was 84.6%. The most common cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with B-ALL were t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1); ETV6-RUNX1 with 22.2% and hyperdiploidy with 19.4%. Our survival analysis showed that t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1); ETV6-RUNX1 and t(1;19)(q23;p13.3); TCF3-PBX1 had the best 5-year survival with 100% of patients surviving, whereas t(v;11q23.3); KMT2A rearranged had the worst 5-year survival of just 33.3% of patients surviving after 5 years. We found no difference in 5-year survival in B-ALL when comparing clinical features. Acute myelogenous leukemia had 20 patients with 70.6% 5-year survival. The most common cytogenetic abnormality in acute myelogenous leukemia was t(8;21)(q21;q22.1); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (20%). In conclusion, this study showed the correlation of different cytogenetic abnormalities with 5-year survival in B-ALL patients. Such correlation was not found when comparing clinical features and 5-year survival of patients with B-ALL. This emphasized the significance of cytogenetic analysis in pediatric leukemia.

Knowledge and Practice of Pediatricians Regarding Hypovitaminosis D-A Survey across 33 European Countries.

Hypovitaminosis D has been recognized as a worldwide pandemic, but there are disagreements regarding its diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practice of European pediatricians concerning vitamin D (VD) and hypovitaminosis D and their adherence to relevant guidelines. A cross-sectional study was conducted through an anonymous survey via SurveyMonkey on 304 European pediatricians. Most of the participants were general pediatricians, followed by endocrinologists and neonatologists. ESPGHAN's and the national guidelines were the most frequently used. VD testing was mostly performed in patients with skeletal, chronic kidney, and autoimmune diseases. Participants predominantly answered the questions regarding the definition of hypovitaminosis D and VD supplementation correctly, especially in children younger than 12 months. They showed the least knowledge regarding the cut off-point for the initiation of the therapy and therapeutic doses used to treat confirmed hypovitaminosis D. Participants' conflicting answers could be related to the differences between the guidelines. We consider that experts in this field should create uniform guidelines, and that those guidelines should also be promoted by national or local pediatric associations.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes Can Be Considered Safe in Children: A Single-Center 11-Year Retrospective Analysis.

Background and Objectives: When the human body is disabled to naturally ingest food through the mouth, enteral or parenteral nutritional support should be started. Percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) is a flexible feeding tube that is inserted into the stomach through the abdominal wall in patients who will need long-term enteral nutrient intake. The aim of this study is to analyze clinical characteristic of children at the time of PEG placement as well as to determine indications, complications and outcomes associated with PEG at the Department of Pediatrics of the University Hospital of Split. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients treated from 2010 to 2020 was performed. The following data were collected from medical records: age, gender, information about nasogastric feeding before PEG placement, indication for PEG insertion, duration of PEG, procedure-related complications and treatment outcomes. Malnutrition was determined according to the z-score range for BMI for age and sex. According to the indication for PEG placement, patients were divided into five categories: central nervous system (CNS) diseases, neuromuscular diseases, genetic disorders, metabolic diseases, and group of children with polytrauma. Results: A total of 40 patients with median age of 110 months were included in study. At the time of PEG placement, most patients had deviations in body weight and height compared to expected values for age and sex. The most common underlying diagnoses were diseases of the central nervous system. Minor complications were found in 13 (35%) of patients. One patient (2.7%) developed major complication (gastrocolic fistula) and consequently underwent reoperation. The median duration of PEG in patients with complications before the need for replacement was 27 months, and in patients without complications, 43 months. Conclusions: Negative deviations of z-score body weight, body height, and body mass index could indicate the need for possible earlier placement of PEG. PEG can be considered as a safe therapeutic option in children since PEG-related complications, mostly in minor forms, were found in a small number of patients.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on resident physicians: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 presents a threat to the mental health of the medical staff working with COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of working during the COVID-19 pandemic on resident physicians. METHODS: The study was conducted via anonymous online survey and included resident physicians. The survey contained questions about sociodemographic information, general job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their personal lives. RESULTS: This study included a response from 728 resident physicians. The majority of residents rated that the COVID-19 pandemic had a mostly negative impact on their satisfaction with professional life (59.9%) and quality of work (62.8%), their personal lives (44.7%) and quality of life (57.1%). Half of all residents indicated that they did not have enough personal protective equipment (PPE). About one-third of residents indicated that the level of stress at work during the COVID-19 pandemic was higher. CONCLUSIONS: Working as resident physicians during COVID-19 pandemic had a negative effect on participants' professional and personal lives. Residents did not have all the necessary PPE nor felt safe working with patients with suspected or proven COVID-19. Further action is needed to provide support for physician residents working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics.

BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The aim of this study was to identify the 50 most-cited articles in the field of pediatrics, analyze their study design and other characteristics of those articles, and assess the prevalence of systematic reviews among them. METHODS: In December 2017, we searched Web of Science (WoS) for all articles published in the field of pediatrics. Two authors screened articles independently and in the further analysis included 50 articles with the highest number of citations. To avoid bias for scientific papers published earlier, the citation density was calculated. We also analyzed Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of journals where citation classics were published. RESULTS: The citation density in top 50 cited articles in the field of pediatrics ranged from 33.16 to 432.8, with the average of 119.95. Most of the articles reported clinical science. Median 2016 JIF for journals that published them was 6.226 (range: 2.778 to 72.406). Half of the top 10 highly cited articles in pediatrics were published in a journal with JIF below 5. Most of the studies among the citation classics in pediatrics were cross-sectional studies (N = 22), followed by non-systematic narrative reviews (N = 10), randomized controlled trials (N = 5), cohort studies (N = 5), systematic reviews (N = 2), case-control studies (N = 2), case reports (N = 2), and there was one study protocol and one expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Few randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were among citation classics in the field of pediatrics. Articles that use observational research methodology, and are published in journals with lower impact factors, can become citation classics.

Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the publication path of non-Cochrane systematic reviews (SR) in the field of anesthesiology and pain registered in the PROSPERO database. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We analyzed characteristics of SRs registered in PROSPERO from its inception to May 2017 and their publication status in August 2018. We surveyed corresponding authors of unpublished SRs about accuracy of PROSPERO status and reasons for nonpublication. RESULTS: After screening 1,408 records from PROSPERO database, we found that the majority had "ongoing" (76.3%) and "completed not published" (9.2%) status. Survey of authors showed that most of the records had not been updated (82.4%, 526/638); SR had already been published in 75.2% (396/526), and work on SR had been discontinued in 7.8% (41/526) of cases. In total, based on PROSPERO status, survey of authors, and database searches, 53.6% (742/1,384) of SRs had been published within a period of 1.3 years or more following their registration. Main reasons for discontinuing work on SR were publication of an SR with similar or same topic by another author team and rejection of SR manuscript. CONCLUSION: Only 16.3% of PROSPERO records had accurate status, and 46.4% of SRs were still unpublished. Further steps to ensure accuracy of PROSPERO status are needed, along with developing strategies for improvement of SR production process.

Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed patterns of publication of Cochrane review protocols (CRPs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We analyzed CRPs published in 2010, extracted their characteristics, and analyzed whether they were published by February 2018. We surveyed corresponding authors and Cochrane review groups to analyze reasons for nonpublication of protocols and analyzed factors predicting the time to publication. RESULTS: Of 576 CRPs, 446 (77.4%) were published as a full review and 130 (22.6%) were still unpublished in February 2018; among unpublished, 37 (28.5%) were withdrawn and 93 (71.5%) were still active. The most common authors' reason for abandoning a protocol was a lack of time to work on the review. The median time to publication was 2.78 years (range 0.96 to 8.05). Multivariate analysis showed that factors with the strongest association with shorter time to publication were review being an update and new authors added. Analysis only on methodological variables indicated that the strongest association for a shorter time until publication was found for including only published data. CONCLUSIONS: Almost a quarter of CRPs remains unpublished after 8 years. This figure is slightly higher than in a previous analysis 10 years ago. Strategies for enhancing completion of Cochrane reviews should be considered.

Revisiting established medicines: An overview of systematic reviews about ibuprofen and paracetamol for treating pain in children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We explored how systematic reviews evaluated paracetamol and ibuprofen for treating pain in children, as these two non-opioid analgesics are well-established medicines included in most national essential medicines lists. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: We carried out an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions (PROSPERO registration: 42016045367). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Reviews of Effects (DARE) up to 23 August 2017. We used AMSTAR checklist to analyse methodological quality of included SRs. RESULTS: We found 17 SRs with 72 unique RCTs; the majority of those trials included under 100 children. Positive conclusive evidence was found in only one SR, regarding safety of paracetamol. Conclusions of other SRs for efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and paracetamol were inconclusive, unclear, or there was no opinion. Only one SR analysed efficacy of ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in chronic pain and the conclusion was that there was no evidence from RCTs that NSAIDs were effective for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents. Most of the SRs addressed very narrow questions, included few trials, with few children and were of low or medium methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Most SRs on two relevant medicines have inconsistent conclusions and doubt upon their effectiveness. Instead of focusing on very narrow questions, SRs should examine more comprehensive research topics to obtain a general sense of consistency, particularly when analysing established medicines. SIGNIFICANCE: Evidence behind two analgesics-ibuprofen and paracetamol-that are well-established medicines for children in most countries appears limited, judging by the systematic reviews. The discrepancy between clinical use and the extensive evidence we reviewed may be a result of the selective criteria in the reviews examined. We need new, and better evidence syntheses supporting the use of these two medicines in wide indications regarding pain in children.