A shared point of care ultrasound curriculum for graduate medical education.

BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) education has grown significantly over the past two decades. Like most curricular items, POCUS education is siloed within individual graduate medical education (GME) programs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a shared GME POCUS curriculum between five GME programs at a single institution. METHODS: Post-graduate-year-1 (PGY-1) residents from emergency medicine (EM), family medicine (FM), internal medicine (IM), combined internal medicine-pediatrics (IM-Peds) and combined emergency medicine-pediatrics (EM-Peds) residency programs were enrolled in a core POCUS curriculum. The curriculum included eleven asynchronous online learning modules and ten hands-on training sessions proctored by sonographers and faculty physicians with POCUS expertise. Data was gathered about the curriculum's effectiveness including participation, pre- and post-curricular surveys, pre- and post-knowledge assessments, and an objective skills assessment. RESULTS: Of the 85 residents enrolled, 61 (72%) participated in the curriculum. Engagement varied between programs, with attendance at hands-on sessions varying the most (EM 100%, EM-Peds 100%, FM 40%, IM 22%, Med-Peds 11%). Pre- and post-knowledge assessment scores improved for all components of the curriculum. Participants felt significantly more confident with image acquisition, anatomy recognition, interpreting images and incorporating POCUS findings into clinical practice (p < 0.001) after completing the curriculum. CONCLUSION: In this shared GME POCUS curriculum, we found significant improvement in POCUS knowledge, attitudes, and psychomotor skills. This shared approach may be a viable way for other institutions to provide POCUS education broadly to their GME programs.

Two-week intensive medical student point-of-care ultrasound training impact on long term utilization.

BACKGROUND: There is little to no data evaluating long term usage of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) after a training intervention for medical students. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of an intensive POCUS training program on medical student's usage at 9-months post-program. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study of rising second year medical students who participated in a 2-week summer POCUS training program. Instruction consisted of 8 h of asynchronous online didactic material, 2-4 h of daily hands-on instructor-led and independent scanning, and instruction on how to teach POCUS. Students were assessed pre- and post-program, and again at 9 months post-program to evaluate POCUS usage. RESULTS: A total of 56 students participated in the program over 2 summers; 52 (92.9%) responded to the 9-month post-program survey. At 9 months, 49 (94.2%) of students taught POCUS after the program to peers or faculty. Students reported serving as a POCUS instructor in 283 subsequent teaching sessions accounting for 849 h of POCUS instruction time. Six (11.5%) students were involved in the creation of a POCUS interest group on their regional campus, 7 (13%) created a POCUS curriculum for their student interest group, and 4 (7.7%) created an opt-in co-curricular POCUS program for students at their regional campus. Three (5.8%) students did not serve as educators after the program and only one student reported not using POCUS again after the program. CONCLUSION: After a 2-week intensive POCUS training program for medical students, the majority of students demonstrated continued involvement in POCUS learning and education at 9-month follow-up including serving as peer instructors and assisting with limitations in financial resources and trained faculty.

Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound for acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of LUS for ADHF in the prehospital setting. METHODS: We performed a keyword search of multiple databases from inception through June 1, 2023. Included studies were those enrolling prehospital patients with undifferentiated dyspnea or suspected ADHF, and specifically diagnostic studies comparing prehospital LUS to a gold standard and intervention studies with a non-US comparator group. Title and abstract screening, full text review, risk of bias (ROB) assessments, and data extraction were performed by multiple authors. and adjudicated. The primary outcome was pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LR) for prehospital LUS. A test-treatment threshold of 0.7 was applied based on prior ADHF literature in the ED. Intervention outcomes included mortality, mechanical ventilation, and time to HF specific treatment. RESULTS: Eight diagnostic studies (n = 691) and two intervention studies (n = 70) met inclusion criteria. No diagnostic studies were low-ROB. Both intervention studies were critical-ROB, and not pooled. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of prehospital LUS for ADHF were 86.7% (95%CI:70.8%-94.6%) and 87.5% (78.2%-93.2%), respectively, with similar performance by physician vs. paramedic LUS and number of lung zones evaluated. Pooled LR+ and LR- were 7.27 (95% CI: 3.69-13.10) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.34), respectively. Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.922. At the observed 42.4% ADHF prevalence (pre-test probability), positive pre-hospital LUS exceeded the 70% threshold to initiate treatment (post-test probability 84%, 80-88%). CONCLUSIONS: LUS had similar diagnostic test characteristics for ADHF diagnosis in the prehospital setting as in the ED. A positive prehospital LUS may be sufficient to initiate early ADHF treatment based on published test-treatment thresholds. More studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of prehospital LUS.

Prehospital lung ultrasound in acute heart failure: Impact on diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) are commonly misdiagnosed and undertreated in the prehospital setting. These delays in diagnosis and treatment have a direct negative impact on patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of paramedics with and without the use of lung ultrasound (LUS) for the diagnosis of AHF in patients with dyspnea in the prehospital setting. Secondarily, we assessed LUS impact on rate of and time to initiation of HF therapies. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study on a consecutive sample of patients transported to the hospital by one emergency medical services agency. Adult patients (>18 years) with a chief complaint of dyspnea were included. LUS was performed by trained paramedics and was defined as positive for AHF if both anterior-superior lung zones had greater than or equal to three B-lines or bilateral B-lines were visualized on a four-view protocol. Paramedic diagnosis was compared to hospital discharge diagnosis which served as the criterion standard. RESULTS: Of the 264 included patients, 94 (35%) had a final diagnosis of AHF. Forty total patients had a LUS performed; 17 of these patients had a final diagnosis of AHF. Sensitivity and specificity for AHF by paramedics were 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.34) and 97% (95% CI 0.92-0.99) without LUS and 71% (95% CI 0.44-0.88) and 96% (95% CI 0.76-0.99) with the use of LUS. In the 94 patients with AHF, 14% (11/77) received HF therapy prehospital without the use of LUS and 53% (9/17) with the use of LUS. LUS improved frequency of treatment by 39%. Median time to treatment was 21 min with LUS and 169 min without. CONCLUSIONS: LUS improved paramedic sensitivity and accuracy for diagnosing AHF in the prehospital setting. LUS use led to higher rates of prehospital HF therapy initiation and significantly decreased time to treatment.

The prognostic value of improving congestion on lung ultrasound during treatment for acute heart failure differs based on patient characteristics at admission.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound congestion scoring (LUS-CS) is a congestion severity biomarker. The BLUSHED-AHF trial demonstrated feasibility for LUS-CS-guided therapy in acute heart failure (AHF). We investigated two questions: 1) does change (∆) in LUS-CS from emergency department (ED) to hospital-discharge predict patient outcomes, and 2) is the relationship between in-hospital decongestion and adverse events moderated by baseline risk-factors at admission? METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of 933 observations/128 patients from 5 hospitals in the BLUSHED-AHF trial receiving daily LUS. ∆LUS-CS from ED arrival to inpatient discharge (scale -160 to +160, where negative = improving congestion) was compared to a primary outcome of 30-day death/AHF-rehospitalization. Cox regression was used to adjust for mortality risk at admission [Get-With-The-Guidelines HF risk score (GWTG-RS)] and the discharge LUS-CS. An interaction between ∆LUS-CS and GWTG-RS was included, under the hypothesis that the association between decongestion intensity (by ∆LUS-CS) and adverse outcomes would be stronger in admitted patients with low-mortality risk but high baseline congestion. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years, GWTG-RS 36, left ventricular ejection fraction 36 %, and ∆LUS-CS -20. In the multivariable analysis ∆LUS-CS was associated with event-free survival (HR = 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97), while discharge LUS-CS (HR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.54-1.84) did not add incremental prognostic value to ∆LUS-CS alone. As GWTG-RS rose, benefits of LUS-CS reduction attenuated (interaction p < 0.05). ∆LUS-CS and event-free survival were most strongly correlated in patients without tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, hyponatremia, uremia, advanced age, or history of myocardial infarction at ED/baseline, and those with low daily loop diuretic requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in ∆LUS-CS during AHF treatment was most associated with improved readmission-free survival in heavily congested patients with otherwise reassuring features at admission. ∆LUS-CS may be most useful as a measure to ensure adequate decongestion prior to discharge, to prevent early readmission, rather than modify survival.

External validation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool.

Objective: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a core component of emergency medicine (EM) residency training. No standardized competency-based tool has gained widespread acceptance. The ultrasound competency assessment tool (UCAT) was recently derived and validated. We sought to externally validate the UCAT in a 3-year EM residency program. Methods: This was a convenience sample of PGY-1 to -3 residents. Utilizing the UCAT and an entrustment scale, as described in the original study, six different evaluators split into two groups graded residents in a simulated scenario involving a patient with blunt trauma and hypotension. Residents were asked to perform and interpret a focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) examination and apply the findings to the simulated scenario. Demographics, prior POCUS experience, and self-assessed competency were collected. Each resident was evaluated simultaneously by three different evaluators with advanced ultrasound training utilizing the UCAT and entrustment scales. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between evaluators was calculated for each assessment domain; analysis of variance was used to compare UCAT performance and PGY level and prior POCUS experience. Results: Thirty-two residents (14 PGY-1, nine PGY-2, and nine PGY-3) completed the study. Overall, ICC was 0.9 for preparation, 0.57 for image acquisition, 0.3 for image optimization, and 0.46 for clinical integration. There was moderate correlation between number of FAST examinations performed and entrustment and UCAT composite scores. There was poor correlation between self-reported confidence and entrustment and UCAT composite scores. Conclusions: We had mixed results in our attempt to externally validate the UCAT with poor correlation between faculty and moderate to good correlation with faculty to diagnostic sonographer. More work is needed to validate the UCAT before adoption.

Comparison of pulmonary congestion severity using artificial intelligence-assisted scoring versus clinical experts: A secondary analysis of BLUSHED-AHF.

AIM: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is the leading cause of cardiovascular hospitalizations in the United States. Detecting B-lines through lung ultrasound (LUS) can enhance clinicians' prognostic and diagnostic capabilities. Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based automated guidance systems may allow novice users to apply LUS to clinical care. We investigated whether an AI/ML automated LUS congestion score correlates with expert's interpretations of B-line quantification from an external patient dataset. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis from the BLUSHED-AHF study which investigated the effect of LUS-guided therapy on patients with ADHF. In BLUSHED-AHF, LUS was performed and B-lines were quantified by ultrasound operators. Two experts then separately quantified the number of B-lines per ultrasound video clip recorded. Here, an AI/ML-based lung congestion score (LCS) was calculated for all LUS clips from BLUSHED-AHF. Spearman correlation was computed between LCS and counts from each of the original three raters. A total of 3858 LUS clips were analysed on 130 patients. The LCS demonstrated good agreement with the two experts' B-line quantification score (r = 0.894, 0.882). Both experts' B-line quantification scores had significantly better agreement with the LCS than they did with the ultrasound operator's score (p < 0.005, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Artificial intelligence/machine learning-based LCS correlated with expert-level B-line quantification. Future studies are needed to determine whether automated tools may assist novice users in LUS interpretation.

Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training for Family Physicians Using Teleultrasound.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess family physicians' change in knowledge and ability to perform abdominal aorta ultrasound after implementation of a novel teleultrasound curriculum. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study conducted at a single academic institution. Family physicians completed a preassessment, test, and objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE). Physicians then individually completed a standard curriculum consisting of online content and an hour-long, hands-on training session on abdominal aorta ultrasound using teleultrasound technology. Physicians then performed a minimum of 10 independent examinations over a period of 8 weeks. After physicians completed the training curriculum and 10 independent scans, we administered a postassessment, test, and OSCE. We analyzed differences between pre- and postcurriculum responses using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: Thirteen family physicians completed the curriculum. Comparing pre- to postcurriculum responses, we found significant reductions in barriers to using aorta POCUS and improved confidence in using, obtaining, and interpreting aorta POCUS (P<0.01). Knowledge improved from a median score of 70% to 90% (P<0.01), and OSCE scores improved from a median of 80% to 100% (P=0.012). Overall, 211 aorta ultrasound examinations were independently acquired with a median image quality of 4 (scale 1 to 4). CONCLUSIONS: After an 8-week teleultrasound curriculum, family physicians with minimal experience with POCUS showed improved knowledge and psychomotor skill in abdominal aorta POCUS.

Gamification of POCUS: Are Students Learning?

INTRODUCTION: While gamification of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is well received by learners, little is known about the knowledge gained from material taught during these events. We set out to determine whether a POCUS gamification event improved knowledge of interpretation and clinical integration of POCUS. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of fourth-year medical students who participated in a 2.5-hour POCUS gamification event consisting of eight objective-oriented stations. Each station had one to three learning objectives associated with the content taught. Students completed a pre-assessment; they then participated in the gamification event in groups of three to five per station and subsequently completed a post-assessment. Differences between pre- and post-session responses were matched and analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 265 students with matched pre- and post-event responses; 217 (82%) students reported no to little prior POCUS experience. Most students were going into internal medicine (16%) and pediatrics (11%). Knowledge assessment scores significantly improved from pre- to post-workshop, 68% vs 78% (P=0.04). Self-reported comfort with image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical integration all significantly improved from pre- to post-gamification event (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study we found that gamification of POCUS, with clear learning objectives, led to improved student knowledge of POCUS interpretation, clinical integration, and self-reported comfort with POCUS.

Bedside lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children presenting to an emergency department in a resource-limited setting.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an effective tool for diagnosing pneumonia; however, this has not been well studied in resource-limited settings where pneumonia is the leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of bedside LUS for diagnosis of pneumonia in children presenting to an emergency department (ED) in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study of children presenting to an ED with respiratory complaints conducted in Nepal. We included all children under 5 years of age with cough, fever, or difficulty breathing who received a chest radiograph. A bedside LUS was performed and interpreted by the treating clinician on all children prior to chest radiograph. The criterion standard was radiographic pneumonia, diagnosed by a panel of radiologists using the Chest Radiography in Epidemiological Studies methodology. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of LUS for the diagnosis of pneumonia. All LUS images were later reviewed and interpreted by a blinded expert sonographer. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-six children were enrolled in the study. The median age was 16.5 months (IQR 22) and 57.3% were male. Eighty-four patients (23%) were diagnosed with pneumonia by chest X-ray. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios for clinician's LUS interpretation was 89.3% (95% CI 81-95), 86.1% (95%CI 82-90), 6.4, and 0.12 respectively. LUS demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92). Interrater agreement between clinician and expert ultrasound interpretation was excellent (k = 0.85). CONCLUSION: Bedside LUS when used by ED clinicians had good accuracy for diagnosis of pneumonia in children in a resource-limited setting.

Assessment of Medical Students' Ability to Integrate Point-of-Care Cardiac Ultrasound Into a Case-Based Simulation After a Short Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: While a large amount of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) undergraduate medical education research exists, very little assesses the effectiveness of teaching on the student's ability to utilize POCUS within a clinical context. We set out to assess the ability of pre-clinical (second year) medical students to perform and interpret a parasternal long axis (PSLA) cardiac ultrasound view, and to diagnose a pericardial effusion on POCUS in a simulated patient with hypotension. METHODS: This was a prospective study assessing second-year medical students before and after focused cardiac POCUS instruction. Pre-instruction, students completed a pre-assessment and test. They then watched a short video on cardiac ultrasound technique, anatomy, and pathology. Students then participated in 10 minutes of one-on-one hands-on instruction using a simulated patient. Immediately after didactics and hands-on instruction, students in groups of two to four completed a case simulation where they performed a PSLA view, identified pathology, and made a diagnosis. Differences between pre- and post-workshop responses were analyzed using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 132 pre-clinical second-year medical students; 126 (95%) had limited to no POCUS experience prior to the workshop. Comparing pre- to post-workshop responses, we found significant improvement in students' ability to identify a pericardial effusion (46% to 69%) (p=0.002) on a PSLA cardiac view. Of the 57 student groups (132 students), 41 (72%) groups were able to adequately obtain a PSLA view on a mannequin using an ultrasound simulator without needing guidance with probe placement or maneuvering. Thirty-five (61%) student groups were able to identify a pericardial effusion and diagnose cardiac tamponade in a simulated patient with hypotension. CONCLUSION: After short, structured training, pre-clinical medical students, novice to cardiac POCUS, showed improved knowledge with identifying a pericardial effusion on an ultrasound image. The majority of students were able to obtain a PSLA view and diagnose cardiac tamponade in a hypotensive patient during a during a case-based simulation.

Piloting a Graduate Medical Education Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum.

Objective As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use grows, training in graduate medical education (GME) is increasingly needed. We piloted a multispecialty GME POCUS curriculum and assessed feasibility, knowledge, and comfort with performing POCUS exams. Methods Residents were selected from the following residency programs: internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, and a combined internal medicine/pediatrics program. Didactics occurred through an online curriculum that consisted of five modules: physics and machine operation, cardiac, lung, soft tissue, and extended focused sonography in trauma applications. Residents completed a pre- and post-curriculum questionnaire, as well as knowledge assessments before and after each module. One-hour hands-on training sessions were held for each module. Differences between pre- and post-participation questionnaire responses were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum. Results Of the 24 residents selected, 21 (86%) were post-graduate year two or three, and 16 (65%) were from the internal medicine program. Eighteen (67%) residents reported limited prior POCUS experience. All pre- to post-knowledge assessment scores increased (p<0.05). Statistically significant increases pre- to post-curriculum were found for frequency of POCUS use (p = 0.003), comfort in using POCUS for assessing for abdominal aortic aneurysm, soft tissue abscess detection, undifferentiated hypotension and dyspnea, cardiac arrest and heart failure (p<0.025); and competency in machine use, acquiring and interpreting images and incorporating POCUS into clinical practice (p<0.001). All participants felt the skills learned during this curriculum were essential to their future practice. Conclusions In this pilot, we found using a combination of online and hands-on training to be feasible, with improvement in residents' knowledge, comfort, and use of POCUS.

Prehospital Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

Introduction  Early diagnosis and optimization of heart failure therapies in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), including in the prehospital setting, is crucial to improving outcomes. However, making the diagnosis of AHF in the prehospital setting is difficult. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of prehospital diagnosis (AHF versus not heart failure [HF]) in patients with acute dyspnea when compared to final hospital diagnosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) with a primary or secondary complaint of shortness of breath. Patients were identified through an EMS electronic database (ESO) and matched to their hospital encounter. ESO was reviewed for prehospital diagnosis and management. Hospital electronic medical records were reviewed to determine final hospital diagnosis, management in the emergency department and hospital, disposition, and length of stay. The primary outcome compared prehospital diagnosis to final hospital diagnosis, which served as our criterion standard. Results Of 199 included patients, 50 (25%) had a final diagnosis of AHF. Prehospital paramedic sensitivity and accuracy for AHF were 14% (7/50; confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.26) and 77% (CI 0.70-0.82), respectively. In the 50 patients with AHF, 14 (28%) received nitroglycerin in the prehospital setting, while 27 (54.0%) patients were inappropriately treated with albuterol. Conclusion Prehospital paramedics had poor sensitivity and moderate accuracy for the diagnosis of AHF. A small percentage of patients ultimately diagnosed with AHF had HF therapy initiated in the prehospital setting. This data highlights the fact that AHF is difficult to diagnose in the prehospital setting and is commonly missed.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Education During a Pandemic: From Webinar to Progressive Dinner-Style Bedside Learning.

OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), traditionally, requires the proximity of learners and educators, making POCUS education challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. We set out to evaluate three alternate approaches to teaching POCUS in UME. Sessions progressed from an online seminar to a remote, interactive simulation to a "progressive dinner" style session, as precautions evolved throughout the pandemic. METHODS: This prospective study details a series of three POCUS workshops that were designed to align with prevailing social distancing precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 656 medical students were included. The first and second workshops used web-based conferencing technology with real-time ultrasound imaging, with the second workshop focusing on clinical integration through simulation. As distancing precautions were updated, a novel "progressive dinner" technique was used for the third workshop. Surveys were conducted after each session to obtain feedback on students' attitudes toward alternative teaching techniques and quantitative and qualitative analyses were used. RESULTS: The initial, remote POCUS workshop was performed for 180 medical students. Ninety-nine (177) percent of students felt the session was "intellectually challenging" and "stimulating." Ninety-nine percent of students (340/344), after the second workshop, indicated the session was intellectually challenging, stimulating, and a positive learning experience. Students' ability to correctly identify pathologic images increased post-session evaluation from in-session polling. For workshop three, 99% (107/108) of students indicated that the session was "informative." There was a significant improvement in pre- to post-workshop knowledge regarding image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical integration. CONCLUSION: While image acquisition skills are best conveyed at the bedside, these modified POCUS teaching techniques developed and delivered in alignment with COVID-19 pandemic restrictions during a series of three workshops were shown to be effective surrogates for traditional teaching approaches when social distancing requirements, a large learner pool, or lack of local expertise exist.

Success of implementation of a systemwide point-of-care ultrasound privileging program for emergency medicine faculty.

Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used in the emergency department (ED). Not all practicing emergency physicians received POCUS training during residency, leaving a training gap that is reflected in POCUS privileging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of meeting privileging criteria as well as associated factors, following implementation of a basic POCUS training and privileging program within a large emergency medicine department. Methods: We implemented a POCUS training and privileging program, based on national guidelines, for faculty physicians who worked at one of the following EDs staffed by the same emergency medicine department: a pediatric tertiary site, two tertiary academic sites, and seven community sites. POCUS examinations included aorta, cardiac, first-trimester obstetrics (OB), and extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma. Pediatric emergency medicine faculty were taught soft tissue and thoracic US instead of aorta and OB. Completion of the program required 16 h of didactics, ≥25 quality-assured US examinations by examination type, and passing a series of knowledge-based examinations. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Associations between physician characteristics and successfully becoming privileged in POCUS were modeled using Firth's logistic regression. Results: A total of 176 faculty physicians were eligible. A total of 145 (82.4%) achieved basic POCUS privileging during the study period. Different pathways were used including 86 (48.9%) practice-based, nine (5.1%) fellowship-based, and 82 (46.9%) residency-based. POCUS privileging was lower for those working in a community versus academic setting (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9). A greater number of scans completed prior to the privileging program was associated with greater success. Conclusions: Implementation of a POCUS training and privileging program can be successful in a large emergency medicine department that staffs hospitals in a large-scale health care system composed of both academic and community sites. Faculty physicians with at least some prior exposure to POCUS were more successful.

The Parasternal Long Axis View in Isolation: Is it Good Enough?

BACKGROUND: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) is a vital tool to evaluate patients at the bedside, but its use can be limited by patient habitus, sonographer skill, and time to perform the examination. OBJECTIVE: Our primary goal was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the parasternal long axis (PSLA) view in isolation for identifying pericardial effusion, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and right ventricular (RV) dilatation compared with a four-view FOCUS examination. METHODS: This was a retrospective study looking at FOCUS images. Examinations were blinded and randomized for review by point-of-care ultrasound faculty. The primary objective was measured by comparing ultrasound findings on PSLA view in isolation with findings on a full four-view FOCUS examination, which served as the criterion standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Of 100 FOCUS examinations; 36% were normal, 16% had a pericardial effusion, 41% had an LV ejection fraction < 50%, and 7% had RV dilatation. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying pericardial effusion, LV dysfunction, and RV dilatation were 81% (confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.95) and 98% (95% CI 0.91-0.99), 100% (95% CI 0.88-1) and 91% (95% CI 0.80-0.97), and 71% (95% CI 0.30-0.94) and 99% (95% CI 0.93-1), respectively. All moderate to large effusions were identified correctly. Overall, there were only four clinically significant disagreements between PSLA alone and the four-view interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: In isolation, the PSLA view was highly sensitive and specific for identifying LV ejection fraction and moderate to large pericardial effusions. It was highly specific for identifying RV dilatation, but had only moderate sensitivity.

Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pediatric Lung POCUS: A Pilot Study of Novice Learners.

OBJECTIVE: Respiratory symptoms are among the most common chief complaints of pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) outperforms conventional chest X-ray and is user-dependent, which can be challenging to novice ultrasound (US) users. We introduce a novel concept using artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced pleural sweep to generate complete panoramic views of the lungs, and then assess its accuracy among novice learners (NLs) to identify pneumonia. METHODS: Previously healthy 0- to 17-year-old patients presenting to a pediatric ED with cardiopulmonary chief complaint were recruited. NLs received a 1-hour training on traditional lung POCUS and the AI-assisted software. Two POCUS-trained experts interpreted the images, which served as the criterion standard. Both expert and learner groups were blinded to each other's interpretation, patient data, and outcomes. Kappa was used to determine agreement between POCUS expert interpretations. RESULTS: Seven NLs, with limited to no prior POCUS experience, completed examinations on 32 patients. The average patient age was 5.53 years (±1.07). The median scan time of 7 minutes (minimum-maximum 3-43; interquartile 8). Three (8.8%) patients were diagnosed with pneumonia by criterion standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for NLs AI-augmented interpretation were 66.7% (confidence interval [CI] 9.4-99.1%), 96.5% (CI 82.2-99.9%), and 93.7% (CI 79.1-99.2%). The average image quality rating was 2.94 (±0.16) out of 5 across all lung fields. Interrater reliability between expert sonographers was high with a kappa coefficient of 0.8. CONCLUSION: This study shows that AI-augmented lung US for diagnosing pneumonia has the potential to increase accuracy and efficiency.

Design and implementation of a basic and global point of care ultrasound (POCUS) certification curriculum for emergency medicine faculty.

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) use in the emergency department is associated with improved patient outcomes and increased patient satisfaction. When used for procedural guidance, it has been shown to increase first pass success and decrease complications. As of 2012, ultrasound has been identified as a core skill required for graduating emergency medicine (EM) residents. Despite this, only a minority of EM faculty who trained prior to 2008 are credentialed in POCUS. Half of all EM training programs in the United States have less than 50% of their faculty credentialed to perform and teach POCUS to learners. As the use of POCUS continues to grow in medicine, it is especially important to have a pathway for faculty to attain competence and become credentialed in POCUS. The goal of this paper was to outline an implementation process of a curriculum designed to credential EM faculty in POCUS.

The State of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: Findings From a National Survey.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the current state of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) integration in undergraduate medical education (UME) at MD-granting medical schools in the United States. METHOD: In 2020, 154 clinical ultrasound directors and curricular deans at MD-granting medical schools were surveyed. The 25-question survey collected data about school characteristics, barriers to POCUS training implementation, and POCUS curriculum details. Descriptive analysis was conducted using frequency and percentage distributions. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two (79%) of 154 schools responded to the survey, of which 36 were multicampus. Sixty-nine (57%) schools had an approved POCUS curriculum, with 10 (8%) offering a longitudinal 4-year curriculum. For a majority of schools, POCUS instruction was required during the first year (86%) and second year (68%). Forty-two (61%) schools were teaching fundamentals, diagnostic, and procedural ultrasound. One hundred fifteen (94%) schools identified barriers to implementing POCUS training in UME, which included lack of trained faculty (63%), lack of time in current curricula (54%), and lack of equipment (44%). Seven (6%) schools identified no barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the responding medical schools in the United States had integrated POCUS instruction into their UME curricula. Despite this, a very small portion had a longitudinal curriculum and multiple barriers existed for implementation, with the most common being lack of trained faculty. The data from this study can be used by schools planning to add or expand POCUS instruction within their current curricula.

Teaching Seasoned Doctors New Technology: An Intervention to Reduce Barriers and Improve Comfort With Clinical Ultrasound.

Introduction Although clinical ultrasound (CUS) is a core skill that is a requirement for emergency medicine (EM) residency graduation, only a fraction of EM practitioners who trained prior to this requirement are certified in CUS. The objective of the study was to implement a CUS workshop for practicing EM physicians, identify barriers to utilization, and assess comfort with the machine, obtaining and interpreting images, and incorporating CUS into clinical practice. Methods This was a prospective descriptive cohort study of EM physician faculty who participated in an interactive 5-hour CUS workshop intervention that introduced four core CUS modalities via didactics and hands-on scanning stations. Pre- and post-surveys were administered to identify barriers to utilization and assess perceived comfort with CUS using a 5-point Likert scale. Results were analyzed using Fisher's exact and paired t-tests. Results Thirty-five EM physicians participated with a 100% survey response rate. Only five of the physicians were ultrasound certified at the time of the workshop. On average, physicians were 16 years post-residency. Prior to the workshop, 29% had minimal ultrasound experience and 43% had not performed more than 50 ultrasounds. In the pre-course survey, every physician expressed at least one barrier to CUS utilization. Post-workshop, physicians felt significantly more comfortable using the ultrasound machine (p=0.0008), obtaining and interpreting images (p=0.0009 and p=0.0004), and incorporating CUS into clinical practice (p=0.002). Conclusion This workshop is an effective tool to expose practicing physicians to core concepts of CUS, improve their comfort level, and reduce barriers to ultrasound utilization.