Cooperation within the therapeutic relationship improves metacognitive functioning: preliminary findings.

Both clinical observations and empirical data suggest that metacognitive functioning is a factor strongly associated with a good psychotherapeutic outcome. It has been suggested that some interpersonal social motivations (i.e., attachment and cooperation) may be associated with different levels of metacognitive functioning also within the therapeutic relationship. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between cooperation and metacognitive monitoring within 58 psychotherapy sessions from seven different patients. All patients were initially assessed through a detailed psychiatric interview. Patients' adult attachment styles were evaluated using the Attachment Style Questionnaire. The association between the activation of patients' interpersonal social motivations (e.g., cooperation and attachment) and the modifications of metacognitive abilities during sessions was investigated using the Assessing Interpersonal Motivations in Transcripts method and the Metacognition Assessment Scale have been used. Our results showed that the activation of the patient's cooperative system is positively associated with an increase in metacognitive functioning, while the activation of attachment is not. The results of the present study have important implications for clinicians: they give empirical support for the role of cooperation in fostering metacognition within the therapeutic relationship.

Similarities and differences between multivariate patterns of cognitive and socio-cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and related risk.

Cognition and social cognition anomalies in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) have been largely documented, but the degree of overlap between the two disorders remains unclear in this regard. We used machine learning to generate and combine two classifiers based on cognitive and socio-cognitive variables, thus delivering unimodal and multimodal signatures aimed at discriminating BD and SCZ from two independent groups of Healthy Controls (HC1 and HC2 respectively). Multimodal signatures discriminated well between patients and controls in both the HC1-BD and HC2-SCZ cohorts. Although specific disease-related deficits were characterized, the HC1 vs. BD signature successfully discriminated HC2 from SCZ, and vice-versa. Such combined signatures allowed to identify also individuals at First Episode of Psychosis (FEP), but not subjects at Clinical High Risk (CHR), which were classified neither as patients nor as HC. These findings suggest that both trans-diagnostic and disease-specific cognitive and socio-cognitive deficits characterize SCZ and BD. Anomalous patterns in these domains are also relevant to early stages of disease and offer novel insights for personalized rehabilitative programs.

Is Cannabis Legalization Eliciting Abusive Behaviors in Parents? A Case Report.

The interest in cannabis, cannabis-based compounds, and treatments is rapidly growing along with the legalization of marijuana in many countries and widespread use of cannabis derivatives in medical products. A growing body of literature is warning about possible unintentional intoxication in children because of unregulated and unsupervised use of cannabinoids by parents; to our knowledge, very rarely have parental self-prescription and self-administration to their children (affected by neurologic or other disorders or no disorders at all) been reported. We report a 4-year-old child, suffering from an anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, who was found unpredictably positive for cannabis and other illicit substances after drug testing was performed in order to investigate the child's treatment-resistant behavioral disturbances. Toxicologic analyses were also extended to the child's parents, who finally disclosed that they had deliberately administered a cannabis-derived product (cannabidiol extract) as a home remedy for managing their child's behavior. Careless with regard to the possible adverse effects and certain that the product was legal, they presumed there was no need for them to inform the physicians in charge of treating the child of this practice.

Physician autonomy and patient rights: lessons from an enforced blood transfusion and the role of patient blood management.

This article provides an ethical and medico-legal analysis of ruling no. 465 of 30 May 2018 issued by the Court of Termini Imerese (Palermo) and confirmed on appeal on 11 November 2020, which, in the absence of similar historical precedents in Europe, convicted a medical doctor of a crime of violent assault for having ordered the administration of a blood transfusion to a patient specifically declining blood transfusion on religious grounds. We analyse the Court's decision regarding the identification of assault in performing the blood transfusion and its decision not to accept exculpatory urgent 'necessity' as a defence. In addition, we present an updated revision of the current standard of care in transfusion medicine as well as the ethical principles governing the patient's declining of transfusion. In doing so, we highlight that respect for the patient's self-determination in declining transfusions and respect for the professional autonomy of the doctor protecting the safety and life of the patient could be equally satisfied by applying the current peer-reviewed evidence.

The potential lethality of caput medusae.

While gastro-oesophageal varices commonly complicate portal hypertension and may be a life-threatening condition, fatal haemorrhaging from cirrhosis-related caput medusae has seldom been described in the scientific literature. This article documents a rare death due to the rupture of a varix in the umbilical area. This case raises a number of points for medico-legal discussion, such as the negative consequences of an erroneous cause of death in evaluating medical malpractice cases and the importance of a thorough external examination of the body in order to ensure this type of vascular lesion is not overlooked.

The Motion of the Italian National Bioethics Committee on Aggressive Treatment towards Children with Limited Life Expectancy.

The motion of the Italian National Bioethics Committee entitled "Aggressive treatment or therapeutic obstinacy on young children with limited life expectancy" comprises a premise that rejects therapeutic obstinacy and makes 12 recommendations. Recommendation no. 1 states the general rules: it ascribes a cardinal role to a shared care plan, it supports pain management therapy and pain relief, it opposes ineffective and disproportionate clinical treatment and defensive medicine. The other recommendations are correlated to the enacting of a national law establishing clinical ethics committees in paediatric hospitals; participation of parents and their fiduciaries in the decision-making processes; recourse to courts only as extrema ratio in the event of irremediable disagreement between the medical team and the family members; accompaniment at the end of life also through continuous deep sedation combined with pain therapy; access to palliative care; the need to reinforce research on pain and suffering in children; clinical trials and research studies conducted in children; the training of doctors, healthcare personnel and psychologists, to support parents in emotional and practical terms; the facilitation of the closeness of parents to children in extremely precarious clinical conditions; the relevant role of the associations of parents of sick children. Comments are made, in particular, about the innovative recommendations respectively relating to the adoption of care planning, the establishment, by law, of clinical ethics committees in paediatric hospitals and the limitation of recourse to courts-only as extrema ratio-in the event of irremediable disagreement between the medical team and the family members.

Patient blood management: The best approach to transfusion medicine risk management.

In advanced health systems it is increasingly important to offer effective medical services that have high quality and safety standards. We present an overview of the direct hazards and the indirect hazards associated with blood transfusions. Our aim is to focus on the potential medico-legal impacts of these hazards in the context of clinical risk management, incorporating the accumulating evidence from Patient Blood Management programs. The direct or deterministic hazards of transfusion refer to scenarios where the mechanisms for post transfusion damage are clearly traceable to the blood transfused in a 1:1 cause and effect manner. The indirect hazards can be defined as probabilistic and are associated with transfusion through epidemiological studies. The implementation of Patient Blood Management programs demonstrates that the use of a blood transfusion is not always necessary or unavoidable but can be considered modifiable. Review of the literature confirms that transfusion should not be the default option to manage anemia or blood loss. Instead, accumulating evidence demonstrates that a patient-centred, proactive approach to managing a patient's own blood is the new standard of care. It thus follows, an adverse transfusion event, where the transfusion was avoidable through the application of patient blood management, may constitute a profile for medical professional medical negligence. In an effort to maximise patient safety, transfusion medicine practice culture needs to shift towards a patient blood management approach, with hospitals implementing it as an important tool to minimize the risks of allogeneic blood transfusion.

Patient blood management implementation in light of new Italian laws on patient's safety.

The present work aims to analyze the impact - from legal and medical perspective - of the recent Italian legislative provisions on the subject of healthcare safety, and how these affect current transfusion practices, also in light of the accumulation of evidence deriving from the implementation of the Patient Blood Management (PBM) program. The scientific evidence shows that PBM is a bundle of care that improves patient outcomes including mortality and morbidity, improves the quality of life of patients and the population, reduces healthcare costs and decreases consumption of blood components. These aspects should be largely sufficient to carry out an urgent implementation of PBM in Italian hospitals. However, it is now also possible to indicate a further incentive for implementation which is made up of medico-legal aspects and is characterized by the need to decrease the intrinsic risks of the use of blood products so as to protect doctors and hospitals from possible future medico-legal disputes regarding adverse transfusion events that could be effectively avoided.

The clinical legal medicine: a need for quality of care and patient's safety. A single center five-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical legal medicine is a branch of legal medicine that takes place in a clinical setting approaching the patient's bedside and using a particular attention not only for conceptual or normative references but also for every possible medical and social aspect. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The requests of medico-legal opinions received by the Department of Legal Medicine of a large university hospital were retrospectively collected over a 5-years period. The analysis focused on the recurrence rate of the requests and the most common medico-legal issues to be solved in a clinical context, differentiating between adult and minor patients. RESULTS: The collected medico-legal advices amounted to 448. The most clearly involved clinical area was Medicine (54%) followed by Gynecology and Obstetrics (15.6%), Pediatrics and Surgery (10.7%). The requests concerning patient's self-determination in therapeutics choices, including refusal of proposed treatments, covered almost one-half of total casuistry. The designation of support administrator represented also a relevant issue (20.5%). In case of minors, the queries related to reporting crimes were three times higher than in adults, while the appointment of a support administrator was never requested. CONCLUSION: Clinical legal medicine, through medico-legal advices, plays a primary role in contributing to the safeguarding of health and to the decision-making process of clinicians.

The medico-legal assessment of aesthetic damage. A correlation analysis between experts and an operative proposal.

Aesthetic damage, defined as any detrimental modification of the individual morpho-functional exterior attributes, is difficult to assess, since the perception of its entity is rather subjective. This study aims to provide a medico-legal contribution to the assessment of this kind of damage. 60 photographic images, representing stabilized aesthetic damage, were collected and showed to 16 expert evaluators, who were required to exclusively quantify the objective component of the aesthetic impairment. The inter-observer agreement for the assessments was calculated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Looking into specific characteristics of both the injury and the damaged subject, the assessors were more consistent in quantifying the damage in male subjects (ICC 0.68) and in subjects aged over 50 years (ICC 0.81) as well as in assessing extensive damages (ICC 0.61) than those of mild severity (ICC 0.41). The assessment of impairments located in the facial area resulted in a high level of concordance (ICC 0.73), while damages located the head and neck regions presented the lowest concordance (ICC 0.35). The evaluators were more consistent in assessing the outcomes of burns (ICC 0.70). Regardless the various reasons underlying the different degree of concordance, these results and the high degree of the overall concordance (ICC 0.63) point out the skillfulness of medicolegal professionals to formulate a complex judgment as more objectively as possible. Finally, an operative proposal was outlined to guide medico-legal professionals or interns in evaluating the aesthetic damage as more objectively as possible.

The contribution of legal medicine in clinical risk management.

BACKGROUND: In advanced health services, a main objective is to promote the culture of safety and clinical risk management. In this regard, the reporting of sentinel events fits within a perspective of error analysis, attempting to propose solutions aimed at preventing a new occurrence of the harmful event. The purpose of this study is to analyze the contribution of medico-legal litigation in the management of clinical risk and to propose an organizational model so as to coordinate the intervention of clinical risk management and medico-legal services. METHODS: Retrospective review of 206 cases of medico-legal litigation, settled against a Hospital of a North-eastern city in Italy from January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Approximately 20% of cases, that are classifiable as "sentinel events", were not reported due to various factors. The reason that these events are under-reported is mainly due to the latency between the event itself and its manifestation as a serious damage to health as well as the discomfort in reporting the events of this kind, which is still widespread among healthcare workers. The systematic research of the available documentation for medico-legal purposes permits the acquisition of more information concerning the clinical event, thereby increasing the number and accuracy of the reports to the clinical risk unit. CONCLUSION: The analysis of medico-legal litigation is a valid tool to enhance the reporting of "sentinel events". One possible proposal is the implementation of an organizational model to establish a rapid procedure for the reporting of sentinel events during the evaluation of medico-legal litigations.

The utility of plastinates in court: a case of firearm homicide.

Plastination is a technique renowned for its use in the preservation of human tissues or organs, and is mainly employed in anatomical training and in research regarding various scientific fields. The advantages of this method are related to the natural appearance, absence of odor, and easy-handling of the plastinated products. The use of plastinates in forensic sciences, their potential role in personal identification, and their usefulness in interpretation of post-mortem findings has been described, although literature on this topic is poor. The present paper is the first report of a firearm homicide where the brain of the victim was plastinated and presented in court as documentary evidence. Three dimensional examination of the brain during the trial allowed the judge to directly evaluate the pathway of the projectile and to compare it with the information that was presented based on depositions, post mortem data and police investigations, in a more straightforward manner. The important role played by plastination in the reported case in assisting with the final verdict could be a catalyst to extend the use of this technique to other criminal cases.

Disabling Outcomes After Peripheral Vascular Catheter Insertion in a Newborn Patient: A Case of Medical Liability?

BACKGROUND The positioning of peripheral venous catheters (PVC) is an invasive procedure commonly performed in pediatrics hospital wards to obtain vascular access for the administration of fluids, medications and other intravenous (IV) therapies. Many studies exist about management of peripheral venous access in adults. On the contrary, scientific evidence on the management of this procedure in children and newborns, especially regarding the optimal duration of infusion and the possible related side effects, is still poor. To minimize the risk of phlebitis, the guidelines of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest the replacement of the catheter every 72-96 hours in adult patients, while in pediatric patients the catheter can remain in place for the entire duration of the IV therapy, unless complications arise. CASE REPORT In the presented case, after the positioning of a PVC in a newborn, no clear signs/symptoms of phlebitis were registered before the sixth day and, despite the immediate removal of the catheter, the thrombotic process, secondary to phlebitis, was already occurring, causing serious and permanent disabling outcomes, susceptible to legal medical evaluation and financial compensation. CONCLUSIONS The knowledge of this case is particularly interesting to clinicians working in the field of neonatal care and to clinical risk management services inside hospital structures, since similar cases may be the source of requests for extremely high financial compensations due to medical liability.

Genital trauma and vaginal bleeding: is it a lapse of time issue? A case report of a prepubertal girl and review of the literature.

Child victims of sexual abuse may present with physical findings whose interpretation requires the most exhaustive evaluation and an accurate collection of a detailed history. Genital bleeding is usually considered as an acute sign, related to a trauma that occurred shortly before its appearance. We report a case of a 34-month-old child who was referred to the emergency room with a significant vaginal hemorrhage, originating from a wide laceration of the posterior fourchette, and a negative history for accidental trauma. The characteristics of the lesion, compared to the temporal evolution of the healing process, and the witnesses' depositions led us to assume that the time elapsed between the abusive event and the physical examination was longer in respect to what had appeared at the first sight. The judicial reconstruction of the events confirmed our assumption, allowing the charge of the right abuse perpetrator. As the literature regarding this eventuality is very poor, we report this case to stress the importance for physicians to consider that an active bleeding may be the manifestation of a trauma that occurred very long before.

The complementary medicine (CAM) for the treatment of chronic pain: scientific evidence regarding the effects of healing touch massage.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evidence-based medicine offers effective pathways of pharmacological treatment for chronic pain that may compromise the quality of life of patients; this is one of the main reasons why more and more people resort to traditional and complementary approaches, to try to maintain or regain their health. The effectiveness of the various forms of complementary treatments often cannot be proven objectively, which is why, given the need to find more concrete evidence of the effectiveness of complementary therapies with particular reference to the method of healing touch massage, a review of the literature was conducted in order to gather evidence of the efficacy of the specific method regarding pain and other health outcomes of patients with malignant disease to support a proposal for improvement, based on the practice of healing touch massage conducted by nurses. METHOD: Systematic review. RESULTS: There are several examples (in some cases specifically regarding patients with tumors) of the positive effects of healing touch massage on pain, anxiety and fatigue, and also on biochemical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The way to full recognition by both the institutional and the scientific community seems to promise fairly well, although it should be noted that the achievement of this goal will require further research avoiding the limitations of previous studies.