Rehabilitation interventions for the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: developing a patient-centered, evidence-based plan of care throughout survivorship.

PURPOSE: A work group from the American Physical Therapy Association Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy developed and published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) to aid clinicians in identifying interventions for individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). This guideline reviewed the evidence for risk mitigation and volume reduction beginning at cancer diagnosis and continuing through survivorship. Application of CPGs can be challenging due to the variability of clinical settings, heterogeneous patient populations, and range of rehabilitation clinician expertise. The purpose of this paper is to assist these clinicians in implementing the recommendations from the CPG to develop a patient-centered, evidence-based plan of care. METHODS/RESULTS: This publication presents important considerations for the implementation of recommended rehabilitation interventions across the trajectory of BCRL. CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports specific interventions to treat or mitigate the risk for the various stages of BCRL. As clinicians implement these recommendations into practice, they also need to address other impairments that may exist in every individual. Continued collaboration between clinicians and researchers is necessary to further develop optimal treatment modalities and parameters. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: By implementing evidence-based interventions as outlined in the CPG, clinicians can improve the quality of care for survivors of breast cancer.

Patient education for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim was to identify the impact of the (a) components of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) educational content, (b) modes of education, and (c) timing of education on arm volume, quality of life, function, complications associated with BCRL, adherence to interventions, and knowledge acquisition in individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). METHODS: This review followed the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42021253084). Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus from January 2010 to December 2021. Study quality and bias were assessed using the American Physical Therapy Association's Critical Appraisal Tool for Experimental Intervention Studies. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were eligible, and 15 met the inclusion criteria (4 acceptable and 11 low quality). This review was unable to determine the optimal content, mode, and timing for BCRL education across survivorship. Content included a brief overview of BCRL, early signs and symptoms, risk reduction practices, and a point of contact. Delivery was multi-modal, and knowledge acquisition was rarely assessed. Education was provided pre/post operatively and after BCRL developed. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized BCRL education via a multi-modal approach, repeated at multiple time points, and assessment of survivors' knowledge acquisition is recommended. Consideration of the survivors' phase of treatment, content volume, and time required to complete the program is advised when developing the educational intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors of BC may need to advocate for BCRL education based on their individual risk and needs, request a point of contact for questions/follow up, and express their preferred style of learning.

Interventions for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy of APTA.

A work group from the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy developed a clinical practice guideline to aid clinicians in identifying interventions for people with breast cancer-related lymphedema, targeting volume reduction, beginning at breast cancer diagnosis and continuing through cancer treatments and survivorship. Following a systematic review of published studies and a structured appraisal process, recommendations were developed to guide physical therapists and other health care clinicians in their intervention selection. Overall, clinical practice recommendations were formulated based on the evidence for each intervention and were assigned a grade based on the strength of the evidence. The evidence for each specific intervention was synthesized and appraised by lymphedema stage, when the information was available. In an effort to make recommendations clinically applicable, they were presented by modality throughout the care trajectory. Methodology and research populations varied significantly across studies, and it will be important for future research to use standardized definitions for participant characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and interventions.

Incidence and predictors of axillary web syndrome and its association with lymphedema in women following breast cancer treatment: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Axillary web syndrome (AWS) presents as a common postsurgical complication in individuals with breast cancer. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) contributes to the shoulder and arm morbidity common in breast cancer survivors and often associated to cancer treatment. A paucity of literature exists evaluating the risk factors for developing AWS and the association between AWS and BCRL. The purposes of this study were (1) to identify risk factors for AWS in individuals with breast cancer, (2) to examine the association between BCRL and AWS, and (3) to determine if AWS increases the risk for developing BCRL. METHODS: A retrospective study of 354 women who underwent breast cancer treatment and received physical therapy was included. RESULTS: Axillary web syndrome developed in a third of women and predominately occurred in the first 8 postoperative weeks. The odds of AWS development were 73% greater for participants over the age of 60 (OR = 1.73, CI 95% 1.05-2.84). Women with AWS had 44% greater risk to develop lymphedema during the first postoperative year (RR = 1.44, CI 95% 1.12-1.84, p = 0.002). If AWS developed within the first postoperative month, women were almost 3 times more likely to develop lymphedema within the first 3 postoperative months compared with other women with AWS (RR = 2.75, CI 95% 1.199-6.310, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that 30% of breast cancer survivors will have AWS during the first year of survivorship. As institutions prioritize screening efforts, early postoperative prospective surveillance is needed for women over 60 due to high risk for AWS development and any women with AWS for increased risk of lymphedema development based on our findings.

Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association.

The Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) developed a clinical practice guideline to aid the clinician in diagnosing secondary upper quadrant cancer-related lymphedema. Following a systematic review of published studies and a structured appraisal process, recommendations were written to guide the physical therapist and other health care clinicians in the diagnostic process. Overall clinical practice recommendations were formulated based on the evidence for each diagnostic method and were assigned a grade based on the strength of the evidence for different patient presentations and clinical utility. In an effort to maximize clinical applicability, recommendations were based on the characteristics as to the location and stage of a patient's upper quadrant lymphedema.

Diagnosis of Upper-Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of APTA.

INTRODUCTION: The Oncology Section of APTA developed a clinical practice guideline to aid the clinician in diagnosing secondary upper-quadrant cancer-related lymphedema. METHODS: Following a systematic review of published studies and a structured appraisal process, recommendations were written to guide the physical therapist and other health care clinicians in their diagnostic process. Overall, clinical practice recommendations were formulated on the basis of the evidence for each diagnostic method and were assigned a grade based on the strength of the evidence for different patient presentations and clinical utility. RECOMMENDATIONS: In an effort to make these clinically applicable, recommendations were based on the characteristics as to the location and stage of a patient's upper-quadrant lymphedema.

Effect of Physical Therapy Students' Clinical Experiences on Clinician Productivity.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy clinical education experiences (CEEs) are difficult to secure, particularly first-level CEEs. Our purpose was to determine 1) what impact student full-time CEEs have on PT clinician productivity and 2) whether there is a productivity difference between first vs final CEEs. METHODS: Productivity logs, including possible factors impacting productivity, were distributed to clinician-student pairings on first and final CEEs. Two-week baseline data (without a student) were compared to weeks 1 and 6 (with a student) for 31 logs using a 2x4 repeated-measures ANOVA. In a subset of 17 logs for CEEs 8 weeks or longer, a 2x5 repeated-measures ANOVA was performed. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of patients seen and CPT units billed by both levels of CEEs comparing weeks 1 and 6. In the subset of CEEs, 8 weeks or longer, there was a significant increase in the number of patients treated per hour at week 6 and a trend toward a change at week 8 when compared to baseline week A. The factors selected as impacting productivity were census (59%) and staffing (32%). CONCLUSION: Physical therapy clinician-student pairings showed an overall increase in productivity during both full-time first and final level CEEs.