Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Super Obesity: Primary Response Criteria and Their Relationship with Comorbidities Remission.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of super obesity has increased considerably in recent years, representing up to the 0.5% of the population. Even though bariatric surgery induces significant weight loss in these patients, it has been reported that up to 50% of the patients with super obesity will fail according to the current primary response criteria. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare different primary response criteria and their impact regarding comorbidities remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients with super obesity who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were identified in our institution from March 2004 to February 2019. An evaluation of the primary response at a 2-year follow-up was made using different criteria. A multivariate analysis was made to evaluate related variables to comorbidities remission. RESULTS: Two years later, the rate of patients who achieved an EWL > 50%, %EWL > 70%, and BMI < 35 kg/m2 were 84.5%, 52.1%, and 62%, respectively. Regarding the comorbidities, 85%, 84.8%, and 81.1% of the patients improved or remitted T2D, HBP, and hyperlipidemia, respectively. An EWL > 50% 2 years later was related to complete remission of hyperlipidemia (p = 0.047), whereas weight regain above 10% is a risk factor for failure of complete remission of HBP in 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: More than 75% of patients with super obesity yield an EWL > 50% 2 years later. In terms of hyperlipidemia, it is desirable to achieve an EWL of at least 50%. Whereas for T2D and HBP, a minimum of 25% TWL yields 72% and 60.5% of complete remission.

Reaching LDL-C Targets in Patients with Moderate, High, and Very High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease After Bariatric Surgery According to Different Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is highly prevalent in obese patients and is the leading cause of death. High levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with higher coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the achievement of the currently proposed cardiovascular prevention goals after 1 year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis from a prospectively built database of patients who underwent a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2004 to 2018. Patients with intermediate, high, or very high risk for CVD according to the 2018 AHA/ACC or the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were selected. An analysis of clinical and biochemical variables in 1 year was performed. Logistic multivariate regressions were made to assess the impact of preoperative and weight loss parameters in the achievement of LDL-C goals. RESULTS: From 1039 patients, 70 met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis of the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines, and 75 in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Mean decrease in LDL-C levels was 21.1 ± 40.2 mg/dL 1 year after surgery, and 29/34 patients were off medications. The percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals according to the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines was 27.1%, whereas according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, the percentages was 9.3%. The %TWL was associated with achieving LDL-C goals according to the 2018 AHA/ACC at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB induces a significant weight loss and an improvement in LDL-C levels 1 year after surgery. The number of patients that reached the goals varies according to the guidelines used and ranged from 9.3 to 27.1%.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients >60 Years of Age: Morbidity and Short-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a common disease in the elderly population, and bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention to achieve significant and sustainable weight loss. Many bariatric programs have established an arbitrary cutoff at the age of 60 to 65 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients older than 60 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RYGB from 2004 to 2019 in a single center. Logistic and linear multivariate regressions were made to compare complications and short-term outcomes between patients aged > 60 years and < 60 years. The statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: From 849 patients who underwent a primary RYGB, 57 were > 60 years of age. Overall, early and late complications were similar in both groups, except for unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) admission which was more frequent in the > 60 years group. Excess body weight loss (%EWL) and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 1 year in patients > 60 years old were 76.6 ± 21.8% and 30.73 ± 6.8%, respectively. Figures for the same parameters in the control group were 81.7 ± 19.9% (p = 0.09) and 34.3 ± 7.2 (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, an age > 60 is not related to higher rates of overall early and late complications after RYGB. Comorbidity remission rates are similar to those in younger patients. Elderly patients had lower total weight loss at 1 year, but the %EWL was similar in both groups.

Does FMI Correlate Better than BMI with the Occurrence of Metabolic Changes in Obese Patients? Study Based on 2007 Consecutive Mexican Patients.

BACKGROUND: The body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric indicator. However, it does not discern among the different body components. The body fat content, expressed as fat mass index (FMI), is an accurate way to estimate adiposity. Since most metabolic diseases are associated with excess fat tissue, our aims were to comparatively analyze the frequency of associated metabolic abnormalities in patients with different obesity degrees based on BMI and FMI and to determine the best cut-off value of both indicators to predict metabolic abnormalities. METHODS: From a cohort of 2007 patients, BMI and FMI were calculated using DXA. Individuals were classified into the different obesity degrees according to the reference ranges from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A comparative analysis between BMI, FMI, and their correlation to the presence of metabolic alterations was performed. RESULTS: BMI underestimated the degree of obesity when compared with FMI. Spearman's rank-order correlation for both indexes resulted in very high coefficients (rho Spearman's = 0.857; p = 0.0001). The prevalence of metabolic alterations increased as BMI and FMI also increased. Despite the high positive statistical correlation between BMI and FMI, it was seen that some comorbidities were more specifically related to one particular index. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between the BMI and the FMI for predicting the degree of obesity. Likewise, there were no significant differences between them for the prediction of metabolic alterations.